Effects of Different Exposure Days to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) on Live Birth Rates in the Depot GnRH-a Protocol: A Retrospective Analysis of 7007 Cycles

Live Birth Outcomes for PCOS Patients Under the Follicular-Phase Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Protocol or Antagonist Protocol - A Retrospective Chinese Cohort

Objective

For patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET), there has been no consensus regarding which protocol is the most optimal for live birth rate in fresh cycles. We sought to evaluate depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF outcomes for PCOS patients in a single fertility center.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort, PCOS patients who visited the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University reproductive center between February 2012 and December 2019 were screened, and 533 PCOS infertility patients were included undergoing their first IVF cycle, with 470 in the depot GnRH agonist group and 63 in the GnRH antagonist group. The primary of this study outcome was the fresh live birth rate (LBR).

Results

PCOS women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR (49.79%) than those in the GnRH antagonist group (34.92%, p = 0.027). The multivariable logistic regression also confirmed that women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR than those in the GnRH antagonist group (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.05~3.18, p = 0.032). After propensity score matching (PSM), the LBR in the depot GnRH agonist group was higher (50.32%) than that of the GnRH antagonist group (35.48%), p = 0.033. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were similar between the two groups, with 35 in the depot GnRH group and 6 in the GnRH antagonist group (p = 0.561).

Conclusions

For PCOS patients in fresh embryo transfer cycles, the depot GnRH agonist protocol may lead to a higher LBR than the antagonist protocol with satisfied lower OHSS rates.

Efficacy of long-term pituitary down-regulation pretreatment prior to in vitro fertilization in infertile patients with endometriosis: A meta-analysis

Controversial conclusions have been made in previous studies regarding the influence of ultra-long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in the reproductive outcomes of women with endometriosis who are undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). An electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect and Medline from inception until 10 September 2022. Only randomized studies were included. After the selection process, seven articles were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The pooling of the results showed the adverse effect of ultra-long protocol in terms of live birth rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.53, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.31-0.9, P=0.02) and fertilization rate (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, P=0.02). There was no statistical significance between the ultra-long protocol and long protocol of the rest outcome Indicators. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that ultra-long GnRH-a does not appear to improve the results of IVF/ICSI treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis.

Comparison of clinical effects between early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in 3310 cycles: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

It is the duty of doctors to choose a safe, simple, economic and effective controlled ovulation stimulation (COS) protocol for the patients. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of the early follicular prolonged GnRH agonist (EFPL) and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-Ant) protocols, hoping to provide some reference for clinicians when choosing COS program.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 3310 ovum pick up cycles undergoing assisted reproductive technology during January 2019 to May 2022 in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to improve the comparability between the two protocols. Subgroups were divided according to age, body mass index (BMI) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). The live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

After PSM, the endometrial thickness, fresh embryo transplantation rate, chemical pregnancy rate, CPR were significantly higher in EFPL group than that in GnRH-Ant group (P < 0.001). The E2, LH, P values on trigger day were significantly lower in EFPL group (P < 0.001). The cycle cancellation rate was significantly reduced in EFPL group (P < 0.001). However, the total amount of Gn and duration of Gn were significantly increased in the EFPL group (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the LBR was significantly higher in EFPL group after matching [OR (95%CI), 1.86 (1.13, 3.05), P = 0.02], especially for those with age < 35 years [OR (95%CI), 1.95 (1.14, 3.34), P = 0.02], BMI < 24 kg/m² [OR (95%CI), 2.08 (1.14, 3.80), P = 0.02], AMH levels ≥ 4.5 ng/ml [OR (95%CI), 4.19 (1.53, 11.43), P < 0.01].

CONCLUSION

EFPL regimen is more suitable to elicit live birth for those young patients with BMI < 24 kg/m² and AMH ≥ 4.5 ng/ml. However, for patients with decreased ovarian reserve or advanced age, EFPL regimen has no advantage over the GnRH-Ant regimen.

The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

A total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR.

RESULT(S)

In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E₂) value on Day hCG + 9, progesterone (P) value on Day hCG + 9, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR were more favourable in the depot GnRH-a protocol than in the long GnRH-a protocol (P < 0.05). However, the moderate or severe OHSS rates were higher in the depot group than in the long group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness, luteal support medication, early pregnancy loss rates, mid- and late-term pregnancy loss rates, or foetal malformation rates between the two protocols.

CONCLUSION(S)

Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health.