Recent advances in the understanding and management of primary hyperparathyroidism

Pilot Study of Plasma miRNA Signature Panel for Differentiating Single vs Multiglandular Parathyroid Disease

CONTEXT

The ability to differentiate sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (sPHPT) caused by a single parathyroid adenoma (PTA) from multiglandular parathyroid disease (MGD) preoperatively, as well as definitely diagnose sPHPT in difficult patients, would enhance surgical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to identify miRNA (miR) signatures for MGD, single- and double-PTA, as well as cell-free miRNA (cfmiR) in plasma samples from patients with single-PTAs to use as biomarkers.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients with sPHPT (single-PTA n = 32, double-PTA n = 12, MGD n = 9). Preoperative plasma samples from 16 single-PTA and 29 normal healthy donors (NHDs). All specimens were processed and analyzed for 2083 miRs using HTG EdgeSeq miR whole-transcriptome assay and normalized using DESeq2 to identify differentially expressed (DE) miRs. MiR classifiers were identified using Random Forest. Main outcome measures were receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve.

RESULTS

MiR signatures distinguished normal parathyroid from MGD and PTA as well as MGD from PTA in tissue samples. Common miRs were found in the single-PTA and double-PTAs. Data integration identified a 27-miR signature in single-PTA tissue samples compared to the rest of the tissue samples. In plasma samples analysis, significant cfmiRs were DE in single-PTA patients compared to NHD. Of those, only 9 miRNAs/cfmiRs were found DE both in tissue and plasma samples from patients diagnosed with a single PTA (AUC = 76%).

CONCLUSION

Twenty-seven miRs were consistently found DE in single-PTA tissue and plasma samples. Data integration showed a 9-cfmiR signature with potential clinical utility to preoperatively diagnose sPHPT caused by a single PTA, which could decrease more invasive parathyroid explorations.

Revision parathyroid surgery - challenges and considerations in comparison to primary surgery

OBJECTIVE

Revision parathyroidectomy is made necessary by recurrent or persistent parathyroid disease. This study aimed to identify challenges in revision surgery compared to primary parathyroid surgery.

METHODS

All revision parathyroidectomies performed by one surgeon over a 17-year period were assessed for demographics, imaging, histology, biochemistry, cure rate, gland weight, gland location and gland ectopia, and compared to a series of 100 primary parathyroidectomies.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight revision surgical procedures were identified. Sestamibi scanning for gland localisation was superior to ultrasound in both primary and revision surgery. Pre-operative calcium and gland weight were significantly higher in revision cases. There were no significant differences in post-operative calcium levels, pre- or post-operative parathyroid hormone levels, or gland location. 36 per cent of glands excised in revision surgery were ectopic, compared to 25 per cent in primary procedures. The cure rate was significantly lower in revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Revision parathyroidectomy patients present with higher pre-operative calcium and larger adenomas; the cure rate is significantly lower in these patients.

[Special features of the diagnostics and treatment of hereditary primary hyperparathyroidism]

Between 2% and 10% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) are diagnosed with hereditary forms of primary hyperparathyroidism (hpHPT). They are more prevalent in younger patients before the age of 40 years, in patients with persistence or recurrence of pHPT and pHPT patients with multi-glandular disease (MGD). The various forms of hpHPT diseases can be classified into four syndromes, i.e., hpHPT associated with diseases of other organ systems, and four diseases that are confined to the parathyroid glands. Approximately 40% of patients with hpHPT suffer from multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) or show germline mutations of the MEN‑1 gene. Currently, germline mutations that lead to a specific diagnosis in patients with hpHPT have currently been described in 13 different genes, which enables a clear diagnosis of the disease; however, a clear genotype-phenotype correlation does not exist, even though the complete loss of a coded protein (e.g. due to frame-shift mutations in the calcium sensing receptor, CASR) often leads to more severe clinical consequences than merely a reduced function of the protein (e.g. due to point mutation). As the various hpHPT diseases require different treatment approaches, which do not correspond to that of sporadic pHPT, a clear definition of the specific form of hpHPT must always be strived for. Therefore, before surgery of a pHPT with clinical, imaging or biochemical suspicion of hpHPT, genetic proof or exclusion of hpHPT is necessary. The differentiated treatment approach for hpHTP can only be defined by taking the clinical and diagnostic results of all the abovenamed findings into account.

Advances in the diagnosis and the management of primary hyperparathyroidism

The parathyroid glands, one of the last organs to be discovered, are responsible for maintaining calcium homeostasis, and they continue to present the clinician with diagnostic and management challenges that are reviewed herein. Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) comprises the vast majority of pathology of the parathyroid glands. The classic variant, presenting with elevated calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, has been studied extensively, but the current body of literature has added to our understanding of normocalcemic and normohormonal variants of PHPT, as well as syndromic forms of PHPT. All variants can lead to bone loss, kidney stones, declining renal function, and a variety of neurocognitive, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal complaints, although the majority of PHPT today is asymptomatic. Surgery remains the definitive treatment for PHPT, and advances in screening, evolving indications for surgery, new imaging modalities, and improvements in intra-operative methods have greatly changed the landscape. Surgery continues to produce excellent results in the hands of an experienced parathyroid surgeon. For those patients who are not candidates for surgery, therapeutic advances in medical management allow for improved control of the hypercalcemic state. Parathyroid cancer is extremely rare; the diagnosis is often made intra-operatively or on final pathology, and recurrence is common. The mainstay of treatment is normalization of serum calcium via surgery and medical adjuncts.

How should we define cure after parathyroidectomy for normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism? A retrospective cohort study

Cure after surgery for normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) is defined as parathyroid hormone (PTH) normalization. However, an increase of PTH is frequently observed in cured patients with hypercalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (HHPT). Therefore, this criterion must be redefined. A single-center retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism from 2013 to 2019. Cure rates of different types of hyperparathyroidism were analyzed. PTH reduction was studied as a possible criterion to define cure in patients with NHPT. One-hundred and eighty-six patients were included: 173 with HHPT and 13 with NHPT. After a mean follow-up of 33.4 months, 174 (93.6%) patients were considered cured. Cure was more frequent in the group of patients with HHPT (97.1% vs. 46.2%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, surgical failure was associated with NHPT and multiglandular disease. Forty-nine (30.1%) cured patients with HHPT had an increased PTH during the follow-up. When decline of PTH levels was studied in patients with HHPT to define cure, the area under curve was 0.92. A cut-off value of 40% in PTH reduction achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 83.4% and 80.0%. If cure was defined as a 40% reduction of PTH, cure rate in the group of patients with NHPT would increase to 69.2%. Patients with NHPT had a lower cure rate than patients with HHPT. A significant number of cured patients with HHPT had an increased PTH during follow-up. A 40% reduction in PTH levels is proposed as an alternative definition for cure in patients with NHPT.

The effect of chronic kidney disease on intraoperative parathyroid hormone: A linear mixed model analysis

BACKGROUND

Reduced creatinine clearance is an indication for surgery in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy have chronic kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinetics of intraoperative parathyroid hormone decline during parathyroidectomy in patients who have chronic kidney disease compared with those with who have normal renal function.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy (n = 646). Patients were grouped based on estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than (normal renal function) or less than (chronic kidney disease) 60 mL/min/1.73m². All patients had intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring and ≥6-month postoperative serum studies to confirm surgical cure. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone kinetic curves were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Despite similar pre-excision values, patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone values at 5 minutes (76 vs 58 pg/mL, P = .02) and 10 minutes (54 vs 37 pg/mL, P = .004) postexcision. No significant difference was observed in whether patients met Miami criterion by 5 minutes (chronic kidney disease 71%, normal renal function 78%, P = .255) or by 10 minutes (chronic kidney disease 95%, normal renal function 96%, P = .751) postexcision. Using a linear mixed model, glomerular filtration rate did not have a significant effect on the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher postexcision intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels. However, renal function did not affect the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time, nor did renal function ultimately affect the likelihood of meeting the Miami criterion. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring remains useful in this population, although additional time points may be needed to observe normalization of values.