Evaluation of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale test and re-test in Swedish among healthy volunteers

Comparison of early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery before and after ERAS® implementation-a single center three-armed cohort study

PURPOSE

This study examines the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) on patient recovery after elective colorectal surgery. The innovative PostopQRS™ tool was used for the analysis of patient recovery.

METHODS

This single-center study compares three cohorts: two retrospective cohorts before (A) and after (B) ERAS® implementation and a prospective cohort post-ERAS® implementation (C) using PostopQRS™. The present study was prospectively registered in the German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00026903).

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included from June 2020 to February 2022. Significant differences were observed in bowel function, oral food intake, opioid use, and PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) occurrence. By the day of discharge, 98% in cohorts B and C had bowel movements or stoma output, compared to 66% in cohort A (p < 0.001). Solid food intake on POD1 was higher in cohorts B and C (p = 0.025), while opioid use was lower (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Cohort C showed 90% recovery on discharge.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates improved early mobility, reduced need for opioids, a higher rate of patients with solid food intake on POD1, and earlier bowel movement as well as excellent recovery following the colorectal ERAS® implementation.

Isocapnic hyperventilation provides early extubation after head and neck surgery: A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) shortens recovery time after inhalation anaesthesia by increasing ventilation while maintaining a normal airway carbon dioxide (CO2)-level. One way of performing IHV is to infuse CO2 to the inspiratory limb of a breathing circuit during mechanical hyperventilation (HV). In a prospective randomized study, we compared this IHV technique to a standard emergence procedure (control).

METHODS

Thirty-one adult ASA I-III patients undergoing long-duration (>3 hours) sevoflurane anaesthesia for major head and neck surgery were included and randomized to IHV-treatment (n = 16) or control (n = 15). IHV was performed at minute ventilation 13.6 ± 4.3 L/min and CO2 delivery, dosed according to a nomogram tested in a pilot study. Time to extubation and eye-opening was recorded. Inspired (FICO2) and expired (FETCO2) CO2 and arterial CO2 levels (PaCO2) were monitored. Cognition was tested preoperatively and at 20, 40 and 60 minutes after surgery.

RESULTS

Time from turning off the vapourizer to extubation was 13.7 ± 2.5 minutes in the IHV group and 27.4 ± 6.5 minutes in controls (P < .001). Two minutes after extubation, PaCO2 was 6.2 ± 0.5 and 6.2 ± 0.6 kPa in the IHV and control group respectively. In 69% (IHV) vs 53% (controls), post-operative cognition returned to pre-operative values within 40 minutes after surgery (NS). Incidences of pain and nausea/vomiting did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial comparing an IHV method with a standard weaning procedure, time to extubation was reduced with 50% in the IHV group. The described IHV method can be used to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

Evaluation of a method for isocapnic hyperventilation: a clinical pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) is a method that shortens time to extubation after inhalation anaesthesia using hyperventilation (HV) without lowering airway CO₂ . In a clinical trial on patients undergoing long-duration sevoflurane anaesthesia for major ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgery, we evaluated the utility of a technique for CO₂ delivery (DCO₂ ) to the inspiratory limb of a closed breathing circuit, during HV, to achieve isocapnia.

METHODS

Fifteen adult ASA 1-3 patients were included. After end of surgery, mechanical HV was started by doubling baseline minute ventilation. Simultaneously, CO₂ was delivered and dosed using a nomogram developed in a previous experimental study. Time to extubation and eye opening was recorded. Inspired (FICO₂ ) and expired (FETCO₂ ) CO₂ and arterial CO₂ levels were monitored during IHV. Cognition was tested pre-operatively and at 20, 40 and 60 min after surgery.

RESULTS

A DCO₂ of 285 ± 45 ml/min provided stable isocapnia during HV (13.5 ± 4.1 l/min). The corresponding FICO₂ level was 3.0 ± 0.3%. Time from turning off the vaporizer (1.3 ± 0.1 MACage) to extubation (0.2 ± 0.1 MACage) was 11.3 ± 1.8 min after 342 ± 131 min of anaesthesia. PaCO₂ and FETCO₂ remained at normal levels during and after IHV. In 85% of the patients, post-operative cognition returned to pre-operative values within 60 min.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients, a DCO₂ nomogram for IHV was validated. The patients were safely extubated shortly after discontinuing long-term sevoflurane anaesthesia. Perioperatively, there were no adverse effects on arterial blood gases or post-operative cognition. This technique for IHV can potentially be used to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

Evaluation of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale test and re-test in Swedish among healthy volunteers

Introduction Patient outcome measures are required to assess the quality of healthcare. Tools for a patients' self-assessment of quality of recovery, during perioperative care, have been developed during the last decade. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PostopQRS) questionnaire is one of the most well-accepted and validated tools available. Here we assess the PostopORS questionnaire in Swedish. Methods Sixty-one students from the Bachelor Program in Nursing, (50 female and 11 male; mean age, 25; range, 21-46) filled in the Swedish translation of the PostopQRS questionnaire twice. They also evaluated whether they found the queries easy to understand and respond to .Results The participants found the Swedish translation of the PostopQRS questionnaire easy to read and understand. There were minor differences in test responses between the initial test and the re-test 48 hours later. We found that the PostopQRS questionnaire has some background noise; 12 out of 61 participants (20%) reported mild pain, 25 (41%) scored some depression and 33 scored mild anxiety (54%). The cognitive domain showed a learning effect between tests in "word recall" and "word generation", while "digit recall forward" and "digit recall backward" showed no change. We found a difference in cognitive test performance with age; younger participants had higher mean cognitive test scores compared to participants >30 years. Overall, nine participants showed a decrease in re-test scores; two experienced a mild increase in pain; one experienced a mild increase in anxiety; and six performed more poorly on cognitive tests. Conclusion The Swedish translation of the PostopQRS was found to be adequate for use in the assessment of quality of recovery, and the questions were well understood by participants. Our study shows the importance of baseline testing for assessment of recovery, since recovery is assessed as a return to or improvement in each individual's baseline score.