Proprioceptive Changes in Bilateral Knee Joints Following Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Effects of proprioceptive training on gait and plantar pressure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

People who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have an increased risk of osteoarthritis. Abnormality of lower limb kinematics will occur after the operation. This may be related to lower limb muscle strength, the co-excitation of hamstrings and quadriceps femoris, and the weakness of proprioception. Proprioceptive training can improve the proprioception of lower limbs and promote the recovery of lower limb kinematics. Our research objective is to observe whether proprioceptive training can improve the proprioception of lower limbs within 3 months after surgery and whether the recovery of proprioception can correct the abnormal lower limb kinematics. The secondary objective is to explore the underlying mechanism of postoperative lower limb gait abnormalities.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a prospective single-center randomized clinical trial to be conducted in the Sports Medicine and Orthopedics of Zhongda Hospital Southeast University. Forty participants aged 18-50, preparing to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons as grafts will be randomly assigned to the intervention or comparator group. People in the intervention group will add proprioceptive training three times a week, 20 min each time. The intervention will be conducted on the first day after surgery. The researcher mainly collects the data of joint of sense, gait, and plantar pressure. The assessment will be divided into three stages: after signing the informed consent form (within 2 weeks before surgery), 6 weeks after surgery, and 12 weeks after surgery.

DISCUSSION

The main purpose of our study is to explore whether the proprioception of patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is weakened, whether the lower limb kinematics is abnormal and whether the lower limb kinematics can be corrected through proprioceptive training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200065808. Registered on 15 November 2022; Version 1.

Changes in proprioception at different time points following anterior cruciate ligament injury or reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the changes in 30° and 60° position sense in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury at different time points after injury and reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients were divided into six groups according to time after ACL injury and reconstruction: group A (ACL injury 1.5-6 months), group B (ACL injury 6-12 months), group C (ACL injury > 12 months), group D (postoperative ACL reconstruction 1-6 months), group E (postoperative ACL reconstruction > 6 months), and group F consisting of 14 healthy adults (control group). The ability of the affected leg to reproduce the same joint position during knee flexion was tested using active joint position sense assays to assess proprioception in both the lower extremities of the patient or between groups.

RESULTS

Proprioception decreased rapidly during the early stages of ACL injury. Significant difference in the affected side at 30° compared to the healthy side (Group A: 4.70 (4.78, 9.00) vs 4.15 (3.35, 6.13), P = 0.03; Group B: 2.90 (0.48, 4.56) vs 8.30 (4.18, 10.43), P = 0.001; Group E: 6.25 (2.55, 11.60) vs 9.60 (3.90, 12.73), P = 0.009). However, no significant differences were detected for a double lower limb contrast of 60° (Group A: 5.1 (1.00, 8.00) vs 3.00 (0.75, 3.55), P = 0.044). Finally, the affected side of patients in groups C, D and E had significant differences in position perception at 30° compared with healthy subjects (P < 0.01), and the affected side of patients in groups C and E had significant differences in position sense at 60° compared with healthy subjects (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ACL injury had a greater impact on the patient's 30° position sense, with only a small impact for 60°. Further, the early and middle proprioception recovery stages after ACL injury were the best before surgery. Finally, proprioception recovery training should be performed soon after injury.

Effects of Visual Feedback During Balance Training on Knee Function and Balance Ability in Postoperative Patients After Knee Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of visual feedback training on knee function and balance ability in postoperative patients with knee fracture.

METHODS

A clinical randomized controlled trial with 104 participants, randomly assigned (1:1) to a visual feedback training group or a  control group. Eligible participants were evaluated using Lysholm scores, the Tinetti scale, and the evaluation module of TecnoBody® to demonstrate dynamic balance function in a standing position before treatment and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Both visual feedback training and control groups improved significantly in the Lysholm and Tinetti scores after 8 weeks. Compared with the control group, the TecnoBody® tests included centre of pressure path length, and the area over centre of pressure movement, both of which significantly improved in the visual feedback training group at 8 weeks after treatment. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of their Lysholm scores and Tinetti gait before the intervention and 4 weeks after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Applying visual feedback training in conjunction with traditional rehabilitation strategies may improve knee function and motor control in postoperative patients with knee fracture. Although visual feedback training does not have a short-term effect on knee function and gait, this method could be a useful addition for rehabilitation of knee fracture patients.

Somatosensory Function Influences Aberrant Gait Biomechanics Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Osteoarthritis is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALCR), and aberrant gait biomechanics are considered a primary contributor. Somatosensory dysfunction potentially alters gait biomechanics, but this association is unclear. Therefore, the purposes of this investigation were to compare somatosensory function between limbs and evaluate associations between somatosensory function and gait biomechanics linked to osteoarthritis development in individuals with ALCR. Seventy-three volunteers with ALCR participated. Gait biomechanics (peak vertical ground reaction force magnitude and loading rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments, peak knee flexion and varus angles, and quadriceps/hamstrings co-activation) were assessed as subjects walked at their preferred speed. The somatosensory function was assessed via joint position sense error (knee flexion) and vibratory perception threshold (femoral epicondyles, malleoli, and first metatarsal). Though somatosensory function did not differ between the ACLR and contralateral limbs, poorer joint position sense in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates and internal knee extension moments, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial and lateral malleoli and first metatarsal head in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates, greater internal knee valgus moments and varus angles, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial malleolus and first metatarsal head in the contralateral limb was associated with greater peak knee varus angles and internal knee valgus moments. These results suggest that future research evaluating rehabilitation approaches for improving somatosensory function is warranted as a potential approach for restoring normal gait biomechanics and reducing osteoarthritis risk. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:620-628, 2020.