Febrile Neutropenia in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with the Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Nivolumab

Case report: A rare case of anti-PD-1 sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis/severe neutropenia in non-small cell lung cancer and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer and are widely used in the era of immunotherapy. However, ICIs can cause adverse reactions. Hematological toxicities induced by immunotherapy are relatively rare. Agranulocytosis, a rare hematologic adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has received limited attention in terms of treatment and patient demographics. Herein, we report the case of a 68-year-old male with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) who received two cycles of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab immunotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy and one cycle of sintilimab monotherapy. He was diagnosed with grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis (with symptoms of fever and chills) after the first two cycles of treatment. Teicoplanin was promptly initiated as antimicrobial therapy. The patient presented with sudden high fever and developed agranulocytosis on the day of the third cycle of treatment initiation, characterized by an absolute neutrophil count of 0.0×109/L. The patient was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor but did not show improvement. He was then treated with corticosteroids, and absolute neutrophil counts gradually returned to normal levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis in a patient with NSCLC. Sintilimab-induced severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis is a rare side effect that should be distinguished from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treated promptly with appropriate therapies; otherwise, the condition may worsen.

G-CSF improving combined whole brain radiotherapy and immunotherapy prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic advantage of G-CSF to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 117 patients (37 in G-CSF group and 80 in no G-CSF group) who underwent first-line WBRT combined with immunotherapy were enrolled. Their survival, intracranial response, BM-related symptoms and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) of patients in G-CSF group was significantly improved compared to patients no G-CSF group (median time: 14.8 vs 10.2 months; HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97, p = 0.035). However, there were no significant differences in intracranial responses between the two groups (p > 0.05). The G-CSF group exhibited a significantly higher rate of relief from BM-related symptoms compared to the no G-CSF group (91.7 % vs 59.5 %, p = 0.037). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated that after-treatment ALC > 0.9 × 10^9/L (HR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.046) and Hb > 110 g/dL (HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.71, p = 0.001) were significant potential factors associated with extended OS. The addition of G-CSF was well tolerated and effectively reduced the incidence of neutropenia (0 % vs 5.0 %, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Integrating G-CSF with WBRT and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for NSCLC-BMs has exhibited significant efficacy and favorable tolerability.

Exploring Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case of Febrile Neutropenia in a Melanoma Patient Receiving Immunotherapy

Introduction

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has opened a new chapter in cancer treatment. Nevertheless, their use may result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with multifactorial determinants, complex mechanisms, and varying clinical implications. In specific cancer types, like melanoma, irAEs exhibit a complex relationship with patient outcomes.

Case Presentation

We present a case of febrile neutropenia following ICI therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma, underscoring the intricate clinical landscape associated with irAEs in the context of cancer immunotherapy. More specifically, a 68-year-old man was diagnosed with metastatic malignant melanoma and administered a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. However, after a single dose, the patient was hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. The patient eventually recovered, but a diagnosis of myelosuppression related to prior immunotherapy led to treatment discontinuation. Subsequently, the patient transitioned to a second-line therapy.

Conclusion

This case contributes to our comprehension of rare yet potentially severe hematological irAEs and their influence on immunotherapy outcomes. Such insights will guide future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the field of immunotherapy.

Isolated Neutropenia Due to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

In this article, we explore the correlation between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and neutropenia. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment and management by maximizing the innate abilities of the immune system. However, this therapeutic potential is accompanied by a range of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), including neutropenia, which is a rare but potentially life-threatening side effect of this mode of cancer treatment. Through an in-depth analysis of various case reports, we have compiled a detailed table summarizing the occurrences of neutropenia associated with different ICIs, the grades of neutropenia, treatments used, and patient outcomes. Management of neutropenia must include an approach based on early diagnosis of the condition and a treatment based on its severity. This review discusses different therapeutic interventions, ranging from the administration of corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and, in very severe cases, a stem cell transplant. We have also enlisted salient side effects caused by these interventions. Our findings emphasize that while neutropenia is a relatively rare adverse effect of ICIs, its severity necessitates increased awareness among healthcare professionals. As ICIs continue to be seen as an integral component of cancer therapy, a comprehensive understanding of neutropenia as a side effect and its management is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. A crucial purpose of this review is to highlight the need to achieve a balance between acquiring the therapeutic benefits of various treatment strategies for irAEs and considering their potential side effects, especially with the use of steroids. Achieving this equilibrium is very important in optimizing patient care during immunotherapy, as these irAE management options can both mitigate the neutropenia triggered by ICIs and potentially give rise to secondary complications. Therefore, a careful assessment of the risks and benefits associated with each treatment approach is essential in tailoring irAE management.

Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) for treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the recent advances

The immune system uses various immune checkpoint axes to adjust responses, support homeostasis, and deter self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Nevertheless, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) can use protective mechanisms to facilitate immune evasion, which leads to potentiated cancer survival and proliferation. In this light, many blocking anti-bodies have been developed to negatively regulate checkpoint molecules, in particular, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) / PD-ligand 1 (L1), and bypass these immune suppressive mechanisms. Meanwhile, anti-PD-1 anti-bodies such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and sintilimab have shown excellent competence in successfully inspiring immune responses versus NSCLC. Accordingly, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved nivolumab (alone or in combination with ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients. However, PD-1 blockade monotherapy remains inefficient in more than 60% of NSCLC patients, and many patients don't respond or acquire resistance to this modality. Also, toxicities related to anti-PD-1 anti-body have been progressively identified in clinical trials and oncology practice. Herein, we will outline the clinical benefits of PD-1 blockade therapy alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy) in NSCLC patients. Moreover, we will take a glimpse into the recently identified predictive biomarkers to determine patients most likely to suffer serious adverse events to decrease untoward toxicity risk and diminish treatment costs.

Temporary Severe Neutropenia during Administration of Atezolizumab: A Novel Case Report

Here, we describe a case of temporary severe neutropenia after atezolizumab monotherapy and its treatment course. Atezolizumab monotherapy was introduced as a 6th-line treatment for a man in his late 60s, who was diagnosed with stage Ⅳ lung adenocarcinoma. The first treatment cycle was administered during hospitalization, and the patient presented with a fever of 37.8°C on the first day. The fever resolved after the administration of acetaminophen and naproxen, and the white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and other white blood cell fractions were normal. However, grade 3 leukopenia and grade 4 neutropenia appeared at the beginning of the third cycle, and treatment was discontinued. After treatment, monocyte count in the leukocyte fraction increased from approximately 10% to 25.6%. Lenograstim 100 μg subcutaneous injection and oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily were started of onset of neutropenia, and he was hospitalized the next day. Laboratory findings upon admission showed a significant improvement to 5,300/µL for leukocytes and 3,376/µL for neutrophils. Lenograstim was discontinued, with no further decrease in the neutrophil count. Atezolizumab therapy was resumed, and there was no further reduction in leukocyte, neutrophil, or leukocyte fractions over about a 2-year period. Concomitant drugs were maintained during the atezolizumab treatment, suggesting that they did not induce neutropenia. In conclusion, we observed temporary severe neutropenia during atezolizumab monotherapy. Neutrophil recovery with cautious monitoring has enabled longer efficacy. We should consider temporary symptom occurrence in cases of haematological immune-related adverse events.

Successful Steroid Treatment of Pembrolizumab-induced Agranulocytosis that Developed after Splenectomy in a Patient with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Neutropenia, a rare immune-related adverse event, affects patients receiving treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We herein report a case of pembrolizumab-induced agranulocytosis. An 83-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced-stage lung carcinoma concomitant with splenomegaly complicated by hypersplenism, causing pancytopenia. To avoid the risk of bone marrow suppression due to cytotoxic chemotherapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy was chosen. However, the patient developed agranulocytosis despite the resolution of pancytopenia through splenectomy performed after the fourth pembrolizumab cycle. Neutrophil counts improved after steroid treatment but not after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment. This case demonstrated that neutropenia can sometimes develop abruptly after several ICI therapy cycles.

Management and Outcomes of Hematological Immune-related Adverse Events: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Data regarding clinical outcomes and management of hematological manifestations of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is limited to case reports, series, and a few retrospective reviews. We aimed to determine the rate of response of hematological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to immunosuppressive therapy. MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to the present day. Retrospective reports were included without language restrictions. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of response to immunosuppression. Eighty studies (14 case series and 66 individual case reports) were analyzed with a total of 135 patients with ICI-related hematological irAEs. Data analysis showed an average proportional response rate to immunosuppression among hematological irAE entities of 50% (range: 25%-70%). The heterogeneity index (I2) was 0% among reports within each entity. There is a wide spectrum of hematological manifestations to ICI therapy, and to date there is no large randomized-controlled trial data to evaluate the efficacy of treatment strategies for hematological irAEs. We found a variable overall response rate to immunosuppression therapy of around 50%, without statistically significant heterogeneity among different irAE types but significant differences among the different countries of publication. Future studies evaluating the optimal dose and duration of immunosuppressive agents for patients with hematological irAEs should be undertaken.