A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of C-Arm Cone-Beam CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of Lung Nodules

Conventional versus cone-beam computed tomography in lung biopsy: diagnostic performance, risks, and the advantages of tract embolization with gelfoam particle suspension

Background

With the widespread adoption of computed tomography (CT) technology, the number of detected pulmonary nodules has gradually increased. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy has become the primary method for qualitative diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Benefiting from its three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction capability, cone-beam CT (CBCT) technology has also been widely adopted. Nevertheless, pneumothorax remains the most common complication of these diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of conventional CT (CCT)- and CBCT-guided coaxial core needle biopsy (CCNB) and the effectiveness of gelfoam particle suspension in reducing complications through tract embolization.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 patients who had undergone CCNB for nodules ≤3 cm from January 2020 to June 2022 at Zhongshan People's Hospital, comprising 325 biopsies (145 CCT-guided and 180 CBCT-guided). Gelfoam tract embolization was specifically used in biopsies of patients identified with a high risk of complications. Comparative statistics involved diagnostic outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy), procedural lengths, complication occurrences, and radiation doses.

Results

Diagnostically, both CCT (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, accuracy 94.1%) and CBCT (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 100%, accuracy 93.8%) offered a similarly high performance. The CCT technique was preferable in terms of shorter median operational times (19 vs. 24 minutes; P<0.001) and greater radiation exposure (13.9 vs. 10.1 mSv; P<0.001). The complication rates of CBCT and CCT, such as those of pneumothorax (18.9% vs. 20.7%; P=0.69) and hemorrhage (23.9% vs. 18.6%; P=0.25), were comparable. Of note, the comparison of biopsies with and without gelfoam embolization revealed a marked reduction in postoperative pneumothorax incidence (1.24% vs. 7.9%; P=0.004) and the requirement for drainage (0% vs. 4.27%; P=0.02), indicating the effectiveness of this procedure.

Conclusions

CCT- and CBCT-guided lung biopsies demonstrate equivalent diagnostic capacities, with CCT providing shorter median operational times. Importantly, gelfoam embolization substantially diminishes the risk of postoperative pneumothorax, underscoring its value in high-risk patients.

Chinese expert consensus on cone-beam CT-guided diagnosis, localization and treatment for pulmonary nodules

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system can provide real-time 3D images and fluoroscopy images of the region of interest during the operation. Some systems can even offer augmented fluoroscopy and puncture guidance. The use of CBCT for interventional pulmonary procedures has grown significantly in recent years, and numerous clinical studies have confirmed the technology's efficacy and safety in the diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pulmonary nodules. In order to optimize and standardize the technical specifications of CBCT and guide its application in clinical practice, the consensus statement has been organized and written in a collaborative effort by the Professional Committee on Interventional Pulmonology of China Association for Promotion of Health Science and Technology.

Pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage after C-arm cone-beam computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: incidence, clinical significance, and correlation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the incidence and clinical significance of pneumothorax (PTX) and pulmonary hemorrhage (PH) after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) guided by C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Furthermore, this study aimed to examine the relationships between PTX and PH with demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging, and PTLB parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients who underwent PTLB at our hospital between January 2019 and October 2022. Incidences of PTX and PH were recorded. PTX was considered clinically significant if treated with chest tube insertion (CTI), and PH if treated with bronchoscopes or endovascular treatments. The various factors on PTX and PH were analyzed using the Chi-squared test and Student t-test. Logistic regression analyses were then used to determine these factors on the correlation to develop PTX and PH.

RESULTS

PTX occurred in 67/192 cases (34.9%); CTI was required in 5/67 (7.5%). PH occurred in 63/192 cases (32.8%) and none of these cases required bronchoscopes or endovascular treatments. Lesion diameter (ORPTX = 0.822; ORPH = 0.785), presence of pulmonary emphysema (ORPH = 2.148), the number of samples (ORPH = 1.834), the use of gelfoam (ORPTX = 0.474; ORPH = 0.341) and ablation (ORPTX = 2.351; ORPH = 3.443) showed statistically significant correlation to PTX and PH.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT-guided PTLB is a safe and effective method for performing lung biopsies. The use of gelfoam has been shown to reduce the occurrence of PTX and PH. However, caution should be exercised when combining radiofrequency ablation with PTLB, as it may increase the risk of PTX and PH.

CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB): A thoracic surgeon's learning curve and experience summary

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the learning process of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB). Here, we aimed to evaluate the number of cases required to achieve proficiency by plotting the learning curve of PTNB.

METHODS

Data were collected from 94 consecutive patients who underwent computed tomography-guided PTNB by a thoracic surgeon at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between May 2021 and February 2022. The data collected included patient information, relevant examination results, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and diagnostic results.

RESULTS

The inflection points of the cumulative sum curve were around cases 13 and 24, according to which three phases were identified, including phase I, phase II, and phase III. A significant downtrend was observed regarding operative time (phase I, 26.53 ± 9.13 min vs. phase III, 18.42 ± 4.29 min, p < 0.05), rate of false-negative (phase I, 15.4% vs. phase III, 5.7%; p < 0.05), rate of pneumothorax (phase I, 30.8% vs. phase III, 12.9%; p < 0.05), and rate of hemoptysis (phase I, 15.4% vs. phase III, 2.9%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen cases were accumulated to lay the technical foundation, and 24 cases were required to achieve proficiency. In this study we summarize our own experience and provide specific guidance for young doctors with no experience in biopsy.

EarlyCDT Lung blood test for risk classification of solid pulmonary nodules: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

EarlyCDT Lung (Oncimmune Holdings plc, Nottingham, UK) is a blood test to assess malignancy risk in people with solid pulmonary nodules. It measures the presence of seven lung cancer-associated autoantibodies. Elevated levels of these autoantibodies may indicate malignant disease. The results of the test might be used to modify the risk of malignancy estimated by existing risk calculators, including the Brock and Herder models.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EarlyCDT Lung; and to develop a conceptual model and identify evidence requirements for a robust cost-effectiveness analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Citation Index, EconLit, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment database, NHS Economic Evaluation Database ( NHS EED ) and the international Health Technology Assessment database were searched on 8 March 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was performed of evidence on EarlyCDT Lung, including diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Study quality was assessed with the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 tool. Evidence on other components of the pulmonary nodule diagnostic pathway (computerised tomography surveillance, Brock risk, Herder risk, positron emission tomography-computerised tomography and biopsy) was also reviewed. When feasible, bivariate meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy were performed. Clinical outcomes were synthesised narratively. A simulation study investigated the clinical impact of using EarlyCDT Lung. Additional reviews of cost-effectiveness studies evaluated (1) other diagnostic strategies for lung cancer and (2) screening approaches for lung cancer. A conceptual model was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 47 clinical publications on EarlyCDT Lung were identified, but only five cohorts (695 patients) reported diagnostic accuracy data on patients with pulmonary nodules. All cohorts were small or at high risk of bias. EarlyCDT Lung on its own was found to have poor diagnostic accuracy, with a summary sensitivity of 20.2% (95% confidence interval 10.5% to 35.5%) and specificity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval 86.2% to 95.8%). This sensitivity was substantially lower than that estimated by the manufacturer (41.3%). No evidence on the clinical impact of EarlyCDT Lung was identified. The simulation study suggested that EarlyCDT Lung might potentially have some benefit when considering intermediate risk nodules (10-70% risk) after Herder risk analysis. Two cost-effectiveness studies on EarlyCDT Lung for pulmonary nodules were identified; none was considered suitable to inform the current decision problem. The conceptualisation process identified three core components for a future cost-effectiveness assessment of EarlyCDT Lung: (1) the features of the subpopulations and relevant heterogeneity, (2) the way EarlyCDT Lung test results affect subsequent clinical management decisions and (3) how changes in these decisions can affect outcomes. All reviewed studies linked earlier diagnosis to stage progression and stage shift to final outcomes, but evidence on these components was sparse.

LIMITATIONS

The evidence on EarlyCDT Lung among patients with pulmonary nodules was very limited, preventing meta-analyses and economic analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence on EarlyCDT Lung among patients with pulmonary nodules is insufficient to draw any firm conclusions as to its diagnostic accuracy or clinical or economic value.

FUTURE WORK

Prospective cohort studies, in which EarlyCDT Lung is used among patients with identified pulmonary nodules, are required to support a future assessment of the clinical and economic value of this test. Studies should investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of EarlyCDT Lung in combination with Brock and Herder risk assessments. A well-designed cost-effectiveness study is also required, integrating emerging relevant evidence with the recommendations in this report.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021242248.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Nomogram model to predict pneumothorax after computed tomography-guided coaxial core needle lung biopsy

PURPOSE

To develop a predictive model to determine risk factors of pneumothorax in patients undergoing the computed tomography (CT)¹-guided coaxial core needle lung biopsy (CCNB).

METHODS

A total of 489 patients who underwent CCNBs with an 18-gauge coaxial core needle were retrospectively included. Patient characteristics, primary pulmonary disease, target lesion image characteristics and biopsy-related variables were evaluated as potential risk factors of pneumothorax which was determined on the chest X-ray and CT scans. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify the independent risk factors of pneumothorax and establish the predictive model, which was presented in the form of a nomogram. The discrimination and calibration of the model were evaluated as well.

RESULTS

The incidence of pneumothorax was 32.91 % and 31.42 % in the development and validation groups, respectively. Age, emphysema, pleural thickening, lesion location, lobulation sign, and size grade were identified independent risk factors of pneumothorax at the multivariate logistic regression model. The forming model produced an area under the curve of 0.718 (95 % CI = 0.660-0.776) and 0.722 (95 % CI = 0.638-0.805) in development and validation group, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and actual probability.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model for pneumothorax after CCNBs had good discrimination and calibration, which could help in clinical practice.

Comparison Between CBCT and Fusion PET/CT-CBCT Guidance for Lung Biopsies

PURPOSE

To establish the feasibility of performing percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions guided by fusion PET/CT-CBCT and to evaluate whether the metabolic information provided by a prior PET/CT scan add incremental benefits for diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 180 patients who underwent CBCT-guided lung biopsy (group 1-90 cases) or PET/CT-CBCT fusion-guided lung biopsy (group 2-90 cases). Technical and clinical success was calculated. We also evaluated the agreement between biopsy and definitive histology and the possibility to carrying out immunehistochemical and molecular biology analyses.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 84/90 (93.3%) cases for group 1 and 89/90 (98.9%) for group 2 cases (p 0.054). Clinical success was achieved in 80/94 (95.2%) cases for group 1 and 88/89 (98.9%) cases for group 2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy rate were, respectively, 94.5%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 73.3% and 95.2% for group 1 and 98.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.4% and 98.9% for group 2 (p 0.167). Agreement between biopsy and definitive histology was reached in 85.7% for group 1 and in 96.2% for group 2 (p 0.211). Immunohistochemical and molecular biology investigations were possible in 66.7% for group 1 and in 77.0% for group 2 (p 0.297). No major complication occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT-CBCT-guided lung biopsy is a feasible technique. In our retrospective case series, we found a higher clinical success rate, but no statistical difference was found.

Ultrasound- Versus CT-Guided Subpleural Lung and Pleural Biopsy: An Analysis of Wait Times, Procedure Time, Safety, and Diagnostic Adequacy

PURPOSE

To compare the wait times, safety, and diagnostic adequacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous lung biopsies with ultrasound (US) guidance for subpleural lung and pleural lesions.

METHODS

Consecutive CT- and US-guided biopsies performed at our institution between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy wait times, lesion size, degree of pleural contact, procedure duration, number of needle passes, complications, and pathologic diagnosis were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 158 biopsies of subpleural or pleural-based lesions were reviewed. Forty-three cases utilized US guidance, while 115 cases used CT, 41 with conventional CT (CCT), and 74 with cone-beam CT guidance (CBCT). Overall, the mean lesion maximum axial diameter and length of pleural contact for US-guided biopsies was greater than for CT (4.8 ± 2.6 cm vs 3.2 ± 1.9 cm and 4.0 ± 2.5 cm vs 2.6 ± 1.7 cm, respectively, P < .001). Wait times for US-guided biopsies were significantly shorter than CCT by 10.9 days on average while being equivalent to CBCT. Procedure time was shorter for lesions localized with US than CT (29.5 ± 16.4 minutes vs 37.6 ± 19.5 minutes, P = .007) despite CT using less needle passes per lesion (3.5 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 0.8, P = .034). Sample adequacy was equivalent for both modalities (88% for US and 92% for CT). The frequency of pneumothoraces was similar between US (12%) and CT (15%).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound and CT guidance have similar safety and diagnostic adequacy for subpleural lung and pleural biopsies. Ultrasound guidance has shorter wait and procedure times.

Learning Curve of C-Arm Cone-beam Computed Tomography Virtual Navigation-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy

Objective

To evaluate the learning curve for C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) virtual navigation-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and to determine the amount of experience needed to develop appropriate skills for this procedure using cumulative summation (CUSUM).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 2042 CBCT virtual navigation-guided PTNBs performed by 7 novice operators between March 2011 and December 2014. Learning curves for CBCT virtual navigation-guided PTNB with respect to its diagnostic performance and the occurrence of biopsy-related pneumothorax were analyzed using standard and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM). Acceptable failure rates were determined as 0.06 for diagnostic failure and 0.25 for PTNB-related pneumothorax.

Results

Standard CUSUM indicated that 6 of the 7 operators achieved an acceptable diagnostic failure rate after a median of 105 PTNB procedures (95% confidence interval [CI], 14–240), and 6 of the operators achieved acceptable pneumothorax occurrence rate after a median of 79 PTNB procedures (95% CI, 27–155). RA-CUSUM showed that 93 (95% CI, 39–142) and 80 (95% CI, 38–127) PTNB procedures were required to achieve acceptable diagnostic performance and pneumothorax occurrence, respectively.

Conclusion

The novice operators' skills in performing CBCT virtual navigation-guided PTNBs improved with increasing experience over a wide range of learning periods.

Comparison of Conventional and Cone-Beam CT for Monitoring and Assessing Pulmonary Microwave Ablation in a Porcine Model

PURPOSE

To compare cone-beam computed tomography (CT) with conventional CT for assessing the growth and postprocedural appearance of pulmonary microwave ablation zones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 microwave ablations were performed in porcine lung in vivo by applying 65 W for 5 minutes through a single 17-gauge antenna. Either CT (n = 8) or CBCT (n = 9) was used for guidance and ablation zone monitoring at 1-minute intervals. Postprocedural noncontrast images were acquired with both modalities. Three independent readers measured the length, width, cross-sectional area, and circularity of the ablation zones on gross tissue samples and CT and cone-beam CT images. The measurements were compared via linear mixed-effects models for postprocedural appearance and with a polynomial mixed effects model for ablation zone growth curves.

RESULTS

On postprocedural images, the differences between cone-beam CT and CT in mean length (3.84 vs 3.86 cm; Δ = -0.02; P = .70), width (2.61 vs 2.56 cm; Δ = 0.06; P = .46), area (7.84 vs 7.65 cm²; Δ = 0.19; P = .35), and circularity (0.85 vs 0.85; Δ = 0.01; P = .62) were not statistically significant after accounting for intersubject and interrater variability. Also, there was no significant difference between CT and cone-beam CT growth curves of the ablation zones during monitoring in terms of length (p_Int. = 1.00; p_Lin.Slope = 0.52; p_Quad.Slope = 0.69); width (p_Int. = 0.83; p_Lin.Slope = 0.98; p_Quad.Slope = 0.79), area (p_Int. = 0.47; p_Lin.Slope = 0.27; p_Quad.Slope = 0.57), or circularity (p_Int. = 0.54; p_Lin.Slope = 0.74; p_Quad.Slope = 0.80). Both CT and cone-beam CT overestimated gross pathologic observations of ablation length, width, and area (P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Cone-beam CT was similar to conventional CT when assessing the growth, final size, and shape of pulmonary microwave ablation zones and may be useful for monitoring and evaluating microwave ablations in the lung.

CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy Using the Additional Laser Guidance System by a Pulmonologist with 2 Years of Experience in CT-Guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy

BACKGROUND

We developed an additional laser guidance system to improve the efficacy and safety of conventional computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB), and we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our system.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent CT-guided PTNB using our additional laser guidance system from July 1, 2015, to January 20, 2016.

RESULTS

There were nine false-negative results among the 238 total cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of our system for diagnosing malignancy were 94.4% (152/161), 100% (77/77), 100% (152/152), 89.5% (77/86), and 96.2% (229/238), respectively. The results of univariate analysis showed that the risk factors for a false-negative result were male sex (p=0.029), a final diagnosis of malignancy (p=0.033), a lesion in the lower lobe (p=0.035), shorter distance from the skin to the target lesion (p=0.003), and shorter distance from the pleura to the target lesion (p=0.006). The overall complication rate was 30.5% (74/243). Pneumothorax, hemoptysis, and hemothorax occurred in 21.8% (53/243), 9.1% (22/243), and 1.6% (4/243) of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The additional laser guidance system might be a highly economical and efficient method to improve the diagnostic efficacy and safety of conventional CT-guided PTNB even if performed by inexperienced pulmonologists.

Image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small ground glass opacities: a case series

Background

This case series demonstrated the feasibility of the image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (iVATS) for localization and removal of ground glass opacities (GGOs). The procedure was performed in a hybrid operating room (OR) using C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) equipped with a laser-guided navigation system.

Methods

Between October 1^st 2016 to July 31^st 2017, 14 consecutive patients presenting with GGOs underwent iVATS procedure. The efficacy and safety of the procedure were assessed through a retrospective chart review.

Results

The median GGOs size was 7 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 4-10 mm] with a median depth-to-size (D-S) ratio of 1.16 (IQR: 0-2.3). All of the lesions were visible on intraoperative CBCT images and localizations were successful in all patients with a median localization time of 22 min (IQR: 16-44 min). No patient required a conversion to thoracotomy. There was no operative mortality and the median length of postoperative stay was 4 days (IQR: 3-6 days). The final pathological diagnoses were as follows: primary lung cancer (n=6), lung metastases (n=2), and benign lung lesions (n=6).

Conclusions

Our study suggests the iVATS could be a helpful tool for single-stage detection and removal of GGOs.