Radiobasilic Versus Brachiobasilic Transposition on the Upper Arm to Avoid Steal Syndrome

Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiobasilic and brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients

We evaluated the cost and efficacy of radiobasilic and brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) methods in terms of forearm autogenous arteriovenous access in hemodialysis patients. We used a decision tree to compare the cost-effectiveness of proximal radiobasilic AVF (pRBAVF) and brachiobasilic AVF (BBAVF), considering the mean direct medical costs and patency rates. The overall mean cost of pRBAVF per patient (1767.59 Turkish lira [TL]) was lower than that of BBAVF (1877.99 TL). Also, the mean patency duration per patient was higher for pRBAVF (25.72 months) than BBAVF (20.21 months). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) showed that pRBAVF was 20.04-fold more effective than BBAVF. The monthly ICERs also favored pRBAVF, which was less costly and more effective. The pRBAVF provided clinical and economic benefits for hemodialysis patients requiring forearm autogenous arteriovenous access. pRBAVF was more effective in terms of patency than BBAVF, and was also less expensive.

Elbow AVF configurations and indications

INTRODUCTION

Brescia-Cimino radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the first-choice vascular access procedure for patients in need of long-term hemodialysis. The average life expectancy of patients receiving hemodialysis has increased in recent years and many patients now live longer and require secondary or tertiary procedures. Elbow fistulas should only rarely be constructed as primary fistulas. The aim of the surgeon must be not only to achieve a functioning fistula, but to avoid possible complications other than failure to mature (FTM), like distal ischemia and cardiac failure and to save the vessels as much as possible for future procedures.

BACKGROUND

Both arterial and venous anatomy of the elbow and upper arm have significant variations. The surgeon must be aware of these variations during the operation, and try not to harm the vasculature of the extremity while trying to construct a functioning fistula. The main advantages of elbow fistulas are the opportunity to have multiple outflows, preservation of the major veins in their original place with no dissection and giving no harm to them, and having a longer outflow tract for cannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the elbow, beginning to construct an AVF with the perforating vein is the most advantageous. If the perforating vein is not available or has been used before, median cubital vein, its branches, median antecubital vein or other available nearby veins may be used depending on the anatomy. Perforating vein should be ligated if any other elbow vein is used to prevent flow to deep veins.