Unexplained hyperkalemia: The tip of the iceberg

Clinical Thresholds for Pseudohyperkalemia and Pseudonormokalemia in Patients with Thrombocytosis

BACKGROUND

The lysis of platelets during in vitro coagulation leads to increased potassium concentrations.We aimed to establish the cut-off value for platelet count interfering serum potassium and to estimate the percentage of cases of pseudohyperkalemia and pseudonormokalemia in our hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individuals diagnosed with essential thrombocytosis (2010-2019) based on the WHO criteria for the classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia were considered.The cut-off value for the interference of platelet count on serum potassium results was calculated using the reference change value. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a ROC-curve, and the size of the effect by the Cohen's d.The clinical impact of both phenomena was assessed by reviewing the medical records of individuals classified as such, and also looking for potential cases in 2019 on the laboratory information system.

RESULTS

Fifty-four individuals with essential thrombocytosis were included. Potassium concentration correlated with platelet count (P-value<0.001; Spearman's ρ =0.394) in serum. The cut-off value of platelet count interfering potassium was 598x10³/μL [CI95%: 533-662x10³/μL], with an associated sensitivity and specificity of 0.67 [CI95%:0.52-0.80] and 0.58 [CI95%:0.42-0.72] respectively.The medical records of patients classified as pseudohyperkalemia or pseudonormokalemia did not include any medical action for the modification of potassium levels. In 2019, up to 0.14% of the total serum potassium determinations were susceptible to be pseudohyperkalemia or pseudonormokalemia.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a cut-off value for platelet count interfering serum potassium concentrations, and brings to light not only pseudohyperkalemia-related issues, but also the pseudonormokalemia phenomenon, which usually goes unnoticed.

Electrolytes disturbances in cancer patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypernatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcaemia, hyperkalaemia and hypermagnesemia are electrolytes disturbances that can arise in cancer patients in relation to unique causes that are related to the cancer itself or its treatment and can lead to delay or interruption of cancer therapy. This article summarizes these main causes, the proposed pathophysiology and the recommended management for these disturbances.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been many cancer drugs approved in the field of oncology over the past several years and a subset of these drugs have been associated with electrolytes disturbances. This includes, for example, immune checkpoint inhibitor related hyperkalemia, fibroblast growth factor 23 inhibitor associated hyperphosphatemia and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor associated hypomagnesemia and hypocalcaemia.

SUMMARY

This article provides an updated review of certain electrolytes disturbance in cancer patients and allows clinicians to have a greater awareness and knowledge of these electrolyte abnormalities in efforts to early recognition and timely management.

Pseudohyperkalemia and the Need for Imperative Caution With the Newly Introduced Potent Potassium Binders: Two Cases

Pseudohyperkalemia was first reported in 1955 by Hartmann and Mellinkoff, as a marked elevation of serum potassium in the absence of clinical evidence of electrolyte imbalance - simultaneous serum potassium exceeds plasma potassium by >0.4 mmol/L. We describe two patients with pseudohyperkalemia who inadvertently received inappropriate potassium binder therapy for weeks to months before the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia was entertained and subsequently confirmed. Potassium binders ultimately were promptly discontinued once the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia was confirmed. Physicians’ attention must be drawn to the availability of the new potent oral potassium binders, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. We strongly advocate for imperative caution with these new binders. Iatrogenic life-threatening hypokalemia remains a real concern and must be avoided. Our patients highlighted the importance of caution in the use of the newer potent potassium binders to mitigate against the causation of iatrogenic hypokalemia. Also as important is the observation that in the same patient, with changing clinical scenarios, a patient might exhibit true hyperkalemia that alternated with pseudohyperkalemia, the first of such a report.

Pseudohyperkalemia caused by essential thrombocythemia in a patient with chronic renal failure: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia is one of the most common complications of chronic renal failure. Pseudohyperkalemia is caused by elevated levels of serum potassium in vitro and is usually accompanied by thrombocythemia. Although an elevated level of potassium is typically correlated with impaired renal function, pseudo-hyperkalemia has been rarely reported in patients with chronic renal failure. Here, we conducted a review of the literature to study the case of pseudo-hyperkalemia caused by the essential thrombocythemia in a patient with chronic renal failure.

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with complaints of palpitation, dyspnea, and acratia for 2 d and a history of essential throm-bocythemia for 1 year. The routine blood test showed platelet count of 1460 × 10⁹/L, and biochemistry tests showed that the patient suffered from hyperkalemia (potassium: 7.50 mmol/L) and renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 8.88 mL/min). Initial treatment included medicines to lower her potassium-levels and hemodialysis. However, the therapy did not affect her serum potassium levels. Plasma potassium concentration measurements and a history of essential thrombocythemia established the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia. The treatments of the platelet disorder gradually normalized serum potassium levels; however, the treatments had to be discontinued later due to the severe leukopenia, and enhanced levels of serum potassium concentrations were observable in the patient. Since plasma sampling was not permitted, doctors had to use a diuretic just in case. Finally, the patient collapsed into unconsciousness and died due to multiple organ dysfunction and electrolyte disturbance.

CONCLUSION

We reviewed the literature and suggest that serum and plasma potassium values should both be measured for patients whose platelet counts exceed 500 × 10⁹/L to eliminate chances of pseudohyperkalemia, especially for those with chronic renal failure. An inappropriate treatment for pseudohyperkalemia can aggravate a patient's condition.