Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study

Prevalence and network structure of depression, anxiety and adverse doctor-patient relationship risks among patients with physical diseases: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Mental health issues among patients with physical diseases are increasingly common. This study investigated the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adverse doctor-patient relationship risks (ADRR) among patients with physical diseases, and the central and bridge symptoms of this network structure.

METHODS

A total of 14,344 patients with physical diseases enrolled in this survey. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Psychological Safety Questionnaire were used to evaluate anxiety, depression, and ADRR. The "qgraph" package in R 4.4.3 was used to construct a network model to identify central and bridge symptoms.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and ADRR were found to be 9.52 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 9.04-10.00 %), 19.35 % (95 % CI: 18.71-20.00 %), and 4.29 % (95 % CI: 3.96-4.62 %), respectively. Within the network structure, the central symptoms identified were 'Sad mood,' 'Restlessness,' and 'Excessive worry,' which also served as the bridge symptoms. The flow network analysis revealed that ADRR exhibited the strongest associations with 'Anhedonia', 'Restlessness', and 'Suicidal ideation'. Additionally, 'Suicidal ideation' shows strongest correlations with 'Guilt', 'Concentration', and 'Restlessness'.

LIMITATION

The generalizability of the study's findings is constrained, as the sample consisted exclusively of inpatients, potentially limiting applicability to non-hospitalized individuals with physical illnesses.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel insights into the comorbidity of depression, anxiety, and ADRR at the symptom level in patients with physical diseases through the application of network analysis. The identification of bridge symptoms highlights potential targets for interventions aimed at addressing the comorbidity among these disorders.

Medical malpractice in organ transplantation: public allegations and key legal outcomes

Introduction

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and patient outcomes, organ transplantation (OT) remains fraught with legal challenges and ethical dilemmas. This study aims to address the notable gap in literature on malpractice claims specifically related to OT, providing insights into litigation trends, outcomes, and implications for medical practice and patient care.

Methods

We retrospectively queried the Verdictsearch database from 1988 to 2023, and captured malpractice claims involving several organs. Data on demographics, organ types, and litigation outcomes were collected to compare compensation across different categories of malpractice and patient outcomes.

Results

Out of 292 malpractice cases identified, 62 met inclusion criteria, distributed across 19 states with kidney being the most implicated organ (46.8%). Defendants prevailed in 53.2% of cases, while settlements were reached in 29.0%, and plaintiffs won in 16.1% of cases. Surgical errors and complications were the most frequent allegations, followed by medication and treatment errors. The median compensation for deceased plaintiffs was significantly higher ($1,300,000) compared to living plaintiffs at litigation initiation ($128,000).

Discussion

Our study sheds light on the challenges and trends in malpractice litigation within the field of OT. By identifying key areas of concern and the influence of patient outcomes on litigation resolution, this study offers valuable insights for healthcare providers, legal practitioners, and policymakers aimed at enhancing patient safety, reducing litigation risks, and fostering a deeper understanding of the ethical and legal complexities in OT.

Indian Dental Malpractice Claims and Lawsuits: A Medico-Legal Analysis

Background and Aim

The law of the land assumes that a dentist will always use credible skill, care, and caution in the care of patients. Failing to do something that one is supposed to do (act of omission) or doing something that one is not supposed to do (act of commission) falls under the purview of medical jurisprudence. Each patient is legally entitled to get quality medical care from a physician; failure to such trust is an actionable offense and grievances can be challenged in consumer redressal forums. This analytical study was aimed to study the reasons for dental negligence cases that sought judicial assistance in consumer courts in terms of monetary benefits and also to study the delay in settlements.

Materials and Methods

Archival data of final court-pronounced judgment cases on dental negligence between 2018 and 2022 (i.e., 5 years) were gathered from customer forum websites (https://confonet.nic.in, http://indiankanoon.org/doc, and www.casemine.com). A total of 56 proven dental allegation cases were retrieved. In each verdict case, the allegation against dentist by the plaintiff was recorded, and the response to the complaint by the defendant was studied and analyzed. The year of filing the case and date of judgment, basis of compensation awarded, delay in judgment and role of expert evidence appointed by the court assessed.

Results

Misdemeanor by serious negligence: 3, slight negligence: 8, negligent injuries: 35, felony of injuries by serious negligence: 10.

Conclusion

Because dentistry involves making decisions in unclear scenarios that affect patient care, there is an inherent danger of malpractice litigation. Awareness of medico-legal issues and professional indemnity insurance coverage for the dentist to safeguard himself from negligence, continuous medico-legal training and documentation of records, and adherence to clinical standards for procedures should be emphasized as prior motives to enhance the standard of care, and a basic awareness of how Indian courts resolve disputes would help dentists plan their professional indemnity insurance and operate their profession properly.

Perceptions and Practices of Saudi Hospital Pharmacists Towards Reporting Medication Errors Including Near Misses

OBJECTIVES

Medication errors (MEs) represent a patient safety concern that can have negative consequences on patients in the short and long term. Community pharmacists play an important role in the medication management process, which urges the need for their role in managing MEs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the perceptions and attitudes of Saudi pharmacists towards reporting MEs.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire that was distributed to Saudi pharmacists. The questionnaire was distributed to pharmacists via email after they had provided their consent to take part in the study. Data from the questionnaire were analysed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), where descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

The findings showed that most pharmacists appreciated the importance of reporting MEs and the role the reporting played in improving the quality of healthcare delivery. However, pharmacists raised many concerns regarding barriers to reporting. Such barriers to reporting included blaming patients or healthcare professionals, underdeveloped protocols, and the lack of standard procedures for ME reporting. Moreover, inadequate communication between healthcare professionals (for example, between pharmacists and doctors) represented an additional barrier to reporting MEs.

CONCLUSIONS

MEs and near misses are underreported among Saudi pharmacists due to many operational and communication challenges. These findings are useful for healthcare authorities involved in developing patient safety frameworks for reporting MEs and near misses. Future work can also determine the attitudes of other healthcare professionals involved in the medication management process.

Patient Safety in the Surgical Field: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Al-Baha University Medical Students

Background Patient safety and quality of surgical care are crucial in healthcare. Adequate knowledge and attitudes among healthcare providers regarding differentiating malpractice from surgical complications are essential for preventing adverse events. We aimed to assess medical students' knowledge and attitudes toward patient safety in surgical procedures. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted among clinical years of medical students and interns at Al-Baha University, Saudi Arabia, from June 15, 2023, to August 1, 2023. Exclusion criteria were students from basic years, pharmacology students, applied medical science, dental students, and students from other universities. A self-administered questionnaire collected data on participants' demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to patient safety in surgical procedures. Results A total of 271 medical students participated, exceeding the target sample size of 181. Participants' ages ranged from 20 to 28 years, with the majority between 23 and 25 (60.5%). Males accounted for 63.8% of participants. The largest group was fourth-year students (31.7%), followed by interns (23.6%), those in sixth year (23.2%), and those in fifth year (21.4%). Moreover, 82.7% of participants demonstrated good knowledge of patient safety concepts. The highest level of knowledge was noted among fourth-year students (89.5%), and the lowest was among fifth-year medical students (75.9%), but was not statistically significant (p=0.701). Most participants demonstrated appropriate attitudes and practices (83.6%); however, 9.2% refused to perform surgery on a patient with active hepatitis B due to concerns for their own safety. Conclusion The majority of participants exhibited suitable knowledge and attitudes toward patient safety in surgical scenarios, but there was deficient knowledge among fifth- and sixth-year students. Moreover, a negative attitude regarding patient safety was noticed, exemplified by refusing surgeries on patients with active hepatitis B.