Do patients with active RA have differences in disease activity and perceptions if anti-TNF naïve versus anti-TNF experienced? Baseline results of the optimization of adalimumab trial

Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study

Background

Biologic disease-modifying drugs have revolutionised the treatment of a number of chronic inflammatory diseases (CID). However, up to 60% of the patients do not have a sufficient response to treatment and there is a need for optimization of treatment strategies.

Objective

To investigate if the treatment outcome of biological therapy is associated with the habitual dietary intake of fibre and red/processed meat in patients with a CID.

Methods

In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 233 adult patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Axial Spondyloarthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis, for whom biologic therapy was planned, over a 3 year period. Patients with completed baseline food frequency questionnaires were stratified into a high fibre/low red and processed meat exposed group (HFLM) and an unexposed group (low fibre/high red and processed meat intake = LFHM). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a clinical response to biologic therapy after 14-16 weeks of treatment.

Results

Of the 193 patients included in our primary analysis, 114 (59%) had a clinical response to biologic therapy. In the HFLM group (N = 64), 41 (64%) patients responded to treatment compared to 73 (56%) in the LFHM group (N = 129), but the difference was not statistically significant (OR: 1.48, 0.72-3.05). For RA patients however, HFLM diet was associated with a more likely clinical response (82% vs. 35%; OR: 9.84, 1.35-71.56).

Conclusion

Habitual HFLM intake did not affect the clinical response to biological treatment across CIDs. HFLM diet in RA patients might be associated with better odds for responding to biological treatment, but this would need confirmation in a randomised trial.

Trial registration

(clinicaltrials.gov), identifier [NCT03173144].

Vedolizumab as the first line of biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in bio-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) remain unknown.

AIMS

To perform a meta-analysis regarding vedolizumab as first line of biological therapy for UC or CD.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases per December 2020 was undertaken. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified 79 eligible studies with 4,520 and 3,494 bio-naïve patients with UC and CD, respectively, and 8,105 and 11,140 bio-exposed patients. Among bio-naïve patients with UC, a total of 40.0% (95%CI 27.0-54.0, I²=86%) and 63.9% (95%CI 47.0-79.2, I²=36%) achieved clinical remission at weeks 14 and 52, respectively. The corresponding rates in CD were 54.0% (95%CI 42.0-66.0, I²=23%), and 61.7% (95%CI 55.2-68.1, I²=0%). Bio-naïvety was associated with a higher probability of clinical remission at week 52 in UC (relative risk (RR)=1.32 (95%CI 1.14-1.53)), while this was only apparent until week 26 in CD (RR=1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.95)). Finally, bio-naïve UC patients had a lower risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.29 (95%CI 0.09-0.95)).

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab was found to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile in bio-naïve patients with UC and CD. The findings have implications in the management of IBD.

Satisfaction of treatment with biologics is high in psoriasis: results from the Bio-CAPTURE network

BACKGROUND

Although the effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis has been measured extensively with objective outcome measures, studies based on subjective, patient-reported outcome measures remain scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate satisfaction with medication, as measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for biologics in daily practice psoriasis care in the first 6 months of treatment; and to identify possible differences in satisfaction with medication between patients experienced (biologics-experienced) and inexperienced (biologics-inexperienced) in the use of biologics.

METHODS

TSQM baseline measurements were compared using measurements taken after 6 months, using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired comparisons. Intention-to-treat with last observation carried forward (ITT with LOCF) and as-treated analyses were performed. The difference between biologics-experienced and biologics-inexperienced patients for TSQM was analysed using ITT with LOCF. At 6 months, outcomes for biologics-experienced and biologics-inexperienced patients were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were eligible for analysis, and treated with etanercept (n = 34), adalimumab (n = 49) or ustekinumab (n = 23). Fifty-four per cent of patients were biologics-inexperienced. A statistically significant improvement was seen in all domains of the TSQM ('effectiveness', 'side-effects', 'convenience' and 'global satisfaction') by comparison of months 3 or 6 with baseline (all P ≤ 0·02). After 6 months, biologics-inexperienced patients scored better on the 'global satisfaction' domain than biologics-experienced patients (P < 0·01).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a prospective, longitudinal analysis of TSQM for biologics in daily practice psoriasis care. High satisfaction rates were achieved. The 'effectiveness' and 'convenience' domains showed the most room for improvement.