Do Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Affect Tissue Healing After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Biologic Impact of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction

Surgical intervention after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is typically required because of the limited healing capacity of the ACL. However, mechanical factors and the inflammatory response triggered by the injury and surgery can impact patient outcomes. This review explores key aspects of ACL injury and reconstruction biology, including the inflammatory response, limited spontaneous healing, secondary inflammation after reconstruction, and graft healing processes. Understanding these biologic mechanisms is crucial for developing new treatment strategies and enhancing patient well-being. By shedding light on these aspects, clinicians and researchers can work toward improving quality of life for individuals affected by ACL tears.

The effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on soft tissue and bone healing in the knee: a systematic review

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to mitigate pain and inflammation associated with musculoskeletal conditions; however, there is conflicting data on the adverse effects of these drugs on tissue and bone healing. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of NSAIDs on the healing of knee, soft tissue, and bone.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medical Database (Embase)/Ovid, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Clinical, animal, and in vitro studies on the effect of NSAIDs on knee healing were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane bias assessment tool and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scoring system for included clinical studies, and the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation assessment tool for all included animal studies. General study population characteristics, interventions used, NSAIDs utilized, outcome measures, and study results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 15 studies, there were three clinical, ten animal, and two in vitro studies. In clinical studies, nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors and selective COX-2 inhibitors did not cause a significant increase in failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions or meniscal repairs with NSAID administration pre-, peri-, or post-operatively in comparison to placebo or no NSAID administration. Among animal studies assessing COX-2 inhibitor effects on soft tissue, healing was impaired (2/4), delayed but unaffected (1/4), or unaffected (1/4). In animal studies assessing COX-1 inhibitors, ligament healing was either increased (1/4), unaffected (2/4), or impaired (1/4). Meanwhile, administration of non-selective COX inhibitors in animals did not affect soft tissue (3/3) and cartilage (1/1) healing. Two in vitro studies identified a negative outcome on patellar tendon and ACL cell proliferation or viability after non-selective COX inhibition and variable results after selective COX-2 inhibition.

Conclusions

Animal studies on postoperative NSAID use after knee surgery suggest that administration of selective and nonselective COX-2 inhibitors may impair healing of soft tissue, bone and tendon-to-bone; however, further clinical studies are needed to better characterize dose and duration dependent risks of NSAIDs.

Effect of anti-inflammatory treatments on patient outcomes and concentrations of inflammatory modulators in the post-surgical and post-traumatic tibiofemoral joint setting: a narrative review

Background and Objective

There are several anti-inflammatory therapeutic options that can be used in the context of post-surgical and post-traumatic knee settings. Each of these options carries with it certain benefits, as well as potential issues depending on the duration and administration of each therapy. An understanding of how these anti-inflammatory drugs modulate various biomarkers of inflammation is also necessary in understanding how they can affect patient and objective outcomes following acute knee injury or surgery. This review covers the many traditional therapeutic options that have been used in treating knee injuries, as well as some natural therapeutics that have shown anti-inflammatory properties.

Methods

A current review of the literature was conducted and synthesized into this narrative review.

Key Content and Findings

Many traditional anti-inflammatory therapeutics have been shown to be beneficial in both post-traumatic and post-surgical tibiofemoral joint settings at reducing inflammation and improving patient outcomes. However, many of these treatments have risks associated with them, which becomes problematic with prolonged, repeated administration. Natural anti-inflammatory compounds may also have some benefit as adjunctive treatment options in these settings.

Conclusions

There are multiple different therapeutic options that can be used in acute knee settings, but the specific mechanism of injury or surgical context should be weighed when determining the best clinical approach.

Oral Ketorolac as an Adjuvant Agent for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Successful outpatient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction hinges on effective analgesia. Routinely, oral narcotic agents have been the preferred analgesic postoperatively in orthopaedic surgery. However, these agents have several known adverse effects and are associated with a potential for abuse. This study evaluates the efficacy of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with analgesic properties, as an adjuvant agent for postoperative pain control after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria involved patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, renal dysfunction, chronic analgesia use, or alcohol abuse. Eligible patients were randomized into one of two groups. The control group received a standard-of-care pain protocol involving oxycodone-acetaminophen 5 to 325 on discharge. The ketorolac group additionally received intravenous ketorolac postoperatively and 3 days of oral ketorolac on discharge. Pain levels and total narcotic utilization were recorded three times per day for the first 5 days after surgery. Pain and functional outcomes were obtained at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 48 patients; the mean age of the cohort was 32 ± 11.6 years, and 60.4% of patients were female. No differences were observed in preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative functional scores between the two groups. Over the first 5 days after surgery, patients in the ketorolac group consumed a mean of 45.4% fewer narcotic pills than the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, mean postoperative pain scores were 22.36 points lower for patients in the ketorolac group (P < 0.001). There was no difference in functional outcome scores at up to 6 weeks postoperatively or adverse events between the two groups with no reported cases of gastrointestinal bleeding.

DISCUSSION

The use of adjunctive intravenous and short-term oral ketorolac substantially reduces narcotic utilization and pain levels after ACL reconstruction.

CLINICALTRIALGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04246554.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: Creating a Permissive Healing Phenotype in Military Personnel and Civilians for Faster Recovery

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in military personnel and civilians can be a devastating injury. A service member is 10 times more likely to suffer an ACL injury than their civilian counterparts, and despite successful surgical stabilization, 4%-35% will develop arthrofibrosis, over 50% will not return to full active duty, and up to 50% will develop post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) within 15 years. Equally concerning, woman are 2 to 8 times more likely to experience ACL injuries than men, which represents a major knowledge gap.

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed in December 2021 using structured search terms related to prevalence, risk factors, disease progression, and treatment of ACL injury and reconstruction. The literature search was conducted independently by two researchers using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, with inclusion of articles with military, civilian, and sex relevance, and exclusion of most papers with a publication date greater than 10 years. The resources used for the review reflect the most current data, knowledge, and recommendations associated with research and clinical findings from reliable international sources.

Results

Currently, there is no effective system-based drug therapy that creates a “permissive environment” to reduce synovial and cartilage stress after ACL injury and reconstruction and prevent secondary complications. We argue that progress in this area has been hampered by researchers and clinicians failing to recognize that (1) an ACL injury is a system’s failure that affects the whole joint, (2) the early molecular events define and perpetuate different injury phenotypes, (3) male and female responses may be different and have a molecular basis, (4) the female phenotype continues to be under-represented in basic and clinical research, and (5) the variable outcomes may be perpetuated by the trauma of surgery itself. The early molecular events after ACL injury are characterized by an overexpression of joint inflammation, immune dysfunction, and trauma-induced synovial stress. We are developing an upstream adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium therapy to blunt these early molecular events and expedite healing with less arthrofibrosis and early PTOA complications.

Conclusions

ACL injuries continue to be a major concern among military personnel and civilians and represent a significant loss in command readiness and quality of life. The lack of predictability in outcomes after ACL repair or reconstruction underscores the need for new joint protection therapies. The male–female disparity requires urgent investigation.

Comparing the Efficacy of Postoperative Pain Control Between Intravenous Parecoxib and Oral Diclofenac in ACL Reconstruction

Background:

A nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug such as oral diclofenac is normally used to relieve postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but most patients continue to have moderate-to-severe pain that disturbs their rehabilitation. Some orthopaedists prefer to use intravenous (IV) parecoxib for postoperative pain control.

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy of IV parecoxib and oral diclofenac for postoperative pain control in ACLR.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We retrospectively collected and analyzed postoperative pain in patients who underwent both single- and double-bundle ACLR; pain was reported on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS; 10 = worst pain). After the operation, each patient was given either IV parecoxib twice a day or oral diclofenac 3 times a day, and all patients received paracetamol 6 times per day for 24 hours postoperatively. If the patient complained of moderate or severe pain (VAS >3) after surgery, 3 mg of morphine would be given intravenously every 3 hours and 1 mg of morphine as a rescue analgesic every 1 hour for 24 hours postoperatively. Postoperative VAS and morphine consumption were recorded every 4 hours for 24 hours. Data were analyzed using paired t test, analysis of variance, and chi-square test.

Results:

Overall, 161 patients were included in this study, of whom 47 received IV parecoxib and 114 received oral diclofenac. The mean VAS scores at 4 and 8 hours postoperatively were 3.5 and 3.4, respectively, in the parecoxib group, and 4.4 and 4.7, respectively, in the diclofenac group. The parecoxib group had significantly lower mean VAS than the diclofenac group at 4 hours (P = .047) and 8 hours (P = .005), and the mean cumulative morphine consumption in the parecoxib group was significantly lower than in the diclofenac group at all time points (P < .05) except 4 hours postoperatively.

Conclusion:

This study found that IV parecoxib was more effective than oral diclofenac in controlling postoperative pain and resulted in lower postoperative morphine consumption within the first 24 hours after ACLR.

Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) are a relatively common procedure in orthopedic sports medicine with an estimated 130,000 arthroscopic operations performed annually. Most procedures are carried out on an outpatient basis, and though success rates of ACLR are as high as 95%, pain remains the most common postoperative complication delaying patient discharge, and thereby increasing the costs associated with patient care. Despite the success and relative frequency of ACLR surgery, optimal and widely accepted strategies and regimens for controlling perioperative pain are not well established. In recent years, the paradigm of pain control has shifted from exclusively utilizing opiates and opioid medications in the acute postoperative period to employing other agents and techniques including nerve blocks, intra-articular and periarticular injections of local anesthetic agents, NSAIDs, and less commonly, ketamine, tranexamic acid (TXA), sedatives, gabapentin, and corticosteroids. More often, these agents are now used in combination and in synergy with one another as part of a multimodal approach to pain management in ACLR, with the goal of reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and the incidence of delayed hospital discharge. The purpose of this review is to consolidate current literature on various agents involved in the management of postoperative pain following ACLR, including the role of classically used opiate and opioid medications, as well as to describe other drugs currently utilized in practice either individually or in conjunction with other agents as part of a multimodal regimen in pain management in ACLR.

Pitch-side Acute Severe Pain Management Decisions in European Elite football

This is the first study on acute severe pain management involving sport and exercise medicine Doctors who are leaders in football medicine in their respective countries. An online survey was designed describing the management of acute severe pain in this expert cohort. The survey captured participant sex, age, years working in sports medicine, core specialty and use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Finally, three clinical vignettes exploring the management of acute pain were presented. Forty-four senior team doctors across 55 European countries completed the survey. There were no consistent guidelines proposed, with 33 (75%) participants indicating they did not use any. Methoxyflurane was proposed by 14 (32%) and 13 (30%) participants for female anterior cruciate ligament rupture and male ankle fracture, respectively. Strong opioids were not used in 17 (39%) and 6 (14%) participants regarding female cruciate injuries and male fractures, respectively. Despite 75% of participants having paediatric life support training, eight (18%) participants expressed uncertainty administering medications in this population, and 15 (34%) would avoid using strong opioids altogether. There is a tendency to undertreat pain and avoid strong opioids for reasons including lack of monitoring equipment, anti-doping concerns and lack of comfort treating paediatric patients with opioids.