1
|
Spadaccio C, Nenna A, Pisani A, Laskawski G, Nappi F, Moon MR, Biancari F, Jassar AS, Greason KL, Shrestha ML, Bonaros N, Rose D. Sutureless Valves, a "Wireless" Option for Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 84:382-407. [PMID: 39019533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Transcatheter technologies triggered the recent revision of the guidelines that progressively widened the indications for the treatment of aortic stenosis. On the surgical realm, a technology avoiding the need for sutures to anchor the prosthesis to the aortic annulus has been developed with the aim to reduce the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and simplify the process of valve implantation. In addition to a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-like stent that exerts a radial force, these so-called "rapid deployment valves" or "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement also have cuffs to improve sealing and reduce the risk of paravalvular leak. Despite promising, the actual advantage of sutureless valves over traditional surgical procedures (surgical aortic valve replacement) or TAVR is still debated. This review summarizes the current comparative evidence reporting outcomes of "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement to TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement in the treatment of aortic valve stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Spadaccio
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Pisani
- Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Grzegorz Laskawski
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Marc R Moon
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Fausto Biancari
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital/University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arminder S Jassar
- Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin L Greason
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Malakh L Shrestha
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Bonaros
- Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - David Rose
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmed KA, Ahmed J, Samant A, Arub Y, Mohsin I, Ahmed MH. The Longest Known Survival of a Patient With Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A 42-Year Follow-Up. Cureus 2023; 15:e44069. [PMID: 37638273 PMCID: PMC10449611 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a frequently performed procedure for treating aortic valvulopathy. AVR involves replacing the damaged aortic valve with either a mechanical or a bioprosthetic valve. While many factors are involved when selecting between the two options, age and patient preference are the deciding factors at this point. Mechanical valves demonstrate long-standing durability that overlaps with the accompanied bleeding risk due to lifetime anticoagulant therapy, making them a more favorable choice for younger patients. Bioprosthetic valves are preferred for older patients as they show a reduced risk of thrombogenicity. However, bioprosthetic valves have a higher incidence of structural valve degeneration (SVD) than mechanical valves. Our case report focuses on a 76-year-old patient who had undergone an AVR with a bioprosthetic valve at the age of 33, which has still not demonstrated any valve deterioration. As the longest known case of bioprosthetic durability, this patient provides useful data for designing bioprosthetic valves more resistant to structural degeneration and thereby better suited to younger patients or those at higher risk of bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yusra Arub
- Department of Research, KAAJ Healthcare, San Jose, USA
| | - Ibrahim Mohsin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Norton Community Hospital, Norton, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poulis N, Zaytseva P, Gähwiler EKN, Motta SE, Fioretta ES, Cesarovic N, Falk V, Hoerstrup SP, Emmert MY. Tissue engineered heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current state, challenges, and future developments. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2020; 18:681-696. [DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1792777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Poulis
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Polina Zaytseva
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric K. N. Gähwiler
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah E. Motta
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Wyss Translational Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nikola Cesarovic
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volkmar Falk
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center of Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon P. Hoerstrup
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Wyss Translational Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian Y. Emmert
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Wyss Translational Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puluca N, Münsterer A, Prinzing A, Sexton ZA, Lange R, Meyer-Saraei R, Scharfschwerdt M. In vitro comparison of everting vs. non-everting suture techniques for the implantation of a supra-annular biological heart valve. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:2443-2449. [PMID: 32642150 PMCID: PMC7330396 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of different suturing techniques for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in vitro. Whether or not the applied suturing technique impacts the outflow tract diameter by narrowing the annulus diameter was examined. Methods The commonly applied non-everting pledget forced suture technique (NE, n=13) was compared with an everting pledget forced suture (ET, n=13) for AVR using the 25 mm St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve. Hemodynamic parameters were obtained in a pulsatile flow simulator. A high speed camera captured the visual aspects of the suturing technique. Results Despite some kind of left ventricular outflow narrowing due to protruding pledgets using the NE suture technique, mean pressure gradients of both techniques were nearly similar (NE 5.88±2.7 mmHg, ET 5.23±1.31 mmHg, P=0.44). Closing volume (NE 3.16±0.48 mL; ET 3.51±0.68 mL; P=0.14) and the leakage volume (NE: 8.09±2.53 mL; ET: 8.35±3.65 mL; P=0.83) also showed no differences. Conclusions AVR using either suturing techniques leads to a similar hemodynamic performance in vitro. The impact of the suturing technique may be higher in a smaller annulus. Therefore, further studies using smaller prostheses are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazan Puluca
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.,Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Andrea Münsterer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.,Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Anatol Prinzing
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.,Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - Zachary A Sexton
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine; Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rüdiger Lange
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.,Insure (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center Munich, Technische Universität München, Germany.,German Heart Center Munich-DZHK Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Roza Meyer-Saraei
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Centre Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Michael Scharfschwerdt
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sattar Y, Rauf H, Bareeqa SB, Ullah W, Myla M. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management. Cureus 2019; 11:e6431. [PMID: 31993269 PMCID: PMC6970438 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe aortic stenosis (AS) affects 3.4% of the elderly over 60 years of age. It presents with exertional dyspnea, syncope, angina, and progression to irreversible congestive heart failure. Early intervention produces a better outcome in preventing the clinical deterioration of AS. The choice of intervention is transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The decision should be made after evaluating an individual case based on its clinical features and the user’s experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We reviewed available data to illustrate the types of ASs, the background of interventions, current guidelines for TAVR, and its comparison with SAVR in terms of adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasar Sattar
- Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Hiba Rauf
- Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | | | - Waqas Ullah
- Internal Medicine, Abington Hospital - Jefferson Health, Abington, USA
| | - Madhura Myla
- Cardiovascular Disease, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement has stood the test of time but is no longer an operation that is exclusively approached through a median sternotomy using only sutured prostheses. Currently, surgical aortic valve replacement can be performed through a number of minimally invasive approaches employing conventional mechanical or bioprostheses as well as sutureless valves. In either case, the direct surgical access allows inspection of the valve, complete excision of the diseased leaflets, and debridement of the annulus in a controlled and thorough manner under visual control. It can be employed to treat aortic valve pathologies of all natures and aetiologies. When compared with transcatheter valves in patients with a high or intermediate preoperative predictive risk, conventional surgery has not been shown to be inferior to transcatheter valve implants. As our understanding of sutureless valves and their applicability to minimally invasive surgery advances, the invasiveness and trauma of surgery can be reduced and outcomes can improve. This warrants further comparative trials comparing sutureless and transcatheter valves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Glasgow, G81 4DY, UK
| | - Khalid Alkhamees
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center Al Hassa, Prince Fawaz bin Abdulaziz St., Hofuf city, 31982, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nawwar Al-Attar
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Agamemnon Street, Glasgow, G81 4DY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoffmann CT, Heiner JA, Nguyen TC. Review of minimal access versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6:498-503. [PMID: 29062745 PMCID: PMC5639223 DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (miniAVR) have become alternatives to surgical aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy (SAVR) to treat severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite increased interest and utilization, few studies have directly compared TAVR and miniAVR. A review of the current literature shows TAVR to be an indispensable tool for inoperable, high-risk, and perhaps intermediate-risk patients with severe AS. However, it is associated with a number of deleterious perioperative outcomes, such as valvular regurgitation and vascular complications. MiniAVR is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, a lower incidence of blood transfusions, decreased ventilation time, and improved cosmetic results. MiniAVR maintains potential advantages over SAVR, including the implantation of a durable prosthesis and low rates of perioperative myocardial infarction and paravalvular leak. It is associated with longer aortic cross clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times; however, the use of sutureless valve implants can circumvent this. Studies comparing TAVR and miniAVR demonstrate decreased postoperative mortality, valvular regurgitation, and incidence of stroke in the miniAVR cohorts. Few studies currently exist comparing TAVR and miniAVR, as it is hard to compare the typically low-risk miniAVR versus high-risk TAVR patient populations. It is clear that both strategies will be cornerstones in the modern AVR era, but the situations in which to apply each strategy have not yet been clearly delineated. This highlights the need for surgeons to adopt these minimally invasive techniques. We believe there is a compelling role for miniAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients, but due to the paucity of data, neither TAVR nor miniAVR should be discounted before a randomized, risk-stratified trial is performed. More studies are needed to compare TAVR and miniAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carson T Hoffmann
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas at Houston, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jacob A Heiner
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas at Houston, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tom C Nguyen
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas at Houston, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bashir M, Harky A, Bleetman D, Adams B, Roberts N, Balmforth D, Yap J, Lall K, Shipolini A, Oo A, Uppal R. Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 29:265-272. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|