Efficacy of Vertebroplasty in Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Study on the Optimal Surgical Scheme for Very Severe Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Therapy of very severe osteoporotic compression fractures (VSOVCF) has been a growing challenge for spine surgeons. Opinions vary regarding the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of VSOVCF and which internal fixation method is more effective is still under debate, and research on this topic is lacking. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of various pedicle screw fixation methods for treating VSOVCF.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective comparative study was conducted between January 2015 and September 2020. Two hundred and one patients were divided into six groups according to different surgical methods: 45 patients underwent long-segment fixation (Group 1); 39 underwent short-segment fixation (Group 2); 30 received long-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 3); 32 received short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4); 29 had long-segment fixation combined with kyphoplasty (PKP) (Group 5); and 26 cases had short-segment fixation combined with PKP (Group 6). The clinical records were reviewed and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were used for clinical evaluation. The vertebral height (VH), fractured vertebral body height (FVBH), and Cobb's angle were objectively calculated and analyzed on lateral plain radiographs. Student's t-tests and one-way ANOVA among groups were conducted to analyze the continuous, and the chi-squared test was used to compare the dichotomous or categorical variables. The difference was considered statistically significant when the P-value was less than 0.05.

RESULTS

The six groups had similar distributions in age, gender, course of the disease, follow-up period, and injured level. In the postoperative assessment of the VAS score, the surgical intervention most likely to rank first in terms of pain relief was the short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4). For the functional evaluation, the surgical intervention that is most likely to rank first in terms of ODI score was a short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws (Group 4), followed by long-segment fixation (Group 1). The long-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws was the first-ranked surgical intervention for the maintenance of Cobb's angle and vertebral height, whereas the short-segment fixation performed the worst. The highest overall complication rate was in Group 6 with an incidence of 42.3% (11/26), followed by Group 2 with an incidence of 38.5% (15/39).

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of VSOVCF, the short-segment fixation with cement-reinforced screws is the most effective and optimal procedure, and should be used as the preferred surgical method if surgeons are proficient in using cemented screws; otherwise, directly and unquestionably use long-segment fixation to achieve satisfactory clinical results.

Cortical Trajectory Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of the Existing Literature

Posterior lumbar fusion is a safe and effective surgical method for diseases, such as lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, lumbar instability, spinal deformity, and tumor. Pedicle screw (PS) fixation was first introduced by Bouche and has been adopted as the gold standard for posterior lumbar fusion. Santoni and colleagues introduced a new methodological screw insertion technique that uses a cortical bone trajectory (CBT), described as that from a medial to lateral path in the transverse axial plane and caudal to the cephalad path in the sagittal plane through the pedicle for maximum contact of the screw with the cortical bone. Owing to the lower invasiveness, superior cortical bone contact, and reduced neurovascular injury incidence, the CBT technique has been widely used in posterior lumbar fusion; however, these advantages have not been proven in clinical/radiological and biomechanical studies. We designed the present study to review the existing evidence and evaluate the merit of CBT screw fixation. Six electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published in August 2020 using the search terms "cortical bone trajectory," "CBT spine," "CBT fixation," "cortical pedicle screws," and "cortical screws." Studies were analyzed and divided into the following groups: "biomechanics investigation," "surgical technique," and "clinical/radiological studies." Most studies compared CBT and PS fixation, and the CBT screw fixation method showed better or similar outcomes.

Osteoporotic burst fracture-clinical, radiological and functional outcome of three-column reconstruction using single posterior approach (Instrumentation, Corpectomy, Arthroscope Assisted Transpedicular Decompression and Mesh Cage)

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel effective procedure utilizing three-column reconstruction via a posterior approach with a technique that utilizes an arthroscope to visualize the anterior surface of the dura during decompression.

METHODS

A Prospective Study. 80 Osteoporotic vertebral burst fracture patients with similar demographic data managed by three-column reconstruction through single posterior approach surgery: Pedicle screw fixation, Corpectomy, Arthroscope Assisted Transpedicular Decompression (AATD) and Fusion (Mesh Cage + Bone grafting). Preoperative and postoperative clinical parameters (Visual Analog Score VAS, swestry Disability Index ODI, neurlogy, radiological parameters and surgical variables were recorded analysed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in demographic data. Significant improvement was noted in VAS (pre-operative, 7.90 ±0.60; final follow-up 2.90 ± 0.54) and ODI (preoperative, 77.10 ± 6.96; final follow-up 21.30 ± 6.70). Neurological improvement was noted in 74 patients (Frankel grade E) while six patients remained non-ambulatory (Frankel grade C). Significant improvement was noted in local kyphosis angle (preoperative, 22.14 ± 2.60; postoperative, 10.40 ± 1.40) with a 10% loss of correction (2.5 ± 0.90) at final follow-up. Implant failure in two patients and proximal junctional failure in two patients managed with revision surgery. No iatrogenic dural or nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporotic Burst fracture can be managed with single posterior surgery, three-column reconstruction with mesh cage. It provides a significant improvement in clinical, radiological and functional outcomes. The arthroscope can improve a surgeon's operative field and magnification thereby ensuring complete decompression without injuring the dura or spinal cord.