The use of automated strain gauge plethysmography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis

A systematic review of clinical prediction scores for deep vein thrombosis

Objective Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis remains a challenging problem. Various clinical prediction rules have been developed in order to improve diagnosis and decision making in relation to deep vein thrombosis. The purpose of this review is to summarise the available clinical scores and describe their applicability and limitations. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance using the keywords: clinical score, clinical prediction rule, risk assessment, clinical probability, pretest probability, diagnostic score and medical Subject Heading terms: 'Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis' OR 'Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis'. Both development and validation studies were eligible for inclusion. Results The search strategy returned a total of 2036 articles, of which 102 articles met a priori criteria for inclusion. Eight different diagnostic scores were identified. The development of these scores differs in respect of the population included (hospital inpatients, hospital outpatients or primary care patients), the exclusion criteria, the inclusion of distal deep vein thrombosis and the use of D-dimer. The reliability and applicability of the scores in the context of specific subgroups (inpatients, cancer patients, elderly patients and those with recurrent deep vein thrombosis) remains controversial. Conclusion Detailed knowledge of the development of the various clinical prediction scores for deep vein thrombosis is essential in understanding the power, generalisability and limitations of these clinical tools.

On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is used to estimate the skin blood flow using infrared light. Researchers from different domains of science have become increasingly interested in PPG because of its advantages as non-invasive, inexpensive, and convenient diagnostic tool. Traditionally, it measures the oxygen saturation, blood pressure, cardiac output, and for assessing autonomic functions. Moreover, PPG is a promising technique for early screening of various atherosclerotic pathologies and could be helpful for regular GP-assessment but a full understanding of the diagnostic value of the different features is still lacking. Recent studies emphasise the potential information embedded in the PPG waveform signal and it deserves further attention for its possible applications beyond pulse oximetry and heart-rate calculation. Therefore, this overview discusses different types of artifact added to PPG signal, characteristic features of PPG waveform, and existing indexes to evaluate for diagnoses.

In too deep: understanding, detecting and managing DVT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious health and social care problem of the developed world, affecting 1 in 1000 adults every year, and with an annual financial overhead of approximately £640 million. The nature of DVT means that often the condition can go unrecognized until the thrombus becomes an embolus. The pathogenesis of DVT continues to be based on Virchow's triad, which attributes VTE to 'hypercoagulability', 'stasis' and 'intimal injury'. The diagnosis of DVT is often the result of a number of tests performed either sequentially or in combination before mechanical and/or chemical treatment is embarked on. Creating public awareness of DVT and PE is the best way to prevent this condition. Nurses are in an ideal position to discuss the importance of lifestyle changes and other related measures to prevent DVT.

Is there still a role for computerized strain gauge plethysmography in the assessment of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis?

INTRODUCTION

Although deep vein thromboses (DVTs) are common, only a minority of patients referred with suspected DVT will have the condition. Various strategies exist to allow rapid and safe discharge of low-risk patients, thus precluding the need for imaging.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of clinical risk assessment, D-Dimer analysis, computerized strain gauge plethysmography (CSGP) or a combination of the above in the assessment of outpatients with suspected DVT.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study on outpatients referred with suspected DVT to our medical assessment unit. Patients systematically underwent clinical risk assessment, D-Dimer analysis, CSGP and imaging with ultrasonography and/or venography.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty patients with suspected DVT were included in the analysis. Using a threshold of 0.6 mg/l, D-Dimer had a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for detecting DVT. Incorporating D-Dimer analysis with clinical risk assessment increased the specificity of the test. The sensitivity and NPV of CSGP were poor at 52.8 and 86.7%, respectively. Incorporating CSGP with D-Dimer did not influence decision making. Although the sensitivity of CSGP was higher for above knee (73.7%) than below knee DVT (29.4%), neither was sufficient for use as a screening tool.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not support the role of CSGP either as a stand-alone screening tool or in conjunction with clinical risk scoring. As the evidence base for CSGP is conflicting, its accuracy should first be assessed before being incorporated into hospital algorithms as a DVT exclusion tool. However, our results support the current practice for D-Dimer use either alone or in conjunction with clinical assessment tool in the assessment of lower limb DVT.

Near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor peripheral blood flow perfusion

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive evaluation of peripheral perfusion may be useful in many contexts including peri-operative monitoring. We validated a novel non-invasive spectroscopy technique to assess peripheral perfusion. This method, which is based on the measurement of tissue saturation variations after an ischemic period, was compared to strain gauge plethysmography and radionuclide plethysmography. The technique uses near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to determine the rate of change of forearm tissue saturation during reactive hyperemia.

METHODS

In a prospective crossover study, 25 subjects were simultaneously evaluated with NIRS and strain gauge plethysmography. Six baseline flow measurements were performed to assess the reproducibility of each method. Twenty-seven serial measurements were then made to evaluate flow variation during forearm reactive hyperemia.

RESULTS

Strain gauge and NIRS methods showed excellent reproducibility with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.93, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The NIRS technique appears well suited for the non-invasive evaluation of limb perfusion.

Ultrasound in the detection of venous thromboembolism

Venous thrombosis is a common disease process leading to tens of thousands of deaths per year. Despite prophylactic efforts, venous thromboembolic disease is a common and serious complication in critical care patients. Difficulty and delay in obtaining diagnostic imaging studies to rule out deep venous thrombosis is exacerbated by increased susceptibility that critically ill patients have to thromboembolism. Lower extremity venous ultrasound use by clinicians has been well studied and has proven both reliable and efficient. Evaluation of the upper extremities can be more challenging and requires a higher degree of technical skill. However, both can be integrated into an overall scheme of prevention, screening, and rapid diagnosis of thromboembolic disease and its complications. This article delves into available literature and describes performance of both applications in a critical care setting.

Meta-analysis of plethysmography and rheography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Plethysmography and rheography techniques have been widely studied as diagnostic tests for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study aimed to systematically review the accuracy of these tests for diagnosing clinically suspected DVT.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Reviews of Effectiveness, the ACP Journal Club (1966 to 2004), and citation lists of retrieved articles. Studies that compared plethysmography or rheography to a reference standard of ultrasound or contrast venography were selected. Standardised data were extracted and study quality determined against validated criteria. Data were analysed by random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 78 studies, reporting 82 patient cohorts. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were: 75% (73% to 77%) and 90% (89% to 91%) for impedance plethysmography, 83% (81% to 85%) and 81% (79% to 82%) for strain-gauge plethysmography, 85% (79% to 90%) and 91% (81% to 95%) for air plethysmography, 91% (87% to 94%) and 71% (66% to 75%) for light-reflex rheography, and 86% (83% to 89%) and 93% (91% to 95%) for phleborheography. Meta-regression was limited by poor reporting of studies. There was some evidence that diagnostic performance depended on the proportion of males in the cohort and reporting of study setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Although plethysmography and rheography techniques add diagnostic value, they have inadequate diagnostic performance to act as a stand-alone test in DVT diagnosis. Evaluation of their role in combination with other tests, or standardised clinical assessment, is required.

A comparison of computerised strain gauge plethysmography with D-dimer testing in screening for deep-vein thrombosis

There has been a significant increase in the amount of diagnostic testing performed to confirm or refute a diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), often in low-risk patients. D-dimer testing and computer-assisted strain gauge plethysmography (SGP) are rapid, inexpensive methods of excluding DVT and, in combination with a clinical probability score for DVT, both have been used to accurately exclude DVT. D-dimer testing, SGP and a combination of both in excluding DVT were compared in 243 ambulant outpatients who followed a prespecified investigation protocol. The negative-predictive value of D-dimer testing alone was 100%, 93.9% (95% CI 93.6-94.1) and 80% (95% CI 73.7-86.3) in patients with a low, moderate and high pretest probability (PTP) score for DVT respectively. The corresponding results for SGP were 95.6% (95% CI 95.5-95.7), 86.1% (95% CI 85.9-86.4) and 77.8% (95% CI 75.9-79.7) in patients with a low, moderate and high PTP score for DVT respectively. D-dimer testing provided a rapid, cost-effective method for excluding DVT in low-risk ambulant patients, which was superior to SGP. Combined use of the modalities did not improve any aspect of clinical decision making.

Diagnosis, investigation, and management of deep vein thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and its clinical diagnosis is unreliable. This article explains current screening and diagnostic methods as well as treatment