A survey of routine head CT protocols in Australia

Craniofacial identification standards: A review of reliability, reproducibility, and implementation

There are numerous anatomical and anthropometrical standards that can be utilised for craniofacial analysis and identification. These standards originate from a wide variety of sources, such as orthodontic, maxillofacial, surgical, anatomical, anthropological and forensic literature, and numerous media have been employed to collect data from living and deceased subjects. With the development of clinical imaging and the enhanced technology associated with this field, multiple methods of data collection have become accessible, including Computed Tomography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiographs, Three-dimensional Scanning, Photogrammetry and Ultrasound, alongside the more traditional in vivo methods, such as palpation and direct measurement, and cadaveric human dissection. Practitioners often struggle to identify the most appropriate standards and research results are frequently inconsistent adding to the confusion. This paper aims to clarify how practitioners can choose optimal standards, which standards are the most reliable and when to apply these standards for craniofacial identification. This paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of each mode of data collection and collates published research to review standards across different populations for each facial feature. This paper does not aim to be a practical instruction paper; since this field encompasses a wide range of 2D and 3D approaches (e.g., clay sculpture, sketch, automated, computer-modelling), the implementation of these standards is left to the individual practitioner.

A guide to identification and selection of axial planes in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain

For brain magnetic resonance (MR) examination, three-dimensional imaging is commonly performed. Radiologists need to know the appropriate imaging angle for viewing. We present six imaging angles for the axial images. Each angle is determined by the reference line. The landmarks on the midsagittal MR image to determine the angle of the reference lines are as follows: the supraorbito-meatal line (the center of the mammillary body and the fastigium of the fourth ventricle), the orbito-meatal (OM) line (the center of the mammillary body and the most posterior point of the cerebellar tentorium), the Talairach anterior commissure (AC)-posterior commissure (PC) line (the superior edge of the AC and the inferior edge of the PC), the Schaltenbrand AC-PC line (the center of the AC and the center of the PC), the subcallosal line (the inferior border of the genu and the inferior border of the splenium of the corpus callosum), Reid's baseline (the center of the pituitary gland and the most posterior point of the cerebellar tentorium) and the brainstem vertical line (the line perpendicular to the posterior border of the brainstem). The AC-PC line is most commonly used in MR examination. The OM line is most commonly used in computed tomography examination. The supraorbito-meatal line is recommended for avoiding irradiation to the orbit. In cases of multiple sclerosis, the subcallosal line is recommended in the guidelines. For lesions in the orbital cavity, paranasal cavity or skull base, Reid's baseline is useful. For cases of brainstem lesions, the brainstem vertical line is useful.

Determination of Examination-Specific Diagnostic Reference Level in Computed Tomography by A New Quality Control-Based Dose Survey Method

A new "quality-control-based (QC-based) dose survey method" has been developed for determination of diagnostic reference levels (DRL) in Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. The "QC-based dose survey method" is based on the use of retrospective data in the QC documents and reports, which are typically available from the National Regulatory Authority database. The method was applied to 70 CT scanners in Tehran, Iran, by using the available QC reports from the database. The commonly used "data collection method" was also applied by filling each questionnaire on-site to validate the new method. Using the new QC-based and data collection methods, the DRLs of four common CT examinations: head, sinus, chest, and abdomen/pelvis were determined and compared. The DRLs determined by the "QC-based method" for head, sinus, chest, and abdomen/pelvis are 59, 29, 10, and 13 mGy, respectively, for the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIVol) and 834, 235, 233, and 522 mGy-cm for the dose length product (DLP), respectively. The difference between the DRLs obtained by the two methods is on the average 6.7 ± 5.7%, which is within the acceptance tolerance level of the IAEA for QC dosimetry tests. The "QC-based dose survey method" is believed to be an effective alternative method to the other commonly used "data collection" and "direct dose measurement method" for determination of CT examination DRLs. This new method has unique characteristics such as simplicity, time and cost effectiveness, highly reduced clinical interruptions and collaborations, and potential for large-scale surveys with capability for more frequent review of national DRL values.

Quality criteria implementation for brain and lumbar spine CT examinations

A study was undertaken to implement the quality criteria proposed by the European Commission for brain general and lumbar spine (disc herniation) CT examinations. The proposed criteria were evaluated for samples including 93 brain and 86 lumbar spine CT examinations, with special emphasis on the diagnostic and radiation dose requirements. The extent to which the image criteria had been achieved was evaluated after two independent observers had each read the images twice. Dose measurements were conducted in parallel to estimate the proposed dose quantities needed to obtain the images. For brain examinations, we found that a group of image criteria were largely met, and met uniformly in all sites. One criterion (1.2.5) was frequently fulfilled but had intermediate values for two sites; the remaining criteria were fulfilled to different extents, although for criteria 1.2.1 and 1.2.2, scores were lower than 50% and 70%, respectively. The mean percentage image quality score had values between 57% and 78%, with variation coefficients in the range 30-68%. Mean values of the dose quantities were in the ranges 44-74 mGy for weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), 497-1018 mGy cm for dose-length product (DLP) and 1.1-2.2 mSv for effective dose (E). CTDIw and DLP were not correlated because of significant variations in the scanned length, whereas DLP and E were strongly correlated. A weak relationship between image quality score and DLP was found for the sample as a whole. For lumbar spine examinations, none of the critical reproduction image criteria was systematically achieved. One group of criteria (1.2.7, 1.2.8 and 1.2.9) was fulfilled to a large extent in many departments, but fulfilment of the remainder varied widely. The mean score fluctuated in the range 39-88%, with three groups of differences: low (39-51%), intermediate (67-71%) and high (85-88%). Mean values of the CTDIw varied between sites in the range 27-48 mGy. Mean DLP values varied between 188 mGy cm and 333 mGy cm, and the mean effective dose ranged between 3 mSv and 5 mSv. There were significant differences in effective dose between men and women. By sites, there was no relationship between DLP and mean score, with the highest image score associated with intermediate dose values. The percentage disagreement among the observers about a given criterion ranged between 2% and 22% for brain, and between 3% and 46% for lumbar spine.

Radiation doses from CT in the Sultanate of Oman

The computed tomography dose index (CTDI), dose-length product (DLP) and the effective dose were determined for a range of CT examinations in the Sultanate of Oman. There was a wide variation in CTDI. This shows that there is a variation in both scanner design and the exposure settings used by hospitals. There was also a wide variation in DLP and effective dose, suggesting that in some cases too many slices are taken. Therefore, standard protocols should be designed and adhered to in order that radiation doses may be reduced in the future.

Variation of patient dose in head CT

CT dose varies with both equipment related and operator dependent factors. Thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) was employed in two phantoms to investigate the variation in absorbed dose for head CT scans, using a cylindrical head CT dose phantom. Dose profiles were plotted and the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) calculated for a single 10 mm thick slice on 14 CT scanners. An anthropomorphic head phantom was also scanned from the base-of-skull to the vertex using 10/10 mm slices. The absorbed dose measured at the centre of the scan series is reported (Dmid). The mean CTDIw for the 14 scanners was 60.0 mGy, while the mean Dmid was 45.8 mGy. Dmid better represents the absorbed dose in human tissues. The CTDIw and Dmid normalized to mAs varied by up to a factor of 2.2 for the different scanners. Equipment related factors contribute to such variations. However, variations due to operator dependent factors such as the choice of exposure factors, scanning protocol and positioning technique must also be considered. When such factors are taken into account the absorbed dose received by the patient can vary considerably, by as much as 16.2 for lens dose. Increased awareness of the factors influencing CT dose and the standardization of scanning protocols is recommended.