Different Doses of Nalbuphine Combined with Dexmedetomidine in Laparoscopic Oophorocystectomy

Adoption of Dexmedetomidine in Different Doses at Different Timing in Perioperative Patients

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is an alpha-2 agonist used for sedation during various procedures. Dex activates 2-adrenoceptors, and causes the decrease of sympathetic tone, with attenuation of the neuroendocrine and hemodynamic responses to anesthesia and surgery; it reduces anesthetic and opioid requirements; and causes sedation and analgesia.

OBJECTIVE

it was to compare the perioperative effects of different doses of Dex at different timing in patients using Dex during the perioperative period adopting a medical data classification algorithm based on optimized semi-supervised collaborative training (Tri-training).

METHODS

495 patients requiring surgical treatment in Xingtai People's Hospital were randomly selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into group A (used before induction), group B (used during induction), and group C (used after induction) according to different induction timing, with 165 cases in each group. Then, groups A, B, and C were divided into groups A1, B1, and C1 (0.4 μg/(kg·h) rate), groups A2, B2, and C2 (0.6 μg/(kg·h) rate), and groups A3, B3, and C3 (0.8 μg/(kg·h) rate) according to the dose used, with 55 cases in each group. Intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative adverse reactions were compared among the 9 groups.

RESULTS

the similarity between the Tri-training algorithm optimized by Naive Bayes (NB) classification algorithm and the actual classification (93.49%) was clearly higher than that by decision tree (DT) and K-nearest neighbor (kNN) classification algorithm (76.21%, 74.31%); heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values decreased obviously after Dex used in groups B1, C1, B2, C2, B3, and C3 (P <0.05), but did not change significantly in groups A1, A2, and A3 (P >0.05); the proportion of patients with satisfactory Ramsay score in group A3 was distinctly superior than that in groups A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, and C3 (P <0.05); the incidence of adverse reactions in group A3 was significantly inferior than that in groups A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, and C3 (P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

the optimization effect of NB classification algorithm was the best, and the injection of Dex at the injection rate of 0.8 μg/(kg·h) before induction of anesthesia could apparently improve the fluctuation of HR, SBP, and DBP during perioperative period, and effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions in patients, with better sedative effect on patients.

Effect of Preventive Analgesia with Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Background

The study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine combined with dexmedetomidine for preventive analgesia in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Methods

110 patients with deviation of the nasal septum were randomized into the nalbuphine group (group N), dexmedetomidine combined with nalbuphine group (group DN), and saline group (group C). Fifteen minutes before the induction of anesthesia, patients in group N were injected nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg intravenously; patients in group DN received intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and injection of nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg; patients in group C received 0.9% saline. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores, the need for remedial analgesia, the consumption of remifentanil and propofol, and the incidence of adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

MAP, HR, and NRS scores of the DN group were significantly lower and the QoR-40 scores were higher than those of groups N and C (P < 0.001). The need for remedial analgesia, the consumption of remifentanil and propofol, and the incidence of nausea in the DN group were the lowest among the three groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preventive analgesia with nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine in endoscopic sinus surgery can not only maintain hemodynamic stability but also reduce intraoperative anesthetic dosage, postoperative pain, and improve the quality of postoperative recovery without affecting the revival and extubation time.

Analgesic Effects and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Added to Nalbuphine or Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Children After Tonsillectomy Adenoidectomy

Tonsillectomy is a frequently performed surgical procedure in children, requiring post-operative analgesia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine or sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after pediatric tonsillectomy adenoidectomy. A total of 400 patients undergoing tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy were included in the study. Patients received a PCIA pump (0.5 mg/kg nalbuphine, 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 0.9% sodium chloride to a total volume of 100 ml) for postoperative pain management were classified into Group ND (n = 200). Patients received a PCIA pump (2 μg/kg sufentanil, 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 0.9% sodium chloride to a total volume of 100 ml) for postoperative pain management were classified into Group SD (n = 200). More stable hemodynamic changes were noted in Group ND than Group SD from 1 h to 48 h after operation. At 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, the children in Group ND had higher Ramsay sedation scores than those in Group SD. The times to push the PCIA button in Group ND and Group SD were 2.44 ± 0.74 and 2.62 ± 1.00, showing significant differences (p = 0.041). The VASR scores of children in Group ND were significantly lower within 6, 12, and 24 h than those in Group SD (p &lt; 0.05). The VASC scores of children in Group ND were significantly lower within four time points (2, 6, 12, and 24 h) than those in Group SD (p &lt; 0.05). At 1st day after surgery, the children in Group ND had lower levels of serum ACTH, IL-6, and COR levels than those in Group SD (p &lt; 0.001). The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were significantly higher in Group SD than Group ND (5.00% vs. 11.00%, p = 0.028; 1.00% vs. 4.50%, p = 0.032). The total incidence rate of adverse reactions was significantly higher in Group SD than Group ND (15.00% vs. 31.00%, p = 0.0001). The study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine added to nalbuphine PCIA enhanced the analgesic effects, attenuated the postoperative pain, and reduced the stress response after pediatric tonsillectomy adenoidectomy.

Perioperative Nursing Management of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy Guided by Ultrasound Imaging under Intelligent Algorithm

This study was aimed at exploring the application value of ultrasonic imaging-guided laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy after denoising by intelligent algorithms in perioperative nursing intervention of patients. In this study, convolutional downsampling was introduced to the UNet model, based on which the residual structure and Recon module were added to improve the UNet denoising model, which was applied to 100 patients who underwent ultrasound imaging-guided laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. The patients were grouped into a control group receiving conventional nursing and an experimental group receiving perioperative nursing management. The various experimental indicators were comprehensively evaluated. The results revealed that after denoising using the improved UNet model, the ultrasound image showed no unnecessary interference noise, and the image clarity was significantly improved. In the experimental group, the operation time was 55.45 ± 6.13 days, the intraoperative blood loss was 71.52 ± 9.87 days, the postoperative exhaust time was 1.9 ± 0.73 days, the time to get out of bed was 1.2 ± 0.85 days, the complication rate was 8%, the hospitalization time was 7.3 ± 2.6 days, and the nursing satisfaction rate reached 98%. All above aspects were significantly better than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In short, the improved UNet denoising model can effectively eliminate the interference noise in ultrasound and restore high-quality ultrasound images. Perioperative nursing intervention can accelerate the recovery speed of patients, reduce the complication rate, and shorten the length of stay in hospital. Therefore, it was worthy of being widely used in clinical nursing.