The yield of continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study

Prevalence, electroclinical spectrum and effect on the outcome of non-convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill patients; the utility of routine electroencephalogram

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the importance of routine electroencephalogram (rEEG) in detecting non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), describing the electroclinical spectrum and effect on outcome in critically ill patients with altered mental status (CIPAMS).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at King Fahd University Hospital. Clinical data and EEG recordings of CIPAMS to rule out NCSE were reviewed. All patients had at least 30 minutes of EEG recording. The Salzburg Consensus criteria (SCC) were applied to diagnose NCSE. The data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables such as etiologies, EEG findings, and functional outcomes. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the predictors of unfavorable outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 323 CIPAMS referred to rule out NCSE were enrolled (mean age 57.8 ± 20 years). Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was diagnosed in 54 (16.7%) patients. A significant association was found between subtle clinical features and NCSE (P =< 0.01). Acute ischemic stroke (18.5%), sepsis (18.5%), and hypoxic brain injury (22.2%) were the main etiologies. The previous history of epilepsy was significantly associated with NCSE (P = 0.01). Acute stroke, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, and NCSE were statistically associated with unfavorable outcomes. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (P = 0.02, OR = 2.75, CI = 1.16-6.48) during multivariable analysis. Sepsis was associated with higher mortality (P =< 0.01, OR = 2.4, CI = 1.4-4.0).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study findings suggest that the utility of rEEG in detecting NCSE in CIPAMS should not be underestimated. Important observations further indicate that repeating rEEG is advisable, as this would increase the likelihood of identifying NCSE. Thus, physicians should consider and repeat rEEG when evaluating CIPAMS in order to detect NCSE, which is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. Nonetheless, further studies comparing rEEG and cEEG yields are required to augment the current understanding of the electroclinical spectrum and better describe NCSE in CIPAMS.

Does continuous electroencephalography influence therapeutic decisions in neurocritical care?

OBJECTIVES

In the neurocritical care unit (neuro-ICU), the impact of continuous EEG (cEEG) on therapeutic decisions and prognostication, including outcome prediction using the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), is poorly investigated. We studied to what extent cEEG contributes to treatment decisions, and how this relates to clinical outcome and the use of STESS in neurocritical care.

METHODS

We included patients admitted to the neuro-ICU or neurological step-down unit of a tertiary referral hospital between 05/2013 and 06/2015. Inclusion criteria were ≥20 h of cEEG monitoring and age ≥15 years. Exclusion criteria were primary epileptic and post-cardiac arrest encephalopathies.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria, 80 of which had status epilepticus, including 14 with super-refractory status. Median length of cEEG monitoring was 50 h (range 21-374 h). Mean STESS was lower in patients with favorable outcome 1 year after discharge (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) compared to patients with unfavorable outcome (mRS 3-6), albeit not statistically significant (mean STESS 2.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.09). STESS had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 42%, and a negative predictive value of 93% for outcome. cEEG results changed treatment decisions in 76 patients, including escalation of antiepileptic treatment in 65 and reduction in 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

Status Epilepticus Severity Score had a high negative predictive value but low sensitivity, suggesting that STESS should be used cautiously. Of note, cEEG results altered clinical decision-making in three of four patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of status epilepticus, confirming the clinical value of cEEG in neurocritical care.