Talipes equinovarus or Clubfoot: A review of study approaches, management and trends in Pakistan

Prevalence and pattern of congenital clubfoot among less than 5-year-old children in Ethiopia; cross-sectional based study

BACKGROUND

Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital malformations, but it is also one of the most neglected public health problems among less than five-year-old children, mainly in middle- and low-income countries. Approximately 80% of clubfoot cases are found in low- and middle-income countries. In this study setting, no epidemiological studies have been conducted to assess clubfoot deformity. Due to this gap, the study aimed to assess prevalence, and pattern of congenital club foot among less than 5-year-old children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was carried out at Black Lion Specialized Hospital at the pediatric orthopedic clinic. The sample size was 261 to determine the prevalence and pattern of congenital clubfoot. Terms like frequency, percentage, and mean were used for data presentation.

RESULT

A total of 36,303 pediatric patients visited Black Lion Specialized Hospital during the study period, and clubfoot prevalence was 7.2 per 1000. The largest subclassification of congenital clubfoot was idiopathic clubfoot, which accounted for 6.2 per 1000, whereas syndromic clubfoot was 0.3 per 1000, and neuropathic clubfoot was shared at 0.36 per 1000. Most of the cases in this study were bilateral clubfoot, with males having more dominance.

CONCLUSION

In the area under investigation, a significant prevalence of congenital clubfoot was observed, especially among male children. The majority of cases were bilateral, with idiopathic clubfoot being the dominant form.

Outcomes of the Ponseti Technique in Different Types of Clubfoot-A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Background: Clubfoot is a congenital deformity that can affect one or both of a newborn's lower extremities. The main objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of the Ponseti method for the management of different types of clubfoot. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 151 children with 253 clubfeet (idiopathic untreated, idiopathic recurrent, and syndromic) with at least one year of follow-up was conducted in four months after ethical approval. Data were collected with a structured proforma after the consent of the parents. An independent sample t-test was applied to show the comparison between the groups, and a p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of 151 patients, 76% were male and 24% were female. Out of a total of 235 feet, 96 (63%) were idiopathic untreated, 40 (26.5%) were idiopathic recurrent, and 15 (9.5%) were syndromic clubfoot. The average number of casts was higher in syndromic clubfoot (9 casts per foot). There was no significant difference in the baseline Pirani score of the three groups (p-value > 0.05); but after one year of follow-up, there was a significant difference in the Pirani score of idiopathic and syndromic clubfoot (p-value ≤ 0.05) and between recurrent clubfoot and syndromic clubfoot (p-value = 0.01). Conclusions: The aetiology of syndromic clubfoot affects the outcomes of the Ponseti method and leads to relapse. In idiopathic (untreated and recurrent) clubfoot, the Ponseti method does not produce a significant difference in outcome. Poor brace compliance and a lack of tenotomy lead to orthotic (ankle foot orthosis AFO and foot orthosis FO) use in the day time and the recurrence of clubfoot deformity in these three types of clubfoot.

Clubfoot management in the Middle East: a survey-based review

Clubfoot is the most frequent congenital deformity involving the foot. Little is known about the management of this disease in the Middle East as sparse data is available in the literature. Through the last 5 decades, congenital clubfoot management in the Middle East went from manipulation through Kite’s technique in the late seventies, to early primary surgical intervention in the late eighties and early nineties of the previous century, and then back to manipulation with Ponseti’s technique and the French functional technique in the late nineties, with the latter falling out of favor with time. This is comparable to the evolution of management witnessed in the United States and in Europe, with 10 to 15 years of delay. The delay is getting shorter with time due to the easier access to published scientific data and the increasing number of fellows from Middle East travelling to referral centers in Europe and the USA. A survey was performed among pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the Middle East to assess their approach to clubfoot management. This is the first survey of its kind in the region. It showed a wide adoption (97.1%) of the Ponseti’s technique with serial manipulation and casting, Achilles tenotomy followed by abduction bracing. Divergent practices were found concerning the upper age limit for Ponseti treatment and the setting of the Achilles tenotomy. Nevertheless, these subjects are still a matter of debate in the literature and international conferences. All in all, pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the Middle East are offering their patients the gold standard of care. However, lot of work is to be done in raising awareness for this disease in the community, and among our colleagues as prenatal screening for clubfoot in the Middle East is practically nonexistent.