Accuracy and precision of a densitometric tool for jaw bone

Effect of a formalin-based fixation method on bone mineral content in human ex-vivo specimens

OBJECTIVE

Histopathology of formalin-fixated human ex-vivo specimens may be used as reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic index tests like CBCT or MRI. The aim was to estimate changes in bone mineral content (BMC) over time in human ex-vivo bone specimens fixated in a formalin-based solution for 24 h followed by storage in an alcohol-based medium for six months, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

METHODOLOGY

Bone specimens (n = 19) from human ex-vivo mandibles donated for science were included. BMC was measured by DXA before fixation (D₀), after 24 h of immersion fixation in a formalin-based solution (D₁), and hereafter every 30 days (M₁-M₆) during storage in a 30% ethanol-based storage medium for 6 months. Changes in BMC from D₀ to D₁ and from D₀ to M₆ were calculated and mean change in BMC estimated.

RESULTS

Mean change in BMC from D₀ to D₁ was -0.73% (95% CI -1.75%; 0.29%), and from D₀ to M₆ -1.19% (95% CI -2.14%; -0.23%).

CONCLUSIONS

No changes in BMC of ex-vivo human bone specimens were found after 24 h formalin-based immersion fixation. After six months storage in an ethanol-based medium, BMC mean loss of 1% was detected. In this range, changes in BMC are not clinically relevant.

Relationship Between the Surface Chemical Composition of Implants and Contact With the Substrate

The purpose of the study was to use scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry to assess possible morphologic and chemical changes after performing double-insertion and pullout tests of implants of different shapes and surface treatments. Four different types of implants were used—cylindrical machined-surface implants, cylindrical double-surface–treated porous implants, cylindrical surface-treated porous implants, and tapered surface-treated porous implants—representing a total of 32 screws. The implants were inserted into synthetic bone femurs, totaling 8 samples, before performing each insertion with standardized torque. After each pullout the implants were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry using a universal testing machine and magnified 35 times. No structural changes were detected on morphological surface characterization, only substrate accumulation. As for composition, there were concentration differences in the titanium, oxygen, and carbon elements. Implants with surface acid treatment undergo greater superficial changes in chemical composition than machined implants, that is, the greater the contact area of the implant with the substrate, the greater the oxide layer change. In addition, prior manipulation can alter the chemical composition of implants, typically to a greater degree in surface-treated implants.

Assessment of the increased calcification of the jaw bone with CT-Scan after dental implant placement

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the changes of jaw bone density around the dental implant after placement using computed tomography scan (CT-Scan).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study consisted of 30 patients who had lost 1 posterior tooth in maxilla or mandible and installed dental implant. The patients took CT-Scan before and after implant placement. Hounsfield Unit (HU) was measured around the implants and evaluated the difference of HU before and after implant installation.

Results

The mean HU of jaw bone was 542.436 HU and 764.9 HU before and after implant placement, respectively (p<0.05). The means HUs for male were 632.3 HU and 932.2 HU and those for female 478.2 HU and 645.5 HU before and after implant placement, respectively (p<0.05). Also, the jaw bone with lower density needed longer period for implant procedure and the increased change of HU of jaw bone was less in the cases which needed longer period for osseointegration.

Conclusion

CT-Scan could be used to assess the change of bone density around dental implants. Bone density around dental implant was increased after placement. The increased rate of bone density could be determined by the quality of jaw bone before implant placement.

Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to identify radiographic methods revealing data that are most representative for the true peri-implant bone as assessed by histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty implants were placed in 10 minipigs. To assess matching between different image modalities, measurements conducted on intra-oral digital radiographs (IO), cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) and histological images were correlated using Spearman's correlation. Paired tests (Wilcoxon test) were used to determine changes in the bone parameters after 2 and 3 months of healing.

RESULTS

Significant correlations between bone defect depth on IO and histological slices (r= + 0.7, P<0.01), as well as on CBCT images and histological slices (r= + 0.61, P<0.01), were found. CBCT and IO images deviate, respectively, 1.20 and 1.17 mm from the histology regarding bone defects. No significant correlations were detected between fractal analysis on CBCT, intra-oral radiography and histology. For bone density assessment, significant but weaker correlations (r= + 0.5, P<0.01) were found for intra-oral radiography vs. histology. Significant marginal bone-level changes could be observed after 3 months of healing using intra-oral radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

This study allowed linking radiographic bone defect depth to the histological observations of the peri-implant bone. Minute bone changes during a short-term period can be followed up using digital intra-oral radiography. Radiographic fractal analysis did not seem to match histological fractal analysis. CBCT was not found to be reliable for bone density measures, but might hold potential with regard to the structural analysis of the trabecular bone.

Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This methodological study aimed to determine whether the mandibular trabecular bone assessment from panoramic radiographs, using a visual index, corresponds to the evaluation obtained from periapical radiographs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A panoramic radiograph and corresponding periapical radiographs of the region of the lower premolars and molars were collected from each of 32 patients (mean age 18.5 +/- 5.5 years). Two calibrated observers assessed randomly the interdental sites between the first molar and second premolar and between the two premolars on all the radiographs using a visual index. Evaluations were repeated with an interval of 60 days. The results of the repeated evaluations were used to assess intra- and inter-observer agreements, employing Kappa statistics. Spearman's correlation was used to determine the association between assessments of panoramic and periapical radiographs.

RESULTS

In total, 79 interdental sites were evaluated on the panoramic and periapical radiographs. The visual analysis of periapical radiographs revealed intra-observer agreements of 0.88 for observer 1 and 0.93 for observer 2, and an inter-observer agreement of 0.82. The intra-observer agreement for panoramic radiographs was 0.79 and 0.83 for observers 1 and 2, respectively, and the inter-observer agreement was 0.79. A substantial correlation was found between periapical and panoramic radiographs (rho = 0.737, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although panoramic radiographs are less reliable than periapical radiographs, they can be used for assessment of the trabecular bone pattern with the aid of a visual index. Training on the method is recommended to obtain results with a high reproducibility.

Alveolar bone measurement precision for phosphor-plate images

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to demonstrate methods for determining measurement precision and to determine the precision of alveolar bone measurements made with a vacuum-coupled positioning device and phosphor plate images.

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects were rigidly attached to the x-ray tube by means of a vacuum coupling device and custom cross-arch bite plates. Original and repeat radiographs (taken within minutes of each other) were obtained of the mandibular posterior teeth of 51 subjects, and cementoenamel junction-alveolar crest (CEJ-AC) distances were measured on both sets of images. In addition, x-ray transmission (radiodensity) and AC height differences were determined by subtracting one image from the other. Image subtractions and measurements were performed twice. Based on duplicate measurements, the root mean square standard deviation (precision) and least significant change (LSC) were calculated. LSC is the magnitude of change in a measurement needed to indicate that a true biologic change has occurred.

RESULTS

The LSCs were 4% for x-ray transmission, 0.49 mm for CEJ-AC distance, and 0.06 mm for crest height.

CONCLUSION

The LSCs for our CEJ-AC and x-ray transmission measurements were similar to what has been previously reported. The LSC for AC height (determined with image subtraction) was <0.1 mm. Compared with findings from earlier studies, this represents a highly precise measurement of AC height. The methods demonstrated for calculating LSC can be used by investigators to determine how large changes in radiographic measurements need to be before the changes can be considered to be (with 95% confidence) true biologic changes and not noise (i.e., equipment/observer error).

Development of a clinically applicable tool for bone density assessment

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy and reliability of new software for radiodensitometric evaluations.

METHODS

A densitometric tool developed by MevisLab was used in conjunction with intraoral radiographs of the premolar region in both in vivo and laboratory settings. An aluminum step wedge was utilized for comparison of grey values. After computer-aided segmentation, the interproximal bone between the premolars was assessed in order to determine the mean grey value intensity of this region and convert it to a thickness in aluminum. Evaluation of the tool was determined using bone mineral density (BMD) values derived from decalcified human bone specimens as a reference standard. In vivo BMD data was collected from 35 patients as determined with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The intra and interobserver reliability of this method was assessed by Bland and Altman Plots to determine the precision of this tool.

RESULTS

In the laboratory study, the threshold value for detection of bone loss was 6.5%. The densitometric data (mm Al eq.) was highly correlated with the jaw bone BMD, as determined using dual X-ray absorptiometry (r = 0.96). For the in vivo study, the correlations between the mm Al equivalent of the average upper and lower jaw with the lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD and femoral neck BMD were 0.489, 0.537 and 0.467, respectively (P < 0.05). For the intraobserver reliability, a Bland and Altman plot showed that the mean difference +/- 1.96 SD were within +/-0.15 mm Al eq. with the mean difference value small than 0.003 mm Al eq. For the interobserver reliability, the mean difference +/-1.96 SD were within +/-0.11 mm Al eq. with the mean difference of 0.008 mm Al eq.

CONCLUSIONS

A densitometric software tool has been developed, that is reliable for bone density assessment. It now requires further investigation to evaluate its accuracy and clinical applicability in large scale studies.

Bone density measurements in intra-oral radiographs

Jaw bone density measurements are applicable in many clinical situations to assess bone tissue. To be able to implement research findings in clinical reality, tools must be simple and low cost. Intra-oral radiographs including a reference material perform well as a densitometric tool. However, the inclusion of a reference material, usually in the form of a metal wedge, is an additional burden for the dentist. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a reference step wedge is required for accurate densitometric results. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements and densitometric measurements on intra-oral radiographs using a custom-made software were performed on bone samples from the premolar region of the mandible. Observer agreement of bone density expressed as grey value was high. The correlation between mandibular bone mineral density and the densitometric values on intra-oral radiographs was substantially higher when the aluminium step wedge was included. The Wilcoxon test revealed no significant difference between the density measurements using nine or three steps of the Al reference wedge. Density determination of grey value and mm Aleq thickness value both have good intra- and inter-observer agreement. However, jaw bone densitometry is far more accurate when including a reference wedge.

Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy

INTRODUCTION

To improve patient comfort, deviations from the very successful standard osseointegration protocol are being developed. To keep implant failure rates as low as possible, the most perfect treatment planning and a good patient selection are extremely important. Because bone density plays an important role in implant outcome, known relations of bone density could improve treatment planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Pubmed search revealed 66 manuscripts investigating and discussing bone density of human jawbone whether or not related to implant stability or outcome. Forty-five of these will be discussed in this review.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Many pre-operative methods of jawbone density assessment are available. Most of those techniques correlate well with one another. Some are more elaborate to use in clinical practice. Primary stability measurements show significant correlations with different bone densities and also with implant outcome; however, not many studies investigate both at the same time.

CONCLUSION

To investigate the outcome of adaptation methods of the surgical protocol with regard to the jawbone density, an objective pre-surgical determination of bone density is necessary.