Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System (TESSYS) Technique in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of clinical efficacy between Percutaneous Endoscopic Large channels nerve decompression through Translaminar approach and Percutaneous Endoscopy Conventional channels nerve decompression through Transforaminal approach for the treatment of degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

OBJECYTIVE

Percutaneous endoscopic surgery via the interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach are commonly used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and in order to compare the clinical efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Large channel Translaminar approach (PEL-TL) and Percutaneous Endoscopy Conventional channels Transforaminal approach (PEC-TF) in the treatment of degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic single segment unilateral decompression surgery for degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. They were divided into PEL-TL group and PEC-TF group according to different surgical methods. Recording general information of two groups of patients, including age, gender, course of disease, and length of hospital stay. Recording the surgical time, C-arm fluoroscopy frequency, incidence and type of complications for two groups of patients. CT was used to measure the Lateral Recess Angle (LRA), and MRI was used to measure the Dural Sac Cross sectional Area (DSCA) to evaluate the degree of lateral recess stenosis and compare the neurological decompression between the two groups. Using the White Panjabi scoring system (WP) to evaluate local stability before and 3 months after surgery. Recording the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for preoperative and postoperative hip and lower limb pain in two groups of patients. Evaluateing the efficacy using the modified Macnab criteria one year after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). The surgery time in the PEL-TL group was shorter than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). The number of C-arm fluoroscopy in the PEL-TL group was significantly lower than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups of patients (11.1% in the PEL-TL group and 14.3% in the PEC-TF group) (P > 0.05). The postoperative recurrence rate of PEL-TL is lower than that of PEC-TF (P < 0.05). All enrolled patients were followed up regularly for 1 year. There was no significant difference in preoperative LRA and DSCA between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). After 1 year of surgery, LRA and DSCA in both groups were significantly larger than before (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative DSCA between the two groups, but LRA in the PEL-TL group was more significantly larger than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative WP between the two groups of patients, and there was no significant difference in WP in two groups. The ODI scores and the VAS scores of buttock and lower limb pain at each follow-up time point after surgery in both groups of patients showed significant improvement compared to before surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in functional scores between the two groups at each follow-up time point (p > 0.05). One year after surgery, the efficacy was evaluated using the modified Macnab criteria. Among them, in the PEL-TL group, 36 cases were excellent and 14 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 92.6%. In the PEC-TF group, 48 cases were excellent and 16 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 91.4%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both surgical methods can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in treating degenerative lumbar 4/5 spinal stenosis. PEL-TL has fewer C-arm fluoroscopy times, wider decompression range, shorter surgical time, and lower recurrence rate during surgery, while PEC-TF can be routinely performed under local anesthesia to reduce anesthesia risk.

Application of Repeated Foraminoplasty in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

BACKGROUND

A sufficient foraminoplasty is critical in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), which may affect the progress of surgery. This study assessed repeated foraminoplasty (RF) applied in PETD for patients with LDH and lumbar foraminal stenosis.

METHODS

This study enrolled 133 patients with LDH and lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent PETD; patients were assigned to traditional foraminoplasty (TF) and RF groups. Intervertebral foramen enlargement and ratio of nerve roots completely exposed were compared between the 2 groups. Perioperative indicators were assessed for surgical efficiency and safety. Visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index score, and MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Anterior-posterior diameter increase of intervertebral foramen (P < 0.001) and ratio of the nerve roots completely exposed (P = 0.032) in the RF group were significantly greater than those in the TF group. The decompression time and total operative time of the patients who underwent RF were significantly shorter compared with patients who underwent TF (P < 0.001). With respect to evaluation of clinical efficacy, the visual analog scale score of leg pain in the TF group was greater than that in the RF group only on the first day postoperatively (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated foraminoplasty applied in PETD for patients with LDH and lumbar foraminal stenosis might improve intervertebral foramen enlargement in anterior-posterior diameter, exposure of nerve roots, surgical efficiency, and immediate relief of leg pain after surgery.

Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: Are We Finally There? A Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness Against Non-microscopic Discectomy, Microdiscectomy and Tubular Discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional microdiscectomy (MD), tubular discectomy (MED), and open non-microscopic discectomy (OD) Despite significant technological advancements in endoscopic techniques over the past decade, it is not yet clear whether FELD offers a definitive advantage over traditional methods.

PURPOSE

This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of available publications to assess whether the superiority of endoscopic treatment over traditional open and minimally invasive endoscopic surgical techniques can be more conclusively established. The central question driving this meta-analysis was: Are we finally there?

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Meta-analysis study included adult patients (≥18 years old) with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) without concurrent lumbar spinal stenosis METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials published between 2013 and 2024. The quality of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Included studies reported on at least one of the following outcomes: (1) adverse effects, (2) operative parameters, (3) bed and hospital stay, and (4) clinical indices (postoperative values). Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare treatment effects between FELD and MD, MED, or OD.

RESULTS

FELD demonstrated several advantages, particularly in short-term pain (within 6 months postoperatively) relief and faster patient (length of bed stay 1-2 days) mobilization, while maintaining comparable risks of recurrence, reoperation, and complications relative to traditional techniques. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the data and a limited number of prospective trials.

CONCLUSIONS

More well-designed, prospective randomized trials are necessary, with a focus on radiological outcomes and comprehensive cost analyses including societal costs. Only through such robust data can we determine whether FELD truly represents a new gold standard for lumbar discectomy. Are we finally there? We are certainly closer, but much remains to be addressed.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy versus Open Microdiskectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Comparative Cohort Study on Costs and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

 Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (TELD) is considered an effective treatment for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). There is a paucity of studies comparing in detail the costs and long-term clinical outcomes of TELD and open microdiskectomy (MD), especially in developing countries. Thus, we sought to provide a multidimensional insight into this matter by comparing the direct costs and long-term outcomes of TELD with those of MD.

METHODS

 The electronic health records of 434 patients with LDH who underwent either TELD or MD were collected from February 2011 to October 2014. Within a 7-year follow-up period, 412 patients, comprising 203 patients treated with TELD and 209 patients treated with MD, were fully evaluated. Patient characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), postoperative hospital stay, time to return to work (RTW), perioperative complications, and direct costs were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

 The postoperative ODI and VAS scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). In accordance with the modified MacNab criteria, the rate of excellent and good outcomes was 88.67 and 88.03% in the TELD and MD groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in the clinical outcomes and perioperative complications. However, IBL, hospital stay, and RTW were significantly reduced in the TELD group (p < 0.05). Twenty-one cases in the TELD group and nine in the MD group underwent reoperation due to recurrence (p < 0.05). Total inpatient cost per patient was $1,596 in the TELD group and $1,990 in the MD group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 TELD for the treatment of symptomatic LDH could be an affordable strategy, providing certain advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as shorter hospital stay and earlier recovery along with comparable clinical outcomes to the conventional surgical method.

A Novel Classification of Migrated Lumbar Disk Herniation Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Algorithm Recommendations for Full-Endoscopic Discectomy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish a novel classification of migrated lumbar disk herniation (LDH) based on magnetic resonance imaging and provide appropriate treatment strategies for each type through algorithms.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a surgical technique that has been developed rapidly in recent years. For migrated LDH, few surgeons currently classify it with multiplanar positioning, and there is no consensus on the choice of treatment strategy. Therefore, we established a new multiplanar classification criteria that can localize the lesions more accurately than previous studies.

METHODS

A total of 263 eligible patients from March 2017 to March 2022 were included. Protrusions for each patient were located based on our classification and the surgical approach was selected according to our algorithms. The clinical symptoms of all patients before surgery, and at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were collected. Evaluations were performed using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. We used the chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t-test to compare perioperative results and postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up results.

RESULTS

VAS (low back pain) scores were reduced from 5.33 ± 2.67 to 0.73 ± 0.77 (p < 0.001), and VAS (leg pain) scores were reduced from 7.44 ± 2.21 to 0.37 ± 0.51 (p < 0.001). ODI scores improved from 58.46 ± 8.04 to 12.57 ± 2.51 (p < 0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate reached 92.78% at the 12-month follow-up. Twenty-six patients developed complications, all of which improved after treatment. Recurrence occurred in 13 patients, and four of them underwent secondary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an innovative classification method using multi-plane positioning, and the algorithm used with it can help surgeons make appropriate choices when using endoscopic technology to treat migrated LDH. Statistical analysis of follow-up data confirmed that this is a safe and effective strategy.

Endoscopic Lumbar Disc Surgery Experience with the TESSYS Technique in 253 Case Series

Background: Herniated lumbar disc (HLD) is a widespread medical problem which can require surgery. Minimally invasive surgical management can represent an extremely valuable option for patients suffering from HLDs. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is an alternative to classical microdiscectomy which was proposed more than two decades ago and has evolved technologically with time. Methods: The transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique has been introduced in recent years and offers the advantage of performing a controlled foraminal augmentation with full nerve root protection. We started using this technique in 2016 and prospectively evaluated the results of endoscopic TESSYS-based operations performed in a three-year period until the end of 2019. Selection criteria were very strict, and we included only patients with unilateral radicular pain with no instability who failed conservative therapy. Out of the 253 patients operated on in that time span, 183 were available for follow-up evaluation. Results: After surgery, there was a clinically significant improvement of all symptoms which basically lasted in the long-term follow-up. Complications were limited and generally minor. Redo surgery with microdiscectomy was required only in four cases. Obesity did not play a clear negative role in patients' outcome. Conclusions: Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy with the TESSYS technique represents a valuable management option for patients harbouring unilateral herniated lumbar disc located laterally.

Stability simulation analysis of targeted puncture in L4/5 intervertebral space for PELD surgery

Introduction: The application prospects of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) as a minimally invasive spinal surgery method in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation are extensive. This study aims to find the optimal entry angle for the trephine at the L4/5 intervertebral space, which causes less lumbar damage and has greater postoperative stability. To achieve this, we conduct a three-dimensional simulated analysis of the degree of damage caused by targeted puncture-based trephine osteotomy on the lumbar spine. Methods: We gathered clinical CT data from patients to construct a lumbar model. This model was used to simulate and analyze the variations in trephine osteotomy volume resulting from targeted punctures at the L4/5 interspace. Furthermore, according to these variations in osteotomy volume, we created Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models specifically for the trephine osteotomy procedure. We then applied mechanical loads to conduct range of motion and von Mises stress analyses on the lumbar motion unit. Results: In percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy, the smallest osteotomy volume occurred with a 20° entry angle, close to the base of the spinous process. The volume increased at 30° and reached its largest at 40°. In percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, the largest osteotomy volume was observed with a 50° entry angle, passing through the facet joints, with smaller volumes at 60° and the smallest at 70°. In FEA, M6 exhibited the most notable biomechanical decline, particularly during posterior extension and right rotation. M2 and M3 showed significant differences primarily in rotation, whereas the differences between M3 and M4 were most evident in posterior extension and right rotation. M5 displayed their highest stress levels primarily in posterior extension, with significant variations observed in right rotation alongside M4. Conclusion: The appropriate selection of entry sites can reduce lumbar damage and increase stability. We suggest employing targeted punctures at a 30° angle for PEID and at a 60° angle for PTED at the L4/5 intervertebral space. Additionally, reducing the degree of facet joint damage is crucial to enhance postoperative stability in lumbar vertebral motion units.

Clinical efficacy of nucleoplasty for uncontained lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient in-depth studies on whether percutaneous lumbar nucleoplasty (PLN) is effective and safe for the treatment of uncontained lumbar disc herniation (ULDH). This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of PLN on radiating leg pain caused by ULDH.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PLN for ULDH and met the inclusion criteria between June 2018 and July 2022 were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for radiating pain preoperatively; at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively; and at the last follow-up. Patient satisfaction was assessed using MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50.2 years (range 24-73 years). The mean and standard deviation of the preoperative NRS in 39 patients with radiating pain was 9.0 ± 1.2. The NRS scores at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively and at the last follow-up were 4.6 ± 3.2, 3.6 ± 3.3, 2.9 ± 3.2, and 1.4 ± 2.0, respectively, showing significant improvement (all, p < 0.001). The number of patients (percentage) with excellent or good satisfaction according to the MacNab criteria was 29 (70.7%). Major complications were not observed. Three patients underwent additional surgery after PLN because of persistent radiating pain.

CONCLUSIONS

PLN is a safe and feasible treatment option for ULDH. Treatment outcomes were favorable on average; however, the lack of consistency was a drawback.

Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Preclinical Study

BACKGROUND

In minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), where the surgeon cannot directly see the patient's internal anatomical structure, the implementation of augmented reality (AR) technology may solve this problem.

METHODS

We combined AR, artificial intelligence, and optical tracking to enhance the augmented reality minimally invasive spine surgery (AR-MISS) system. The system has three functions: AR radiograph superimposition, AR real-time puncture needle tracking, and AR intraoperative navigation. The three functions of the system were evaluated through beagle animal experiments.

RESULTS

The AR radiographs were successfully superimposed on the real intraoperative videos. The anteroposterior (AP) and lateral errors of superimposed AR radiographs were 0.74 ± 0.21 mm and 1.13 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. The puncture needles could be tracked by the AR-MISS system in real time. The AP and lateral errors of the real-time AR needle tracking were 1.26 ± 0.20 mm and 1.22 ± 0.25 mm, respectively. With the help of AR radiographs and AR puncture needles, the puncture procedure could be guided visually by the system in real-time. The anteroposterior and lateral errors of AR-guided puncture were 2.47 ± 0.86 mm and 2.85 ± 1.17 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the AR-MISS system is accurate and applicable.

Long-Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Background

Our study aims to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic effects of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) on lumbar disc herniation.

Patients and Methods

Radiographic and clinical data of patients undergoing TELD in our institution from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected. LDH outpatients who had not received surgical treatment during the same period were 1:1 matched by propensity score matching as the conservative group. The radiographic parameters of the two groups at baseline and at the last follow-up (≥24 months) were analyzed.

Results

The study included 47 patients in the TELD group, matched with 47 patients in the conservative group. The disc height of the TELD group at the last follow-up was lower than that at the baseline (P < 0.001), and lower than that of the conservative group at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The disc degeneration grade of the TELD group at the last follow-up was greater than that at the baseline, and greater than that of the conservative group at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the facet joint degeneration in the TELD group between the baseline and the last follow-up, and between the TELD group and the conservative group at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). The pain intensity and disability score in the TELD group at 3-month follow-up and at the last follow-up were significantly lower than those at the baseline (P < 0.001). Six patients in the TELD group required additional surgery during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Our long-term follow-up data shows that the disc height of the operated level was significantly reduced and the disc degeneration was significantly aggravated in TELD-treated patients; in contrast, the facet joint degeneration did not show significant aggravation.

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Approach Selection: A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature to develop an algorithm formulated by key opinion leaders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze currently available data and propose a decision-making algorithm for full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to help surgeons choose the most appropriate approach [transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) or interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD)] for patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Full-endoscopic discectomy has gained popularity in recent decades. To our knowledge, an algorithm for choosing the proper surgical approach has never been proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and MeSH terms was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Patient samples included patients with LDH treated with full-endoscopic discectomy. The inclusion criteria were interventional research (randomized and nonrandomized trials) and observation research (cohort, case-control, case series). Exclusion criteria were case series and technical reports. The criteria used for selecting patients were grouped and analyzed. Then, an algorithm was generated based on these findings with support and reconfirmation from key expert opinions. Data on overall complications were collected. Outcome measures included zone of herniation, level of herniation, and approach (TELD or IELD).

RESULTS

In total, 474 articles met the initial screening criteria. The detailed analysis identified the 80 best-matching articles; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 articles remained for this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed algorithm suggests a TELD for LDH located in the foraminal or extraforaminal zones at upper and lower levels and for central and subarticular discs at the upper levels considering the anatomic foraminal features and the craniocaudal pathology location. An IELD is preferred for LDH in the central or subarticular zones at L4/L5 and L5/S1, especially if a high iliac crest or high-grade migration is found.

Factors related to the postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy: A meta-analysis

Objective

To explore factors related to the postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang database and VIP database were systematically searched from the time of each library's construction to October 20, 2022. The studies that compared the influencing factors of recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included based on the PICO search structure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of observational studies. The effects of the patient's age, gender, BMI, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, course of the disease, Pfirrmann grade, and the surgical segment on recurrent lumbar disc herniation were systematically evaluated using Revman 5.3. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

Thirteen studies involving 3,393 patients (323 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation) treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy were included in this study. The results of the systematic evaluation showed that the effects of gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, type of lumbar disc herniation and the surgical segment on recurrent lumbar disc herniation were not statistically significant. However, age ≥60 years (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.13, 4.41), BMI ≥25 (OR = 2.89; 95% CI: 1.23, 6.80), diabetes (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.55), course of disease ≥4 years (OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.58, 5.43), Pfirrmann grades 3-4 (OR = 3.10; 95% CI: 2.18, 4.40), incomplete removal of nucleus pulposus (OR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.69, 6.27) and intraoperative fibre breakage (OR = 3.18; 95% CI: 1.56, 6.50) increased the risk of recurrence after treatment.

Conclusion

The recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic treatment is related to demographic characteristics, disease history and surgical conditions. In the future, more high-quality studies are needed to explore the influencing factors of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain

Introduction

Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

Objective

The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders.

Methods

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented.

Results

After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain.

Conclusion

The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.

Comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and open lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

In order to compare the outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and open lumbar discectomy (OLD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods

The Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sience, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wangfang databases were searched from inception to April 30, 2022 to collect the published studies about PTED vs. OLD for treatment of LDH. The Revman 5.2 was used for data analysis. The primary outcomes were excellent rates, complication rates and reoperation rates. The secondary outcomes were length of incision, length of operation, length of hospital stay, and the amount of intraoperative blood loss.

Results

A total of nine studies were included, of which, eight randomized controlled trials and one retrospective study involving 1,679 patients with LDH (755 patients for PTED, and 924 patients for OLD) were included. According to meta-analysis, there were no significant difference in excellent rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.94–2.28, P = 0.09), reoperation rates (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.50–1.84, P = 0.90), length of operation [standardized mean differences (SMD) = −17.97, 95%CI: −54.83–18.89, P = 0.34], and the amount of intraoperative blood loss (SMD = −128.05, 95%CI: −258.67–2.57, P = 0.05), respectively. There were significant differences in complication rates (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14–0.33, P < 0.001), length of incision (SMD = −2.76, 95%CI: −2.88–−2.65, P < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (SMD = −5.19, 95%CI: −5.36–−5.01, P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

PTED can achieve better outcomes with respect to the complication rates, length of incision, and length of hospital stay compared with OLD.

Comparison of Three Common Intervertebral Disc Discectomies in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Multiple Data

OBJECTIVE

Due to recent developments and the wide application of percutaneous transforaminal discectomy (PTED), we herein compare it with microendoscopic discectomy (MED) and traditional open surgery (OD) through surgical indicators and postoperative outcomes to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive surgery PTED.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO2018: CRD42018094890). We searched four English and two Chinese databases from the date of their establishment to May 2022. Randomized controlled trials and case-control studies of PTED versus MED or PTED versus OD in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation were retrieved.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies with 6467 cases were included. When comparing MED with PTED, the latter had less intraoperative blood loss, smaller incision, shorter postoperative bed times, shorter hospitalization times, better postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain, and postoperative dysfunction index (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) and higher recurrence rates and revision rates. However, operation times, postoperative VAS leg scores and complications, and successful operation rates were similar in both groups. Comparison of PTED with OD revealed in the former less intraoperative blood loss and smaller incision, shorter postoperative bed times, shorter hospitalization times, shorter operation times, and higher recurrence rates and revision rates. Nonetheless, comprehensive postoperative VAS scores, VAS leg pain scores, VAS low back pain, ODI and incidence of complications, and successful operation rates were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effect and safety of PTED, MED and OD in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation were comparable. PTED had obvious advantages in that it is minimally invasive, with rapid recovery after surgery, but its recurrence rates and revision rates were higher than MED and OD. Therefore, it is not possible to blindly consider replacing MED and OD with PTED.

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy and Open Lumbar Discectomy for Gluteal Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation

Introduction

This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of modified percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) in the surgical management of single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH) gluteal pain and to determine whether it provides a better clinical outcome than open lumbar discectomy (OD).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients treated with modified PETD and OD for gluteal pain in LDH from January 2015 to December 2020 was conducted. Sample size was determined using a priori power analysis. Demographic information, surgical outcomes including procedure time (minutes), intraoperative blood loss (mL), hospital days, costs (RMB), fluoroscopy shots, recurrence and complications, etc., were recorded and analyzed. Prognostic outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (JOA) and modified MacNab criteria. The preoperative and postoperative VAS, ODI and JOA scores were recorded by two assistants. When the results were inconsistent, the scores were recorded again by the lead professor until all scores were consistently recorded in the data. MRI was used to assess radiological improvement and all patients received follow-ups for at least one year.

Results

The sample size required for the study was calculated by a priori analysis, and a total of 72 participants were required for the study to achieve 95% statistical test power. A total of 93 patients were included, 47 of whom underwent modified PETD, and 46 of whom underwent OD. In the modified PETD intragroup comparison, VAS scores ranged from 7.14 ± 0.89 preoperatively to 2.00 ± 0.58, 2.68 ± 0.70, 2.55 ± 0.69, 2.23 ± 0.81, and 1.85 ± 0.72 at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients showed significant pain relief postoperatively (P &lt; 0.01). According to the modified MacNab score, the excellent rate in the PETD group was 89.36%. There was no significant difference compared to the OD group (89.13%, P &gt; 0.05). Complication rates were lower (P &gt; 0.05) but recurrence rates were higher (P &gt; 0.05) in the modified PETD group than in the OD group. The modified PETD group had a faster operative time (P &lt; 0.01), shorter hospital stay (P &lt; 0.01), less intraoperative bleeding (P &lt; 0.01), and less financial burden to the patient (P &lt; 0.01) than the OD group. At 7 days postoperatively, the VAS score for low back pain was higher in the OD group than in the modified PETD group (P &lt; 0.01). The VAS and JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were not significantly different between the modified PETD and OD groups (P &gt; 0.05), and the ODI was significantly different at 3 months postoperatively (P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Modified PETD treatment is safe and effective for gluteal pain due to L4/5 disc herniation and has the advantages of a lower complication rate, faster postoperative recovery, shorter length of stay, fewer anesthesia risks and lower cost of the procedure compared with OD. However, modified PETD has a higher recurrence rate.

Comparison of Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Non-Endoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic discectomy (ED) with non-endoscopic discectomy (NED) for treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trial from inception until August 13, 2020. Trials which investigated multiple operative approaches on lumbar disc herniation were identified without language restrictions.

RESULTS

In total, 25 trials involving 2258 patients with symptomatic LDH were included. Twenty trials performed the comparison between ED and NED. Five trials performed the comparison between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). The operative time of micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED) was longer than open discectomy (OD). The length of hospital stay of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) was shorter than fenestration discectomy (FD). Significant differences in intraoperative blood loss volumes were found between PELD with FD and MED with OD. The complication rate of PELD was lower than FD (PELD: 4.3%; FD: 14.6%) and the complication rate of full-endoscopic discectomy (FE) was lower than microscopic discectomy (MD) (FE: 13.4%; MD: 32.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

PELD and FE have the advantage of limiting intraoperative damages. ED and NED can be both considered sufficient to achieve good clinical outcomes. PETD and PEID are able to achieve similar results but the learning curve of PETD was steeper. More independent high-quality RCTs with sufficiently large sample sizes performing cost-effectiveness analyzes are needed.

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided robot-assisted percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) has been widely used for minimally invasive treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), and percutaneous disc target puncture has a steep learning curve and high radiation exposure. Proper technology grafting can improve the surgical procedure and clinical outcomes. The changes brought by grafting surgical robots into PETD are worth investigating. A retrospective analysis was performed on the information of patients who received PETD in our hospital from March 2019 to July 2020. A total of 102 of patients who received 2D-guided robot-assisted PETD were included in Group A, and 102 of patients who received C-arm fluoroscopy-guided bare-handed PETD were included in Group B. The number of punctures, number of fluoroscopies, operation duration, intraoperative anxiety score, complications, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before operation, on Day 1 after operation and at the last follow-up visit of the two groups were compared. All 204 patients received successful operations. Group A received 1.20±0.42 punctures, 10.49±2.16 fluoroscopies and 60.69±5.63 minutes of operation, significantly fewer than the 4.84±1.94 punctures, 17.41±3.23 fluoroscopies and 71.19±5.11 minutes of operation of Group B (all P<0.05), and Group A had significantly lower intraoperative anxiety scores and incidence of complications than Group B (both P<0.05). Both groups had comparable VAS and ODI scores on Day 1 after operation and at the last follow-up visit, which were both significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). 2D-guided robot-assisted PETD can enable precise planning of the puncture path, make it easier for operators to complete targeted punctures at pathogenic targets, reduce the number of punctures and fluoroscopies, shorten the operation duration to optimize the operation process, and reduce complications and alleviate intraoperative anxiety for better clinical results. Therefore it mayb be a better choice to assist PETD.

Differential Agnostic Effect Size Analysis of Lumbar Stenosis Surgeries

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of 89 randomized prospective, prospective, and retrospective studies on spinal endoscopic surgery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to provide familiar Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg effect size (ES) data following endoscopic decompression for sciatica-type back and leg pain due to lumbar herniated disc, foraminal, or lateral recess spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Higher-grade objective clinical outcome ES data are more suitable than lower-grade clinical evidence, including cross-sectional retrospective study outcomes or expert opinion to underpin the ongoing debate on whether or not to replace some of the traditional open and with other forms of minimally invasive spinal decompression surgeries such as the endoscopic technique.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019 identified 89 eligible studies on lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery enrolling 23,290 patient samples using the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain used for the ES calculation.

RESULTS

There was an overall mean overall reduction of ODI of 46.25 (SD 6.10), VAS back decrease of 3.29 (SD 0.65), and VAS leg reduction of 5.77 (SD 0.66), respectively. Reference tables of familiar ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg show no significant impact of study design, follow-up, or patients' age on ES observed with these outcome instruments. There was no correlation of ES with long-term follow-up (P = 0.091). Spinal endoscopy produced an overall ODI ES of 0.92 extrapolated from 81 studies totaling 12,710 patient samples. Provided study comparisons to tubular retractor microdiscectomy and open laminectomy showed an ODI ES of 0.9 (2895 patients pooled from 16 studies) and 0.93 (1188 patients pooled from 5 studies). The corresponding VAS leg ES were 0.92 (12,631 endoscopy patients pooled from 81 studies), 0.92 (2348 microdiscectomy patients pooled from 15 studies), and 0.89 (1188 open laminectomy patients pooled from 5 studies).

CONCLUSION

Successful clinical outcomes can be achieved with various lumbar surgeries. ESs with endoscopic spinal surgery are on par with those found with open laminectomy and microsurgical decompression.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This article is a meta-analysis on the benefit overlap between lumbar endoscopy, microsurgical decompression, laminectomy, and lumbar decompression fusion.

Microendoscopic decompression of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots

Nerve root morphological variability is often incompletely appreciated on preoperative imaging and can complicate intraoperative decision-making. This case demonstrates the utility of spinal endoscopy in the visualisation and manipulation of conjoined nerve roots and includes procedural images to promote better understanding and awareness of this anatomical anomaly. A woman in her 50s presented with 1 year of progressive left S1 radiculopathy refractory to non-operative modalities. History and examination were notable for S1 dermatomal paresthesias, positive ipsilateral straight leg raise and grade 4/5 gastrocnemius strength. MRI demonstrated an L5-S1 left paracentral disc herniation causing severe lateral recess stenosis. Endoscopic decompression revealed conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots. Laminotomies and discectomy provided circumferential decompression. The patient experienced immediate and sustained relief of her preoperative radiculopathy as manifested in patient-reported outcome measures. Evolving endoscopic spine platforms provide novel visualisation of nerve root anomalies yielding new insight on safe and effective decompressive techniques.

Cost-effectiveness of full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica

OBJECTIVE

To assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy among patients with sciatica.

METHODS

This economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 12-month multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design, in which patients were randomised to PTED or open microdiscectomy. Patients were aged from 18 to 70 years and had at least 6 weeks of radiating leg pain caused by lumbar disc herniation. Effect measures included leg pain and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as derived using the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Missing data were multiply imputed, bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty, and various sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness.

RESULTS

Of the 613 patients enrolled, 304 were randomised to PTED and 309 to open microdiscectomy. Statistically significant differences in leg pain and QALYs were found in favour of PTED at 12 months follow-up (leg pain: 6.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 12.6; QALYs: 0.040; 95% CI 0.007 to 0.074). Surgery costs were higher for PTED than for open microdiscectomy (ie, €4500/patient vs €4095/patient). All other disaggregate costs as well as total societal costs were lower for PTED than for open microdiscectomy. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that the probability of PTED being less costly and more effective (ie, dominant) compared with open microdiscectomy was 99.4% for leg pain and 99.2% for QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PTED is more cost-effective from the societal perspective compared with open microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02602093.

Technical Tips for Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: A Three-step Maneuver for Puncture and Early Clinical Experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) with three-step maneuver for puncture (TSMP) for lumbar herniated disc (LDH).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 30 patients who underwent PTED using TSMP for LDH and met inclusion criteria from January 2018 to September 2018. The primary outcome, leg or back pain, was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patient surgical satisfaction was measured at 12 months post surgery using a five-point Likert scale. Potential prognostic factors measured were demographic characteristics, duration of symptom (DOS), and involved levels. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher exact test and t-test. TSMP is a three-step maneuver that builds on the concept of needle puncture site and trajectory determination based on the principles of Kambin's triangle. First, accurate direction of the puncture is confirmed by inserting the needle horizontally. Then by gradually raising the needle tail in the manner described, the superior articular facet and the intervertebral foramen are sequentially located. Finally, the needle tip slides into the intervertebral foramen to reach the target superior articular facet.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean VAS was 7.6 ± 1.19, which decreased to 1.4 ± 0.97 at 12 months following treatment (P < 0.0001). Rates of surgical satisfaction per Likert scale were as follows: very satisfied and satisfied in 26 patients (86.7%). Three recurrent disc herniations of adjacent segmental levels were observed in the L5-S1 group at eight and 12 months after surgery. VAS scores at 12 months varied significantly between L4-L5 level surgery and L5-S1 level surgery groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

TSMP is a reliable technique for puncture into the intervertebral foramen.

Original Designed Uniportal-Bichannel Spinal Endoscopic System (UBiSES) for Foraminoplasty in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy

OBJECTIVE

The study introduced uniportal-bichannel spinal endoscopic system (UBiSES) and explored the feasibility of applying UBiSES to conduct lumbar foraminoplasty in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD).

METHODS

This is a cohort study. 36 patients confirmed as L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in our hospital from March, 2019 to November, 2019 were enrolled. 36 patients were divided into two groups named the UBiSES group (n = 18, male: female = 8:10) and the TESSYS group (n = 18, male: female = 10:8). The average age of the UBiSES group and the TESSYS group were 40.94 ± 12.39 years old and 39.78 ± 13.02 years old respectively. PETD via uniportal-bichannel foraminoplasty assisted by UBiSES was adopted on the UBiSES group while PETD via conventional foraminoplasty was performed on the TESSYS group. One experienced surgeon with more than 4000 cases of lumbar surgery performed PETD on all patients. The demographic data, the duration of working cannula placement (minutes), decompression time (minutes), radiation exposure time (seconds), complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and modified MacNab criteria were recorded and analyzed. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were conducted to evaluate the radiographic improvement.

RESULTS

PETD via lumbar foraminoplasty was successfully performed in all cases. The follow-up points were 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The average follow-up period of all patients was 15.78 ± 2.29 months. There was no statistic difference in age (P = 0.81), sex (P = 0.51) and follow-up (P = 0.14) between two groups. The duration of working cannula placement was 19.08 ± 2.30 min in the UBiSES group and 24.90 ± 4.71 min in the TESSYS group and there was significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistic difference in decompression time between the UBiSES group (44.18 ± 5.70 min) and the TESSYS group (47.46 ± 5.96 min) (P = 1.70). The radiation exposure time was 28.00 ± 4.70 s in the UBiSES group and 40.50 ± 5.73 s in the TESSYS group respectively, and has significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was significant different in the duration of working cannula placement and radiation exposure time in male or female between the UBiSES group and the TESSYS group (P < 0.05). For male or female, no difference observed in decompression time and follow-up period between two groups. Postoperative VAS of low back and leg at every follow-up point (1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months) was improved significantly in both groups compared with their preoperative VAS (P < 0.05). The postoperative ODI (3 months, 6 months, 12 months) has decreased significantly in both the UBiSES group and the TESSYS group compared with their preoperative ODI (P < 0.05). 94.44% patients received an excellent or good recovery in the UBiSES group and 88.89% for the TESSYS group. There was no poor result reported in both groups. The radiographic images showed satisfactory foraminoplasty and sufficient decompression of nerve in both groups. No postoperative complications were observed during follow-ups in the UBiSES group. Two patients in the TESSYS group experienced postoperative dysesthesia and the symptom was disappeared in 5 days and 7 days respectively with dexamethasone and neurotrophic drugs treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The original designed UBiSES could effectively and safely enlarge the foramen with an extensive surgical view and space under full-time and real-time visualization and get satisfactory efficacy.

Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease? Systematic Review and Superiority Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether endoscopic discectomy (ED) shows superiority compared with the current gold standard of microdiscectomy (MD) in management of lumbar disc disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database search including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 till April 2020 for studies comparing ED and MD in the management of lumbar disc disease. Analysis was performed in R platform using OpenMeta[Analyst] software.

RESULTS

We included 27 studies, including 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 7 nonrandomized prospective, and 9 retrospective studies involving 4018 patients in the meta-analysis. We stratified the results based on the study design. Considering the heterogeneity in some results between study designs, we weighed our conclusion essentially based on results of RCTs. On analyzing the RCTs, superiority was established at 95% confidence interval for ED compared with MD in terms of functional outcomes like Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (P = .008), duration of surgery (P = .023), and length of hospital stay (P < .001) although significant heterogeneity was noted. Similarly, noninferiority to MD was established by ED in other outcomes like visual analogue scale score for back pain (P = .860) and leg pain (P = .495), MacNab classification (P = .097), recurrences (P = .993), reoperations (P = .740), and return-to-work period (P = .748).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis established the superiority of endoscopic discectomy in outcome measures like ODI score, duration of surgery, overall complications, length of hospital stay and noninferiority in other measures analyzed. With recent advances in the field of ED, the procedure has the potential to take over the place of MD as the gold standard of care in management of lumbar disc disease.

A systematic review of full endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Aim: Endoscopic discectomies provide several advantages over other techniques such as traditional open lumbar discectomy (OLD) including possibly decreased complications, shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to work. Methods: An electronic database search including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Controlled trials (CENTRAL) were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. Results: A total of nine RCTs met inclusion criteria. Three showed benefit of endoscopic discectomy over the comparator with regards to pain relief, with the remaining six studies showing no difference in pain relief or function. Conclusion: Based on review of the nine included studies, we can conclude that endoscopic discectomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and has additional benefits of lower complication rate and superior perioperative parameters.

Eight Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis on Complications

Objective: Therapeutic options for lumbar disc surgery (LDH) have been rapidly evolved worldwide. Conventional pair meta-analysis has shown inconsistent results of the safety of different surgical interventions for LDH. A network pooling evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was conducted to compare eight surgical interventions on complications for patients with LDH. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for RCT from inception to June 2020, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42020176821). This study is conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. Primary outcomes include intraoperative, post-operative, and overall complications, reoperation, operation time, and blood loss. Results: A total of 27 RCT with 2,948 participants and eight interventions, including automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD), chemonucleolysis (CN), microdiscectomy (MD), micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), open discectomy (OD), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), and tubular discectomy (TD) were enrolled. The pooling results suggested that PELD and PLDD are with lower intraoperative and post-operative complication rates, respectively. TD, PELD, PLDD, and MED were the safest procedures for LDH according to complications, reoperation, operation time, and blood loss. Conclusion: The results of this study provided evidence that PELD and PLDD were with lower intraoperative and post-operative complication rates, respectively. TD, PELD, PLDD, and MED were the safest procedures for LDH according to complications, reoperation, operation time, and blood loss. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020176821.

Application of a targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: preliminary clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) is minimally invasive and has been widely used to treat patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) due to its safety and efficiency. However, due to the unique anatomy of the L5-S1 level, the PTED procedure is often difficult to perform in the region. ZESSYS, a targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device, may help to overcome these anatomical limitations. In this study, we assessed the efficiency and the short-term effects of PTED with ZESSYS at the L5-S1 level.

METHODS

Between January and August of 2018, fifty-six patients with lumbar disc herniation at the single level of L5-S1 and who underwent percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. They were segregated into the transforaminal endoscopic surgical system (TESSYS) group and the ZESSYS group. The puncture time, foraminoplasty time, decompression time, and fluoroscopy time were evaluated for operation efficiency. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The MacNab criteria were used to evaluate patient subjective satisfaction at 12-month follow-up postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average puncture time (5.29 ± 2.05 min), foraminoplasty time (12.82 ± 2.52 min), and fluoroscopy time (26.29 ± 5.96 s) were all significantly shorter in the ZESSYS group than in the TESSYS group (average puncture time 8.07 ± 3.13 min, p < 0.01; foraminoplasty time, 17.18 ± 2.92 min, p < 0.01; fluoroscopy time, 34.73 ± 6.86 s; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in the decompression time (p = 0.057). The VAS score of low back pain and leg pain, as well as the ODI score, improved at all time points postoperatively compared with preoperative, in both the TESSYS group and the ZESSYS group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, and ODI score between the TESSYS group and the ZESSYS group at the same time points (P > 0.05). According to the MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate at 12-month follow-up postoperatively was 85.7% in the TESSYS group and 89.3% in the ZESSYS group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The targeted and quantificational foraminoplasty device named ZESSYS was more efficient in the puncture and foraminoplasty procedures, effectively protecting the exiting nerve and minimizing the level of radiation exposure. The device is efficient and safe for PTED in treating lumbar disc herniation at the L5-S1 level.

The biomechanical effect on the adjacent L4/L5 segment of S1 superior facet arthroplasty: a finite element analysis for the male spine

Background

The superior facet arthroplasty is important for intervertebral foramen microscopy. To our knowledge, there is no study about the postoperative biomechanics of adjacent L4/L5 segments after different methods of S1 superior facet arthroplasty. To evaluate the effect of S1 superior facet arthroplasty on lumbar range of motion and disc stress of adjacent segment (L4/L5) under the intervertebral foraminoplasty.

Methods

Eight finite element models (FEMs) of lumbosacral vertebrae (L4/S) had been established and validated. The S1 superior facet arthroplasty was simulated with different methods. Then, the models were imported into Nastran software after optimization; 500 N preload was imposed on the L4 superior endplate, and 10 N⋅m was given to simulate flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation. The range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral disc stress of the L4-L5 spine were recorded.

Results

The ROM and disc stress of L4/L5 increased with the increasing of the proportions of S1 superior facet arthroplasty. Compared with the normal model, the ROM of L4/L5 significantly increased in most directions of motion when S1 superior facet formed greater than 3/5 from the ventral to the dorsal or 2/5 from the apex to the base. The disc stress of L4/L5 significantly increased in most directions of motion when S1 superior facet formed greater than 3/5 from the ventral to the dorsal or 1/5 from the apex to the base.

Conclusion

In this study, the ROM and disc stress of L4/L5 were affected by the unilateral S1 superior facet arthroplasty. It is suggested that the forming range from the ventral to the dorsal should be less than 3/5 of the S1 upper facet joint. It is not recommended to form from apex to base.

Level of evidence

Level IV

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To give a systematic overview of effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy (OM) in the treatment of lumbar disk herniation (LDH).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The current standard procedure for the treatment of sciatica caused by LDH, is OM. PTED is an alternative surgical technique which is thought to be less invasive. It is unclear if PTED has comparable outcomes compared with OM.

METHODS

Multiple online databases were systematically searched up to April 2020 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies comparing PTED with OM for LDH. Primary outcomes were leg pain and functional status. Pooled effect estimates were calculated for the primary outcomes only and presented as standard mean differences (SMD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) at short (1-day postoperative), intermediate (3-6 months), and long-term (12 months).

RESULTS

We identified 2276 citations, of which eventually 14 studies were included. There was substantial heterogeneity in effects on leg pain at short term. There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in leg pain at intermediate (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.10-0.21) and long-term follow-up (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.30-0.53). Only one study measured functional status at short-term and reported no differences. There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in functional status at intermediate (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.24-0.07) and long-term (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.45-0.24).

CONCLUSION

There is moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in leg pain or functional status at intermediate and long-term follow-up between PTED and OM in the treatment of LDH. High quality, robust studies reporting on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness on the long term are lacking.Level of Evidence: 2.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy compared with other surgeries for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) had a superior effect than other surgeries in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through February 2018 to identify eligible studies that compared the effects and complications between PELD and other surgical interventions in LDH. The outcomes included success rate, recurrence rate, complication rate, operation time, hospital stay, blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain, 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF12) physical component score, mental component score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, Oswestry Disability Index. A random-effects or fixed-effects model was used to pool the estimate, according to the heterogeneity among the included studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (involving 2,528 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with other surgeries, PELD had favorable clinical outcomes for LDH, including shorter operation time (weight mean difference, WMD=-18.14 minutes, 95%CI: -25.24, -11.05; P < .001) and hospital stay (WMD = -2.59 days, 95%CI: -3.87, -1.31; P < .001), less blood loss (WMD = -30.14 ml, 95%CI: -43.16, -17.13; P < .001), and improved SF12- mental component score (WMD = 2.28, 95%CI: 0.50, 4.06; P = .012)) and SF12- physical component score (WMD = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.37, 1.71; P = .02). However, it also was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrent disc herniation (relative risk [RR] = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.08, 2.52; P = .021). There were no significant differences between the PELD group and other surgical group in terms of success rate (RR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.97, 1.04; P = .733), complication rate (RR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.63, 1.18; P = .361), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score score (WMD = 0.19, 95%CI: -1.90, 2.27; P = .861), visual analog scale score for back pain (WMD = -0.17, 95%CI: -0.55, 0.21; P = .384) and leg pain (WMD = 0.00, 95%CI: -0.10, 0.10; P = .991), and Oswestry Disability Index score (WMD = -0.29, 95%CI: -1.00, 0.43; P = .434).

CONCLUSION

PELD was associated with better effects and similar complications with other surgeries in LDH. However, it also resulted in a higher recurrence rate. Considering the potential limitations in the present study, further large-scale, well-performed randomized trials are needed to verify our findings.

Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and open fenestration discectomy (OFD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

Patients in our hospital with LDH who received PTED (n = 71) and OFD (n = 39) from 2013 to 2014 were retrospectively studied. Patient information, including age, gender, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, body weight, height, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and recurrence, was collected. The patients in the two groups were followed up for an average of 63 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients completed the operation and 110 patients were followed up completely. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative low back pain, leg pain, ODI, and JOA of the two groups were better than those preoperatively (P < 0.05). One week after surgery, the recovery of PTED patients was better than that of OFD. The ODI score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (10 [8, 12] vs 14 [11, 16]; P < 0.05), the waist VAS score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (2 [2, 3] vs 3 [2, 4]; P < 0.05), the leg VAS score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (1 [0,1] vs 1 [1, 2]; P < 0.05), while the JOA score of the PTED group was higher than that of OFD group [19(16, 20) vs 12(10, 17); P < 0.05]. There were no significant differences in ODI, JOA, waist and leg VAS scores between the two groups at 1 month after surgery and at subsequent follow-up (P > 0.05). At the end of the follow up, 89.7% (35/39) of patients in the OFD group had excellent improvement in the JOA score, and 88.7% (63/71) of patients in the PTED group had an excellent improvement. There was no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups [(5/71) vs (3/39); P > 0.05]. [Correction added on 05 March 2021, after first online publication: "3/29" was amended to "3/39" in the preceding sentence.] CONCLUSION: Both PTED and OFD can achieve good mid-term efficacy in the treatment of LDH but PTED has certain advantages, including the small incision, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker, earlier recovery. However, prospective randomized controlled studies with a larger sample size are needed.

The biomechanical effects of graded upper articular process arthroplasty on lumbar spine: A finite element study

BACKGROUND

Superior articular process arthroplasty is important for intervertebral foramen microscopy but may lead to spinal instability. Currently, there has been no relevant study in relation to the biomechanical analysis of superior articular process arthroplasty. Hence, this study is intended to verify biomechanical effects after unilateral S1 superior articular process arthroplasty.

METHODS

Eight finite element (FE) models of lumbosacral vertebrae (L4-S) were constructed, and the superior articular process formation was simulated with the help of Geomagic studio. Then, the models were imported into Nastran software after optimization. Normal load and appropriate torque were applied to simulate forward flexion, back extension, lateral flexion and lateral rotation. In the end, changes of lumbar range of motion (ROM) and structural stress were compared with those of normal model.

RESULTS

Compared with the normal model, formed from ventral to dorsal (Longitudinal), the larger motion of lumbar spine and the greater larger stress of articular process showed statistical significance (P < 0.05) in most of directions when the forming range was greater than 3/5. Formed from the apex to the base (transverse), the larger motion of lumbar spine and the greater stress of articular process showed statistical significance (P < 0.05) in most of directions when the forming range was great than 1/5.

CONCLUSION

When conducting unilateral S1 articular process arthroplasty from ventral to dorsal, the forming range is recommended to be less than 3/5 of the superior articular process. Notably, it is not advisable to form from the apex to the base.

Estimation and influence of blood loss under endoscope for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD): a clinical observational study combined with in vitro experiment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to come up with new methods to quantitate the blood loss under endoscope and explore the influence of blood loss on percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).

METHODS

Clinical research and in vitro experiment are combined. In the in vitro experiment, 2.0-ml blood was diluted in different ratio to simulate the rinse solution of PELD, the hematocrit method (HCT-M) and red blood cell count method (RBC-M) were came up to estimate blood loss and the new methods were calibrated with the direct measurement method (Direct-M). In clinical research, 74 patients with L5/S1 disk herniation were treated with PELD, and HCT-M and the empirical method (EMP-M) were used to estimate the blood loss under endoscope. According to blood loss, all patients were divided into group A (≤ 10 ml) and group B (> 10 ml). The blood loss, operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the in vitro experiment, the hematocrit of the rinse solution was always stable over time. The estimated blood loss by HCT-M was stable and quite approximate to actual blood volume (2.0 ml) whatever the blood dilution ratio, while according to RBC-M, the estimated blood loss was close to the actual blood volume only when the dilution ratio was greater than 300 times. In clinical research, the blood loss estimated by HCT-M was higher than that by EMP-M in both groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between group A and group B in blood loss (7.40 ± 1.61 vs 19.91 ± 10.94 ml), operation time (80.51 ± 34.70 vs 136.51 ± 41.88 min), and fluoroscopy frequency (6.92 ± 1.52 vs 11.11 ± 2.32 times) (P < 0.05). The VAS and ODI scores in group B were higher than that in group A 1 week after operation (P < 0.05); however, the scores were not different between the two groups at pre-operation (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HCT-M is a reliable method to estimate endoscopic blood loss in PELD. The amount of endoscopic blood loss affects the operative procedure in operation time and fluoroscopy frequency, as well as clinical effects in VAS and ODI scores after operation in short term.

Foraminoplasty affects the clinical outcomes of discectomy during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy: a two-year follow-up retrospective study on 64 patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the significance of how the degree of injury of the facet joint affects clinical outcomes in foraminoplasty.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 64 patients treated with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy with foraminoplasty (PETDF) from January of 2015 to December of 2016. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the articular surface of the facet joint was damaged. Preoperative, perioperative, demographic data, and radiographic parameters for these two groups were extracted and compared.Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the duration of operation (p = 0.331), intraoperative blood loss volume (p = 0.631), the weight of disc (p = 0.274) or cut bone (p = 0.526). There were no significant differences between the two groups for VAS or ODI at the same time point (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in the VAS scores of low-back pain at 24 h and 24 months after surgery in the injured group. There were significant differences in ISH, ISA, rate of lumbar instability, recurrent herniation, and Macnab scores between the two groups at 24 months after surgery (p < 0.05). The regression equation between ISA and ISH was Y = 4.237 + 0.565x (where Y denotes an increase of ISA; X, reduction of ISH; F = 6.219, p = 0.015). The Poisson ratio was 0.363 (p = 0.003).Conclusions: PETDF is effective and safe for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, when foraminoplasty destroys the articular surface of the facet joint, there may be increases in lumbar instability and recurrence rate post-operation.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose

The objective was to compare the traditional microdiscectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of disc herniations regarding pain, disability, and complications.

Methods

Randomized clinical trial with 47 patients with disc herniations treated with 2 different surgical techniques: traditional microdiscectomy or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Forty-seven patients were divided into 2 groups and monitored for 12 months. Irradiated and low back pain were evaluated with the visual analog scale. Surgery complications were recorded.

Results

After surgery, the sciatica and disability improved significantly but without significant differences between the groups. Improvements in back pain were significant until the third month. There were no statistical differences between groups regarding recurrence, infection, and the need for reoperation.

Conclusions

Endoscopic discectomy results are similar to those of conventional microdiscectomy regarding pain and disability improvement. Postoperative lumbar pain is less intense with endoscopic discectomy than conventional microdiscectomy only during the first 3 months. Endoscopic discectomy is a safe and efficient alternative to microdiscectomy.

Clinical Trials

Trial protocol registration number: RBR-5symrd (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).

Orthobiologic Supplementation Improves Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery

Background

Endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive spine surgery which has been touted to reduce collateral tissue damage, incisional pain, recovery time and complications. Residual back or leg pain and recurrent herniation are commonly reported post-operative outcomes. It has been suggested that injecting orthobiologics like cryopreserved amniotic-derived products (ADPs) and bone marrow aspiration (BMA) into the surgery site would have additional benefit on patient outcomes. This is a Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB)-approved level 1, randomized controlled trial of prospectively collected patient demographic and outcomes data for endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression surgery. The primary goal of this study was to compare patient outcomes of orthobiologic supplementation during endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression surgery.

Methods

Following WIRB approval, 269 patients underwent lumbar endoscopic-assisted decompressive surgery between January 2011 and October 2017. Patients were randomized to receive ADP, BMA, both, or no supplementation (control group). Outcomes were measured by post-operative questionnaires (visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36)) over 12 months.

Results

Mean VAS-leg for either BMA or ADP group displayed statistically significant improvements at 2 weeks (3.55 vs. 4.77, P = 0.002), 6 months (2.34 vs. 3.37, P = 0.026), and 9 months (2.18 vs. 3.57, P = 0.01) compared to no supplementation group (control group). Similarly, improvements in mean VAS-back were significant at 2 weeks (3.98 vs. 5.01, P = 0.011), 2 months (3.22 vs. 3.93, P = 0.04), 9 months (2.38 vs. 4.11, P = 0.004), and 12 months (2.23 vs. 3.58, P = 0.011) compared to no supplementation group (control group). There were statistically significant differences in the ODI (2 weeks, 42.19 vs. 31.11, P = 0.014) and SF-36 (4 months, 85 vs. 63, P = 0.043 for ADP only), but these differences did not subsist over time. Two patients (one control, one ADP) re-herniated at the same level.

Conclusions

Orthobiologic BMA and ADP resulted in improved pain control during early post-operative periods.

Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Management of Lumbar Posterior Edge Separation in Adolescents

PURPOSE

Lumbar posterior edge separation is a common disorder with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in adolescents. Over the years, there has been a lack of an acknowledged assessment and plan. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of all sufferers who have received percutaneous full endoscopic treatment for lumbar posterior edge separation in adolescents.

METHODS

Case series of sufferers with lumbar posterior edge separation who underwent surgery in the Affiliated Hospital Qingdao University between February 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed, including 15 males and 9 females. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and the Korean Version of the Oswestry disability index (K-ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

All sufferers were followed up for 6 to 12 months, with an average time of 10.7 months. The postoperative VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODIs were significantly different from the preoperative scores (p < 0.05). According to the modified Mac Nab criteria, the results were excellent in 17 cases and good in 7 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous full endoscopic treatment can effectively achieve neurological functional recovery in sufferers with favorable efficacy and safety.

Curative effect comparison of transforaminal endoscopic spine system and traditional open discectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) has the advantages of small trauma, rapid recovery, early out-of-bed activity and fewer postoperative complications in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery. However, whether TESSYS would show a better curative effect than traditional open discectomy is not certain.

METHODS

Related clinical trial reports were collected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. After careful screening, the enrolled studies were evaluated by systematic review and meta-analysis using Revman v5.2 and STATA v11.

RESULTS

Using visual analogue scale as assessment index, TESSYS has a better operation effect than open discectomy only at 1 and 12 months after operation, the pooled standard mean differences were -0.289 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.518 to 0.060, P = 0.013) and -0.18 (95% CI -0.34 to 0.03, P = 0.022). When using the Japanese Orthopaedics Association assessment index, a better operation effect of TESSYS was shown only at 3 months after operation, standard mean difference -0.394 (95% CI -0.678 to 0.110, P = 0.007). There were no obvious differences between TESSYS and open discectomy in Oswestry disability index assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

TESSYS seems to display an equal operation effect with traditional open discectomy.

Surgical Outcomes for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation: Decompression Alone versus Fusion Surgery

Upper lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD), defined as L1-2 and L2-3 levels, presents with a lower incidence and more unfavorable surgical outcomes than lower lumbar levels. There are very few reports onthe appropriate surgical interventions for treating upper lumbar HIVD. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcome of decompression alone, when compared with spinal fusion surgery. A retrospective study involving a total of 7592 patients who underwent surgery due to HIVD in our institution was conducted. A total of 49 patients were included in this study: 33 patients who underwent decompression-only surgery and 16 patients who underwent fusion surgery. Demographic data, perioperative information, and functional outcomes were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores showed improvement in both groups postoperatively. The three-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score was significantly better in the fusion group. Additionally, 10 patients (76.9%) in the decompression group and 5 patients (83.3%) in the fusion group reported improvement in preoperative motor weakness. The final “satisfactory” rate was 66.7% in the decompression group and 93.8% in the fusion group (p = 0.034). The overall surgical outcomes of patients with upper lumbar HIVD were satisfactory in this study without any major complications. More reliable satisfactory rates and better functional scores at the three-month postoperative follow-up were reported in the fusion group.

Meta-analysis of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs. fenestration discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and fenestration discectomy (FD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, and Wanfang Data for all relevant studies. All statistical analyses wer performed using Review Manager version 5.3. Dichotomous data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and continuous data were calculated by mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles with 1390 study subjects were included, with 733 patients in the PTED group and 657 patients in the FD group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that postoperative the visual analog scale (VAS) score (mean difference [MD] -0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.22 to -0.03; P = 0.009) and postoperative complications (MD 0.52; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.04; P = 0.06) showed no significant differences between the PTED group and the FD group, while the PTED group had significantly better results in operation time (MD 0.47; 95% CI -11.34 to 12.28; P = 0.94), length of incision (MD -3.74; 95% CI -4.28 to -3.19; P < 0.00001), amount of bleeding (MD -63.66, 95% CI -77.65 to -49.67; P < 0.00001), time of postoperative bed rest (MD -90.19; 95% CI -106.82 to -73.56; P < 0.00001), hospitalization time (MD -5.90; 95% CI -7.21 to -4.59; P < 0.00001), and postoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) score (MD -0.59; 95% CI -1.11 to -0.08; P = 0.02) compared with the FD group.

CONCLUSION

The Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is associated with better postoperative ODI score, better results in length of incision, lower blood loss, shorter operation time, postoperative bed time and hospitalization time. The complications did not differ significantly between PTED and FD in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. These findings provide evidence to support PTED is efficacious for LDH; however, scar repair of a ruptured anulus fibrosus needs a long time and the patients undergoing PTED should be advised to stay in bed for a long time even if the symptoms are markedly relieved. These results are not limited to randomized controlled trials and lack data about the long-term outcome.

A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function

Objective

Angled scopes allow 360° visualization, which makes percutaneous endoscopic techniques (percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, PELD) particularly attractive for sequestrectomies, which entail the removal of extruded lumbar disc fragments that have migrated caudally or cranially between the ligaments, foramina, and neural structures, while preserving the disc. Although many different PELD techniques are currently available, not all of them are suitable for sequestrectomies; furthermore, long-term follow-up data are unfortunately lacking.

Methods

A pilot study was conducted on a cohort of 270 patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery (PELD or microdiscectomy), of whom only 7 were eligible for endoscopic interlaminar sequestrectomy with disc preservation. The patients’ baseline conditions and clinical outcomes were measured with the Oswestry Disability Index and a visual analogue scale. Long-term follow-up was conducted using satisfaction questionnaires that were based on the MacNab criteria and administered by medical/nursing personnel not involved in their primary surgical management.

Results

EasyGo system was eventually used in 5 PELD cases. No dural tears, infections, or nerve root injuries were recorded in patients undergoing sequestrectomy. Surgical events, including blood loss and overall length of hospital stay, did not differ significantly among the 270 patients. In the group treated with endoscopic sequestrectomy, no recurrences or complications were noted during a follow-up of 3 years, and an excellent degree of satisfaction was reported.

Conclusion

We provide OCEBM (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) level 3 evidence that interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy is a tailored and well-tolerated surgical option; nonetheless, a cost-effectiveness analysis assessing the interval until return to working activities and long-term benefits is warranted.

Full Endoscopic Discectomy Using Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System Technique: A Mini Review of Complications

Background:

Full Endoscopic Discectomy (FED) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of Lumbar Disk Herniation (LDH) with increasing popularity among surgeons in the recent years. This alternative to conventional procedures surgical approach is generally a safe and efficient technique possessing many advantages such as less soft tissue trauma, preservation of dorsal musculature, and reduced perioperative morbidity and rapid recovery. However, FED is associated with a number of complications such as postoperative dysesthesia, nerve root injury, and dural tears.

Methods:

Α search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus electronic databases was used to revised the literature on complications of full endoscopic discectomy using transforaminal endoscopic spine system technique

Conclusion:

In this review complications associated with FED are analyzed, emphasizing on the potential beneficial role of Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System (TESSYS) technique in reducing their frequency.

[Not Available]

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to investigate the dimensions of the osseous lumbar intervertebral foramen (IVF) regarding a sample without any clinical indication of spine pathology and, additionally, survey possible correlations of these measurements with clinical characteristics of the individuals.

Materials and Methods:

CT images of spine-related asymptomatic individuals were examined on parasagittal and oblique projections for the evaluation of cranial foramen width (CrFW), caudal foramen width (CaFW), vertebral height (VH) and foraminal height (FH) in accordance with gender, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and vertebral level.

Results:

Overall, CT images of 73 individuals, 40 men and 33 women, with mean age 56.81 (± 14.79) years, mean height 1.69 (± 0.09) meters, mean weight 81.27 (± 18.14) kilograms and mean BMI 28.35 (± 5.62) were included. The maximum mean FW was the CaFWL1 and the minimum the CrFWL5, with values of 8.11 and 6.01 mm, respectively. Height and weight were presented as significantly bigger in men than women; however, women had bigger lumbar IVF values and no significant width measurement for IVF was morphoobserved at any level for either sex. Age showed a negative impact on the elderly by reducing height and the majority of FW measurements. Statistically important differences in accordance with BMI were not seen.

Conclusions:

Data comparison with previous studies is ambiguous due to methodological differences and possible populational variations and they reveal just a glimpse of the in vivo lumbar IVF. Our data could have clinical application on lumbar spine interventions.

Preliminary results of a novel pure endoscopic procedure in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: double endoscopic technique

BACKGROUND

With increased experience and the availability of new technical instrumentations, the surgical endoscopic indications for lumbar spinal pathologies have moved from simple prolapsed disk to canal stenosis. The available endoscopes come in two different sizes (10 mm and 6.3 mm in diameter); however, one is too bulky to use inside the spinal canal and the other is too small to achieve a fast bone decompression.

METHODS

In order to overcome such problems, we developed and used a different surgical technique called: Double Endoscopic Technique. Using this approach, we operated and prospectively collected clinical information on 17 patients (Group A) suffering from a mixed (ligament-bone hypertrophy and prolapsed disk) single segmental lumbar canal stenosis. At a median of 13 months from surgery, all the patients in this group had a very good outcome with an improvement of the VAS and ODI. These clinical results were compared with those from another group of patients who had undergone surgery in the same Unit, but using standard MIS technique (Group B). Both groups were similar in terms of number, age, symptoms and stenosis location. In particular we compared the pre- and post-operative VAS and ODI values, the amount of postoperative pain killers used during the first week post-surgery, the length of in-hospital stay as well as the blood loss during surgery.

RESULTS

Although our aim was only to present a novel surgical endoscopic technique, the results, with all the study limitations including small numbers and short follow-up, have shown that this procedure is safe and effective, yielding an outcome comparable to the standard MIS approach. Furthermore, it is less disruptive towards the involved anatomy, it gives less post-operative pain, it requires a smaller skin incision and the blood loss is negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, this technique may guarantee a faster clinical recovery.

Effectiveness of Bi-Needle Technique (Hybrid Yeung Endoscopic Spine System/Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System) for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

OBJECTIVE

The bi-needle technique is a new technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. This technique combines the advantages of Yeung endoscopic spine system (YESS) and transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of the bi-needle technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and compare it with the TESSYS technique.

METHODS

We reviewed 86 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in our hospital from June 2013 to December 2015. Bi-needle technique was used in 49 patients (30 men, 19 women; average age 40.4 ± 5.2 years). TESSYS technique was used in 37 patients (19 men, 18 women; average age 42.8 ± 6.4 years). Clinical results were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Symptoms in both groups were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in visual analog scale and lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between bi-needle and TESSYS groups at last follow-up (P = 0.69 and P = 0.33, respectively). Operative time was shorter in the bi-needle group (P < 0.01). Recurrence rate and reoperation rate were lower in the bi-needle group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). Discitis was diagnosed in 2 patients in the TESSYS group. There were no patients with postoperative discitis in the bi-needle group.

CONCLUSIONS

The bi-needle technique is safe and effective for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Compared with TESSYS technique, operative time is shorter, and recurrence and reoperation rates are lower.

Lumbar herniated disc - endoscopic discectomy treatment

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.