Identifying the Predictive Role of Oxidative Stress Genes in the Prognosis of Glioma Patients

Identification of a novel glioblastoma multiforme molecular subtype with poor prognosis and high immune infiltration based on oxidative stress-related genes

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Reactive oxygen species that accumulate during tumorigenesis can cause oxidative stress (OS), which plays a crucial role in cancer cell survival. Clinical and transcriptome data of TCGA-GBM dataset from UCSC Xena database were analyzed. Consensus clustering analysis was conducted to identify OS-related molecular subtypes for GBM. The immune infiltrate level between subtypes were characterized by ESTIMATE algorithm. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between subtypes were screened by DESeq2 package. Two OS-related molecular subtypes of GBM were identified, and cluster 2 had poorer overall survival and higher immune infiltration levels than cluster 1. Enrichment analysis showed that 54 DEGs in cluster 2 were significantly enriched in cytokine/chemokine-related functions or pathways. Ten hub genes (CSF2, CSF3, CCL7, LCN2, CXCL6, MMP8, CCR8, TNFSF11, IL22RA2, and ORM1) were identified in GBM subtype 2 through protein-protein interaction network, most of which were positively correlated with immune factors and immune checkpoints. A total of 55 small molecule drugs obtained from drug gene interaction database (DGIdb) may have potential therapeutic effects in GBM subtype 2 patients. Our study identified 10 hub genes as potential therapeutic targets in GBM subtype 2 patients, who have poorer overall survival and higher immune infiltration levels. These findings could pave the way for new treatments for this aggressive form of brain cancer.

Cellular stress responses as modulators of drug cytotoxicity in pharmacotherapy of glioblastoma

Despite the extensive efforts to find effective therapeutic strategies, glioblastoma (GBM) remains a therapeutic challenge with dismal prognosis of survival. Over the last decade the role of stress responses in GBM therapy has gained a great deal of attention, since depending on the duration and intensity of these cellular programs they can be cytoprotective or promote cancer cell death. As such, initiation of the UPR, autophagy or oxidative stress may either impede or facilitate drug-mediated cell killing. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms that regulate ER stress, autophagy, and oxidative stress during GBM development and progression to later discuss the involvement of these stress pathways in the response to different treatments. We also discuss how a precise understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating stress responses evoked by different pharmacological agents could decisively contribute to the design of novel and more effective combinational treatments against brain malignancies.

Establishment and external verification of an oxidative stress-related gene signature to predict clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses of colorectal cancer

Objective: Accumulated evidence highlights the biological significance of oxidative stress in tumorigenicity and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). Our study aimed to establish a reliable oxidative stress-related signature to predict patients' clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Methods: Transcriptome profiles and clinical features of CRC patients were retrospectively analyzed from public datasets. LASSO analysis was used to construct an oxidative stress-related signature to predict overall survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free survival. Additionally, antitumor immunity, drug sensitivity, signaling pathways, and molecular subtypes were analyzed between different risk subsets through TIP, CIBERSORT, oncoPredict, etc. approaches. The genes in the signature were experimentally verified in the human colorectal mucosal cell line (FHC) along with CRC cell lines (SW-480 and HCT-116) through RT-qPCR or Western blot. Results: An oxidative stress-related signature was established, composed of ACOX1, CPT2, NAT2, NRG1, PPARGC1A, CDKN2A, CRYAB, NGFR, and UCN. The signature displayed an excellent capacity for survival prediction and was linked to worse clinicopathological features. Moreover, the signature correlated with antitumor immunity, drug sensitivity, and CRC-related pathways. Among molecular subtypes, the CSC subtype had the highest risk score. Experiments demonstrated that CDKN2A and UCN were up-regulated and ACOX1, CPT2, NAT2, NRG1, PPARGC1A, CRYAB, and NGFR were down-regulated in CRC than normal cells. In H₂O₂-induced CRC cells, their expression was notably altered. Conclusion: Altogether, our findings constructed an oxidative stress-related signature that can predict survival outcomes and therapeutic response in CRC patients, thus potentially assisting prognosis prediction and adjuvant therapy decisions.

Construction of Oxidative Stress-Related Genes Risk Model Predicts the Prognosis of Uterine Corpus Endometrial Cancer Patients

Oxidative stress contributes significantly to cancer development. Recent studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress could alter the epigenome and, in particular, DNA methylation. This study aimed to explore the potential link between oxidative stress and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC). An analysis of RNA-seq data and relevant clinical information was conducted with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and oxidative stress genes were obtained from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in normal and tumor groups of UCEC were analyzed using GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. As a result of survival analysis, Lasso regression analysis of DEGs, a risk score model of oxidative stress-related genes (OSRGs) was constructed. Moreover, this study demonstrated that OSRGs are associated with immune cell infiltration in UCEC, suggesting oxidative stress may play a role in UCEC development by activating immune cells. We discovered 136 oxidative stress-related DEGs in UCEC, from which we screened 25 prognostic genes significantly related to the overall survival of UCEC patients. BCL2A1, CASP6, GPX2, HIC1, IL19, MSX1, RNF183, SFN, TRPM2 and HIST1H3C are associated with a good prognosis while CDKN2A, CHAC1, E2F1, GSDME, HMGA1, ITGA7, MCM4, MYBL2, PPIF, S100A1, S100A9, STK26 and TRIB3 are involved in a poor prognosis in UCEC. A 7-OSRGs-based risk score (H3C1, CDKN2A, STK26, TRPM2, E2F1, CHAC1, MSX1) was generated by Lasso regression. Further, an association was found between H3C1, CDKN2A, STK26, TRPM2, E2F1, CHAC1 and MSX1 expression levels and the immune infiltrating cells, including CD8 T cells, NK cells, and mast cells in UCEC. NFYA and RFX5 were speculated as common transcription factors of CDKN2A, TRPM2, E2F1, CHAC1, and MSX1 in UCEC.

Identification of Key Genes and Pathways Associated with Oxidative Stress in Periodontitis

Background and Objective. Oxidative stress has been associated with the progression of periodontitis. However, oxidative stress-related genes (OS-genes) have not been used as disease-specific biomarkers that correlate with periodontitis progression. This study is aimed at screening the key OS-genes and pathways in periodontitis by bioinformatics methods. Methods. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using periodontitis-related microarray from the GEO database, and OS-genes were extracted from GeneCards database. The intersection of the OS-genes and the DEGs was considered as oxidative stress-related DEGs (OS-DEGs) in periodontitis. The Pearson correlation and protein-protein interaction analyses were used to screen key OS-genes. Gene set enrichment, functional enrichment, and pathway enrichment analyses were performed in OS-genes. Based on key OS-genes, a risk score model was constructed through logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve, and stratified analyses. Results. In total, 74 OS-DEGs were found in periodontitis, including 65 upregulated genes and 9 downregulated genes. Six of them were identified as key OS-genes (CXCR4, SELL, FCGR3B, FCGR2B, PECAM1, and ITGAL) in periodontitis. All the key OS-genes were significantly upregulated and associated with the increased risk of periodontitis. Functional enrichment analysis showed that these genes were mainly associated with leukocyte cell-cell adhesion, phagocytosis, and cellular extravasation. Pathway analysis revealed that these genes were involved in several signaling pathways, such as leukocyte transendothelial migration and osteoclast differentiation. Conclusion. In this study, we screened six key OS-genes that were screened as risk factors of periodontitis. We also identified multiple signaling pathways that might play crucial roles in regulating oxidative stress damage in periodontitis. In the future, more experiments need to be carried out to validate our current findings.

Constructing a novel gene signature derived from oxidative stress specific subtypes for predicting survival in stomach adenocarcinoma

Oxidative stress (OS) response is crucial in oncogenesis and progression of tumor. But the potential prognostic importance of OS-related genes (OSRGs) in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) lacked comprehensive study. STAD clinical information and transcriptome data were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. The prognostic OSRGs were filtered via the univariate Cox analysis and OSRG-based molecular subtypes of STAD were developed using consensus clustering. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was subsequently conducted to filter molecular subtype-associated gene modules. The prognosis-related genes were screened via univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis were used to construct a prognostic risk signature. Finally, a decision tree model and nomogram were developed by integrating risk signature and clinicopathological characteristics to analyze individual STAD patient’s survival. Four OSRG-based molecular subtypes with significant diversity were developed based on 36 prognostic OSRGs for STAD, and an OSRGs-based subtype-specific risk signature with eight genes for prognostic prediction of STAD was built. Survival analysis revealed a strong prognostic performance of the risk signature exhibited in predicting STAD survival. There were significant differences in mutation patterns, chemotherapy sensitivity, clinicopathological characteristics, response to immunotherapy, biological functions, immune microenvironment, immune cell infiltration among different molecular subtypes and risk groups. The risk score and age were verified as independent risk factors for STAD, and a nomogram integrating risk score and age was established, which showed superior predictive performance for STAD prognosis. We developed an OSRG-based molecular subtype and identified a novel risk signature for prognosis prediction, providing a useful tool to facilitate individual treatment for patients with STAD.

The Risk Model Based on the Three Oxidative Stress-Related Genes Evaluates the Prognosis of LAC Patients

Background

Oxidative stress plays a role in carcinogenesis. This study explores the roles of oxidative stress-related genes (OSRGs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). Besides, we construct a risk score model of OSRGs that evaluates the prognosis of LAC patients.

Methods

OSRGs were downloaded from the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) website. The expression levels of OSRGs were confirmed in LAC tissues of the TCGA database. GO and KEGG analyses were used to evaluate the roles and mechanisms of oxidative stress-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Survival, ROC, Cox analysis, and AIC method were used to screen the prognostic DEGs in LAC patients. Subsequently, we constructed a risk score model of OSRGs and a nomogram. Further, this work investigated the values of the risk score model in LAC progression and the relationship between the risk score model and immune infiltration.

Results

We discovered 163 oxidative stress-related DEGs in LAC, involving cellular response to oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species. Besides, the areas under the curve of CCNA2, CDC25C, ERO1A, CDK1, PLK1, ITGB4, and GJB2 were 0.970, 0.984, 0.984, 0.945, 0.984, 0.771, and 0.959, respectively. This indicates that these OSRGs have diagnosis values of LAC and are significantly related to the overall survival of LAC patients. ERO1A, CDC25C, and ITGB4 overexpressions were independent risk factors for the poor prognosis of LAC patients and were associated with risk scores in the risk model. High-risk score levels affected the poor prognosis of LAC patients. Notably, a high-risk score may be implicated in LAC progression via cell cycle, DNA replication, mismatch repair, and other mechanisms. Further, ERO1A, CDC25C, and ITGB4 expression levels were related to the immune infiltrating cells of LAC, including mast cells, NK cells, and CD8 T cells.

Conclusion

In summary, ERO1A, CDC25C, and ITGB4 of OSRGs are associated with poor prognosis of LAC patients. We confirmed that the risk model based on the ERO1A, CDC25C, and ITGB4 is expected to assess the prognosis of LAC patients.