Short-Course Versus Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IE-IIE Extranodal Natural Killer/T cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Survival benefit of metastasectomy in first-line cetuximab therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide registry

This multicenter study aimed to explore the survival benefit of metastasectomy by first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and metastasectomy rate. The exploratory endpoint was the optimal treatment cycle for better OS and PFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal cut-off cycle for survival outcomes. A total of 758 mCRC patients were enrolled in this study, with a median OS of 35.1 months, median PFS of 14.6 months, and metastasectomy rate of 21.4%. Left-sided mCRC had a significantly higher DCR (88.9% vs. 73.1%, P<0.001) and better OS (36.4 vs. 19.6 months, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in PFS and metastasectomy rate between left-sided and right-sided mCRC. However, mCRC patients who underwent metastasectomy over the course of treatment had better OS (54.9 vs. 28.6 months, P<0.001) and PFS (21.0 vs. 13.1 months, P<0.001) than those who did not. Notably, right-sided mCRC who benefited from first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy to underwent metastasectomy also had favorable outcomes, on a par with left-sided mCRC. The optimal treatment cycle was 14 cycles (AUC: 0.779, P<0.001). Patients who received ≥14 cycles had higher metastasectomy rates (27.5% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001), favorable OS (42.6 vs. 23.4 months, P<0.001) and PFS (18.1 vs. 8.6 months, P<0.001), and, importantly, had comparable adverse events compared with patients who received <14 cycles of treatment. Patients who underwent metastasectomy after or during first-line cetuximab therapy have an improved OS in both left-sided and right-sided mCRC. Furthermore, patients receive ≥14 cycles of treatment whenever possible to achieve a higher likelihood of metastasectomy was associated with favorable survival outcomes.

First-line chemoradiation with or without chidamide (tucidinostat) in patients with early stage intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a randomized phase 2 study in China

PURPOSE

We investigated the safety and efficacy profile of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin (GDP), plus chidamide in the first-line setting for intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL).

METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized phase 2 trial performed at two centers in China. Patients were eligible if they were newly-diagnosed with intermediate- and high-risk early-stage ENKTCL with at least one risk factor based on a nomogram-revised risk index:> 60 years old, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, invasion of the primary tumor, stage II or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 1 or stage II disease. Patients were treated with IMRT followed by GDP, with or without chidamide, in the first-line setting. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) comprised the primary endpoint. Toxicities, the 2-year overall survival (OS), and the response rate comprised the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Eligible patients (n = 74) were enrolled between May 2015 and December 2019. Among them, 37 patients were treated with IMRT+GDP+chidamide (chidamide group), while 37 cases were treated with IMRT+GDP (control group). Follow-up comprised a median of 43.4 months (range, 1.0-74.6 months). The objective response rate was 86.5% in the chidamide group and 78.4% in the control group (P = 0.359) at the end of treatment completion. The 2-year OS and PFS rates were 89.2% and 75.2% in the chidamide group versus 83.8% (P = 0.388) and 70.2% (P = 0.821) in the control group. The main adverse events were hematological toxicities and mucositis, with similar rates in the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of chidamide to IMRT + GDP as first-line treatment achieved similar treatment outcomes and tolerable toxicities in patients with intermediate- and high-risk ENKTCL.

What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases?

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205-2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041-2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281-4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359-5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses.

Lymphoma of the female genital tract: a clinicopatholngical analysis of 25 cases

Occurrence of lymphoma of the female genital tract (FGT) is extremely rare, and cohort studies on survival rates of affected patients are sparse. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the FGT. This study included 25 women diagnosed with lymphoma of the FGT. Their data on presenting pathological subtype, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) and Ann Arbor staging, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, treatment, and survival time were collected. Among the 25 patients, the most prevalent histological subtype was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (23/25). Tumors were most commonly located in the ovary (15/25), with the remainder located in the cervix (7/25) and uterine corpus (3/25). 76% of cases by Ann Arbor were stage III or IV, and 70% of cases by FIGO were stage III or IV. The overall median survival from diagnosis of lymphoma was estimated to be 71 months, with 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 92% and 80%, respectively. The FIGO and Ann Arbor staging and IPI score were significantly correlated with overall survival time.