Latent cytomegalovirus infection is an independent risk factor for late graft failure in renal transplant recipients

Mass cytometry reveals single-cell kinetics of cytotoxic lymphocyte evolution in CMV-infected renal transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with graft rejection in renal transplantation. Memory-like natural killer (NK) cells expressing NKG2C and lacking FcεRIγ are established during CMV infection. Additionally, CD8+ T cells expressing NKG2C have been observed in some CMV-seropositive patients. However, in vivo kinetics detailing the development and differentiation of these lymphocyte subsets during CMV infection remain limited. Here, we interrogated the in vivo kinetics of lymphocytes in CMV-infected renal transplant patients using longitudinal samples compared with those of nonviremic (NV) patients. Recipient CMV-seropositive (R+) patients had preexisting memory-like NK cells (NKG2C+CD57+FcεRIγ-) at baseline, which decreased in the periphery immediately after transplantation in both viremic and NV patients. We identified a subset of prememory-like NK cells (NKG2C+CD57+FcεRIγlow-dim) that increased during viremia in R+ viremic patients. These cells showed a higher cytotoxic profile than preexisting memory-like NK cells with transient up-regulation of FcεRIγ and Ki67 expression at the acute phase, with the subsequent accumulation of new memory-like NK cells at later phases of viremia. Furthermore, cytotoxic NKG2C+CD8+ T cells and γδ T cells significantly increased in viremic patients but not in NV patients. These three different cytotoxic cells combinatorially responded to viremia, showing a relatively early response in R+ viremic patients compared with recipient CMV-seronegative viremic patients. All viremic patients, except one, overcame viremia and did not experience graft rejection. These data provide insights into the in vivo dynamics and interplay of cytotoxic lymphocytes responding to CMV viremia, which are potentially linked with control of CMV viremia to prevent graft rejection.

Impact of cytomegalovirus infection on biliary disease after liver transplantation - maybe an essential factor

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in liver transplant (LT)_ recipients, and biliary complications occur in a large number of patients. It has been reported that CMV-DNA is more detectable in bile than in blood.

AIM

To investigate the effects of CMV infection on biliary complications by comparing the levels of CMV-DNA in the bile and blood of patients after LT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 57 patients who underwent LT, 10 of these patients had no biliary complications and 47 patients had biliary complications. We also compared the levels of CMV-DNA in patients’ bile and blood, which were sampled concurrently. We used RNAscope technology to identify CMV in paraffin-embedded liver sections.

RESULTS

CMV-DNA was not detected in bile samples and was detected in 2 blood samples from patients without biliary complications. In the 47 patients with biliary complications, CMV-DNA was detected in 22 bile samples and 8 blood samples, both bile and blood samples were positive for CMV-DNA in 6 patients. The identification rate of CMV-DNA in blood was 17.0%, and was 46.8% in bile. Moreover, tissue samples from 4 patients with biliary complications tested positive using RNAscope technology but were negative with hematoxylin and eosin staining. During the follow-up period, graft failure occurred in 13 patients with biliary complications, 8 of whom underwent retransplantation, and 3 died. CMV-DNA in bile was detected in 9 of 13 patients with graft failure.

CONCLUSION

In patients with biliary complications, the identification rate of CMV-DNA in bile was higher than that in blood. Blood CMV-DNA negative patients with biliary complications should still be monitored for CMV-related biliary tract diseases. Potential occult CMV infection may also be a contributing etiological factor in the development of graft failure.

A single-centre observational study comparing the impact of different cytomegalovirus prophylaxis strategies on cytomegalovirus infections in kidney transplant recipients

Background/objective:

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important component of post kidney transplant care. We aimed to evaluate the impact of two different CMV prophylaxis protocols on the epidemiology and outcomes of CMV infections at our centre.

Methods:

This is a single-centre retrospective before/after observational study. Kidney transplant recipients who received Protocol 1, a valacyclovir- or valganciclovir-based regimen prescribed for one to three months based on the CMV risk status between 2004 and 2008, were compared to those who received Protocol 2, a valganciclovir-based regimen prescribed for three months and six months for those at moderate and high risk, respectively, between 2010 and 2014. The impact of different prophylaxis regimens on the incidence of CMV infections, disease, recurrent infections and onset of CMV infection at 24 months were reviewed.

Results:

There were 192 patients included; 106 patients received Protocol 1, 86 received Protocol 2. At 24 months, the incidence of CMV infection was 53.8% and 55.8% in Protocols 1 and 2, respectively ( p=0.884). The incidence rates of CMV disease and recurrent CMV infections were higher in Protocol 1, but this was not statistically significant. The median time to first CMV infection was significantly shorter in patients who received Protocol 1: 132 days (interquartile range (IQR) 125–139 days) versus 185 days (IQR 178–192 days), p=0.001. Both prophylaxis protocols were well tolerated.

Conclusion:

The incidence of CMV infection was similar in both protocols. Where valganciclovir is not available, valacyclovir may be considered over no prophylaxis. Post-prophylaxis CMV infections are not uncommon, and vigilance for it should be advocated.

Low dose valganciclovir as cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in post-renal transplant recipients induced with alemtuzumab: A single-center study

OBJECTIVES

Alemtuzumab (Ale) is a recombinant monoclonal antibody which binds to CD52 causing profound lymphodepletion, thus allowing its use in renal transplantation induction therapy. However, patients may be at increased risk for opportunistic infections, such as Cytomegalovirus (CMV). We analyzed CMV infection in renal allograft recipients administered low-dose valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis with alemtuzumab induction and steroid minimization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 678 kidney transplant recipients were evaluated, with 606 included for analysis. Patients were excluded for receiving induction therapy other than Ale, or for lack of follow-up within 1 year. VGCV prophylaxis was stratified by recipient CMV risk status and low-dose (450 mg) VGCV was given 3 times a week to low and moderate risk patients and daily to high risk individuals. Subject records were examined for recipient demographics, donor and recipient CMV serostatus, CMV viremia, and invasive infection.

RESULTS

Of the 606 recipients, 154 were defined as low risk for CMV infection (donor and recipient both negative, or D-/R-), 236 as moderate risk without mismatch (D+/R+), 122 as moderate risk with mismatch (D-/R+), and 94 as high risk (D+/R-). Twenty-nine (29) individuals (4.8%) tested positive by PCR for CMV viremia and 10 (1.7%) patients developed invasive CMV disease, including colitis (n = 4), esophagitis (n = 1), enteritis (n = 1), nephritis (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 3). High risk recipients (D+/R-) accounted for the majority of invasive CMV disease (n = 5), followed by moderate risk (n = 4). CMV viremia was also more common in high risk and moderate risk (D+/R+) individuals. Overall rejection rate for our study population was 27%.

CONCLUSION

In this institution's experience, CMV incidence was reduced compared to historically reported data by using low-dose (450 mg) VGCV prophylaxis in combination with Ale induction and steroid minimization. However, overall rejection rate was significantly higher in our population, possibly influenced by the degree of steroid minimization.

NK cell and Th17 responses are differentially induced in murine cytomegalovirus infected renal allografts and vary according to recipient virus dose and strain

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) donor positive (D+) serostatus with acute rejection is associated with renal allograft loss, but the impact of recipient positive (R+) serostatus is unclear. In an allogeneic renal transplant model, antiviral natural killer (NK) and CD8+ T cell memory responses in murine CMV (MCMV) D+/R+ transplants were compared to D-/R- and D+/R- transplants, with recipient infection varied by MCMV dose and strain. D+/R- transplants had high primary antiviral cytolytic (interferon-γ+) and cytotoxic (granzyme B+) NK responses, whereas NK memory responses were lower in D+/R+ recipients receiving a high primary MCMV dose. Despite MCMV immunity, D+/R+ recipients receiving a low MCMV dose showed primary-like high cytolytic and cytotoxic NK responses. D+/R+ transplants infected with different D/R strains had low cytolytic NK responses but high cytotoxic NK responses. NK memory also induced a novel TNF-α+ NK response among high-dose virus recipients. MCMV+ transplants had greater Th17 responses than MCMV-uninfected transplants and Th17 inhibition ameliorated graft injury. All MCMV+ recipients had similar CD8+ T cell responses. In sum, NK and Th17 responses, but not CD8+ T cells, varied according to conditions of primary recipient infection. This variability could contribute to variable graft outcomes in HCMV D+/R+ renal transplantation.

Human Cytomegalovirus-Encoded Receptor US28 Is Expressed in Renal Allografts and Facilitates Viral Spreading In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) activation is associated with decreased renal graft function and survival. Human cytomegalovirus encodes several immune modulatory proteins, including the G protein-coupled receptor US28, which scavenges human chemokines and modulates intracellular signaling.

METHODS

Our aim was to identify the expression and localization of US28 in renal allograft biopsies by immunohistochemistry and determine its role in viral spreading in vitro.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry revealed US28 in 31 of 34 renal transplant biopsies from HCMV-seropositive donors. Expression was independent of HCMV viremia or IgG serostatus. US28 was predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and tubular epithelial cells, with a median positivity of 20% and 40%, respectively. Also, US28-positive cells were present within arterial neointima. In contrast to US28, HCMV-encoded immediate early antigen was detected in less than 5% of VSMCs, tubular epithelial cells, interstitial endothelium, interstitial inflammatory infiltrates, and glomerular cells.Primary VSMCs were infected with green fluorescent protein-tagged wild type or US28-deficient HCMV. The viral spreading of US28-deficient HCMV, via culture medium or cell-to-cell transmission, was significantly impeded as shown by green fluorescent protein (ie, infected) cell quantification and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, the number and size of foci was smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, HCMV-encoded US28 was detected in renal allografts from HCMV-positive donors independent of viremia and serostatus. Also, US28 facilitates HCMV spreading in VSMCs in vitro. Because the vasculature is affected in chronic renal transplant dysfunction, US28 may provide a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients With Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is deemed to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients after kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of CMV infection and risk factors for CMV infection in our center, to help in determination of its impact on the kidney function in this patient population, and to provide new ideas for the prevention and treatment of CMV infection.

METHODS

A total of 319 kidney transplant recipients from our center were studied between January 2000 and December 2015. The CMV viral load in each kidney transplant patients was monitored with the use of CMV quantitative nucleic acid testing (CMV-QNAT). Laboratory data and other medical records were also collected.

RESULTS

The incidence of CMV infection was 8.8% in our studied patients. The patients within 3 to 6 months and 5 to 10 years after transplantation had a higher risk of CMV infection. CMV infection was probably correlated with lower white blood cell counts but elevated hemoglobin, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, potassium, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Anti-CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G and history of allograft rejection were also associated with CMV infection. In multivariate regression analysis, white blood cells, eGFR, anti-CMV IgG, and history of allograft rejection were the independent risk factors associated with CMV infection in kidney transplantation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV infection was an important complication after kidney transplantation, particularly in these patients with allograft impairment.

[Specific infections in organ transplantation]

This article is concerned with the important topic of infections associated with organ transplantation and includes a discussion on four subtopics. The first section describes the current options in the prevention and therapy of viral hepatitis in association with liver transplantation. Infections with hepatitis B, C, D (delta) and E are discussed with special emphasis on the interferon-free treatment of hepatitis C with the new antiviral drugs.The second section deals with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections following lung transplantation (LuTx), which is one of the most frequently detected pathogens in the airway after LuTx. Patients with cystic fibrosis are particularly affected. This is important because studies have shown a clear correlation between chronic PA infections after LuTx and development of chronic transplant failure. Even if the data are still sparse, recommendations on prevention and therapeutic strategies are given. The theme of the third section is the high importance of viral infections after kidney transplantation. In addition to acquired infections, the transplanted organ as well as the recipient can be the source of the infection. The better the transplanted organ is tolerated under moderate immunosuppression, the less common and severe virus infections are. The focus of this section is on three common pathogens: cytomegalovirus, polyomavirus BK and hepatitis viruses.The final section deals with Aspergillus infections following transplantation of various organs. In this context Aspergillus spp. are one of the most commonly occurring fungal diseases. The epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostics, prophylaxis and therapy of invasive aspergillosis are presented.

Long-term impact of CMV infection on allografts and on patient survival in renal transplant patients with protocol biopsies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent complication of early posttransplantation. This study examines its impact on chronic allograft changes, long-term graft loss, and patient survival. We studied 594 patients who had protocol biopsies at 6 wk, and 3 and 6 mo posttransplantation. Chronic allograft changes were evaluated according to the updated Banff classification [interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), vascular and glomerular lesions]. Follow-up data were available for up to 10 yr. CMV infection was diagnosed in 153 of 594 patients (26%) in the first year after transplantation, mostly within the first 3 mo. Graft survival was reduced in patients with CMV ( P = 0.03) as well as the combined allograft/patient survival ( P = 0.008). Prevalence of IF/TA at 6 wk after transplantation was already threefold higher in patients who experienced CMV infection later on compared with patients without CMV ( P = 0.005). In multivariate analyses, CMV viremia or disease was not a significant factor for graft loss or death. In conclusion, patients with CMV infection posttransplantation show more chronic allograft changes early on, even before CMV infection, and development of IF/TA is not more prevalent in patients with CMV. Our data do not support a significant role of CMV in patient and graft outcomes.

CMV infection in the donor and increased kidney graft loss: impact of full HLA-I mismatch and posttransplantation CD8(+) cell reduction

Despite a large body of literature, the impact of chronic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in donor on long-term graft survival remains unclear, and factors modulating the effect of CMV infection on graft survival are presently unknown. In this retrospective study of 1279 kidney transplant patients, we analyzed long-term graft survival and evolution of CD8(+) cell population in donors and recipients by CMV serology and antigenemia status. A positive CMV serology in the donor was an independent risk factor for graft loss, especially among CMV-positive recipients (R(+) ). Antigenemia was not a risk factor for graft loss and kidneys from CMV-positive donors remained associated with poor graft survival among antigenemia-free recipients. Detrimental impact of donor's CMV seropositivity on graft survival was restricted to patients with full HLA-I mismatch, suggesting a role of CD8(+) cells. In R(+) patients with positive CMV antigenemia during the first year, CD8(+) cell count did not increase at 2 years posttransplantation, in contrast to R(-) recipients. In addition, marked CD8(+) -cell decrease was a risk factor of graft failure in these patients. This study identifies HLA-I full mismatch and a decrease of CD8(+) cell count at 2 years as important determinants of CMV-associated graft loss.