Demonstration of the distal end of the oesophagus by transabdominal ultrasound

Predict esophageal varices via routine trans-abdominal ultrasound: A design of classification analysis model

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of esophageal varices. Trans-abdominal ultrasound, as a noninvasive routine examination for the follow-up of cirrhosis patient, is safe, cheap, easy to perform, and plays an important role. In this study, we attempt to design a practical classification analysis model to predict esophageal varices via ultrasound.

METHODS

Compared with endoscopy, the ultrasound qualitative signs (lower esophageal Doppler signals, left gastric vein hepatofugal flow, and paraumbilical vein recanalization) and quantitative parameters (spleen diameter, spleen vein diameter, portal vein diameter, and portal vein velocity) have been evaluated in 286 cirrhosis patients.

RESULTS

The classification analysis model is designed as that: the patients are defined with esophageal varices high risk, who with any ultrasound qualitative signs or who with spleen diameter greater than 162 mm without qualitative parameters. The sensitivity for detecting esophageal varices is 97.5% and the specificity is 82.6%, while the positive predictive value is 96.7%, negative predictive value is 83.4%, and the omission diagnostic rate is 2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This classification analysis model design includes ultrasound qualitative signs and spleen diameter, which can be detected easily via routine ultrasound without other auxiliary. The classification analysis model is useful in detecting esophageal varices, which may be a supplement for predicting of esophageal varices, and reducing the frequency of endoscopy in the follow-up of cirrhosis patients.

Esophageal varix predictive performance of lower esophageal Doppler signals during the swallowing process

The objective of this study was to assess whether the swallowing action can improve the display of lower esophageal Doppler signals (LEDS) during transabdominal ultrasound (TUS). Eighty-four patients with cirrhosis underwent both TUS and endoscopic examination for esophageal varices (EVs). LEDS were assessed under the esophageal resting state and during the swallowing process. Univariate analysis indicated that spleen diameter, spleen vein diameter, portal vein diameter, LEDS and left gastric vein hepatofugal flow were significantly associated with the presence of EVs. No LEDS were detected in patients without EVs at rest or during swallowing. Of the 69 patients with EVs, LEDS could be detected in 21 cases (30.4%) in the esophageal resting state and in 58 cases (84.1%) during the swallowing process. Compared with the esophageal resting state, the swallowing action can significantly improve display of LEDS during TUS (p = 0.000), which may be beneficial for TUS detection of EVs.

Defective mucosal movement at the gastroesophageal junction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the role of muscularis mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

AIM

To evaluate the movement of the mucosa/muscularis-mucosa/submucosa (MMS) at the GEJ in normal subjects and in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Gastroesophageal junctions of 20 non-GERD subjects and 10 patients with GERD were evaluated during 5 mL swallows using two methods: in high-resolution endoluminal ultrasound and manometry, the change in the GEJ luminal pressures and cross-sectional area of esophageal wall layers were measured; in abdominal ultrasound, the MMS movement at the GEJ was analyzed.

RESULTS

Endoluminal ultrasound: In the non-GERD subjects, the gastric MMS moved rostrally into the distal esophagus at 2.17 s after the bolus first reached the GEJ. In GERD patients, the gastric MMS did not move rostrally into the distal esophagus. The maximum change in cross-sectional area of gastroesophageal MMS in non-GERD subjects and in GERD patients was 289 % and 183%, respectively. Abdominal ultrasound: In non-GERD subjects, the gastric MMS starts to move rostrally significantly earlier and to a greater distance than muscularis propria (MP) after the initiation of the swallow (1.75 vs. 3.00 s) and (13.97 vs. 8.91 mm). In GERD patients, there is no significant difference in the movement of gastric MMS compared to MP (6.74 vs. 6.09 mm). The independent movement of the gastric MMS in GERD subjects was significantly less than in non-GERD subjects.

CONCLUSION

In non-GERD subjects, the gastric MMS moves rostrally into the distal esophagus during deglutitive inhibition and forms a barrier. This movement of the MMS is defective in patients with GERD.

Detection of risky esophageal varices by two-dimensional ultrasound: when to perform endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal varices are a consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. Current guidelines recommend that all cirrhotic patients undergo screening endoscopy at diagnosis to identify patients with varices at high risk of bleeding who will benefit from primary prophylaxis. This practice increases costs, involves a degree of invasiveness and discomfort and places a heavy burden on endoscopy units. Several studies have evaluated possible noninvasive predictors of esophageal varices, but most of these studies remain controversial.

METHODS

The intra-abdominal portion of the esophagus in 673 patients who presented with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension was examined using standard 2-dimensional (2D) ultrasound. A direct relationship between the degree of varices observed on upper endoscopy and the intra-abdominal esophageal wall thickness was detected using 2D ultrasound.

RESULTS

The mean thicknesses of the esophageal wall were 3.7 ± 0.5 mm (mean ± standard deviation) in normal individuals, 7.3 ± 3.3 mm in those with esophageal varices and 8.65 ± 1.98 mm in those with risky esophageal varices. The overall accuracy of 2D ultrasound was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

The intra-abdominal esophagus should be observed during abdominal ultrasound examination in patients with liver cirrhosis. Two-dimensional ultrasound can play an important role in screening for esophageal varices.

Ultrasonographic characteristics of the abdominal esophagus and cardia in dogs

Differential diagnoses for regurgitation and vomiting in dogs include diseases of the gastroesophageal junction. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to describe ultrasonographic characteristics of the abdominal esophagus and gastric cardia in normal dogs and dogs with clinical disease involving this region. A total of 126 dogs with no clinical signs of gastrointestinal disease and six dogs with clinical diseases involving the gastroesophageal junction were included. For seven euthanized dogs, ultrasonographic features were also compared with gross pathology and histopathology. Cardial and abdominal esophageal wall thicknesses were measured ultrasonographically for all normal dogs and effects of weight, sex, age, and stomach filling were tested. Five layers could be identified in normal esophageal and cardial walls. The inner esophageal layer was echogenic, corresponding to the cornified mucosa and glandular portion of the submucosa. The cardia was characterized by a thick muscularis, and a transitional zone between echogenic esophageal and hypoechoic gastric mucosal layers. Mean (±SD) cardial wall thicknesses for normal dogs were 7.6 mm (±1.6), 9.7 mm (±1.8), 10.8 mm (±1.6), 13.3 mm (±2.5) for dogs in the <10 kg, 10-19.9 kg, 20-29.9 kg and ≥30 kg weight groups, respectively. Mean (±SD) esophageal wall thicknesses were: 4.1 mm (±0.6), 5.1 mm (±1.3), 5.6 mm (±1), and 6.4 mm (±1.1) for the same weight groups, respectively. Measurements of wall thickness were significantly correlated with dog weight group. Ultrasonography assisted diagnosis in all six clinically affected dogs. Findings supported the use of transabdominal ultrasonography as a diagnostic test for dogs with suspected gastroesophageal disease.

Novel clues for ultrasonographic diagnosis of reflux in pregnant women: a pilot study

The aim of the present study was to define some novel radiological clues that may aid in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux in pregnant women. A total of 84 pregnant women, consisting of 42 reflux patients and 42 controls were included in the study. Reflux and control groups were compared in terms of age and our novel ultrasonographic landmarks related to oesophageal structure. While the two groups did not differ in terms of age, they were significantly different from each other with respect to: single layer, single wall oesophageal thickness; double layer, double wall oesophageal thickness; oesophageal hiatal diameter; perioesophageal fat pad thickness; hypoechogenic single wall muscularis mucosa and lamina propria thickness. Owing to our newly defined radiological clues, ultrasonography may have a 'greater than expected' role in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux in pregnant women. However, further studies must be performed to document the actual diagnostic potential of these radiological tips.

Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernias

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic measures that can be used for sliding hiatal hernia are barium swallow radiography, endoscopy, manometry, and computed tomography. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography for sliding hiatal hernias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in the radiology department of a tertiary care center between May 2011 and May 2012. Twenty-one patients (10 females, 11 males) with sliding hiatal hernias and 41 controls (37 females, 4 males) were enrolled in this study. Esophageal hiatal diameters measured by ultrasonography and computerized tomography were compared. Correlation was tested via Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The average age of patients and controls were 58.6 and 40.1, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between esophageal hiatal diameters measured via ultrasonography in patients (31.7 mm) and controls (11.6 mm) (P < .001). Similarly, esophageal hiatal diameters measured via computed tomography in patients (31.4 mm) was statistically significantly higher than controls (11.5 mm) (P < .001). The average body mass index of patients (28.3) was higher than that of control group (P = .015). Ultrasonographic measurements were correlated well with tomographic results (P = .000, r = 0.995).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography seems to be a valuable, safe, and practical alternative that avoids the side effects of contrast agents in the diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernias. Overall, we suggest that inclusion of ultrasound in the initial diagnostic steps for patients with sliding hiatal hernias may reduce the requirement for more expensive procedures.

Sliding gastric hiatal hernia diagnosis by transabdominal ultrasonography: an easy, reliable and non-invasive procedure

OBJECTIVE

Data in the literature suggest the possibility of using ultrasonography to diagnose sliding gastric hiatal hernia. The aim of this study was to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of sliding gastric hiatal hernia, using endoscopy as the reference test. The latter procedure was used since it also recognizes the presence of esophagitis and/or varices, two pathological conditions that could per se influence ultrasonographic evaluation, based on measurement of the esophageal diameter.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 180 consecutive patients, admitted to our hospital for endoscopy, were examined. Of these, 12 patients were not included in the final study. After fasting, the remaining 168 patients were first evaluated by ultrasonography and later by endoscopy. Esophageal diameter was measured by ultrasonography at the level of the diaphragmatic hiatus.

RESULTS

Using a diameter > or = 18 mm as the sensitivity threshold, 29 patients potentially affected by hiatal hernia were identified by ultrasonography. Upper endoscopy examination confirmed the presence of hiatal hernia in 24 of these patients and documented 4 additional hernias in the group of patients with a transdiaphragmatic esophageal diameter <18 mm (positive and negative predictive values were 82.7% and 97%, respectively). Analysis of the distribution of esophageal varices and esophagitis in all 168 excluded the possibility that these pathological conditions could influence the esophageal diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography represents a simple and well-tolerated diagnostic approach in sliding gastric hiatal hernia. The good diagnostic accuracy suggests its potential use in clinical and epidemiological settings.

Sonographic demonstration of cervical esophageal web

We report a case of esophageal web demonstrated with sonography in a 45-year-old woman with dysphagia. The esophageal web was incidentally detected as a circumferential hypoechoic membrane on sonograms of the cervical esophagus.

Sonographic demonstration of the normal thoracic esophagus

PURPOSE

Although conventional sonography has been used widely in evaluation of the abdominal and cervical esophagus, its use in the thoracic esophagus is seldom mentioned. The aim of this study was to assess whether conventional sonography could demonstrate the thoracic esophagus and to determine this structure's normal sonographic appearance and measurements.

METHODS

Transthoracic sonography was performed in 253 healthy volunteers ranging in age from 12 to 72 years (mean, 41 +/- 15 years). The subjects were examined while supine with their hands raised over their heads; the transducer was placed along the left side of the sternum sequentially from the first to the fifth intercostal spaces. The ultrasound beam was directed to the thoracic aorta using the heart as an acoustic window. The detectable length of the thoracic esophagus was measured in the longitudinal scan from the upper most part visualized to the point at which it penetrated the diaphragm. The esophageal thickness was measured on the anterior wall at the level of the left atrium.

RESULTS

In 188 (74%) of the 253 subjects, the thoracic esophagus could be demonstrated by sonography, except for the portion under the first and second intercostal spaces. In 3 of these 188 subjects, the esophagus also was not visualized at the third intercostal space. In these 188 subjects, the esophageal wall was shown as 3 layers. The esophageal lumen appeared as 1 or 2 hyperechoic bands in longitudinal sonograms. In 163 subjects, gas artifact and the comet-tail sign, with downward movement, were seen in the esophageal lumen after swallowing. The mean demonstrable length of the thoracic esophagus was 10.2 +/- 1.9 cm and the mean thickness 3.2 +/- 0.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the thoracic esophagus can be visualized by sonography, except for a short portion at the back of the left main bronchus. The heart and the thoracic aorta are 2 important landmarks in scanning.

Sonographic anatomy of the cervical esophagus

PURPOSE

Although conventional sonography is used widely for evaluation of the gastroesophageal junction, its use in the cervical esophagus is still limited. The aim of this study was to assess the use of sonography to demonstrate this portion of the esophagus.

METHODS

The cervical esophagi in 60 cadavers and 435 healthy volunteers were examined sonographically. Among the healthy subjects 182 were scanned with a transducer operating at 7.5 MHz, 183 with a 10.0-MHz transducer, and 70 with a 12.0-MHz transducer. Sonographic layer patterns were compared among the groups. Sonographic and histologic analyses were also performed on 3 cadaveric esophageal specimens to correlate the sonographic appearances with the anatomical findings.

RESULTS

Scans of the cadavers showed that the cervical esophagus lay between the trachea and vertebrae, with its origin at the midline; it gradually moved to the left as it descended toward the trunk. It moved to the right when the cadaver's head was turned to the left and the trachea was pushed gently to the left. Based on these anatomical characteristics, visualization of the cervical esophagus was optimized by scanning from both the left and the right lateral approaches, with manipulation of the trachea as needed. In scans of the 435 healthy subjects, the esophageal wall was shown as 5 layers in 423 (97.2%) and as 7 layers in the remaining 12 (2.8%). The demonstration rate of the 7-layer pattern was significantly higher for subjects scanned at 12.0 MHz than for those scanned at 10.0 and 7.5 MHz (p < 0.01). The layers demonstrated sonographically corresponded to histological structures evident on microscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The left lateral approach is essential to sonography of the cervical esophagus. However, the right wall of the esophagus is best seen from the right. In transverse scans, the cervical esophagus wall usually appears to be composed of 5 layers, although 7 layers can also appear, especially as the transducer frequency is increased.

Sonographic findings in achalasia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe the sonographic features of achalasia.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with achalasia (17 men and 18 women; mean age, 43 years) were examined with transabdominal sonography, and the findings were compared with those in 41 volunteers without esophageal disease (21 men and 20 women; mean age, 41 years), 10 patients with gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (7 men and 3 women; mean age, 55 years), and 4 patients with peptic stricture (3 men and 1 woman; mean age, 39 years). The distal end of the esophagus was evaluated, and the thickness of the esophageal wall was measured.

RESULTS

In 28 fasting patients (80%) with achalasia, sonography showed dilatation, retention of fluid, and smooth narrowing of the distal esophagus (like a bird's beak). These findings were not identified in the other patients or volunteers. In addition, in 6 of 7 achalasia patients who had no sign of esophageal dilatation in the fasting state, water retention was demonstrated after ingestion of water, bringing the total number of patients with achalasia with positive sonographic findings to 34 (97%). In patients with achalasia, the mean thickness (+/- standard deviation) of the esophageal wall at the gastroesophageal junction was 4.8 +/- 0.9 mm (range, 3.6-7.2 mm). The thickening was regular, symmetric, and localized to the gastroesophageal junction. In the volunteers, the mean thickness of the esophageal wall was 2.3 +/- 0.5 mm (range, 1.4-3.5 mm). The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the patients with carcinoma, the mean wall thickness was 17.0 /+ 1.1 mm, and the thickening was irregular. In the patients with peptic stricture, the mean wall thickness was 5.1 +/- 1.1 mm (range, 3.8-8.3 mm), and the thickening was irregular and occupied a longer segment of the distal esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with achalasia, transabdominal sonography clearly shows the regular thickening of the esophageal wall, water retention, dilatation of the distal esophagus, and the bird's beak appearance. Sonography may help in differentiating achalasia from carcinoma and peptic stricture of the gastroesophageal junction, which is difficult to do with other modalities.