Management of postpartum haemorrhage

Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays for Postpartum Hemorrhage

This article discusses the importance and effectiveness of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) in assessing hemostatic competence and guiding blood component therapy (BCT) in patients with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). In recent years, VHAs such as thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry have increasingly been used to guide BCT, hemostatic adjunctive therapy and prohemostatic agents in PPH. The three pillars of identifying hemostatic competence include clinical observation, common coagulation tests, and VHAs. VHAs are advantageous because they assess the cumulative contribution of all components of the blood throughout the entire formation of a clot, have fast turnaround times, and are point-of-care tests that can be followed serially. Despite these advantages, VHAs are underused due to poor understanding of correct technique and result interpretation, a paucity of widespread standardization, and a lack of large clinical trials. These VHAs can also be used in cases of uterine atony, preeclampsia, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, amniotic fluid embolism, placental abruption, genital tract trauma, surgical trauma, and inherited and prepartum acquired coagulopathies. There exists an immediate need for a point-of-care test that can equip obstetricians with rapid results on developing coagulopathic states. The use of VHAs in predicting and treating PPH, although in an incipient state, can fulfill this need.

Validation of a new method to assess estimated blood loss in the obstetric population undergoing cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality in developing countries and the primary cause of one-quarter of all maternal deaths globally. Inaccuracy in estimating blood loss obscures the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage and its management.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare assessment of blood loss using the quantitative Triton system (Gauss Surgical, Inc, Los Altos, CA) with other measures of blood loss in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women scheduled for cesarean deliveries at our facility were included. Intraoperative blood loss was measured using the Triton, which was masked to the clinical team, as well as estimated by the surgeon (subjective estimated blood loss). The relation between the 2 methods (Triton and subjective estimated blood loss) and postoperative hemoglobin as well as delta hemoglobin (postoperative minus preoperative hemoglobin) was determined using the Spearman correlation. Triton measurement and subjective estimated blood loss were compared between women with delta hemoglobin in the upper quartile (cases) vs all other quartiles (control). Prediction of delta hemoglobin in the upper quartile also was evaluated for each method, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was compared.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 242 patients. The mean blood loss estimated by the Triton device was significantly lower than that estimated by clinical judgment (415.3±260.6 vs 799.6±215.6 mL, P<.01). The Triton estimate correlated best with delta hemoglobin. Seventy patients had delta hemoglobin in the upper quartile (delta hemoglobin ≥2). There was a significant difference in the Triton blood loss measurement between cases and controls but no difference with subjective estimated blood loss. Triton, but not subjective estimated blood loss, was predictive of delta hemoglobin ≥2 g/dL (Triton: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.74; P<.01 vs subjective estimated blood loss: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.61; P=.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The Triton system provides a better estimate of blood loss than the visual estimate. Clinical trials to evaluate its benefit are warranted.

Initiation and Termination of Massive Transfusion Protocols: Current Strategies and Future Prospects

The advent of massive transfusion protocols (MTP) has had a significant positive impact on hemorrhaging trauma patient morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, societal MTP guidelines and individual MTPs at academic institutions continue to circulate opposing recommendations on topics critical to MTPs. This narrative review discusses up-to-date information on 2 such topics, the initiation and termination of an MTP. The discussion for each begins with a review of the recommendations and supporting literature presented by MTP guidelines from 3 prominent societies, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Surgeons, and the task force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of the main components within those recommendations. Societal recommendations on MTP initiation in hemorrhaging trauma patients emphasize the use of retrospectively validated massive transfusion (MT) prediction score, specifically, the Assessment of Blood Consumption and Trauma-Associated Severe Hemorrhage scores. Validation studies have shown that both scoring systems perform similarly. Both scores reliably identify patients that will not require an MT, while simultaneously overpredicting MT requirements. However, each scoring system has its unique advantages and disadvantages, and this review discusses how specific aspects of each scoring system can affect widespread applicability and statistical performance. In addition, we discuss the often overlooked topic of initiating MT in nontrauma patients and the specific tools physicians have to guide the MT initiation decision in this unique setting. Despite the serious complications that can arise with transfusion of large volumes of blood products, there is considerably less research pertinent to the topic of MTP termination. Societal recommendations on MTP termination emphasize applying clinical reasoning to identify patients who have bleeding source control and are adequately resuscitated. This review, however, focuses primarily on the recommendations presented by the Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma's MTP guidelines that call for prompt termination of the algorithm-guided model of resuscitation and rapidly transitioning into a resuscitation model guided by laboratory test results. We also discuss the evidence in support of laboratory result-guided resuscitation and how recent literature on viscoelastic hemostatic assays, although limited, highlights the potential to achieve additional benefits from this method of resuscitation.

Sublingual misoprostol and hyperpyrexia: case report with temperature curve

BACKGROUND

Misoprostol has a wide range of applications in obstetrics and gynaecology. It is widely recommended by WHO, FIGO and ACOG for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage due to it safety and cost-effectiveness. However, usage might be associated to hyperpyrexia and shivering.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 30 year old Cameroonian female gravida 1 para 1 who had a vaginal delivery at 40 weeks of gestation complicated by primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). PPH was managed by sublingual misoprostol that induced shivering and hyperpyrexia managed successfully with paracetamol and cooling.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of fever and shivering should be kept in mind when administering misoprostol for PPH.