Hospital and patient influencing factors of treatment schemes given to type 2 diabetes mellitus inpatients in Inner Mongolia, China

The prescription pattern of initial treatment for type 2 diabetes in Beijing from 2011 to 2015

The purpose of this study was to describe the prescription pattern of initial treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Beijing from 2011 to 2015.We selected 790,339 newly diagnosed outpatients with T2DM from the Beijing Medical Claim Data for Employees database between January 2011 and December 2015. The percentages of different treatments and agents were calculated from the patients' 1st prescriptions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for primary, secondary, and tertiary hospital settings.The initial treatments given to 57.7%, 30.7%, and 11.7% of patients were oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) monotherapy, OHA polytherapy, and insulin, respectively. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) (43.0%) were the most commonly used agents for monotherapy, followed by metformin (35.5%) and sulfonylureas (14.9%). AGIs were most commonly used in primary hospitals (52.0%), while metformin was prescribed most often in secondary (37.6%) and tertiary (41.8%) hospitals. From 2011 to 2015, there were increases in the use of AGIs (40.1-41.1%, P < .001) and metformin (34.0-40.4%, P < .001), but a decrease in the use of sulfonylureas (18.1-12.8%, P < .001). Similar trends were seen in the different hospital settings. Metformin plus an AGI, a sulfonylurea plus an AGI, and metformin plus a sulfonylurea were the most common OHA polytherapy combinations. The use of metformin plus an AGI increased from 13.8% in 2011 to 19.7% in 2015 (P < .001), while the use of a sulfonylurea plus an AGI, and metformin plus a sulfonylurea, did not change significantly.Half of newly diagnosed patients with T2DM received an initial treatment of OHA monotherapy. Although the use of metformin increased from 2011 to 2015, both AGIs and metformin were the most commonly prescribed agents. The patterns differed from those of most other countries and identification of the underlying reasons will require further investigation.

Hospital and patient influencing factors of treatment schemes given to type 2 diabetes mellitus inpatients in Inner Mongolia, China

Background:

In clinical practice, the physician’s treatment decision making is influenced by many factors besides the patient’s clinical conditions and is the fundamental cause of healthcare inequity and discrimination in healthcare settings. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease with high prevalence, long average length of stay and high hospitalization rate. Although the treatment of T2DM is well guideline driven, there is a large body of evidence showing the existence of treatment disparities. More empirical studies from the provider side are needed to determine if non-clinical factors influence physician’s treatment choices.

Objective:

To determine the hospital and patient influencing factors of treatment schemes given to T2DM inpatients in Inner Mongolia, China.

Methods:

A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey using a cluster sampling technique was conducted in three tertiary hospitals and three county hospitals in Inner Mongolia, China. Treatment schemes were categorized as lifestyle management, oral therapy or insulin therapy according to the national guideline. Socio-demographic characteristics and variables related to severity of disease at the individual level and hospital level were collected. Weighted multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine influencing factors of treatment schemes.

Results:

Regardless of patients’ clinical conditions and health insurance types, both hospital and patient level variables were associated with treatment schemes. Males were more likely to be given oral therapy (RRR=1.72, 95% CI=1.06-2.81) and insulin therapy (RRR=1.94, 95% CI=1.29-2.91) compared to females who were given lifestyle management more frequently. Compared to the western region, hospitals in the central regions of Inner Mongolia were less likely to prescribe T2DM patients oral therapy (RRR = 0.18, 95% CI=0.05-0.61) and insulin therapy (RRR = 0.20, 95% CI=0.06-0.67) than lifestyle management. Compared with non-reformed tertiary hospitals, reformed tertiary hospitals and county hospitals were less likely to give T2DM patients oral therapy (RRR = 0.07 and 0.1 respectively) and insulin therapy (RRR = 0.11 and 0.17 respectively).

Conclusion:

Gender was the only socio-demographic factors associated with treatment scheme for T2DM patients. Hospitals from different regions have different T2DM treatment patterns. Implementation of reform was shown to be associated with controlling medication use for T2DM inpatients. Further studies are needed to investigate the causes of unreasonable treatment disparities so that policies can be generated accordingly.