A 5-Gene Prognostic Combination for Predicting Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer

Molecular Typing of Gastric Cancer Based on Invasion-Related Genes and Prognosis-Related Features

Background

This study aimed to construct a prognostic stratification system for gastric cancer (GC) using tumour invasion-related genes to more accurately predict the clinical prognosis of GC.

Methodology

Tumour invasion-related genes were downloaded from CancerSEA, and their expression data in the TCGA-STAD dataset were used to cluster samples via non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between subtypes were identified using the limma package. KEGG pathway and GO functional enrichment analyses were conducted using the WebGestaltR package (v0.4.2). The immune scores of molecular subtypes were evaluated using the R package ESTIMATE, MCPcounter and the ssGSEA function of the GSVA package. Univariate, multivariate and lasso regression analyses of DEGs were performed using the coxph function of the survival package and the glmnet package to construct a RiskScore model. The robustness of the model was validated using internal and external datasets, and a nomogram was constructed based on the model.

Results

Based on 97 tumour invasion-related genes, 353 GC samples from TCGA were categorised into two subtypes, thereby indicating the presence of inter-subtype differences in prognosis. A total of 569 DEGs were identified between the two subtypes; of which, four genes were selected to construct the risk model. This four-gene signature was robust and exhibited stable predictive performance in different platform datasets (GSE26942 and GSE66229), indicating that the established model performed better than other existing models.

Conclusion

A prognostic stratification system based on a four-gene signature was developed with a desirable area under the curve in the training and independent validation sets. Therefore, the use of this system as a molecular diagnostic test is recommended to assess the prognostic risk of patients with GC.

Combining Algorithms to Find Signatures That Predict Risk in Early-Stage Stomach Cancer

This study applied two mathematical algorithms, lattice up-stream targeting (LUST) and D-basis, to the identification of prognostic signatures from cancer gene expression data. The LUST algorithm looks for metagenes, which are sets of genes that are either overexpressed or underexpressed in the same patients. Whereas LUST runs unsupervised by clinical data, the D-basis algorithm uses implications and association rules to relate gene expression to clinical outcomes. The D-basis selects a small subset of the metagene (a signature) to predict survival. The two algorithms, LUST and D-basis, were combined and applied to mRNA expression and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 203 stage 1 and 2 stomach cancer patients. Two small (four-gene) signatures effectively predict survival in early-stage stomach cancer patients. These signatures could be used as a guide for treatment. The first signature (DU4) consists of genes that are underexpressed on the long-survival/low-risk group: FLRT2, KCNB1, MYOC, and TNXB. The second signature consists of genes that are overexpressed on the short-survival/high-risk group: ASB5, SFRP1, SMYD1, and TACR2. Another nine-gene signature (REC9) predicts recurrence: BNC2, CCDC8, DPYSL3, MOXD1, MXRA8, PRELP, SCARF2, TAGLN, and ZNF423. Each patient is assigned a score that is a linear combination of the expression levels for the genes in the signature. Scores below a selected threshold predict low-risk/long survival, whereas high scores indicate a high risk of short survival. The metagenes associate with TCGA cluster C1. Both our signatures and cluster C1 identify tumors that are genomically silent, and have a low mutation load or mutation count. Furthermore, our signatures identify tumors that are predominantly in the WHO classification of poorly cohesive and the Lauren class of diffuse samples, which have a poor prognosis.

Identification of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Gastric Cancer Based on Multiple Level Integration and Global Network Optimization

Gastric Cancer (GC) is a common cancer worldwide with a high morbidity and mortality rate in Asia. Many prognostic signatures from genes and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) levels have been identified by high-throughput expression profiling for GC. To date, there have been no reports on integrated optimization analysis based on the GC global lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network and the prognostic mechanism has not been studied. In the present work, a Gastric Cancer specific lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network (GCsLMM) was constructed based on the ceRNA hypothesis by combining miRNA-target interactions and data on the expression of GC. To mine for novel prognostic signatures associated with GC, we performed topological analysis, a random walk with restart algorithm, in the GCsLMM from three levels, miRNA-, mRNA-, and lncRNA-levels. We further obtained candidate prognostic signatures by calculating the integrated score and analyzed the robustness of these signatures by combination strategy. The biological roles of key candidate signatures were also explored. Finally, we targeted the PHF10 gene and analyzed the expression patterns of PHF10 in independent datasets. The findings of this study will improve our understanding of the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory mechanisms and further facilitate the discovery of novel prognostic biomarkers for GC clinical guidelines.

Systematic Review of Prognostic Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer Patients

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality and remains the fourth common cancer worldwide. The effective and feasible methods for predicting the possible outcomes for GC patients are still lacking. While genetic profiling might be suitable in some way, the application of gene expression signatures has been show to be a robust tool. Here, by performing a comprehensive search in PubMed, we provided an up-to-date summary of 39 prognostic gene signatures for GC patients, and described the processing procedure of the selection, calculation and construction of gene signature. We also reviewed current web tools including PROGgene and SurvExpress that can be used to analyze the prognostic value of multiple genes for GC. This review will aid in comprehensive understanding of the current prognostic gene signatures to accurately predict the outcome of GC patients, and may guide the future clinical management when the reliability of these signatures is validated in clinics.