VAAFT: Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment; Bringing revolution in Fistula treatment

Comparison between recent sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas-ligation of intersphincteric tract vs transanal opening of intersphincteric space

Complex anal fistulas are difficult to treat. The main reasons for this are a higher recurrence rate and the risk of disrupting the continence mechanism because of sphincter involvement. Due to this, several sphincter-sparing procedures have been developed in the last two decades. Though moderately successful in simple fistulas (50%-75% healing rate), the healing rates in complex fistulas for most of these procedures has been dismal. Only two procedures, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and transanal opening of intersphincteric space have been shown to have good success rates in complex fistulas (60%-95%). Both of these procedures preserve continence while achieving high success rates. In this opinion review, I shall outline the history, compare the pros and cons, indications and contraindications and future application of both these procedures for the management of complex anal fistulas.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anorectal fistulas in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) has gained increasing acceptance as a sphincter-sparing procedure for treating complex anorectal fistulas (CAF), but no unequivocal conclusions can yet be drawn regarding its ultimate effectiveness. We reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VAAFT in CAF patients.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021279085). A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021 with no restriction on language based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We used the keywords video-assisted surgery, video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and complex anorectal fistula to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (7 prospective and 7 retrospective) with a total of 1201 patients (mean age 43.5 years) were included. The median follow-up duration was 16.5(8-48) months. Pooled analysis showed that the rates of success, recurrence and postoperative complication across the studies were 83% (95% CI 81-85%, I² = 37.9%), 16% (95% CI 14-18%, I² = 4.8%), 11% (95% CI 7-15%, I² = 72.1%), respectively. The postoperative Jorge-Wexner score used to assess the level of anal incontinence was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.9-1.27, I² = 74.6%). The internal opening detection rate was 97.6% (95% CI 96.1-99.6%, I² = 48.2%). Recurrence rates varied according to the closure method of internal opening from 21.4% after using staplers, 18.7% after suturing, to 23.5% after advancement flap. The hospital stay was 3.15 days (95% CI 2.96-3.35, I² = 49.7%). Subgroup analysis indicated that the risk of heterogeneity in the urine retention group was higher  compared with that of the overall group and that retrospective studies may be the source of heterogeneity for postoperative anal incontinence. r . Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the pooled results. Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, VAAFT may be a valuable alternative to fistulotomy or seton in treating CAF and has the additional long-term benefits of reducing anal incontinence and surgical morbidity, permitting earlier healing and accelerated rehabilitation.

The effect of vaginal delivery and Caesarean section on the anal Sphincter complex of Primipara based on optimized three-dimensional ultrasound image and nuclear regression Reconstruction Algorithm

Objective

The study used the optimized nuclear regression reconstruction algorithm to explore the value of three-dimensional perineal ultrasound evaluation of the effect of caesarean delivery and caesarean section on the anal sphincter complex of primipara.

Methods

This study performed three-dimensional perineal ultrasound scanning of the anal sphincter complex of 157 primiparas 42 days after delivery. Among them, 77 were in caesarean delivery (spontaneous delivery group) and 80 were in caesarean section (caesarean delivery group) from September 2018 to December 2020 in our hospital. The thickness of the end plane, the middle plane, the distal plane and the distal plane of the external anal sphincter at 3, 6, 9, 12 o'clock direction, and measure the thickness of the central plane of the pubic rectum muscle at 4, 8 o'clock direction. At the same time, the study used tomography and volume contrast imaging to observe the morphology and integrity of the anal sphincter complex.

Results

The thickness of the distal anal sphincter at the 12 o'clock direction, the proximal anal sphincter at 6, 12 o'clock, and the central plane at 9 and 12 o'clock in the obstetric group were smaller than those in the caesarean section group (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the thickness of the remaining anal internal and external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles between the two groups in different directions (all P> 0.05). In the obstetric group, a perineal sphincter defect was found via three-dimensional perineal ultrasound.

Conclusion

The delivery method has a certain influence on the shape of the anal sphincter complex. The thickness of the internal and external anal sphincter of the primiparous women in a certain direction is significantly smaller than that of caesarean section. Transperineally three-dimensional ultrasound can clearly show the morphological characteristics and integrity of the anal sphincter complex, and diagnose the defect of the anal sphincter complex.

Predictive Risk Factors of the Conversion from Video-Assisted Treatment of Anal Fistula to Seton Fistulotomy

Background: To identify the risk factors of converting from video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) to seton fistulotomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients registered to undergo VAAFT between January 2016 and June 2020 at the Erlonglu Hospital. Intraoperative examination of the fistula tract revealed that the patients were assigned to undergo the VAAFT operation and seton fistulotomy. Results: Among 180 patients aged 37 (±10.4) years who underwent intraoperative examination of the fistula tract, 101 completed the standard VAAFT and 79 converted to seton fistulotomy. Univariate analyses revealed that age, necrotic cavity diameter ≥1 cm, scars at the anal entrance, tissue edema, Parks classification, fistula stenosis, and fistula branches were significantly different between the VAAFT and converted groups (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between the risk of surgery conversion and the presence of necrotic cavity with a diameter of ≥1 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.668, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.366-9.853, P = .01), scars at the anal entrance (OR: 9.462, 95% CI: 1.562-57.32, P = .014), fistula stenosis (OR: 25.14, 95% CI: 5.211-121.3, P < .001), and fistula branches (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.088-7.73, P = .033). The nomogram based on the logistic model was fitted with high accuracy and area under curve of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.726-0.861). Conclusions: The independent risk factors of conversion from surgery for VAAFT to seton fistulotomy were the presence of necrotic cavity with a diameter of ≥1 cm, scars at the anal entrance, fistula stenosis, and fistula branches. The protocol of this systematic review was registered a priori in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) under the registration number of ChiCTR1900022810.

VAAFT for complex anal fistula: a useful tool, however, cure is unlikely

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options for complex anal fistula (CAF) are limited. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) allows examination of these anatomically complex fistulae from within. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of VAAFT for a series of CAF.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients at a single centre with complex anal cryptoglandular and Crohn's fistulae managed with VAAFT from June 2016 to June 2019. CAF was diagnosed as high intersphincteric/transsphincteric tract, multiple/secondary tracts, horseshoe or anovaginal fistulae. Patients were treated with 'therapeutic intent' if the internal opening was closed at the time of ablation and 'diagnostic/staged/palliative' VAAFT if there was no ablation/partial treatment/ablation-only, respectively. Symptom improvement was a reduction in reported pain, discharge, or pad use.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (73 cryptoglandular, 11 Crohn's, M:F 2.5:1, median age 43 [22-77] years), underwent 105 VAAFT procedures. Twenty patients had > 1 VAAFT. Median follow-up was 8 (1-46) months. 40 (48%) had multiple or secondary tracts; an additional 16 (19%) had horseshoe and 3 (4%) anovaginal fistulae. Of the 84 patients, 19 [16/73 (22%) cryptoglandular and 3/11 (27%) Crohn's fistulae] healed. 34 (40%) unhealed reported improved symptoms; 23 (27%) no improvement; and 6 (7%) were worse. Sixteen (19%) had CAF > 5 years of whom none healed, albeit 50% reported symptom improvement. Five patients (6%) developed faecal incontinence: 2 temporary, 1 to flatus only and 1 to liquid and 1 to solid, all managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

VAAFT is a useful minimally invasive procedure for complex fistula with no other minimally invasive options. Complete healing is rare, and, although symptoms can be improved in a number of cases, there is a small risk of incontinence.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with anal fistula plug for treatment of horseshoe anal fistula

Objective

Horseshoe anal fistula is a common anorectal disease, and there is no standard procedure for its treatment. In this study, we performed a modified surgical procedure for the treatment of horseshoe anal fistula and investigated its efficacy and adverse effects.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with an anal fistula plug (VAAFT-Plug) in 26 patients with a horseshoe anal fistula. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 18 months. Preoperative and postoperative data were collected to analyze the cure rate, anal sphincter function, and incidence of complications.

Results

The surgeries were successfully performed in all patients, 23 of whom were cured (effective cure rate of 88.46%). Three patients developed recurrence and were cured after traditional surgery. No patients developed severe complications or postoperative anal incontinence. The VAAFT-Plug protocol was performed with a small incision in the fistula that subsequently promoted fistula healing and preserved sphincter function.

Conclusion

Although randomized controlled trials will be needed to fully validate these findings, our results suggest that VAAFT-Plug represents a promising treatment strategy for horseshoe anal fistulas. This technique preserves normal anal function and achieves satisfactory outcomes in most patients.

Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula by Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Combined with Anal Fistula Plug: A Single-Center Study

Objective. The surgical treatment of complex anal fistulae is very challenging because of the incidence of incontinence after traditional approaches. There are no studies on the role of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with anal fistula plug (AFP) in the complex anal fistulae. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of treating complex anal fistulae using VAAFT combined with AFP. Method. This was a retrospective, nonrandomized observational study. 57 consecutive patients with complex anal fistulae who had undergone the VAAFT with AFP in our hospital between April 2016 and December 2019 were included. The primary outcomes were the cure rate, recurrence rate, and Wexner incontinence scores; the secondary outcomes were surgery time, blood loss, wound healing time postoperatively, pain, and patient satisfaction. Results. All 57 patients completed the surgery and follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 28 months; 6 patients suffered with recurrence (recurrence rate: 10.5%). The average surgery time was 57.9 minutes, and the average wound healing time was 46 days. There were no severe postoperative complications, and anal sphincter function was protected in all patients. Conclusions. The treatment of complex anal fistula by VAAFT combined with AFP is safe and effective, has a high healing rate and few postoperative complications, and is a promising surgery that can effectively protect the patient's anal sphincter function.

Efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler for Parks II anal fistula

Background

To explore the efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with an internal-opening closure technique using a stapler in the treatment of Parks II anal fistula.

Methods

From September 2017 to June 2019, 75 patients with Parks II anal fistulas in Beijing Erlonglu Hospital were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. The 37 patients in the treatment group received VAAFT combined with internal-opening closure techniques, and the 38 patients in the control group were treated with anal fistulotomy with seton placement. The primary outcomes included the healing rate and recurrence, the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) score, and the Wexner incontinence score during the 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Results

Thirty-two cases were healed in the treatment group (86.5%) and thirty-six cases were cured in the control group (94.7%). There was no notable difference in the healing rate between the two groups (P=0.487). Significant differences between the groups were observed in the Wexner incontinence and FISI scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation (P=0.001). Furthermore, the wound healing time in the treatment group was significantly shorter than in the control group (P<0.05), while the numerical rating scale (NRS) for postoperative pain on the first day and 1 week after the operation were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

VAAFT combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler is effective and safe for Parks II anal fistula, and should be promoted as a promising treatment.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of complex anal fistulae, particularly those involving a significant portion of the anal sphincter in which fistulotomy would compromise continence, is challenging. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), fistula tract laser closure (FiLaC™) and over-the-scope clip (OTSC^®) proctology system are all novel sphincter-sparing techniques targeted at healing anal fistulae. In this study, all published articles on these techniques were reviewed to determine efficacy, feasibility and safety.

METHODS

A systematic search of major databases was performed using defined terms. All studies reporting on experience of these techniques were included and outcomes (fistula healing and safety) evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (VAAFT-12, FiLaC™-3, OTSC^®-3) including 1245 patients were analysed. All were case series, and outcomes were heterogeneous with follow-up ranging from 6 to 69 months and short-term (< 1 year) healing rates of 64-100%. Morbidity was low with only minor complications reported. There was one report of minor incontinence following the first reported study of FiLaC™, and this was treated successfully at 6 months with rubber band ligation of hypertrophied prolapsed mucosa. There are inconsistencies in the technique in studies of VAAFT and FiLaC™.

CONCLUSIONS

All three techniques appear to be safe and feasible options in the management of anal fistulae, and short-term healing rates are acceptable with no sustained effect on continence. There is, however, a paucity of robust data with long-term outcomes. These techniques are thus welcome additions; however, their long-term place in the colorectal surgeon's armamentarium, whether diagnostic or therapeutic, remains uncertain.

A Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT)

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is a novel, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano (FIA). This review aimed to search the literature for the outcome of VAAFT regarding the recurrence and complication rates of the technique.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in compliance with the PRISMA screening guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were searched for articles reporting the outcomes of VAAFT procedure from inception through April 2017. The main outcomes were patients' characteristics, technical aspects, operation time, recurrence, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (n = 788 patients) were included. The mean age of the patients was 39.5 years. 66.5% of patients had high or complex FIA and 18.4% underwent previous fistula surgery. The internal opening of the fistula was detected in 85.7% of patients. The mean operation time was 42 ± 14.2 min. The weighed mean rate of detection of internal opening was 93.3%. Recurrence occurred in 112 (14.2%) patients after a median follow-up of 9 months. Recurrence rates varied according to method of closure of internal opening from 15.3% after using staplers, 17.7% after suturing, to 25% after advancement flap. The weighted mean recurrence rate across the studies was 17.7%. The weighted mean complication rate was 4.8%.

CONCLUSION

VAAFT may be considered an effective diagnostic tool and a safe method for the treatment of complex and high FIA attaining satisfactory outcome and acceptably low complications. Recurrence after VAAFT may be related to previous fistula surgery and the method of closure of the internal opening.

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) in Cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) is a relatively new minimally invasive videoendoscopic procedure for treating fistula-in-ano. We reviewed and performed metaanalysis to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure.

METHODS

Studies from the period 2010 to 2016 were searched in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Ovid, SCI database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) & Google Scholar database. All studies which utilized VAAFT to treat fistula-in-ano were extracted. The studies in which the Cryptoglandular fistula were treated were included. Procedure's done in patients with Crohn's disease, pediatric patients and associated malignancy were excluded from the study. The primary outcome parameter was success rate in fistula healing and the secondary outcome parameters were operating time, hospital stay, return to work, incontinence rate and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 1378 studies were screened. Out of these, eight studies were finally included for meta-analysis. The analysis (n = 786) demonstrated a net Proportion Meta-analysis pooled rate of 76.01% (95% CI = 68.1 to 83.9) for success rate, 16.2% (95% CI = 12.1 to 20.2) for complications, 44.7 min (95% CI = 38.3 to 51.2) for operating time, 1-4.1 days for mean hospital stay and 1-11 days for return to work. None of the studies reported worsening of continence levels.

CONCLUSIONS

VAAFT is a safe videoendoscopic method to treat fistula-in-ano with an overall success rate of 76% (net Proportion Meta-analysis pooled rate). The main benefit of the procedure is minimal risk to incontinence, minimal hospital stay and early return to work.

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment: Pros and Cons of This Minimally Invasive Method for Treatment of Perianal Fistulas

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present results of a single-center, nonrandomized, prospective study of the video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT).

Methods

68 consecutive patients with perianal fistulas were operated on using the VAAFT technique. 30 of the patients had simple fistulas, and 38 had complex fistulas. The mean follow-up time was 31 months.

Results

The overall healing rate was 54.41% (37 of the 68 patients healed with no recurrence during the follow-up period). The results varied depending on the type of fistula. The success rate for the group with simple fistulas was 73.3%, whereas it was only 39.47% for the group with complex fistulas. Female patients achieved higher healing rates for both simple (81.82% versus 68.42%) and complex fistulas (77.78% versus 27.59%). There were no major complications.

Conclusions

The results of VAAFT vary greatly depending on the type of fistula. The procedure has some drawbacks due to the rigid construction of the fistuloscope and the diameter of the shaft. The electrocautery of the fistula tract from the inside can be insufficient to close wide tracts. However, low risk of complications permits repetition of the treatment until success is achieved. Careful selection of patients is advised.