Efficacy and Safety of Steroid Therapy for Posttransplant Hyperbilirubinemia Caused by Early Allograft Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.

A marginal liver graft with hyperbilirubinemia transplanted successfully by ischemia-free liver transplantation

The shortage of transplant organs remains a serious issue worldwide, and using liver grafts from extended criteria donors could expand the donor pool. Extended criteria donor liver allografts have a high chance of complications such as primary nonfunction, early allograft dysfunction, and ischemic-type biliary lesions. How to employ these extended criteria donors safely and effectively warrants further investigation. Herein, we report the successful use of a marginal donor liver with hyperbilirubinemia to save the life of an acute-on-chronic liver failure recipient using a new surgical technique: ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT). The graft was retrieved for transplantation due to the following reasons: (I) the recipient was in a life-threatening situation and no living donor donation candidate was available; (II) the graft was considered transplantable except for cholestasis; and (III) IFLT could reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), resuscitate the allograft ex situ, and maintain organ viability before transplantation. The graft was transplanted successfully using the IFLT procedure. Although anatomic biliary stricture occurred after surgery, no IRI-related complications were found during the follow-up. The use of liver grafts from extended criteria donors is safe and effective under IFLT. Additional IFLT clinical studies need to be performed, particularly concerning donor management, graft selection, and ex situ resuscitation.