Dee JM, Littenberg B. Regional vs global physical therapy interventions to treat chronic pain in survivors of trauma: a randomized controlled trial.
J Man Manip Ther 2023;
31:328-339. [PMID:
36567611 PMCID:
PMC10566413 DOI:
10.1080/10669817.2022.2159615]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
A history of traumatic life events is associated with chronic pain in later life. Physical therapists utilize a variety of methods to treat pain, however, they have struggled to find effective interventions to improve patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To compare impairment-based, regional (REGION-PT) physical therapy (PT) to a global (GLOBAL-PT) model consisting of pain neuroscience education, graded motor imagery, and exercise for adults with chronic pain and history of trauma.
DESIGN
Randomized Controlled Trial.
METHODS
Adults ≥ 18 years of age with chronic pain and a history of ≥1 trauma identified through the Life Events Checklist received the allocated intervention once a week for six weeks. Treatment effects were assessed using linear mixed models.
RESULTS
Ninety-eight participants completed the trial. There were no difference in outcomes between groups. There were significant interactions between race and intervention. Both interventions were associated with improvements in pain interference for white participants, but non-white participants experienced improvement only with GLOBAL-PT. Regardless of allocation, participants improved in physical function, six of the PROMIS-29 domains, and in pain interference measures.
CONCLUSION
Both interventions are reasonable strategies for individuals with chronic pain and a history of trauma.
Collapse