Imaging Evaluation of the Safe Region for Distal Locking Screw of Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fracture

Silent iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after intertrochanteric fracture fixation with proximal femoral nailing and cerclage wiring: case report and review of literature

Pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication after intertrochanteric fracture fixation. Herein, we present a rare case of late development of a pseudoaneurysm with silent clinical symptoms. The case was a 91-year-old woman treated with proximal femoral nailing and cerclage wiring. Postoperatively, the patient was able to ambulate with a walker without abnormal symptoms. During the follow-ups, the radiographic images showed progressive cortical scalloping on the medial femoral shaft. Ultrasonography revealed a yin-yang sign, and a CT scan confirmed a pseudoaneurysm at the profunda femoris artery (PFA). In this case, many possible causes of pseudoaneurysm were hypothesized. We showed that the excessive displaced, long spiral pattern of an intertrochanteric fracture, which was irreducible by a closed technique, is the risk of a PFA injury. An atherosclerotic vessel was seen in preoperative radiography, indicating poor vessel elasticity which may be a risk of vessel tear during fracture reduction using multiple reduction instruments in excessive displaced fracture. Moreover, over-penetration when drilling should not be overlooked. We also discuss the predisposing factors, surgical techniques which may lead to this type of PFA injury and summarize the literature of pseudoaneurysms related to intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Distal interlocking for short trochanteric nails: static, dynamic or no locking? Review of the literature and decision algorithm

Pertrochanteric hip fractures are among the most common and the use of short cephalomedullary nails as the treatment of choice is increasing.

A systematic review regarding distal locking options for short cephalomedullary nails was undertaken using Medline/PubMed®, Embase® and Cochrane Library® in order to evaluate current indications, associated complications and to provide treatment recommendations.

The results seem to support the use of distal static locking for unstable fractures, dynamic locking for length stable/rotational unstable fractures and no locking for stable fractures.

Complications associated with distal locking include iatrogenic fractures, thigh pain, delayed union and nonunion, implant failure, screw loosening and breaking, drill bit breaking, soft tissue irritation, femoral artery branch injury, intramuscular haematoma and compartment syndrome. It is also associated with longer operative time and radiation exposure.

In unlocked constructs, dorsomedial comminution and nail/medullary canal mismatch contribute to peri-implant fractures. Anterior cortical impingement is associated with cut-out and nonunion.

Most studies comparing distally locked and unlocked nails report a short follow-up.

Distal locking mode should be based on the fracture’s stability.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:421-429. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190045

Evaluation of the positional relationship between femoral arteries and distal screws in the proximal femoral intramedullary nail for preventing iatrogenic vascular injury

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Iatrogenic vascular injury associated with distal screw in the intramedullary nail for femoral trochanteric fracture is a rare but serious complication. This study aimed to investigate the positional relationship between distal screws and superficial (SFA), deep (DFA), and perforating femoral artery (PFA) using computed tomography (CT) angiography and to identify the risk factors of vascular injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients (11 patients who underwent osteosynthesis with proximal femoral intramedullary nail and 27 healthy people) who underwent CT angiography were included. The distance from the great trochanter tip and insertion angle from posterior condylar axis (reference line) of the distal screws were measured, and the presence rates and distances from the femur of each artery within the insertion angle were investigated.

RESULTS

The distance from the great trochanter tip to the distal screw was 142.5 ± 8.8 mm. The insertion angle from the reference line was 27.3°±15° The measurement points were set at 130, 140, and 150 mm distal from the great trochanter tip, and the assumed insertion angle as 27°±15° Within this angle, the presence rates and distances were 50.8%/34.2 ± 7.0 mm (130 mm), 38.5%/34.3 ± 6.0 mm (140 mm), 30.8%/33.4 ± 6.0 mm (150 mm) in SFA; 12.3%/14.2 ± 3.3 mm (130 mm), 3.1%/13.1 ± 5.9 mm (140 mm), and 0% (150 mm) in DFA; and 0% (130-150 mm) in PFA. The presence rate of DFA increased at the posteromedial area in the thigh, and the distance from the femur became closer.

CONCLUSION

Within the angle that distal screws were likely to be inserted, the risk of DFA injury was the highest. Therefore, anatomical reduction of the femoral neck anteversion should be performed so that the distal screw will be inserted towards the anteromedial area in the thigh, and great attention should be paid not to over-drill the medial femoral cortex.

[Comparison of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation operation in traction bed supine position and non-traction bed lateral position in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur]

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in traction bed supine position and non-traction bed lateral position.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 102 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and April 2018 was made. According to the different operative positions, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (50 cases, PFNA internal fixation in traction bed supine position) and group B (52 cases, PFNA internal fixation in non-traction bed lateral position). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture side, cause of injury, AO classification, complications, and time from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The preoperative preparation time, incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy times, fracture healing time, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups, and the effectiveness was evaluated by Harris hip score at 1 year after operation.

Results

There was no significant difference in incision length between groups A and B ( t=1.116, P=0.268). In addition, the preoperative preparation time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy times in group A were significantly greater than those in group B ( P<0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-14 months, with an average of 13 months. There were 3 postoperative complications in group A and group B respectively. In group A, there were 2 cases of hip joint pain and 1 case of local fat liquefaction (healed after dressing change); in group B, there were 2 cases of hip joint pain and 1 case of deep vein thrombosis in lower extremity; there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups ( P=0.642). The patients of the two groups had a good result of fracture reduction and the internal fixation quality, and there was no main nail loosening, screw fracture, spiral blade cutting, withdrawal, and the nail breakage occurred, and no nonunion of bone, coxa vara, and other complications occurred. X-ray showed that the fracture healed in both groups, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( t=1.515, P=0.133). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups at 1 year after operation ( t=0.778, P=0.438).

Conclusion

Compared with the traction bed supine position, PFNA internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the non-traction bed lateral position has the advantages of short preparation time, short operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less X-ray fluoroscopy times, and satisfactory postoperative recovery effect.

Distal locked or unlocked nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, there are just several studies comparing distal locked nails with distal unlocked nails in treating intertrochanteric fractures. We report the first meta-analysis about this issue.

METHODS

Systematic search was conducted for studies in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Meta-analyses were performed regarding intra operative outcomes, complications and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Pooled results showed insignificant difference between distal locking group and distal unlocking group in hip pain (relative risk (RR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-2.19), distal tip fracture (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.37-3.11), lag screw cut-out (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.54-4.78), delayed or nonunion (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.25-7.06), deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23-4.84), wound infection (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.22), Harris hip score (standard mean deviation (SMD) 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.21) and walking ability. However, significant difference was detected in operation time (SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.17), fluoroscopy exposure time (SMD 1.02, 95% CI 0.52-1.52), blood loss (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-0.99) and total incision length (SMD 1.16, 95% CI 0.86-1.47). Result of trial sequential analysis indicated conclusive evidence.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that the distal locked intramedullary nails should not be recommended as routine choice for stable intertrochanteric fractures.

Late Presentation of an Iatrogenic Pseudoaneurysm of the Profunda Femoris Artery following Intramedullary Nailing

Introduction

Hip fractures are one of the most common osteoporotic fractures, and the incidence is expected to increase in the future. Vascular injury of the femoral vessels, although uncommon, is an intermittently reported complication in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. This may be iatrogenic or less frequently as a result of the fracture itself. The profunda femoris artery is most commonly involved, probably because of its close relationship to the femur in the subtrochanteric region.

Case Presentation

We report a well-documented case of pseudoaneurysm of the profunda femoris artery after intramedullary nailing of an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Arterial damage was due to overpenetration when drilling the distal locking hole. Because of the late presentation, pressure on the medial femoral diaphysis caused severe cortical scalloping. This resulted in an obvious radiographic image rarely reported before.

Conclusion

This case report illustrates the uncommon complication of pseudoaneurysm after intramedullary hip nailing. Because of the risk of potentially limb- and life-threatening complications, we advise careful drilling and placement of the distal locking screw. Excessive screw length should be avoided. The injured limb should be returned to the neutral position and lower-limb traction should be reduced before drilling the distal locking hole.