Does CBCT alter the diagnostic thinking efficacy, management and prognosis of patients with suspected Stage 0 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws?

Pre-existing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw before dental extraction

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe adverse event, most commonly associated with dental extractions as a predisposing event. However, it is possible that established MRONJ may be existent before dental extractions and is mistaken for odontogenic disease. The provision of a dental extraction will lead to clinically obvious MRONJ with the cause being attributed to tooth removal. We present a case series of ten patients with pre-existing necrosis of the jaw before dental extraction.Retrospective data were collected on ten patients who presented to the oral surgery department between 2017-2021, diagnosed with pre-existing necrosis. A diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ was made based on the identification of necrotic bone clinically, either with plain film or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients with pre-existing necrosis presented with a range of symptoms, including pain, swelling and tooth mobility. Plain film imaging revealed a variety of findings, including periapical radiolucency, periodontal ligament widening and bone loss. CBCT imaging confirmed a necrotic pattern of bone destruction confirming a diagnosis of pre-existing MRONJ.There is increasing evidence to suggest that local inflammation can be a predisposing factor for MRONJ development as opposed to surgical intervention. This case series provides early insight into the presentation of pre-existing MRONJ.

Nonexposed antiresorptive agent-related osteomyelitis of the jaw: a single-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The nonexposed variant of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) presents with nonspecific clinical findings. The diagnosis of nonexposed ARONJ poses a critical challenge, and there is little evidence regarding its treatment and outcomes. This study aimed to examine the clinical outcomes in patients with nonexposed antiresorptive agent-related osteomyelitis of the jaw (AROMJ). The terms ARONJ and AROMJ were used separately in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled patients with nonexposed AROMJ (osteomyelitis of the jaw without bone exposure associated with antiresorptive agents) with partial reference to an existing position paper on ARONJ. The initiating event of osteomyelitis was limited to periodontitis. Based on the findings of bone scintigraphy, panoramic radiography, computed tomography, and histopathological examination, we also used the hierarchical diagnostic criteria (HDC) for osteomyelitis of the jaw.

RESULTS

There were 58 confirmed cases of nonexposed AROMJ based on the HDC. All patients had sufficient clinical findings to be diagnosed with nonexposed AROMJ as osteomyelitis underwent extraction with bone debridement. The healing rate was 93.1% (54/58). Univariable analysis showed a strong association between the healing status and malignant disease, while multivariable analysis showed no strong association between them.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study had a relatively large sample size of patients with nonexposed AROMJ. The primary disease in patients with nonexposed AROMJ may not have a strong association with the healed status of the lesion. Based on its high healing rate, extraction with bone debridement in confirmed nonexposed AROMJ may prevent progression.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Critical Narrative Review

Background: Nearly two decades have passed since a paradoxical reaction in the orofacial region to some bone modifying agents and other drugs was recognized, namely medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Purpose: The aim of this manuscript was to critically review published data on MRONJ to provide an update on key terminology, concepts, and current trends in terms of prevention and diagnosis. In addition, our objective was to examine and evaluate the therapeutic options available for MRONJ. Methods: The authors perused the most relevant literature relating to MRONJ through a search in textbooks and published articles included in several databases for the years 2003–2021. Results and conclusions: A comprehensive update of the current understanding of these matters was elaborated, addressing these topics and identifying relevant gaps of knowledge. This review describes our updated view of the previous thematic blocks, highlights our current clinical directions, and emphasizes controversial aspects and barriers that may lead to extending the accumulating body of evidence related to this severe treatment sequela.

Infection as an Important Factor in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ)

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has become a well-known side effect of antiresorptive, and antiangiogenic drugs commonly used in cancer management. Despite a considerable amount of literature addressing MRONJ, it is still widely accepted that the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ is unclear. However, several clinical and preclinical studies indicate that infection seems to have a major role in the pathogenesis of MRONJ. Although there is no conclusive evidence for the infection hypothesis yet, available data have shown a robust association between local infection and MRONJ development. This observation is very critical in order to implement policies to reduce the risk of MRONJ in patients under antiresorptive drugs. This critical review was conducted to collect the most reliable evidence regarding the link between local infection and MRONJ pathogenesis.

Do various imaging modalities provide potential early detection and diagnosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw? A review

OBJECTIVE

Patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) often visit their dentists at advanced stages and subsequently require treatments that greatly affect quality of life. Currently, no clear diagnostic criteria exist to assess MRONJ, and the definitive diagnosis solely relies on clinical bone exposure. This ambiguity leads to a diagnostic delay, complications, and unnecessary burden. This article aims to identify imaging modalities' usage and findings of MRONJ to provide possible approaches for early detection.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to review all diagnostic imaging modalities for MRONJ.

RESULTS

Panoramic radiography offers a fundamental understanding of the lesions. Imaging findings were comparable between non-exposed and exposed MRONJ, showing osteolysis, osteosclerosis, and thickened lamina dura. Mandibular cortex index Class II could be a potential early MRONJ indicator. While three-dimensional modalities, CT and CBCT, were able to show more features unique to MRONJ such as a solid type periosteal reaction, buccal predominance of cortical perforation, and bone-within-bone appearance. MRI signal intensities of vital bones are hypointense on T₁WI and hyperintense on T₂WI and STIR when necrotic bone shows hypointensity on all T₁WI, T₂WI, and STIR. Functional imaging is the most sensitive method but is usually performed in metastasis detection rather than being a diagnostic tool for early MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

Currently, MRONJ-specific imaging features cannot be firmly established. However, the current data are valuable as it may lead to a more efficient diagnostic procedure along with a more suitable selection of imaging modalities.

Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Review

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare, severe debilitating condition from unknown causes. It is characterized by nonhealing exposed bone in a patient with a history of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic agents in the absence of radiation exposure to the head and neck region. The first case of MRONJ was reported in the early 2000s. Diagnostic criteria for MRONJ was developed by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) based on pharmacological history as well as clinical and radiographic features. Antiresorptive medications such as bisphosphonate and denosumab are currently considered the treatment of choice in patients with osteoclastic bone disease. These reduce bone turnover and improve bone density, thereby improving bone quality. These agents have also been shown to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures due to their potent effect in suppressing osteoclastic activity by slowing the remodeling process and increasing bone density, thereby improving quality of life for most of the patients. Despite the great benefits of bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive medications, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) due to the effects of these medications in the presence of a local risk factor is a significant drawback. Moreover, antiangiogenic drugs play a major role in developing bone necrosis. They are prescribed in cancer cases to prevent metastasis through the blood and lymph nodes. These drugs interfere with the formation of new blood vessels, resulting in ischemia and eventually ONJ. This risk can be managed by evaluating the route and the duration of administration as such a risk can be considered dose-time dependent. As a preventive measure, dental screening before initiating any type of ONJ-related medications can significantly lower the risk of ONJ. Treatment goals can be achieved through pain and infection control, in addition to the management of bone necrosis and resorption. The aim of this review is to identify all causative agents and summarize the preventive measures, diagnostic criteria, and treatment strategies related to MRONJ.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws: Two Center Retrospective Cohort Studies

This retrospective cohort study aims to describe characteristics of patients with MRONJ, to identify factors associated with MRONJ development, and to examine variables associated with favourable outcome. Totally 32 patients were followed and observed: 21 females and 11 males, in the age range 35-84 in the period from 2009 to 2018. Clinical, radiological examination (Orthopantomograph and CBCT) and biopsy were performed in order to achieve diagnosis. Demographic and clinical variables were taken into consideration: sex, age, primary disease, medication type, mode of delivery, anatomic location, drug treatment duration, timing of tooth extraction, chemotherapy, presence of bone metastasis, aetiology of MRONJ, disease stage, and treatment modality. MRONJ developed under osteoporosis and malignant disease in 11 and 21 patients, respectively. MRONJ development was triggered by tooth extraction or trauma in 30 out of 32 cases, whereas the two patients developed MRONJ spontaneously. Stages I, II, and III were confirmed in 5 (16%), 18 (58%), and 9 (28%) patients, respectively. Mandible was affected in 23 (72%) patients. MRONJ was treated in our department by conservative and surgical modality. In this study we found that 65% of all patients were classified in the cured/improvement group and 35% in the stable/progression group. The female gender, osteoporosis as primary disease, oral regime intake, shorter period on BPs, earlier stage of disease, and specific anatomic localisation (frontal and premolar maxilla) were factors associated with better response to therapy and favourable clinical outcome. Comprehensive treatment protocol and further randomized studies are necessary for further improvements.

Symposium: Imaging modalities for drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (1), role of imaging in drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An up-to-date review (secondary publication)

MRONJ/ARONJ is a serious adverse effect of medication, although the incidence of the disease is rare, and there are still controversial issues regarding the pathogenesis of MRONJ/ARONJ. Medications that can lead to MRONJ/ARONJ are commonly used to treat osteoporosis and to prevent bone fractures caused by bone metastasis of malignancies. The long-standing disease state of ONJ deteriorates the quality of life of affected patients. Early detection and prevention of the disease are key to alleviating pain and discomfort. To date, several imaging modalities have been introduced to depict the lesions. Imaging modalities, radiography, CT, MRI and nuclear medicine provide important information for managing this challenging disease.

Radiographic predictors of bone exposure in patients with stage 0 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the radiographic appearance of stage 0 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) and examine 5 radiographic parameters (trabecular sclerosis, cortical erosion, periosteal reaction, sequestration, and crater-like defect) as predictors of progression to bone exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-three patients with a history of antiresorptive therapy, no bone exposure, and nonspecific signs and symptoms were included. Intraoral photographs, panoramic and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images at initial visit, and follow-up intraoral photographs were reviewed. Three patients had dental disease (DD), 10 patients with stage 0 MRONJ did not progress to bone exposure (NBE), and 10 patients progressed to bone exposure (BE). Radiographic parameters were scored as absent (0), localized (1), or extensive (2), and their sum formed the composite radiographic index (CRI).

RESULTS

DD patients demonstrated minimal radiographic findings, and their CRI was significantly lower than that of NBE and BE patients. Additionally, BE patients demonstrated a higher radiographic index compared with NBE patients. Intriguingly, sequestration was observed in the initial CBCT of 9 (90%) of 10 BE patients, whereas 80% of NBE patients showed absence of sequestration at initial CBCT examination.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT imaging can aid in the differentiation of stage 0 MRONJ from dental disease. Radiographic sequestration at initial presentation can serve as a predictor of future bone exposure in patients with stage 0 MRONJ.