Obesity with High Body Mass Index Does Not Influence Sperm Retrieval in Males with Azoospermia

Male obesity: Associated effects on fertility and the outcomes of offspring

Obesity rates are increasing globally, making it imperative to comprehend the effects of parental obesity on human reproduction. This review aims to highlight the impact of male obesity on reproductive and offspring outcomes. Male obesity has been shown to affect fertility through various mechanisms, including changes in semen quality, difficulty with natural conception, and worsened assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The evidence regarding the impact of male obesity on success of sperm retrieval is conflicting, but all aforementioned adverse effects may be modifiable with weight loss. Moreover, paternal obesity may influence atypical offspring outcomes, such as placental abnormalities and disruptions in fetal development, which may be moderated by epigenetic pathways. Further research is needed to fully understand the complex relationships and underlying mechanisms involved. Gaining more insight into the impact of male obesity on fertility and offspring outcomes can aid in the development of targeted interventions to improve family planning and the health of future generations.

Testicular sperm aspiration has a poor effect in predicting micro-TESE outcomes in NOA patients with AZFc deletion

BACKGROUND

Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is widely used in the diagnosis and management of nonobstructive azoospermia. However, its ability for predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients with AZFc deletion remains uncertain. To investigate whether TESA affected the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in NOA patients with AZFc deletion, a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of NOA patients with AZFc deletion who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) was conducted. The effects of age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, testosterone (T) levels and TESA on the SRR were analyzed in this group of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 181 individuals had their sperm successfully collected and underwent micro-TESE, with an SRR of 67.4%. The patients were separated into two groups based on their micro-TESE results (sperm acquisition and nonsperm acquisition), with no significant variations in age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, or T levels between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the SRR between any of the groups into which patients were classified based on reproductive hormone reference value ranges. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the absence of significant effects of age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, and T levels on sperm acquisition in patients undergoing micro-TESE. In the preoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group, the sperm acquisition and nonsperm acquisition groups had SRRs of 90.1% and 65.1%, respectively. More significantly, there was no significant difference in the SRR between the negative preoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group and the nonpreoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group (65.1 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.855).

CONCLUSION

There is a high probability of successful sperm acquisition in the testis of men undergoing micro-TESE. In this group of patients, age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, and T levels may have little bearing on the micro-TESE outcome. In patients whose preoperative TESA revealed the absence of sperm, the probability of obtaining sperm by micro-TESE remained high (65.1%); negative TESA results appeared to not influence the SRR (63.8%) in patients undergoing micro-TESE.

Evaluation of Predicting Factors Affecting Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Klinefelter Syndrome: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the predicting factors affecting sperm retrieval. We prospectively assessed the relationship between sonographic and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) findings in Klinefelter syndrome (KS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 44 azoospermic men with 47, XXY karyotypes participated in this study. In order to evaluate the amount of blood supply in different parts of testicular tissue, a doppler ultra-sonographic was performed. Also, for the detection of sperm in this group mTESE technique was performed.

RESULTS

The age average of positive mTESE and negative mTESE groups was 29.4 and 33.6 years, respectively. By comparing the testicle volume (based on the data obtained from the clinical examinations conducted by the urologist) it was determined that there is no significant difference between mTESE positive and negative groups. Folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) levels in men with negative mTESE (P=0.03) and testosterone levels in men with positive mTESE significantly increased (P=0.017). The overall rate of testis vascularity was significantly higher in the positive mTESE group than in the negative mTESE group. The clinical pregnancy rate in positive mTESE men was 9% per cycle, 16.6% per embryos were transferred (ET), and 12.5% per cycle.

CONCLUSION

Totally, our observation indicated that there is not a significant relationship between sonographic and mTESE results in KS patients. However, more investigations with bigger sample Size can be useful to validate our results.

Exploratory Analysis in the Differences in Blood Serum and Seminal Plasma of Adipose-Tissue Related Peptides in Obese and Non-Obese Men and Their Correlations With Semen Parameters

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the relationship between circulating metabolic biomarkers and semen parameters in obese, overweight and normal-weight patients.

METHODS

Patients were recruited at the "Andrology and Pathophysiology of Reproduction Unit", in Santa Maria Goretti Hospital. Divided into three groups were 98 participants (obese, overweight and normal-weight patients) according to BMI and were analyzed for three adipokines and six hormone peptides in blood serum and seminal plasma using Luminex assay. Standard semen analysis was performed for ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, motility, morphology and leukocytes.

RESULTS

In all groups of subjects, we observed a higher concentration of blood serum c-peptide, GIP, PAI-1, leptin, ghrelin and GLP-1 in comparison to seminal plasma; differently, higher levels in seminal plasma were observed for insulin and visfatin. In comparison to the non-obese subjects, obese subjects showed a higher blood serum concentration of c-peptide, GLP-1, GIP and leptin and a higher concentration of seminal plasma of GIP and insulin. Total sperm count, progressive motility, motility, and atypical forms directly correlated with PAI-1 and visfatin, whereas GLP-1 directly correlated only with total progressive motility.

CONCLUSION

Obese men showed a different pattern of blood serum and seminal plasma adipokines and hormone peptides concentrations in comparison to normal-weight men. Furthermore, these molecules correlated with functional seminal parameters. Our findings support the option to consider these molecules as new biomarkers and pharmacological targets for a new therapeutic approach in male infertility. However, further studies identifying other potential biomarkers of male infertility with important clinical implication and characterizing their mechanisms of action are mandatory.