Clinical Outcomes of Tuberculosis in Recipients After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Prevention and management of tuberculosis in solid organ transplantation: A consensus statement of the transplantation society of Taiwan

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). Due to the use of immunosuppressants, the incidence of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has been consistently reported to be higher than that among the general population. TB frequently develops within the first year after transplantation when a high level of immunosuppression is maintained. Extrapulmonary TB and disseminated TB account for a substantial proportion of TB among solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment of TB among recipients is complicated by the drug-drug interactions between anti-TB drugs and immunosuppressants. TB is associated with an increased risk of graft rejection, graft failure and mortality. Detection and management of latent TB infection among solid organ transplant candidates and recipients have been recommended. However, strategy to mitigate the risk of TB among solid organ transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. To address the challenges of TB among solid organ transplant recipients, a working group of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan was established. The working group searched literatures on TB among solid organ transplant recipients as well as guidelines and recommendations, and proposed interventions to strengthen TB prevention and care among solid organ transplant recipients.

Impact of Sirolimus versus Mycophenolate Mofetil on Kidney Function after Calcineurin Inhibitor Dose Reduction in Liver Transplant Recipients

Impaired kidney function is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although immunosuppressants are essential in these patients, they impair kidney function. This study aimed to compare adverse kidney outcomes between patients treated with a reduced dose of tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitor) plus sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the liver transplant center at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between April 2011 and December 2017. Propensity score matching was used to identify 232 patients. The risk of adverse kidney outcomes was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression, and changes in kidney function over time were analyzed using linear mixed modeling. Acute kidney disease risks in this study cohort were not significantly different for the two immunosuppressants (aHR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.70-1.55, p = 0.8328). However, sirolimus use was significantly associated with a higher risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline > 30% than MMF (aHR, 2.09; 95% CI: 1.33-3.28; p = 0.0014). Our results demonstrate that sirolimus use may have worsened long-term kidney outcomes compared to MMF. Close monitoring of kidney function, dose adjustment, and timely transition to MMF is necessary for LT patients receiving sirolimus.

Sotorasib associated with tacrolimus and everolimus: A significant drug interaction in lung transplant patients

The management of immunosuppressors in solid organ transplantation requires pharmacological therapeutic monitoring with regular adaptation of the dosage to the residual level. An obvious cause of these fluctuations is drug interactions, particularly for mTOR inhibitors and anti-calcineurin drugs, which are highly metabolized by cytochromes P450. A 72-year-old lung transplanted man, treated by tacrolimus and everolimus in the long term, had his residual immunosuppressor levels unbalanced by the introduction of sotorasib, which is used for metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. This imbalance is explained by the fact that sotorasib is an inducer of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor of PGP, but the strength of the interaction has never been studied. This will have required a threefold increase in dosages and weekly monitoring before satisfactory residual levels were achieved.

Review article: latent tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases receiving immunosuppression-risks, screening, diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

One quarter of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Systemic immunosuppression is a risk factor for LTBI reactivation and the development of active tuberculosis. Such reactivation carries a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the increasing global incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the use of immune-based therapies, current guidelines on the testing and treatment of LTBI in patients with IBD are haphazard with a paucity of evidence.

AIM

To review the screening, diagnostic practices and medical management of LTBI in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Published literature was reviewed, and recommendations for testing and treatment were synthesised by experts in both infectious diseases and IBD.

RESULTS

Screening for LTBI should be performed proactively and includes assessment of risk factors, an interferon-gamma releasing assay or tuberculin skin test and chest X-ray. LTBI treatment in patients with IBD is scenario-dependent, related to geographical endemicity, travel and other factors. Ideally, LTBI therapy should be used prior to immune suppression but can be applied concurrently where urgent IBD medical treatment is required. Management is best directed by a multidisciplinary team involving gastroenterologists, infectious diseases specialists and pharmacists. Ongoing surveillance is recommended during therapy. Newer LTBI therapies show promise, but medication interactions need to be considered. There are major gaps in evidence, particularly with specific newer therapeutic approaches to IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive screening for LTBI is essential in patients with IBD undergoing immune-suppressing therapy and several therapeutic strategies are available. Reporting of real-world experience is essential to refining current management recommendations.

The potential liver donor with tuberculosis: A fresh look at international recommendations based on a survey of practice in Indian liver transplant centres

Background The western recommendations for the use of organs from liver donors with tuberculosis (TB) come from an environment where the burden of disease is low and cadaveric organ donation rates are high-in complete contrast to the Indian scenario, where these recommendations may be too restrictive. Methods A questionnaire relating to current practice on the use of organs from liver donors with TB was sent to all liver transplant centres in India. Results Responses were obtained from 94% of centres. Two-thirds accepted organs from deceased donors with TB in the elective setting, especially for recipients with a high MELD (Model for end-stage liver disease) score. The proportion rose by 1.5 times in the setting of acute liver failure. Two-thirds advised anti-TB treatment (ATT) for corresponding recipients, and the remaining advised isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) prophylaxis. Untreated living donors with TB were not accepted. Half the respondents accepted living donors after completion of ATT, and did not treat recipients postoperatively. The remainder accepted them after 8 weeks of treatment and advised INH prophylaxis or ATT for recipients. Conclusions That this practice has not impacted recipient outcomes suggests that the guidelines for management of liver donors and recipients may need to be altered for populations endemic for TB.

Excellent Outcome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Treating Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a fatal condition, and liver transplantation (LT) is a vital option for these patients. However, the result of living donor LT (LDLT) for ACLF is not well investigated. This study investigated the outcomes of LDLT in patients with ACLF compared with patients without ACLF. This was a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control study. From July 2002 to March 2017, a total of 112 patients with ACLF who underwent LDLT were enrolled according to the consensus of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver. A total of 224 patients were selected for control comparison (non-ACLF) with demographic factors (sex, age, and body mass index) matched (1:2). Patients with ACLF were stratified into ACLF 1, 2, and 3 categories according to the number of organ failures based on the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Survival and surgical outcomes after LDLT were analyzed. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores in the ACLF group were significantly higher than those in the non-ACLF group (P < 0.001). The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the ACLF and non-ACLF groups were 97.3%, 95.5%, 92.9%, respectively, and 96.9%, 94.2%, and 91.1%, respectively (P = 0.58). There was more intraoperative blood loss in the ACLF group than in the non-ACLF group (P < 0.001). The other postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. A total of 20 patients (17.9%) in the ACLF group presented with 3 or more organ system dysfunctions (ACLF 3), and the 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were comparable with those of ACLF 1 and ACLF 2 (P = 0.25). In carefully selected patients, LDLT gives excellent outcomes in patients with ACLF regardless of the number of organs involved. Comprehensive perioperative care and timely transplantation play crucial roles in saving the lives of patients with ACLF.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis in solid organ transplant donors and recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to impaired immune response, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are susceptible to tuberculosis (TB) and its subsequent morbidity and mortality. Current prevention strategies, diagnostic and treatment approach to TB infection in donors and recipients were reviewed in this article.

RECENT FINDINGS

Screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in donors and recipients is the cornerstone of TB-preventive strategy in recipients and requires an assessment of TB risk factors, TB-specific immunity testing, and radiographic evaluation. Interferon-gamma release assay has superseded the tuberculin skin test in LTBI evaluation despite its recognized limitations. LTBI treatment should be offered to transplant candidates and living donors before transplantation and donation, respectively. Diagnosis of TB disease can be challenging because of nonspecific clinical presentation in the recipient and is limited by the sensitivity of current diagnostics. The approach to LTBI and TB disease treatment is similar to the general population, but can be challenging because of potential drug interactions and toxicities.

SUMMARY

The appropriate evaluation of donors and recipients for TB can mitigate posttransplant TB disease. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment parallels that of immunocompetent hosts. Future research evaluating existing and novel diagnostics and treatment in transplant recipients is needed.

Tuberculosis in Pediatric Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients

Children undergoing solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at high risk of morbidity and mortality from tuberculosis (TB) disease in the post-transplant period. Treatment of TB infection and disease in the post-transplant setting is complicated by immunosuppression and drug interactions. There are limited data that address the unique challenges for the management of TB in the pediatric transplant population. This review presents the current understanding of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention for pediatric transplant recipients with TB infection and disease. Further studies are needed to improve diagnosis of TB and optimize treatment outcomes for these patients.

Rifabutin for treating tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective observational study and literature review

BACKGROUND

The treatment of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is challenging owing to interactions between rifampin and immunosuppressive drugs. Rifabutin, a rifamycin with excellent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and that induces cytochrome p450 less, may facilitate treatment. We report our experience with rifabutin for treating TB in SOT recipients and review the available literature.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of all SOT recipients with TB between January 2000 and December 2019. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with and without rifabutin-containing regimens were compared and a literature review was conducted.

RESULTS

We included 31 SOT recipients with TB, among whom 22 (71%) were men and the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 50-20). There were no significant differences between patients treated with rifabutin (n = 12), rifampin (n = 14), and non-rifamycins (n = 5) in clinical cure rates (83.3%, 64.3%, and 100%, respectively; P = .21), side effects (25%, 37.5%, and 20%, respectively; P = .74), or mortality (16.7%, 35.7%, and 0%, respectively; P = .21). Only one patient, treated with rifampin, suffered graft rejection. The literature review identified 59 SOT recipients with TB treated with rifabutin-containing regimens from 8 publications. Overall, the clinical cure, graft rejection, and mortality rates were 93.2%, 5.1%, and 6.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifabutin-containing regimens offer a reliable alternative to rifampin when treating TB in SOT recipients.

Comparative analysis of the drug-drug interaction between immunosuppressants, safety and efficacy of rifabutin from rifampicin-based Anti-TB treatment in living donor liver transplant recipients with active tuberculosis

Background

The Interaction between anti-tuberculous and immunosuppressive drugs which may increase the risk of graft rejections is a major challenge in managing transplant recipients with tuberculosis (TB). Instead of rifampicin (RFM), most guidelines recommended the use of rifabutin (RFB) because of its reduced capacity to induce immunosuppressant metabolism while maintaining the same efficacy as RFM against TB. However, there has been no available data directly comparing the outcome of RFB from RFM-based anti-TB regimens in liver transplant patients with TB. This study aimed to compare the effects of RFB from RFM-based treatment in terms of the drug interaction with immunosuppressants, as well as the safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with active TB.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on all adult LDLT recipients diagnosed with active TB from June 1994 to May 2016 that had concurrently and continuously received either RFB or RFM-based treatment and immunosuppressants.

Results

Twenty-two patients were included. Twelve (55%) patients were in the RFM group. Ten (45%) patients were in the RFB group. RFB group showed a lesser rate of immunosuppressant trough level reduction (20% vs 50%, p = 0.009) during TB treatment. There was no TB recurrence and no significant change in platelet or leukocyte count in either group. Acute cellular rejection (ACR), rate of TB-treatment completion and overall survival, rates were excellent and statistically similar in both groups.

Conclusion

The use of RFB in LDLT recipients with active TB, had a lesser drug interaction than when RFM was used. However, RFB did not significantly reduced the rate of ACR. RFB and RFM are both effective and safe to use in LDLT recipients with active TB.

Risk factors of tuberculosis after liver transplant in a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious opportunistic infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to clarify the frequency and risk factors for tuberculosis in LT recipients.

METHODS

A total of 884 LT recipients were investigated retrospectively at China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. We performed a case-control study (1:2) to investigate the potential risk factors and disease onset of TB after LT.

RESULTS

Among the 884 LT recipients, 25 of TB cases (2.8%) were reported from 2009 to 2016. The overall incidence of TB was 744 cases per 100,000 patient-year, which was 18-fold higher than the general population in Taiwan. The median time to develop TB after liver transplant was 20 months. Of the TB cases, 15 were pulmonary TB and 10 were extra-pulmonary TB. Five cases of those extra-pulmonary TB occurred in the first post-transplant year. Overall five-year survival rate was 63.3%. Multivariate analyses identified apical fibrotic change in pre-transplant computed tomographic (CT) finding and the exposure to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors before TB event as independent risk factors for TB development (Odd ratio (OR) 10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73-67.49, p = 0.01; OR 3.847, 95% CI 0.80-18.51, P = 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TB incidence in LT recipients is high in this study. Among those post-transplant recipients with long-term immunosuppression, abnormal CT finding and exposure to mTOR inhibitors before liver transplant might be the risk factors for TB.