Local airway anesthesia attenuates hemodynamic responses to intubation and extubation in hypertensive surgical patients

Comparison of nebulisation 0.75% ropivacaine with 2% lignocaine for attenuation of haemodynamic response due to intubation: A prospective randomised study

INTRODUCTION

Laryngoscopy and intubation are associated with the reflex response of hypertension, tachycardia and other intraoperative complications. Nebulised route drug administration and entropy-guided induction enable optimal intubating conditions.

AIMS

To compare pre-induction nebulisation between 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lignocaine in blunting the nasotracheal intubation response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients undergoing elective faciomaxillary surgeries were prospectively randomised to receive pre-induction nebulisation: 5mL of 2% lignocaine (100mg) (Group L) or 5mL of 0.75% ropivacaine (37.5mg) (Group R). Patients were induced and intubated (nasotracheal) with entropy monitoring. Observed parameters included systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, entropy at baseline, induction, intubation, post-intubation one, three and five minutes, propofol induction dose, electrocardiogram changes and peri-intubation cough reflex.

RESULTS

Ropivacaine aerosol proved significantly better than lignocaine aerosol on haemodynamics (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate) and cough reflex (p < 0.05). Both groups experienced similar entropy changes and propofol induction dose requirements and no fresh electrocardiogram changes (compared with the baseline).

CONCLUSION

Pre-induction nebulised ropivacaine offers superior intubating conditions than lignocaine regarding haemodynamic response and cough reflex for faciomaxillary surgeries.

Multimodal prevention of emergence cough following nasal endoscopic surgery under general anesthesia: a double-blind randomized trial

Purpose

Cough during emergence from anesthesia is a common problem and may cause adverse events. Monotherapy faces uncertainty in preventing emergence cough due to individual differences. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multimodal intervention for preventing emergence cough in patients following nasal endoscopic surgery.

Methods

In this double-blind randomized trial, 150 adult patients undergoing nasal endoscopic surgery were randomly allocated into three groups. For the control group (n = 50), anesthesia was performed according to clinical routine, no intervention was provided. For the double intervention group (n = 50), normal saline 3 mL was sprayed endotracheally before intubation, 0.4 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was infused over 10 min after intubation, and target-controlled remifentanil infusion was maintained at an effect-site concentration of 1.5 ng/mL before extubation after surgery. For the multimodal intervention group (n = 50), 0.5% ropivacaine 3 mL was sprayed endotracheally before intubation, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil were administered as those in the double intervention group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of emergence cough, defined as single cough or more from end of surgery to 5 min after extubation.

Results

The incidences of emergence cough were 98% (49/50) in the control group, 90% (45/50) in the double group, and 70% (35/50) in the multimodal group, respectively. The incidence was significantly lower in the multimodal group than those in the control (relative risk 0.71; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.86; p < 0.001) and double (relative risk 0.78; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.95; p = 0.012) groups; the difference between the double and control groups was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.92; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02; p = 0.20). The severity of sore throat was significantly lower in the multimodal group than that in the control group (median difference-1; 95% CI -2 to 0; p = 0.016). Adverse events did not differ among the three groups.

Conclusion

For adult patients undergoing endonasal surgery, multimodal intervention including ropivacaine topical anesthesia before intubation, dexmedetomidine administration after intubation, and remifentanil infusion before extubation after surgery significantly reduced emergence cough and was safe.

Comparison of nebulized ropivacaine (0.75%) with nebulized dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic response on intubation in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia: A comparative randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

Background

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation lead to sympathetic stimulation resulting in hemodynamic fluctuations. We compared local anesthetic ropivacaine 0.75% with alpha agonist dexmedetomidine through ultrasonic nebulization for direct local action of the drug in the airway.

Methods

In our randomized study, 180 patients were prospectively assigned to three groups of 60 each: group R (0.75%), group D (1 microgram/kg), and group C (control). The primary objective was to determine whether nebulized ropivacaine or nebulized dexmedetomidine can cause a reduction in stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. The secondary objectives were to compare the hemodynamic parameters at extubation, cough response at extubation, and postoperative sore throat.

Results

A total of 165 patients were analyzed. Demographically, all the groups were similar. Group R and group D were found to significantly attenuate the heart rate (HR) at intubation and extubation when compared to group C (P < 0.05). A significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was seen (P < 0.05; group D: 90 ± 18.4 mmHg, group C: 99.5 ± 15.9 mmHg, group R: 92.4 ± 16.1 mmHg). There was a significant reduction in cough response in both groups in comparison with group C at 0 minutes (P value; group C vs group D: <.0001; group C vs group R:.01) and 5 minutes (P value; group C vs group D: <.0001; group C vs group R: <.0001).

Conclusion

Preinduction topical use of ropivacaine or dexmedetomidine, through the nebulization route, effectively attenuated the pressor responses when compared to placebo.

Comparative study of the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation

Introduction

Providing a stable hemodynamic in extubation is important. We aimed to compare the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.

Methods

This double-blind randomized trial was performed in 2019-2020 in Isfahan on 72 patients under general anesthesia. Patients using Random Allocation software were divided into three groups and received 0.1 mg/ kg or 0.2 mg/kg labetalol and normal saline intravenously 10 min before extubation. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation(SPO2) was measured for each patient before induction of anesthesia and 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after extubation.

Results

SBP changes were significantly different between the three groups at 1, 3, 5 minutes after extubation (P=0.036, P=0.009, P=0.005 respectively) unlike the other two groups, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg labetalol did not have an increase in DBP after extubation (P>0.05). DBP was significantly different between the three groups one minute after extubation (P=0.03). At minutes 1 and 3 following extubation, there was a significant difference in the MAP between the three groups. (P=0.029 and P=0.012 respectively). There was no significant difference between the three groups regarding heart rate (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Tracheal extubation is usually associated with an increase in hemodynamic variables. Both doses of labetalol attenuate the hemodynamic response accompanying tracheal extubation. But labetalol 0.2 mg/kg in reducing hemodynamic response to extubation acted more effectively than labetalol 0.1mg/kg.

Preoperative lignocaine nebulisation for attenuation of the pressor response of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing caesarean section delivery: A randomised double-blind controlled trial

Background and Aims

Following induction of general anaesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation usually cause tachycardia and hypertension due to increased sympathetic activity. This response is generally exaggerated in hypertensive patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative lignocaine nebulisation in attenuating the pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing caesarean delivery.

Methods

After ethical approval, we conducted this randomised, double-blind study, which included 110 patients with severe preeclampsia who underwent caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either preoperative nebulisation of lignocaine 2% in a dose of 4.5 mg/kg (not exceeding 400 mg) in the lignocaine group or nebulisation of an equivalent volume of 0.9% NaCl in the saline group. The primary objective was the systolic blood pressure after tracheal intubation. The secondary objectives included heart rate, maternal serum cortisol and blood glucose levels, grade of cough during emergence, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice, neonatal Apgar score and umbilical blood gas.

Results

The systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the lignocaine group compared to the saline group at 1, 3 and 5 min after endotracheal intubation and after delivery of the foetus (P = 0.001, 0.003, 0.002 and 0.019, respectively). Similarly, the heart rate was significantly lower in the lignocaine group versus saline group at 1 and 3 min after endotracheal intubation (P = 0.041 and 0.042, respectively).

Conclusion

Preoperative lignocaine nebulisation in a dose of 4.5 mg/kg effectively attenuated the pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing caesarean delivery.

Addition of topical airway anaesthesia to conventional induction techniques to reduce haemodynamic instability during the induction period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the effects of combining topical airway anaesthesia with intravenous induction on haemodynamic variables during the induction period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, superiority study from 1 March 2021 to 31 December 2021 will include 96 participants scheduled for cardiac surgery. Participants will be screened into three blocks (ASA II, ASA III, ASA IV) according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and then randomly allocated into two groups within the block in a 1:1 ratio. Concealment of allocation will be maintained using opaque, sealed envelopes generated by a nurse according to a computer-generated randomisation schedule. In addition to general intravenous anaesthetics, participants will receive supraglottic and subglottic topical anaesthesia. Changes in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in both groups will be recorded by an independent investigator at the start of anaesthesia induction until the skin incision. If vasopressors are used during this period, the frequency, dosage and types of vasopressors will be recorded. The incidence and severity of participants' postoperative hoarseness and sore throat will also be assessed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qianfoshan Hospital of Shandong Province (registration number: YXLL-KY-2021(003)). The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and in conferences or congresses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04744480.

Impact of topical airway anesthesia on immediate postoperative cough/bucking: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative cough may occur after tracheal intubation, but it is indistinct which drug is best at diminishing these events. Additionally, airway reflexes are commonly accompanied by severe hemodynamics responses during emergence.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of topical airway anesthesia on immediate post-extubation cough/bucking and extubation time.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and LILACS published until December 23, 2020 were included. Our primary outcome was postoperative cough/bucking incidence which was compared between local anesthetics and controls. Extubation times were likewise considered. Predisposition appraisal and subgroup, affectability investigations were likewise performed.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis found a 45% reduction in cough incidence after treatment with topical airway local anesthetic (RR.á=.á0.55; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.72; p.á<.á0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.61. The intervention showed no differences in reduction of the extubation time (mean difference = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.28; p.á=.á0.49).

CONCLUSION

Topical airway anesthesia demonstrated better than placebo or no medication in reducing immediate post-extubation cough/bucking. Further studies could have this objective to combine the different ways to perform better outcomes for patients.

Effect of Pharmacological Agents Administered for Attenuating the Extubation Response on the Quality of Extubation: A Systematic Review

Background

Several drugs have been tried to obtund the hemodynamic extubation response but all have variable side effects that may affect the quality of short-term recovery.

Objective

Our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of pharmacological agents, such as dexmedetomidine, local anesthetics, and so on, administered for attenuating the extubation response on the quality of extubation, as judged by the presence or absence of cough, sedation, and laryngospasm/bronchospasm in adult patients who had undergone general anesthesia. A secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of these drugs on other immediate post-extubation complications such as respiratory depression, desaturation, bradycardia, hypotension, and nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods

This is a systematic review of (randomized controlled trials) RCTs with meta-analysis. The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for RCTs on the effect of pharmacological agents on both the hemodynamic extubation response as well as the quality of extubation.

Results

Fourteen out of 24 included studies were subjected to a meta-analysis. The risk of cough was less likely in the intervention group as compared to control groups (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46, p<0.00001, I²=35%). Sedation, hypotension (OR= 10.47; 95% CI: 1.86, 58.80, p=0.008, I²=0%), and bradycardia (OR= 6.57; 95% CI: 2.09, 20.64, p=0.001, I²=0%) were reported with dexmedetomidine. Only one study reported laryngospasm with dexmedetomidine and two studies with opioids.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine 0.4 to 0.5 ug/kg was associated with smooth extubation, minimal coughing, no laryngospasm/ bronchospasm, and with stable hemodynamics, without causing respiratory depression, PONV, and desaturation. However, in higher doses (more than 0.5 ug/kg), it caused bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation. Other pharmacological agents, such as local anesthetics, calcium channel blockers, and opioids, did not attenuate cough associated with extubation.

Effect of topical ropivacaine on the response to endotracheal tube during emergence from general anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study

Background

The airway reflex such as cough is common accompanied with severe fluctuations of hemodynamics during emergence. This prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial tested the hypothesis that topical ropivacaine may reduce extubation response and postoperative sore throat.

Methods

Fifty-four patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to two groups. The patients in Group R were received 0.75% ropivacaine, which was sprayed on the tracheal mucosa, epiglottis, tongue base, and glottis to achieve uniform surface anesthesia. As control, patients in Group C were received the same volume saline. The primiary outcome was the incidence and grade of cough during peri-extubation.

Results

The incidence (34.62% vs. 76.92%, P = 0.002) of cough during extubation were lower in Group R compared to Group C. Meanwhile, the sore throat visual acuity score at 12 h after surgery was lower in Group R than that in Group C (2.00 vs. 3.50, P = 0.040).

Conclusion

Topical anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine before intubation can significantly reduce the incidence of cough during peri-extubation. Meanwhile, it reduced hemodynamic fluctuations and postoperative throat pain without influence patients recovery.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800014412 (date of registration January 2018).

Comparison of Effect of Airway Nebulization with Lignocaine 2% versus Ropivacaine 0.25% on Intubation and Extubation Response in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Context:

Both intubation and extubation are associated with pressor response.

Aims:

We aimed to evaluate if ropivacaine 0.25% nebulization would prevent hemodynamic and cough responses to intubation and extubation and compared it with lignocaine 2% and saline group.

Settings and Design:

This was a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 75 patients classified as the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II belonging to 18–60 years were included in the randomized double-blind trial and divided into three groups; Group 1: received 5 ml of normal saline, Group 2: received 5 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine, Group 3: received 5 ml of 2% lignocaine through nebulization before the induction. Patients were then administered general anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and saturation were recorded at baseline (T1), at intubation (T2), upon anesthetic withdrawal (T3), upon eye opening (T4), upon extubation (T5), and 2 min after extubation (T6). Cough response was recorded at emergence and extubation.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Repeated measures analysis of variance were used to compare hemodynamic variables and Chi-square test to compare the grades of cough between the two groups.

Results:

The drug ropivacaine was found to be effective in reducing the hemodynamic responses to both intubation and extubation when compared to saline (P < 0.05). At extubation, though the mean values of HR and MAP were lower in ropivacaine compared to lignocaine group, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.103 and 0.153 respectively). Only 40% of patients who received ropivacaine had cough at extubation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Ropivacaine when used through nebulization preinduction effectively reduced both intubation and extubation responses when compared to saline. However, there was no significant difference between the ropivacaine and lignocaine on extubation response.

Attenuation of the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with fentanyl, lignocaine nebulization, and a combination of both: A randomized controlled trial

Background:

The present study was undertaken to compare and evaluate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) fentanyl and lignocaine airway nebulization and a combination of both in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Materials and Methods:

Ninety-six patients of either sex aged between 18 and 65 years of age, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) health status Classes I and II, undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group F received IV fentanyl 2 μg/kg, Group L received nebulization with 3 mg/kg of 4% lignocaine, and Group FL received both nebulization with 3 mg/kg of 4% lignocaine and IV fentanyl 2 μg/kg before intubation. Hemodynamic parameters were noted before and immediately after induction, 1 min after intubation, and every minute after intubation for 10 min.

Results:

Hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation was not completely abolished in any of the groups. Nebulized lignocaine was least effective in attenuating hemodynamic response to intubation, and hemodynamic parameters were significantly high after intubation as compared to other groups. Fentanyl alone or in combination with nebulized lignocaine was most effective, and Group F and Group FL were comparable. The maximum increase in mean blood pressure after intubation from baseline in Groups F, L, and FL was 7.4%, 14.6%, and 5.4%, respectively.

Conclusion:

In our study, IV fentanyl 2 μg/kg administered 5 min before induction was found to be the most effective in attenuating the hemodynamic response. There was no advantage to the use of nebulized lignocaine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.