Nocardia Colonization: A Risk Factor for Lung Deterioration in Cystic Fibrosis Patients?

Nocardia spp. isolation in chronic lung diseases: Are there differences between patients with Pulmonary Nocardiosis and Nocardia colonization?

AIMS

Chronic lung diseases are a recognized risk factor for Nocardia spp.

INFECTION

Nocardia spp. isolation does not inevitably imply disease, and thus colonization must be considered. Here, we aimed to analyse the differences between pulmonary nocardiosis (PN) and Nocardia spp. colonization in patients with chronic lung diseases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective study of patients with laboratory confirmation of isolation of Nocardia spp. in at least one respiratory sample was performed. Patients with PN and Nocardia spp. colonization were compared. There were 71 patients with Nocardia spp. identification, 64.8% were male, with a mean age of 67.7±11.2 years. All patients had ≥1 pre-existing chronic lung disease and 19.7% patients were immunocompromised. PN and Nocardia spp. colonization were considered in 26.8% and 73.2% of patients, respectively. Symptoms and chest CT findings were significantly more frequent in patients with PN (p<.001). During follow-up time, 12 (16.9%) patients died, 6 in PN group. Immunosuppression, constitutional symptoms, haematological malignancy and PN diagnosis were associated with significantly shorter survival times, despite only immunosuppression (HR 3.399; 95% CI 1.052-10.989) and PN diagnosis (HR 3.568; 95% CI 1.078-11.910) remained associated with a higher death risk in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PN was linked to clinical worsening, more chest CT findings and worse clinical outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY

Nocardia spp. isolation in chronic lung disease patients is more common than expected and the differentiation between colonization and disease is crucial.

How do I manage nocardiosis?

BACKGROUND

Nocardiosis is a rare infection that is often difficult to treat and may be life-threatening. There is no consensus on its management.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to provide the current evidence for the diagnosis and management of individuals with nocardiosis, and to propose a management approach for this uncommon infection.

SOURCES

We systematically searched the medical literature on nocardiosis for studies published between 2010 and 2020 and describing ten or more individuals.

CONTENT

Nocardiosis, a primarily opportunistic infection which may occur in immunocompetent persons, most commonly involves the lungs and frequently disseminates to other sites including the central nervous system. The reference standard for Nocardia species identification is molecular biology, and the preferred method for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is broth microdilution. Monotherapy seems appropriate for patients with primary skin nocardiosis or non-severe pulmonary disease; we reserve a multidrug regimen for more severe infections. Species identification and AST results are often missing at initiation of antibiotics. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the preferred agent for initial therapy, because Nocardia is very often susceptible to this agent, and because it has been the keystone of nocardiosis treatment for years. Linezolid, to which Nocardia is almost always susceptible, may be an alternative. When combination therapy is required, the repertoire of companion drugs includes third-generation cephalosporins, amikacin and imipenem. Therapeutic modifications should take into account clinical response to initial therapy and AST results. Treatment duration of 6 months is appropriate for most situations, but longer durations are preferred for disseminated nocardiosis and shorter durations are reasonable in low-risk situations. Secondary prophylaxis may be considered in selected individuals with permanent immunosuppression.

IMPLICATIONS

We hereby provide the clinician with an easy-to-use algorithm for the management of individuals with nocardiosis. We also illuminate gaps in evidence and suggest future research directions.

Nocardiosis: A Neglected Disease

Nocardiosis is a neglected tropical disease. It has varied geographical presence and a spectrum of clinical presentations. This review aims to focus on the epidemiology of nocardial infections with a systematic approach to their diagnosis and treatment. Nocardiacauses chronic infections and ailments, and may remain cryptic but progressive in its course. Unless suspected, diagnosis can be easily missed resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Thorough knowledge of local epidemiology, demography, clinical course and presentation, diagnostic modalities, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the prevalent Nocardia species is essential to curb spread of this infection. This is a systematic review in which internet search has been done for citation indices (Embase, PubMed, Ovid, and other individual journals) till March 2020 utilizing the following key words "Nocardia," "taxonomy," "prevalence," "clinical features," "diagnosis," "treatment," and "susceptibility." We selected a total of 87 review articles, case series, and case reports all in English language.

Nocardia colonization in contrast to nocardiosis: a comparison of patients' clinical characteristics

Information on Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract is scarce. The current study is aimed at comparing clinical characteristics between individuals with Nocardia colonization and those with nocardiosis. All patients with Nocardia isolation between 2007 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Israel were included. Nocardia isolation was based on biochemical tests together with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance patterns until 2011 and on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer from 2012. We defined nocardiosis as a clinically evident infection related to the isolation of the bacteria, which required antibiotic therapy. We defined colonization as Nocardia isolation with no clinical evidence of disease. The medical charts of all included individuals were independently reviewed by an infectious disease specialist to ensure adequate classification. Logistic regression models were fitted to compare clinical characteristics between the groups. Fifteen (20%) of the 75 Nocardia isolations met the criteria for colonization. Of those, 13 (87%) had background illnesses. Having a chronic pulmonary disease was associated with increased likelihood of Nocardia colonization, in contrast to nocardiosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-15.48, p = 0.040), while an inverse association was found with corticosteroid therapy (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.74, p = 0.015). Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract accounts for a substantial proportion of all Nocardia isolations. Individuals colonized with Nocardia typically have chronic pulmonary disease and are less frequently treated with corticosteroid than patients with nocardiosis.

Macrophage activation syndrome due to Nocardia spp in a pediatric patient with cystic fibrosis

Nocardia spp is a gram-positive aerobic filamentous bacteria that causes pulmonary and systemic infections, especially in patients with immunosuppression or chronic lung diseases. It is rarely reported in children with cystic fibrosis. Macrophage activation syndrome is a life-threatening disease with an excessive inflammatory response usually triggered by infections. There are few reports in cystic fibrosis related to macrophage activation syndrome. Herein we report a child with cystic fibrosis who had macrophage activation syndrome due to Nocardia infection.