Quantitative and qualitative comparison of MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 1.5 and 3.0 T using an optimized high-resolution protocol

A detunable wireless resonator insert for high-resolution TMJ MRI at 1.5 T

MRI is essential for evaluating and diagnosing various conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and surrounding structures, as it provides highly detailed images that enable healthcare professionals to assess the joints and surroundings in great detail. While commercial MRI scanners typically come equipped with basic receive coils, such as the head receive array, RF coils tailored for specialized applications like TMJ MRI must be obtained separately. Consequently, TMJ MRI scans are often conducted using the head receive array, yet this configuration proves suboptimal due to the lack of specialized coils. In this study, we introduce a simple, low-cost, and easy-to-reproduce wireless resonator insert to enhance the quality of TMJ MRI at 1.5 T. The wireless resonator shows a significant improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and noticeably better imaging quality than the head array alone configuration in both phantom and in vivo images.

MRI of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Comparative Study of 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are common and may cause persistent functional limitations and pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 and 3 T is commonly applied for the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). No evidence is available regarding the feasibility of modern low-field MRI for the assessment of TMDs. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the image quality (IQ) of 0.55 T MRI in direct comparison with 1.5 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (34 TMJs) with suspected intraarticular TMDs were enrolled, and both 0.55 and 1.5 T MRI were performed on the same day. Two senior readers independently evaluated the IQ focusing on the conspicuity of disc morphology (DM), disc position (DP), and osseous joint morphology (OJM) for each joint. We analyzed the IQ and degree of artifacts using a 4-point Likert scale (LS) at both field strengths. A fully sufficient IQ was defined as an LS score of ≥3. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test for related samples was used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

The median IQ for the DM and OJM at 0.55 T was inferior to that at 1.5 T (DM: 3 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-4] vs 4 [IQR, 4-4]; OJM: 3 [IQR, 3-4] vs 4 [IQR 4-4]; each P < 0.001). For DP, the IQ was comparable (4 [IQR 3-4] vs 4 [IQR 4-4]; P > 0.05). A sufficient diagnostic IQ was maintained for the DM, DP, and OJM in 92% of the cases at 0.55 T and 100% at 1.5 T. Minor image artifacts (LS score of ≥3) were more prevalent at 0.55 T (29%) than at 1.5 T (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging of the TMJ at 0.55 T yields a lower IQ than does MRI at 1.5 T but maintains sufficient diagnostic confidence in the majority of patients. Further improvements are needed for reliable clinical application.

Compressed Sensing SEMAC MRI of Hip, Knee, and Ankle Arthroplasty Implants: A 1.5-T and 3-T Intrapatient Performance Comparison for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Abnormalities

BACKGROUND. The utility of 3-T MRI for diagnosing joint disorders is established, but its performance for diagnosing abnormalities around arthroplasty implants is unclear. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare 1.5-T and 3-T compressed sensing slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) MRI for diagnosing peri-prosthetic abnormalities around hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty implants. METHODS. Forty-five participants (26 women, 19 men; mean age ± SD, 71 ± 14 years) with symptomatic lower extremity arthroplasty (hip, knee, and ankle, 15 each) prospectively underwent consecutive 1.5- and 3-T MRI examinations with intermediate-weighted (IW) and STIR compressed sensing SEMAC sequences. Using a Likert scale, three radiologists evaluated the presence or absence of periprosthetic abnormalities, including bone marrow edema-like signal, osteolysis, stress reaction/fracture, synovitis, and tendon abnormalities and collections; image quality; and visibility of anatomic structures. Statistical analysis included nonparametric comparison and interchangeability testing. RESULTS. For diagnosing periprosthetic abnormalities, 1.5-T and 3-T compressed sensing SEMAC MRI were interchangeable. Across all three joints, 3-T MRI had lower noise than 1.5-T MRI (median IW and STIR scores at 3 T vs 1.5 T, 4 and 4 [range, 2-5 and 3-5] vs 3 and 3 [range, 2-5 and 2-4]; p < .01 for both), sharper edges (median IW and STIR scores at 3 T vs 1.5 T, 4 and 4 [both ranges, 2-5] vs 3 and 3 [range, 2-4 and 2-5]; p < .02 and p < .05), and more effective metal artifact reduction (median IW and STIR scores at 3 T vs 1.5 T, 4 and 4 [range, 3-5 and 2-5] vs 4 and 4 [both ranges, 3-5]; p < .02 and p = .72). Agreement was moderate to substantial for image contrast (IW and STIR, 0.66 and 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41-0.91 and 0.29-0.80]; p = .58 and p = .16) and joint capsule visualization (IW and STIR, 0.57 and 0.70 [range, 0.32-0.81 and 0.51-0.89]; p = .16 and p = .19). The bone-implant interface was more visible at 1.5 T (median IW and STIR scores, 4 and 4 [both ranges, 2-5] at 1.5 T vs 3 and 3 [both ranges, 2-5] at 3 T; p = .08 and p = .58), but periprosthetic tissues had superior visibility at 3 T (IW and STIR, 4 and 4 [both ranges, 3-5] at 3 T vs 4 and 4 [ranges, 2-5 and 3-5] at 1.5 T; p = .07 and p = .19). CONCLUSION. Optimized 1.5-T and 3-T compressed sensing SEMAC MRI are interchangeable for diagnosing periprosthetic abnormalities, although metallic artifacts are larger at 3 T. CLINICAL IMPACT. With compressed sensing SEMAC MRI, lower extremity arthroplasty implants can be imaged at 3 T rather than 1.5 T.

High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint Low Agreement with Clinical Diagnosis in Asymptomatic Females

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between a clinical diagnosis based on research diagnostic criteria/temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) and high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of temporomandibular joints (TMJs) in asymptomatic females. (2) Methods: A prospective study on 100 females (200 TMJs) was performed, using clinical examinations (RDC/TMD) and same-day MRIs of TMJs on a 3T MR unit. The inclusion criteria were as follows: females, age > 18, the presence of upper and lower incisors, and an understanding of the Serbian language. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) and ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey test for differences among the patient subgroups was performed. The agreement between the clinical and MRI findings was determined using Cohen's kappa coefficient (k < 0.21 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.81-1 almost perfect). The statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. (3) Results: Normal findings were observed in 86.7%, disc dislocation (DD) was observed in 9.2%, and arthralgia/osteoarthritis/osteoarthrosis was observed in 2.6% of TMJs using RDC/TMD. On the MRI, normal findings were observed in 50.5%, disc dislocation was observed in 16.3%, and arthralgia/osteoarthritis/osteoarthrosis was observed in 23.5% of TMJs. The anterior DD with reduction showed fair agreement of the clinical and MRI findings (k = 0.240, p < 0.001) compared with the DD without reduction (k = 0.355, p < 0.001). Both showed high specificity (94.9% and 99.4%) but low sensitivity (24.2% and 25.0%). The sensitivity in osteoarthritic changes was low (4.8%), but the specificity remained high (96.2%). (4) Conclusions: The sensitivity of the clinical examination remains low compared with 3T MRI, especially in osteoarthritic changes and anterior DD with reduction. However, the number of false positive diagnoses using RDC/TMD is low in asymptomatic patients. RDC/TMD remains a sensible method for establishing a clinical diagnosis and avoiding the overtreatment of asymptomatic patients.

Comparison of T2 Weighted, Fat-Suppressed T2 Weighted, and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition (FIESTA-C) Sequences in the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Evaluation

Aim

Osteonecrosis can affect the mandibular condyle, and bone marrow edema may be a precursor in osteonecrosis development in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. Early detection of bone marrow changes is crucial for occurring osteonecrosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of fast spin-echo T2 weighted (FSE-T2W), fat-suppressed T2W (FS-T2W), and three-dimensional (3D) fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA-C) MR sequences for early detection of bone marrow changes as well as TMJ soft tissue alterations.

Methods

A total of 60 joints with TMD were included in this study using a 1.5T MR machine (Signa HDxt, GE, Milwaukee, USA) using a dual surface TMJ coil. Qualitatively, the images were interpreted by two observers for disk configuration, disk position, joint fluid, and bone marrow changes. Quantitatively, signal intensity ratios (SIR) in the TMJ condyle, retrodiscal tissue, disk, and muscle were also measured using all tested sequences. Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess both intra- and interobserver agreements for each image set. The SIR of each sequence was compared using a one-way ANOVA Bonferroni-Dunn test.

Results

Overall intraobserver kappa coefficients ranged between 0.35 and 0.88 for joint fluid and between 0.22 and 0.82 for bone marrow changes diagnosis, suggesting high intraobserver agreement for FS-T2W and 3D FIESTA-C sequences than FSE T2W sequence (p < 0.05). 3D FIESTA-C showed higher agreement values for disk configuration and position detection than other sequences.

Conclusions

3D FIESTA-C sequences can be used and incorporated into routine MRI protocols for obtaining high-resolution TMJ MR images due to the short acquisition time and 3D nature of the sequence. Additional studies should be done for dynamic TMJ imaging with this sequence.

Relationship between Clinical Symptoms and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) Patients Utilizing the Piper MRI Diagnostic System

Clinical problems of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and the masticatory musculature are both included in the term temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The purpose of the present study was to examine the pathology of the joints of patients diagnosed with TMD utilizing the dedicated Piper MRI-based classification, and to link these pathologies with various symptoms while considering their severity. In total, 64 patients with clinical TMD were examined. Symptoms were recorded using a questionnaire. The clinical examination included diagnosing the occlusion in centric relation, which was followed by a standardized MRI. It was confirmed that, although they occurred in a high percentage in all classes, muscle pain and occlusal interference are not indicators of TMJ damage. The results indicate that the progressive degradation of the TMJ, represented by qualification to the higher Piper classes, is associated with an increase in TMJ pain only up to a certain stage. For the highest Piper classes, the joint pain occurs in a smaller percentage of patients, but sounds are more frequent.

MRI of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: Recent Advances and Future Directions

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are a prevalent disease covering pain and dysfunction of temporomandibular joints and masticatory muscles, which can be detrimental to quality of life. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful and noninvasive tool for the imaging and understanding of TMD. With the recent technical development of dynamic and quantitative MRI techniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging, T₂ mapping, and ultrashort/zero echo time, it is now feasible in TMD imaging and has been preliminarily investigated with promising results. In this review we will discuss the recent advances of MRI techniques in TMD and its future directions, and hope to highlight the scientific potential and clinical value of novel MRI techniques in diagnosing and treating TMD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Determining the optimal magnetic resonance imaging sequences for the efficient diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders

Background

To compare and analyze nine MRI sequences of the TMJ and determine the optimum sequence for the rapid diagnosis of TMDs so as to develop new clinical guidelines.

Methods

Twenty young volunteers (a total of 40 joints) aged 22-26 years were recruited. Three basic sequences, T₁-weighted imaging (T₁WI), T₂-weighted imaging (T₂WI), and proton density-weighted imaging (PDWI), together with three positions, oblique sagittal (OSag) with closed mouth, oblique coronal (OCor) with closed mouth, and OSag with opened mouth, were selected in combination for testing. In the OCor position, four regions of interest (ROIs), the condyle (C), the disc (D), the disc outside (DO), and fat (F), were analyzed. For the OSag with closed mouth position and the OSag with opened mouth position sequences, the four ROIs were the condyle (C), the disc (D), the disc ahead (DA), and the disc rear (DR). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal intensity ratio (SIR) were calculated and analyzed using independent sample t-tests and one-way analysis of variance. Two senior radiologists scored the images of the nine MRI sequences subjectively and selected three optimal sequences. Using the three selected sequences, 1479 patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR) or anterior disk displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) were evaluated by comparing the preoperative TMJ MRI with the outcomes of the maxillofacial arthroscopy or open surgery.

Results

The T₁WI sequence showed the highest SNR while the T₂WI group had the lowest SNR. The ROIs of the T₂WI group had the highest CNR and SIR values in the OCor and OSag sequences. In the OCor sequence, the value for the SIR F/DO group was higher than the SIR C/D and SIR C/DO values. Using subjective analysis to evaluate the quality of the scans, the highest total scores were obtained for the OSag T₂WI with opened mouth and OSag PDWI with closed mouth sequences. From the objective and subjective analysis, the three optimal sequences selected were OSag PDWI, OCor T₂WI with closed mouth, and OSag T₂WI with opened mouth. In patients with anterior disc displacement, the comparisons of the surgery and the selected MRI sequences indicated that the total diagnostic accuracy of the MRI was 96.3% (1,425/1,479 cases). For patients with ADDwoR, the diagnostic accuracy was 98.5% (1,372/1,393 cases), and for those with ADDwR it was 61.6% (53/86 cases). There were significant differences between the ADDwoR and ADDwR groups (χ²=312.92, P<0.01).

Conclusions

The three optimal MRI sequences for the rapid and efficient diagnosis of TMD were determined to be OSag PDWI, OCor T₂WI with closed mouth, and OSag T₂WI with opened mouth.

Comparison between 2D and 3D MEDIC for human cervical spinal cord MRI at 3T

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spinal cord is important to provide accurate diagnosis and pathological assessment of injuries. MEDIC (Multiple Echo Data Image Combination) sequences have been used in clinical MRI; however, a comparison of the performance of 2D and 3D MEDIC for cervical spinal cord imaging has not been reported. The aim of this study is to compare axial 2D and 3D MEDIC for the visualisation of the grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) of the human cervical spinal cord.

METHODS

Eight healthy participants were scanned using Siemens Prismafit 3T MRI. T2*-weighted gradient spoiled 2D and 3D MEDIC sequences were acquired at 0.4 × 0.4 × 3.0 and 0.3 × 0.3 × 3.0 mm resolutions, with the acquisition times of 6 and 7 min, respectively. Quantitative analyses of the images were made based on the image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and non-uniformity (NU). Two independent radiologists (CS and FN), each provided Likert scoring assessments of anatomical visibility of the GM and WM structures and image clarity for all samples.

RESULTS

Quantitative evaluation showed that 3D MEDIC provided higher SNR, higher CNR and lower NU than 2D MEDIC. However, 2D MEDIC provided better anatomical visibility for the GM, WM and CSF, and higher image clarity (lower artefacts) compared to 3D MEDIC.

CONCLUSIONS

2D MEDIC provides better information for depicting the internal structures of the cervical spinal cord compared to 3D MEDIC.

Repeated Live Imaging in the Temporomandibular Joint of an Anterior Crossbite Mouse Model Using a 7T Magnetic Resonance Device

BACKGROUND/AIM

Few studies have performed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on live animals. The aim of this study was to perform 7T MR microimaging of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) multiple times in the same living mice with malocclusion, and to compare between MR imaging and histopathological findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice were examined by MR imaging at 3-4, 6 and 12 weeks following the attachment of a metal tube on the left mandibular incisor. Histopathological examination was done at 3, 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The detailed structure of the TMJ was evident from MR microimaging. The histopathological examination showed some changes in the cartilage, but no changes in the bone structure of these mice.

CONCLUSION

We successfully performed multiple 7T MR imaging in living mice. Even if the TMJ showed no obvious changes on MR images, minute changes may be present in the cartilage.

Lesions of the lateral pterygoid muscle-an overestimated reason for temporomandibular dysfunction: a 3T magnetic resonance imaging study

The aim of this study was to examine the lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) parenchyma, myotendinous junction, and tendon in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results were compared with findings reported in the literature, in which the LPM has been attributed a major role in triggering TMD. 3T MRI was used for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) imaging. The MRI images of 63 patients were analysed for muscle contracture and atrophy, tendon rupture, signal alterations of the tendon, tendon contrast enhancement, and peritendinous fluid collection. Descriptive statistics and the coefficient estimate method were used for statistical analysis. Focus was placed on the association between LPM tendon pathology and TMJ lesions like osteoarthritis and disc displacement. Severe lesions of the LPM tendon and muscle parenchyma, like rupture or fibrosis, were detected in very few cases. Only moderate signs of tendinosis were found in TMD patients. In contrast, there was a clear correlation between tendon lesions and osteoarthritis or anterior disc displacement. These results indicate the need to discuss and question the role of the LPM and its tendon in TMD. Data suggest that LPM and tendon lesions are part of complex degenerative changes of the TMJ, and it seems less likely that a LPM disorder is causative in TMD.

Interdisciplinary Approach to the Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis-Review of the Literature

Background and objectives: There are an increasing number of patients applying for dental treatment who suffer from temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). Osteoarthritis may be the cause of the pain in the area of temporomandibular joints, but its course may also be absolutely asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to present an interdisciplinary approach to TMJOA, including current diagnostics and treatment modalities on the basis of the available literature. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were analyzed using the keywords: ((temporomandibular joint AND osteoarthritis) AND imaging) and ((temporomandibular joint AND osteoarthritis) AND treatment). The bibliography was supplemented with books related to the temporomandibular joint. After screening 2450 results, the work was based in total on 98 publications. Results and Conclusions: Osteoarthritis is an inflammatory, age-related, chronic and progressive degenerative joint disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), together with clinical symptoms, play significant roles in TMJOA diagnosis. Current MRI techniques seem to be clinically useful for assessment of bony changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. Treatment of TMJOA requires a complex, interdisciplinary approach. TMJOA treatment includes the cooperation of physiotherapists, rheumatologists, gnathologists, orthodontists and quite often also maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists. Sometimes additional pharmacotherapy is indicated. Thorough examination of TMJ function and morphology is necessary at the beginning of any orthodontic or dental treatment. Undiagnosed TMJ dysfunction may cause further problems with the entire masticatory system, including joints, muscles and teeth.

Selection and application of coils in temporomandibular joint MRI

Objective:

To compare and evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values between a 15-channel phased array head coil and 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil in the MRI of temporomandibular joint.

Methods:

300 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 150 patients were examined by using a 15-channel phased array head coil and the other 150 patients were scanned by using a 6-channel dS Flex M surface coil. All of the data were set in the same 6 regions of interest including the temporal lobe, condyle neck, lateral pterygoid muscle, parotid gland, the adipose area and an area of the background noise）. SNR and CNR values were measured respectively.

Results:

The numerical variation law of SNR and CNR values measured in regionsof interest of each group was similar, although different coils were used. There were statistically significant differences of SNR values in all of the oblique sagittal (OSag) proton density-weighted imaging, the part of OSag T₂ weighted image (T₂WI) except for SNR₄ and SNR₅. and oblique coronal (OCor) T₂WI sequence except for SNR₂. On the contrary, SNR₄ and SNR₅ values in the OCor T₂WI and SNR₅ values in OSag T₂WI sequences by using the surface coil were higher than those by using the head coil. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences of CNR values in OSag proton density-weighted imaging sequence except CNR₁ and in OSag T₂WI sequence except CNR₅. But, statistically significant differences of all the values in the OCor T₂WI sequence except for CNR₁ were observed.

Conclusion:

Both the phased array head coil and dS Flex M surface coil can be used for temporomandibular joint MRI.

MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison between acquisitions at 7.0 T using dielectric pads and 3.0 T

OBJECTIVES

To qualitatively and quantitatively compare MRI of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) at 7.0 T using high-permittivity dielectric pads and 3.0 T using a clinical high-resolution protocol.

METHODS

Institutional review board-approved study with written informed consent. 12 asymptomatic volunteers were imaged at 7.0 and 3.0 T using 32-channel head coils. High-permittivity dielectric pads consisting of barium titanate in deuterated suspension were used for imaging at 7.0 T. Imaging protocol consisted of oblique sagittal proton density weighted turbo spin echo sequences. For quantitative analysis, pixelwise signal-to-noise ratio maps of the TMJ were calculated. For qualitative analysis, images were evaluated by two independent readers using 5-point Likert scales. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared using t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, respectively.

RESULTS

TMJ imaging at 7.0 T using high-permittivity dielectric pads was feasible in all volunteers. Quantitative analysis showed similar signal-to-noise ratio for both field strengths (mean ± SD; 7.0 T, 13.02 ± 3.92; 3.0 T, 14.02 ± 3.41; two-sample t-tests, p = 0.188). At 7.0 T, qualitative analysis yielded better visibility of all anatomical subregions of the temporomandibular disc (anterior band, intermediate zone and posterior band) than 3.0 T (Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI of the TMJ at 7.0 T using high-permittivity dielectric pads yields superior visibility of the temporomandibular disc compared with 3.0 T.

Comparison of a 32-channel head coil and a 2-channel surface coil for MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 3.0 T

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively and qualitatively compare MRI of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using a standard TMJ surface coil and a head coil at 3.0 T.

METHODS

22 asymptomatic volunteers were MR imaged using a 2-channel surface coil (standard TMJ coil) and a 32-channel head coil at 3.0 T (Philips Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). Imaging protocol consisted of an oblique sagittal proton density weighted turbo spin echo sequence (repetition time/echo time, 2700/26 ms). For quantitative assessment, a spherical phantom was imaged using the same sequence including a noise scan and a B1+ scan. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) maps and B1+ maps were calculated on a voxelwise basis. For qualitative evaluation, all volunteers underwent MRI of both TMJs with the jaw in the closed position. Two independent blinded readers assessed accuracy of TMJ anatomical representation and overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative measurements were compared between coils using t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis showed similar B1+ and significantly higher SNR for the head coil than the TMJ surface coil. Qualitative analysis showed significantly better visibility and delineation of clinically relevant anatomical structures of the TMJ, including the articular disc, bilaminar zone and lateral pterygoid muscle. Furthermore, better overall image quality was observed for the head coil than for the TMJ surface coil.

CONCLUSIONS

A 32-channel head coil is preferable to a standard 2-channel TMJ surface coil when imaging the TMJ at 3.0 T, because it yields higher SNR, thus increasing accuracy of the anatomical representation of the TMJ.