Marginal bone loss and resorption of second molars related to maxillary third molars in panoramic images compared with CBCT

The relationship of the position of mandibular third molar impaction with the development of dental and periodontal lesions in adjacent second molars

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different positions of Mandibular third molar impaction teeth on dental and periodontal lesions of mandibular second molars and correlate the lesion severity with patient age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assessed 212 CBCT images of patients who visited the department of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology of XX university between 2017 and 2021. Periodontal and dental lesion effects of impacted third molars on mandibular second molars were evaluated. While dental lesions were classified as mild, moderate, and severe, periodontal lesions were classified as mild in cases not exceeding 2/3 of the root, and severe in cases exceeding 2/3 of the root. Pearson's chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test were used for data analsis. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed for further analysis.

RESULTS

Periodontal lesions were frequently observed in the second molar adjacent to the third molar (157 teeth, 74.1%), dental lesions were observed in 10%. Among the third molar positions, the mesioangular position was associated with a high (88%) prevalence of periodontal lesions (p<0.001), followed by the horizontal position (71%). The periodontal lesion was more severe in cases 30-39 years old and over 40 years old than in cases under 20 years old and 21-24 years old. Distoangular, horizontal and vertical/inverse positions are less likely to increase the severity of the periodontal lesion than the mesioangular position. (OR = 0.02; p <0.001, OR = 0.28; p =0.008, OR = 0.14; p <0.001,respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The third molars are often impacted in the mesioangular position, and this position most increases the risk of periodontal infection in the second molars. Accurate diagnosis and evaluation can minimize complications, and CBCT is a reliable imaging technique in which the position of the third molars and their relationship with the 2nd molars can be evaluated.

Does cone beam CT change the treatment decision for maxillary second and third molars? A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether information from CBCT changes the treatment plan for maxillary second and third molars and to examine clinical and radiographic parameters with an impact on treatment decision.

METHODS

This prospective study included 260 maxillary third molars with superimposition onto the second molar in panoramic images (170 patients; mean age 28 years, range 16-63). An initial treatment plan was based on clinical findings and panoramic images. After CBCT, a final treatment plan was decided. Treatment was undertaken based on the final treatment plan. Through logistic regression analyses, impact of clinical and radiographic parameters on change in treatment plan, removal of the third molar vs no treatment, and removal of the second vs third molar were evaluated.

RESULTS

The treatment plan changed in 82 cases (32%). Sixteen cases (6%) changed from removal of the third molar to removal of the second molar. Regression analyses showed that severe resorption in the second molar was significantly related to a change in treatment plan. Removal of a third molar was decided in 180 cases and regression analyses identified that mesioangulation of the third molar, marginal bone loss, superficial resorption, and age were significantly related to removal of the third molar vs no treatment. Thirty second molars were removed, and regression analyses showed that severe resorption was significantly related to removal of the second molar instead of the third molar.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters such as resorption evaluated in CBCT can modify the treatment decision, resulting in removal of the second and/or the third molar.

Cone-beam computed tomography-based radiographic considerations in impacted lower third molars: Think outside the box

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the anatomic circle around the impacted lower third molar to show, document, and correlate essential findings that should be included in the routine radiographic assessment protocol as clinically meaningful factors in overall case evaluation and treatment planning.

Materials and Methods

Cone-beam computed tomographic images of impacted lower third molars were selected according to specific inclusion criteria. Impacted teeth were classified according to their position before assessment. The adjacent second molars were assessed for distal caries, distal bone loss, and root resorption. The fourth finding was the presence of a retromolar canal distal to the impaction. Communication with the dentist responsible for each case was done to determine whether these findings were detected or undetected by them before communication.

Results

Statistically significant correlations were found between impaction position, distal bone loss, and detected distal caries associated with the adjacent second molar. The greatest percentage of undetected findings was found in the evaluation of distal bone status, followed by missed detection of the retromolar canal.

Conclusion

The radiographic assessment protocol for impacted third molars should consider a step-by-step evaluation for second molars, and clinicians should be aware of the high prevalence of second molar affection in horizontal and mesioangular impactions. They also should search for the retromolar canal due to its associated clinical considerations.

Can the Position of the Impacted Third Molars Be an Early Risk Indicator of Pathological Conditions? A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

Objectives

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of pathologies associated with impacted third molars in relation to tooth position on cone-beam computed tomography images.

Material and Methods

In 348 cone-beam computed tomography images, the position of 640 impacted third molars (mesiodistal angulation, buccolingual inclination, impaction depth, and contact point localization) and the presence of pathologies (distal caries, external root resorption, marginal bone loss, and pathological follicular space) were evaluated. The data were analysed statistically with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results

Distal caries was mostly detected in relation to Class A (20.4%) and contact point at (12.5%) and above (10.5%) the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) (P = 0.000; P < 0.05). External root resorption and marginal bone loss were more common in mesioangular angulation (52.3% and 80.1%, respectively), Class C (53% and 73.8%, respectively), and contact point below the CEJ (53.2% and 73.3%, respectively) (P = 0.000; P < 0.05). Lingual inclination was identified as a new risk factor for associated pathologies (P < 0.05). Pathological follicular space was significantly more likely to occur in those with inverted angulation (100%) and absence of contact (31.5%) (P = 0.000 and P = 0.010, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Pathologies arising in second molars in relation to impacted third molars are significantly associated with the three-dimensional position of impacted third molars, and watchful monitoring or prophylactic removal of impacted third molars should be considered, taking into account the relevant risk parameters for the related pathologies.

Buccal rotation for wholly impacted maxillary third molar extraction

BACKGROUND

Extracting wholly impacted maxillary 3rd molars faces difficulty due to the narrow surgical field, adjacent teeth resistances and risk of oroantral communication. This study is designed to introduce and evaluate the applicability of a novel method-buccal rotation to extract maxillary 3rd molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cohort study, from October 1st 2020 to September 30th 2021, 72 wholly impacted maxillary 3rd molars were included. Based on the crowns with coronal 1/3, middle 1/3, apical 1/3 of the adjacent teeth roots, teeth were classified into position I, II, III. Based on the angles < 30°, ≥ 30°but < 60°, ≥ 60° to the adjacent teeth, teeth were classified into angulation A, B, C. Traditional method and novel method-buccal rotation were applied based on the surgical simulations. Surgical results were recorded. To analyze the data, Chi-square test was applied.

RESULTS

82.00% of teeth in position I and 50.00% in position II were designed to use traditional method, 83.33% in position III were using the novel method (p < 0.05). 81.25% of teeth in angulation A and 52.63% in angulation B were designed to use traditional method, 80.00% in angulation C were using the novel method (p < 0.05). Four cases got temporary complications.

CONCLUSION

Buccal rotation was applicable to extract the deep impacted maxillary third molars with large angles towards the adjacent teeth.

Pattern of Endodontic Lesions of Maxillary and Mandibular Posterior Teeth: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

The pattern of expansion of endodontic lesions in the jaws has been less commonly addressed in the literature. For this reason, the aim of this study is to assess the pattern of endodontic lesions of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This cross-sectional study was conducted on 317 endodontic lesions of posterior teeth on CBCT scans retrieved from a radiology center in Qazvin, Iran, from 2020 to 2022. Endodontic lesions were assessed on sagittal, coronal, and axial sections by an endodontist and dental student using the Romexis software. The largest lesion diameter was measured occluso-apically, mesiodistally, and buccolingually. Lesion size was analyzed based on age, gender, jaw, tooth type, and presence/absence of root filling by independent samples t-tests and a one-way Analysis Of Variannce (ANOVA). The largest diameter of lesions in the maxilla and mandible was recorded in the occluso-apical dimension followed by buccolingual and mesiodistal dimensions (p > 0.05). The pattern of lesions was the same in teeth with and without endodontic treatment, but it was significantly different in maxillary and mandibular endodontically treated teeth in the occluso-apical and buccolingual dimensions (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was noted with tooth type or jaw except for maxillary and mandibular first molar lesions, which were significantly different in the occluso-apical dimension (p < 0.05). Lesion size in all three dimensions was significantly greater in males than females (p < 0.05), and was the highest in the occluso-apical dimension in both genders. In the maxilla, the mean lesion size significantly decreased in the mesiodistal dimension with age (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the largest lesion diameter in the maxilla and mandible was found in the occluso-apical dimension, indicating the role of bone density in the pattern of lesions.

Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the use of cone beam CT (CBCT) changes the diagnosis of external root resorption (ERR) or marginal bone loss (MBL) involving a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar.

METHODS

A systematic search was applied in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest. Studies assessing the detection of ERR or MBL in a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar through CBCT and panoramic radiography (PAN) were included. Prevalence and agreement between PAN and CBCT on the detection of ERR and MBL were collected. The risk of bias was assessed using the MAStARI.

RESULTS

A total of 593 papers were identified, and after a 2-phase selection, 5 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Regarding ERR, its prevalence in PAN was reported from 5.31 to 19.5% and from 22.8 to 62.0% in CBCT. The percentage of agreement varied from 28.5 to 74.0%. The prevalence of MBL varied from 21.9 to 62.9% in PAN, while those values varied from 21.6 to 80% in CBCT images. The percentage of agreement between PAN and CBCT for the detection of MBL ranged from 66.0 to 85.0%. Four studies presented low risk of bias and one had moderate risk.

CONCLUSIONS

More ERR and MBL are assessed in CBCT compared to PAN. There is a considerable agreement between PAN and CBCT assessment of ERR and MBL, however, mostly related to the absence of the pathology rather its presence.

Risk factors for external root resorption of maxillary second molars associated with third molars

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of panoramic images compared to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging for maxillary third molar (M3)-associated external root resorption (ERR), and to identify the risk factors of ERR on panoramic images.

Materials and Methods

The study population was composed of all patients who underwent panoramic imaging at Dankook University Dental Hospital from May to October 2019. In total, 397 cases of maxillary M3s in 247 patients (147 men and 100 women) were included. The diagnostic accuracy of ERR in panoramic images compared to CBCT images was evaluated using the chi-square test. To identify risk factors for ERR, dental records and panoramic findings were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of ERR on panoramic images was 0.79 compared to CBCT images (P<0.05). Superimposition of M3s onto second molars (M2) was associated with an approximately 33 times higher risk of ERR than separated M3s (P<0.05). Impacted M3s showed a 5 times higher risk of ERR than erupted M3s (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ERR related to M3s is a common clinical condition, and superimposition of M3 onto M2 on panoramic images was the most important risk factor for ERR. It seemed that CBCT examinations for maxillary M3s might be indicated for ERR diagnosis especially if panoramic radiographs show superimposition of M3 onto M2. Impaction itself was also a risk factor, and it should be carefully examined.

Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography

Background

Deciding whether or not to extract third molars remains a controversial situation in dental practice. Image exams support this decision by enabling a close view of the third molar, its adjacent bone and its relationship with the second molar. This study aimed to assess and compare second molar bone loss adjacent to impacted mandibular third molar in panoramic radiographs (PAN) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Material and Methods

A sample of 70 patients was selected (n=124 teeth). Each patient had a set of a panoramic radiograph and CBCT scans consecutively taken for dental treatment purposes. In PAN and CBCT, mandibular third molars were classified based on their position and bone loss of the adjacent second molar. Agreement between PAN and CBCT scans was assessed and quantified.

Results

Outcomes of bone loss assessment were different between PAN and CBCT scans (p<0.05). Bone loss was found in 62.9% of the PAN, while in CBCT scans it was found in 80%. In particular, nearly 29% (n=27) of the teeth that were classified without bone loss in PAN were classified with bone loss in CBCT scans. Mesioangular and horizontal third molars had a statistically significant association with bone loss of the adjacent second molars (p<0.05). In general, PAN underestimated the severity of bone loss compared to CBCT scans (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Diagnosing second molar bone loss due to impaction of adjacent third molar in PAN may be challenging because of false negatives. Impacted third molars justify preoperative CBCT scans if second molar bone loss needs to be precisely assessed for a more detailed and reliable treatment plan.

Key words:Bone, CBCT, panoramic radiograph, third molar.

Impact of CBCT on treatment decision related to surgical removal of impacted maxillary third molars: does CBCT change the surgical approach?

OBJECTIVES

To assess factors influencing treatment decision for maxillary third molars referred for cone beam CT (CBCT). Parameters influencing the decision to treat and to remove either the maxillary second molar or third molar were pursued.

METHODS

111 impacted maxillary third molars, clinically examined including a panoramic image, in 86 patients (mean age 26 years, range 15-55) were referred for CBCT on suspicion of pathology/root resorption in the second molar, based on information in the panoramic image. The following parameters were assessed from the patient's file, including the radiographic images: (1) third molar angulation; (2) initial treatment plan based on clinical examination and the panoramic image; (3) diagnoses based on information from CBCT; (4) treatment decision after additional CBCT information was available; (5) pre-/post-operative complications; (6) treatment of the maxillary second molar.

RESULTS

70 cases (63.1%) underwent treatment, while 41 (36.9%) received no treatment. Change in treatment plan was registered in 65 cases (58.6%) after CBCT. In 12 cases (10.8%), treatment changed from removal of the third to removal of the second molar, while 25 (22.5%) were scheduled for removal in the initial treatment plan; but after CBCT, the decision was not to treat. If external root resorption involved the pulp of the second molar, there was an almost 17 times higher risk that this tooth was removed instead of the third molar (logistic regression analysis: odds ratio 16.8; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings in CBCT often changed the treatment plan. Severe external root resorption observed in CBCT was the main decisive factor for removing the second instead of the third molar.