1
|
Meianu C, Stroie T, Istratescu D, Preda CM, Diculescu MM. Diagnosis and Medical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Idiopathic Pouchitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:979. [PMID: 38929596 PMCID: PMC11205934 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Despite the decreased rates in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) colectomies due to high advances in therapeutic options, a significant number of patients still require proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPPA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Pouchitis is the most common complication in these patients, where up to 60% develop one episode of pouchitis in the first two years after UC surgery with IPAA with severe negative impact on their quality of life. Acute cases usually respond well to antibiotics, but 15% of patients will still develop a refractory disease that requires the initiation of advanced immunosuppressive therapies. For chronic idiopathic pouchitis, current recommendations suggest using the same therapeutic options as for IBD in terms of biologics and small molecules. However, the available data are limited regarding the effectiveness of different biologics or small molecules for the management of this condition, and all evidences arise from case series and small studies. Vedolizumab is the only biologic agent that has received approval for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active chronic refractory pouchitis. Despite the fact that IBD treatment is rapidly evolving with the development of novel molecules, the presence of pouchitis represents an exclusion criterion in these trials. Recommendations for the approach of these conditions range from low to very low certainty of evidence, resulting from small randomized controlled trials and case series studies. The current review focuses on the therapeutic management of idiopathic pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Meianu
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tudor Stroie
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Doina Istratescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carmen Monica Preda
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Mircea Diculescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knowles JP, Church J. Normal Ileal Mucus Is Inadequate for Epithelial Protection in Ileal Pouch Mucosa. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:635-644. [PMID: 38276959 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical, nonspecific pouchitis is common after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, but its cause is unknown. A possible lack of protection for the ileal mucosa in its role as a reservoir for colonic-type bacteria may be the missing piece in defining the causes of pouchitis. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to review the causes of pouchitis and introduce the hypothesis that inadequate mucus protection in the pouch, combined with a predisposition to abnormal inflammation, is the most common cause of nonspecific pouchitis. DATA SOURCES Review of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles discussing pouchitis and intestinal mucus. STUDY SELECTION Studies published from 1960 to 2023. The main search terms were "pouchitis," and "intestinal mucus," whereas Boolean operators were used with multiple other terms to refine the search. Duplicates and case reports were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Current theories about the cause of pouchitis, descriptions of the role of mucus in the physiology of intestinal protection, and evidence of the effects of lack of mucus on mucosal inflammation. RESULTS The crossreference of "intestinal mucus" with "pouchitis" produced 9 references, none of which discussed the role of mucus in the development of pouchitis. Crossing "intestinal mucus" with "pouch" resulted in 32 articles, combining "pouchitis" with "barrier function" yielded 37 articles, and "pouchitis" with "permeability" yielded only 8 articles. No article discussed the mucus coat as a barrier to bacterial invasion of the epithelium or mentioned inadequate mucus as a factor in pouchitis. However, an ileal pouch produces a colonic environment in the small bowel, and the ileum lacks the mucus protection needed for this sort of environment. This predisposes pouch mucosa to bacterial invasion and chronic microscopic inflammation that may promote clinical pouchitis in patients prone to an autoimmune response. LIMITATIONS No prior studies address inadequate mucus protection and the origin of proctitis. There is no objective way of measuring the autoimmune tendency in patients with ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS Studies of intestinal mucus in the ileal pouch and its association with pouchitis are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Knowles
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen B, Kochhar GS, Kariv R, Liu X, Navaneethan U, Rubin DT, Cross RK, Sugita A, D'Hoore A, Schairer J, Farraye FA, Kiran RP, Fleshner P, Rosh J, Shah SA, Chang S, Scherl E, Pardi DS, Schwartz DA, Kotze PG, Bruining DH, Kane SV, Philpott J, Abraham B, Segal J, Sedano R, Kayal M, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sehgal P, McCormick JT, Picoraro JA, Silverberg MS, Bernstein CN, Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S. Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:826-849. [PMID: 34416186 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00101-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA.
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, MO, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- IBD Center and IBD Interventional Unit, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital Yokohama, Japan
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of California-Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joel Rosh
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Goryeb Children's Hospital-Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA
| | - Samir A Shah
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Miriam Hospital, Gastroenterology Associates, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen Scherl
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Weill Cornell Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD Outpatients Clinic, Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bincy Abraham
- Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Rocio Sedano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Priya Sehgal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New-York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph A Picoraro
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical value of surveillance pouchoscopy in asymptomatic ileal pouch patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:4325-32. [PMID: 23877758 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3054-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the need for and the interval of surveillance pouchoscopy in asymptomatic ileal pouch patients with underlying ulcerative colitis (UC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of finding dysplasia or incidental ileal pouch disorders in asymptomatic patients undergoing surveillance pouchoscopy. METHODS This study included all eligible consecutive asymptomatic UC patients undergoing surveillance pouchoscopy to our subspecialty Pouchitis Clinic from 2002 to 2011. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 138 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 72 (52.2 %) being male. The mean age at pouch construction was 45.4 ± 15.0 years, and the mean interval from ileostomy closure to the inception of first surveillance pouchoscopy was 89.4 ± 78.8 months. One patient was found to have indefinite for dysplasia on pouch body mucosal biopsy (0.7 %), and two patients had non-caseating granulomas, suggesting Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch. Of the 138 patients, 69 (50 %) had abnormal endoscopic findings, 102 (73.9 %) had acute and/or chronic inflammation on histology, and 62 (44.9 %) had both abnormal endoscopy and histology. The abnormal endoscopic findings included isolated pouch ulcer (n = 29, 21 %), active pouchitis (n = 31, 22.5 %), inflammatory polyps (n = 10, 7.2 %), strictures at the anastomosis (n = 5, 3.6 %), inlet (n = 10, 7.2 %) or outlet (n = 2, 1.4 %). Thirteen patients (13/17, 76.5 %) with pouch strictures underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation therapy and nine had (9/10, 90 %) endoscopic polypectomy. Multivariable analysis showed that patients with a preoperative diagnosis of CD and concomitant extraintestinal manifestations had a higher risk for abnormal pouch endoscopic findings with odds ratios of 2.552 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.108-16.545, p = 0.035) and 4.281 (95 % CI 1.204-5.409, p = 0.014), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Dysplasia was rare in asymptomatic patients with restorative proctocolectomy who underwent surveillance pouchoscopy in this cross-sectional study. However, "incidental" abnormal endoscopic and/or histologic findings were common, which often needed endoscopic therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
|