Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for preoperatively predicting the axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer on the basis of contrast-enhanced mammography: a multicenter study

Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography

PURPOSE

The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019. The calcifications were automatically detected and grouped by a machine learning-based computer-aided system. In addition to extracting radiomic features on both low-energy (LE) and recombined (RC) images from the calcification areas, the peri-calcification regions, which is generated by extending the annotation margin radially with gradients from 1 mm to 9 mm, were attempted. Machine learning (ML) models were built to classify calcifications into malignant and benign groups. The diagnostic matrices were also evaluated by combing ML models with subjective reading.

RESULTS

Models for LE (significant features: wavelet-LLL_glcm_Imc2_MLO; wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; wavelet-LHH_glcm_DifferenceVariance_CC; wavelet-HLL_glcm_SumEntropy_MLO;wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGray LevelEmphasis_MLO; original_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO) and RC (significant features: wavelet-HLH_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_10Percentile_CC; original_firstorder_Maximum_MLO; wavelet-HHH_glcm_Autocorrelation_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO; wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_RootMeanSquared_MLO) images were set up with 7 features. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of RC models are significantly better than those of LE models with compact and expanded boundary (RC v.s. LE, compact: 0.81 v.s. 0.73, p < 0.05; expanded: 0.89 v.s. 0.81, p < 0.05) and RC models with 3 mm boundary extension yielded the best performance compared to those with other sizes (AUC = 0.89). Combining with radiologists' reading, the 3mm-boundary RC model achieved a sensitivity of 0.871 and negative predictive value of 0.937 with similar accuracy of 0.843 in predicting malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning model integrating intra- and peri-calcification regions on CEM has the potential to aid radiologists' performance in predicting malignancy of suspicious breast calcifications.

Development of a nomogram-based model combining intra- and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics with clinical features for differentiating benign from malignant in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3-5 nodules

Background

The differences in benign and malignant breast tumors are not only within the nodules but also involve changes in the surrounding tissues. Radiomics can reveal many details that are not discernible to the naked eye. This study aimed to distinguish between benign and malignant breast nodules using an ultrasound-based intra- and peritumoral radiomics model.

Methods

This study retrospectively collected the information from 379 patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3-5 nodules and clear pathological diagnosis of breast nodules screened by routine ultrasound examination in the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shanghai Jiao Tong University from January 2017 to December 2022. The largest dimension of the lesion on the 2D ultrasound image was selected to outline the area of interest which was conformally and outwardly expanded automatically by 5 mm to extract intra- and peritumor radiomics features. The included cases were randomly divided into training sets and test sets in a ratio of 7:3. The optimal features of the included models were retained by statistical and machine learning methods of dimensionality reduction, and logistic regression was used as the classifier to build an intratumoral model and a combined intratumoral-peritumoral radiomics model, respectively; through single-factor and multifactor logistic regression, the optimal features that could predict benign and malignant breast tumors were screened. The clinical and imaging models were established by selecting independent risk factors as clinical and imaging features through univariate and multifactorial logistic regression.

Results

Among 379 BI-RADS category 3-5 breast nodules, there were 124 malignant nodules and 255 benign nodules; patients were aged 14 to 88 (46.22±15.51) years, and the age differences, radiomics score, and mass diameter between the training and test sets were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The intra- and peritumor radiomics model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.840 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.914] in the test set. The model with intra- and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics features combined with clinical features had an AUC value of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.920-0.999).

Conclusions

The nomogram, developed using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features combined with clinical risk features, demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.