Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles

Influence of CBCT-derived panoramic curve variability in the measurements for dental implant planning

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the curve markings performed prior to panoramic and cross-sectional reconstructions can influence the planning of oral implants.

METHODS

Twenty oral radiologists landmarked the reference panoramic curves in 25 CBCT scans of the mandible. Bone height was measured on the resulting cross-sectional slices in the edentulous region of the lower first molar. The following data were recorded: (1) number of landmarks used to build each reference curve; (2) shape of the reference curve (inverted "U", inverted "V" or "horseshoe"); and (3) measurement in the first molar region. The data were assessed for variability based on the number of landmarks, the shape of the reference curve, and the measurements obtained.

RESULTS

The number of landmarks used to guide the panoramic reconstruction varied among radiologists (p < 0.05), but most of them draw curves in inverted "U" shape (68-100%). The reproducibility of the measurements taken in the edentulous mandibular first molar region was excellent (84.7%). The number of landmarks and the shape of the curve did not have a significant influence on the reproducibility of the measurements (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Variations of the operator-dependent steps during the panoramic reconstructions occur but do not play a significant part changing the measurements taken for oral implant planning.

The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis

Objective: Investigating the biomechanical effects of mandibular flexure (MF) on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations in edentulous jaws of different facial types.

Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models were established to analyze mandibular displacement and stress distribution of implant-supported fixed restorations (four or six implants, different implant numbers and sites, and the design of the superstructure across the dental arch in one or two or three pieces, under the loading conditions of maximum opening or right unilateral molar occlusion) in mandibular edentulous patients of three different facial types (brachyfacial, mesofacial, and dolichofacial types).

Results: The brachyfacial type presented higher mandibular flexure and stress in the overall restorative system, followed by the mesofacial and dolichofacial types. During jaw opening and occlusal movements, the one-piece framework showed the lowest bone stress values surrounding the anterior implants and gradually increased to the distal position, and the three-piece framework showed the highest stress values for peri-implant bones. Also, the split framework could greatly increase the stress on abutments and frameworks. Moreover, fixed implant prostheses with cantilevers can generate high amounts of biomechanical stress and strain on implants and surrounding bones. The bone surrounding the anterior implant increased in stress values as the most distal implants were more distally located regardless of frameworks. The zirconia framework demonstrated higher stresses than the titanium framework.

Conclusion: The design of edentulous fixed implant-supported restorations can be optimized for facial types. For patients of the brachyfacial type or with high masticatory muscle strength, the non-segmented framework without a cantilever provides an optimal biomechanical environment.

Influence of the palatal plane cant and skeletal patterns in the hard palate thickness?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the thickness of the hard palate at the different angles formed by the palatal plane and the Frankfort horizontal line using computed tomography in patients with different facial patterns for planning the installation of MARPE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The measurements were analysed in the hard palate of 106 patients. Four regions were selected passing through the mesial face, tangent at the level of the cemento-enamel junction of the premolars and molars. The bone thickness was measured from the floor of the nasal cavity to the cortical bone of the hard palate, 02 measurements with a distance of 05 mm between them (2.5 mm on each side starting from the midsagittal line) and 2 more with a distance of 7 mm between measurements (3.5 mm on each side starting from the midsagittal line). The palatal plane cant was determined based on the palatal plane and the Frankfort horizontal plane. The sagittal skeletal pattern was determined based on the ANB angle and the vertical skeletal pattern based on the SN.Go.Gn angle.

RESULTS

Palatal bone thickness was greater in males than in females. Regarding the sagittal skeletal pattern, patients with Class II were found to have a thinner hard palate than Class I and Class III patients. No difference in the vertical skeletal pattern was observed between groups. Regarding the palatal plane cant, bone thickness was greater in patients with clockwise rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful planning should be considered in the case of female patients; patients with greater angles of the palatal plane cant and Class II patients have a smaller bone thickness.

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of modified alveolar cleft bone graft with cone-beam CT digital imaging in children

BACKGROUND

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used to observe the bone density and bone height in children with modified alveolar bone graft (ABG) at different times after operation. In this study, the changes of labial-palatal bone mass in the stable period of bone union and in the bone graft area were investigated to provide reference for subsequent treatment.

METHODS

A total of 140 pediatric patients with unilateral complete alveolar cleft were selected and routinely underwent iliac bone grafting. The original data obtained by ProMax 3D (Planmeca) examination were stored in DICOM format at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and the images were reconstructed by Simplant software (Dentsply Sirona). The bone density of the healthy side was measured at 3 months and 6 months, and the results were expressed as Hounsfield units (HU). The labial and palatal bone height at the bone graft site at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was classified according to the modified Bergland classification method, and was compared with panoramic film classification.

RESULTS

Mean bone density at 3 months after surgery (385.4800±78.39770 HU) was not significantly different from that at 6 months (356.1875±73.67164 HU; P>0.05). There were significant differences between the classification of lip and palatal bone height 3 months after operation and that of the classification of panorama film in the same month (P<0.05); between the classification of lip and palatal bone height 6 months after surgery compared with that of panorama film of the same month (P<0.05); and between the classification of bone height degree in labial, palatal, and panoramic slices at 3 months after operation and that at 6 months after operation (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The labial and palatal classification is different, and the bone height classification 6 months after surgery is lower than that 3 months after surgery, indicating the persistence of bone resorption. CBCT can objectively evaluate the bone quality in the bone graft area, which has clinical application value for surgical evaluation value and posttreatment guidance.

Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior and Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Immediate dental implant placement has been a subject of great interest over the last decade. Here, information regarding the anatomy and bone thickness of the jaw prior to dental implant placement is crucial to increase the surgery's success and the patient's safety. The clinical premises for this approach have been controversially discussed. One of those heavily discussed premises is a buccal bone thickness of at least 1 mm thickness. This meta-analysis aims to systematically review buccal bone thickness (BBT) in healthy patients. Thus, the feasibility of immediate dental implant placement in daily practice can be assessed. (2) Methods: A search in the electronic databases was performed to identify articles reporting on BBT that was measured by computed tomography in adults. (3) Results: We were able to find 45 studies, including 4324 patients with 25,452 analyzed teeth. The analysis showed a BBT at the alveolar crest of 0.76 ± 0.49 mm in the maxillary frontal and of 1.42 ± 0.74 mm in the maxillary posterior region. In the mandible, the average measured values were similar to those in the maxilla (front: 0.95 ± 0.58 mm; posterior: 1.20 ± 0.96 mm). In the maxillary frontal region 74.4% and in the mandibular frontal region 61.2% of the crestal buccal bones showed widths <1 mm. (4) Conclusions: In more than 60% of the cases, the BBT at the alveolar crest is <1 mm in maxillary and mandibular frontal regions. This anatomic data supports careful pre-surgical assessment, planning of a buccal graft, and critical selection of indication for immediate implant placement, especially in the maxillary and mandibular frontal and premolar region.

The influence of facial types on the morphology and location of the greater palatine foramen: a CBCT study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the morphology and location of the great palatine foramen (GPF) of different facial types using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

METHODS

Sixty CBCT scans were divided into: brachyfacial (n = 20), dolichofacial (n = 20) and mesofacial (n = 20) using Ricketts' VERT index for the determination of cephalometric facial type and imported into ImageJ software. GPF shape was characterized as: round, elongated in the anteroposterior direction (EAP), or elongated in the latero-medial direction (ELM). The distances between the GPF and the palatine suture (PS), the center of the GPF and the center incisive foramen (IF), the GPF and the palatine alveolar ridge (PAR), right side GPF (GPFr) and left side (GPFl) GPFs; and the angles formed from the intersection of the GPF, IF and PS were assessed. The position of the GPF was evaluated in relation to the molars.

RESULTS

GPFr and GPFl mean distances from PAR presented higher values for dolichofacial patients (p < 0.05). GPFr and GPFl location distally to the third molar (3 M) was higher for brachyfacial type, while their location distally to the second molar was higher for mesofacial and between the mesial and distal surfaces of the 3 M for dolichofacial (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GPF was more distant from the PAR in the dolichofacial-type group. The location of the GPF in relation to the molars varied according to the facial type. However, the morphology of the GPF was similar in the three facial types, and the elongated in the anteroposterior direction morphology was more frequent.

Comparison of distance of upper central incisor root and incisive canal in different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and sex: A retrospective CBCT study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the influence of sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns (skeletal classes and facial profiles), and sex on the distance between upper central incisors roots and incisive canal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography exams of 172 patients were classified into skeletal classes I, II, and III and according to the facial profile into mesofacial, brachyfacial, and dolichofacial. In sagittal reconstructions, linear measurements were done between central incisors roots and incisive canal at three levels: incisive foramen opening, intermediate region, and the region close to the apex of upper central incisors. In axial reconstructions, measurements of incisive canal width and distance between the roots were obtained. Analysis of Variance (three-way ANOVA) was used to evaluate measurement differences in relation to skeletal classes, facial profiles, and sex.

RESULTS

The distance between upper central incisors roots and incisive canal anterior region was little influenced by sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and sex. Men had significantly greater incisive canal (mean=2.85mm; SD=1.18) width compared to women (mean=2.40mm; SD=1.04), regardless of skeletal class and facial profile (P<0.05). In general, inter-root distance between medial points of central incisors roots and incisive canal opening was greater in the region close to upper central incisors apex (mean=3.84mm; SD=1.44) than in incisive foramen opening (2.44mm; SD=1.04), (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The distance between upper central incisors roots and incisive canal is little influenced by sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns and sex.