Risk Factors for Transplant Outcomes in Children and Adolescents with Non-Malignant Diseases Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Exploring strategies to optimise outcomes in hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia patients following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

This study aimed to assess haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) safety and efficacy while exploring strategies for optimising outcomes in patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia (HAAA). We retrospectively reviewed 35 HAAA patients who underwent HSCT at a large Chinese blood disease hospital between 2008 and 2022. HAAA patients receiving HSCT typically presented with severe (28.6%) and very severe (65.7%) AA. Male patients predominated (68.6%), with a median onset age of 23 years (range, 9-44). Haploidentical donor-HSCT and matched sibling donor-HSCT were in comparable proportions. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 74.0%, with cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 37.1% and 22.4%, respectively. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days, acute GVHD, and post-HSCT liver events (e.g., hepatic GVHD and a three-fold increase in aminotransferase or bilirubin) significantly worsened 5-year OS. In the multivariate models, recipients with sex-matched grafts had better OS, and those with younger male donors had a lower incidence of II-IV aGVHD. Higher HLA matching degree (HLA > = 7/10) was an independent prognostic factor associated with better OS and GFFS. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days was predictive of post-transplant liver events in HAAA patients. In conclusion, HSCT was a safe and effective treatment for HAAA. Early transplantation, careful donor selection and improving post-transplant liver events were crucial to optimise outcomes.

Treosulfan vs busulfan conditioning for allogeneic bmt in children with nonmalignant disease: a randomized phase 2 trial

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

Unresolved issues in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for non-malignant diseases

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative for a variety of non-malignant diseases (NMDs) as well as hematological malignancies. However, there are several fundamental differences between HCT for NMDs and hematological malignancies, which may necessitate the use of alternative HCT strategies. For example, these diseases differ in the intensity of conditioning regimen sufficient to improve disease. In addition, patients with NMDs are at higher risk of graft failure or mixed chimerism following HCT, and gain no or little survival benefit from graft-versus-host disease. Because more than 80% of patients with NMDs become long-term survivors, greater attention has been paid to late adverse effects and decreased of quality of life after HCT. This review addresses several unresolved issues in allogeneic HCT for patients with NMDs, such as (1) stem cell source, (2) conditioning regimen, (3) use of serotherapy or low-dose irradiation, and (4) therapeutic intervention for mixed chimerism. Resolving these issues may improve transplant outcomes in patients with NMDs.

Persistent Musculoskeletal Deficits in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a common therapy for pediatric hematologic malignancies. With improved supportive care, addressing treatment-related late effects is at the forefront of survivor long-term health and quality of life. We previously demonstrated that alloHSCT survivors had increased adiposity, decreased lean mass, and lower bone density and strength, 7 years (median) from alloHSCT compared to their healthy peers. Yet it is unknown whether these deficits persist. Our longitudinal study characterized changes in muscle and bone over a period of 3.4 (range, 2.0 to 4.9) years in 47 childhood alloHSCT survivors, age 5-26 years at baseline (34% female). Tibia cortical bone geometry and volumetric density and lower leg muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) were assessed via peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Anthropometric and pQCT measurements were converted to age, sex, and ancestry-specific standard deviation scores, adjusted for leg length. Muscle-specific force was assessed as strength relative to MCSA adjusted for leg length (strength Z-score). Measurements were compared to a healthy reference cohort (n = 921), age 5-30 years (52% female). At baseline and follow-up, alloHSCT survivors demonstrated lower height Z-scores, weight Z-scores, and leg length Z-scores compared to the healthy reference cohort. Deficits in MCSA, trabecular volumetric bone density, and cortical bone size and estimated strength (section modulus) were evident in survivors (all p < 0.05). Between the two study time points, anthropometric, muscle, and bone Z-scores did not change significantly in alloHSCT survivors. Approximately 15% and 17% of alloHSCT survivors had MCSA and section modulus Z-score < -2.0, at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Furthermore, those with a history of total body irradiation compared to those without demonstrated lower MCSA at follow-up. The persistent muscle and bone deficits in pediatric alloHSCT survivors support the need for strategies to improve bone and muscle health in this at-risk population. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Total nucleated cell dose in graft is a better prognostic factor for survival in pediatric patients transplanted with bone marrow compared to CD34+, CD3+, or total mononuclear cell count

BACKGROUND

Most studies investigating the impact of graft composition on transplant-related outcomes have focused on the effect of CD34+ cell dose and reported equivocal results. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of doses of total nucleated cells (TNCs), total mononuclear cells (TMCs), CD3+, and CD34+ cells on the outcome of children receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Children and adolescents who underwent allogeneic HSCT for malignant hemato-oncological diseases or nonmalignant diseases in Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation Center between 2010 and 2020 were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients receiving allogeneic HSCT (154 bone marrow transplantation; 58 peripheral blood stem cell transplantation) from matched related or unrelated donors were included in the study. Higher TNC doses associated with a superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 67.7% vs 44.7%) in the whole group (log-rank P = .027). Overall survival (OS) and EFS of bone marrow-transplanted patients differed significantly according to TNC doses (log-rank P = .041 and .027, respectively). Multivariant analysis for OS revealed a P value of .038 for TNC, Exp(B) = 1.939 (95% CI: [1.038, 3.621]). That for EFS revealed a P value of .025 for TNC, Exp(B) = 1.992 (95% CI: [1.088, 3.647]). There was no relationship between doses of CD34+ cells, CD3+ cells, TMC, TNC, and neutrophil or platelet engraftment.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that TNC dose is a better prognostic factor for pediatric allogeneic HSCT outcomes than doses of CD34+ cells, CD3+ cells, or TMC in patients transplanted with bone marrow. Future studies analyzing cell subsets and other components in TNC could elaborate the factor(s) accompanying this observed survival advantage.

The impact of donor total estimated blood volume on nucleated cell yield in bone marrow harvests for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nucleated cell yields of marrow harvests depend on factors related to donors, the procedure itself, and the volume of marrow harvested. Few attempts have been made to relate donor characteristics to harvest volume. We hypothesize that the percentage of total donor blood volume accessed for harvesting impacts the nucleated cell yield per ml of marrow collected.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We investigated 481 consecutive unrelated marrow harvests from a single center. Donor characteristics including weight, body mass index (BMI), white blood cells (WBCs), hemoglobin (Hgb), and platelet counts, as well as estimated total blood volume, were recorded and compared with nucleated cell yields and harvest volumes.

RESULTS

The percentage of donor blood volume accessed for marrow harvesting was inversely related to nucleated cell yields (r = -0.57). The donor-recipient weight differential impacted cell yields as well (r = 0.35), with heavier recipients requiring increased marrow volumes from smaller donors to satisfy their nucleated cell needs. 3.73 × 10⁸ /kg of recipient weight could be collected with 95% certainty when harvest volumes did not exceed 16.1% of donor total blood volume. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, 45.4% of cell yield variance was explained by blood volume percentage accessed for harvesting, donor weight, and WBC. Donor sex, BMI, and platelet counts did not contribute further to cell yield variance. Smokers had higher cell yields than nonsmokers (20.4 vs. 18.3 × 10⁶ /ml; 95% confidence interval 0.62, 3.47) independent of other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Establishing the relationship between percentage of estimated donor total blood volume and recipient cell needs can facilitate donor selection for successful hematopoietic cell (HPC) transplants.