1
|
Castro CJ, Shyu HY, Xaba L, Bair R, Yeh DH. Performance and onsite regeneration of natural zeolite for ammonium removal in a field-scale non-sewered sanitation system. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 776:145938. [PMID: 33652315 PMCID: PMC8111385 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Natural zeolite clinoptilolite was used as the primary ammonium removal method from the permeate of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating high-strength blackwater generated from a community toilet facility. This zeolite-based nutrient capture system (NCS) was a sub-component of a non-sewered sanitation system (NSSS) called the NEWgenerator and was field tested for 1.5 years at an informal settlement in South Africa. The NCS was operated for three consecutive loading cycles, each lasting 291, 110, and 52 days, respectively. Both blackwater (from toilets) and blackwater with yellow water (from toilets and urinals) were treated during the field trial. Over the three cycles, the NCS was able to remove 80 ± 28%, 64 ± 23%, and 94 ± 11%, respectively, of the influent ammonium. The addition of yellow water caused the rapid exhaustion of zeolite and the observed decrease of ammonium removal during Cycle 2. After Cycles 1 and 2, onsite regeneration was performed to recover the sorption capacity of the spent zeolite. The regenerant was comprised of NaCl under alkaline conditions and was operated as a recycle-batch to reduce the generation of regenerant waste. Modifications to the second regeneration process, including an increase in regenerant contact time from 15 to 30 h, improved the zeolite regeneration efficiency from 76 ± 0.7% to 96 ± 1.0%. The mass of recoverable ammonium in the regenerant was 2.63 kg NH4-N and 3.15 kg NH4-N after Regeneration 1 and 2, respectively. However, the mass of ammonium in the regenerant accounted for only 52.8% and 54.4% of the estimated NH4-N originally sorbed onto the zeolite beds after Cycles 1 and 2, respectively. The use of zeolite clinoptilolite is a feasible method for ammonium removal by NSSS that observe variable nitrogen loading rates, but further research is still needed to recover the nitrogen from the regenerant waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Castro
- University of South Florida, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
| | - H Y Shyu
- University of South Florida, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - L Xaba
- Pollution Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - R Bair
- University of South Florida, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - D H Yeh
- University of South Florida, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosario P, Viswash R, Seenivasan T, Ramalingam S, Sellgren KL, Grego S, Trotochaud L. Potential Pitfalls in Wastewater Phosphorus Analysis and How to Avoid Them. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS 2021; 15:11786302211019218. [PMID: 34103934 PMCID: PMC8168049 DOI: 10.1177/11786302211019218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Due to the increasing adoption of nutrient discharge regulations, many research groups are stepping into new territory with phosphorus (P) measurements. Accurate reporting of P concentrations in effluent from novel wastewater treatment technologies is critical for protecting both environmental and human health. Analysis of P in wastewater is prone to pitfalls because of the (1) variety of chemical forms of P in wastewater (orthophosphate, condensed P, and organic P), (2) availability of different chemical assays for measuring different P forms, and (3) different conventions in the units for reporting P. Here, we present a case study highlighting how these pitfalls affect analysis and interpretation of P measurements. We show that, when used appropriately, commercially-available kits are indeed accurate tools for evaluating reactive P and total P concentrations. For both standard solutions and real wastewater, we systematically remove steps from the total P protocol to show how protocol deviations affect the results. While standard solutions are important for validating analytical methods, commercially-available wastewater standard solutions only contain P as orthophosphate (reactive P). We therefore demonstrate options for making a mixed-P standard solution containing acid-hydrolyzable and/or organic P compounds that can be used to validate both reactive P and total P assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ramya Viswash
- PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, TN, India
| | | | - Sudha Ramalingam
- PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, TN, India
| | - Katelyn L Sellgren
- Center for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sonia Grego
- Center for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lena Trotochaud
- Center for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trotochaud L, Andrus RM, Tyson KJ, Miller GH, Welling CM, Donaghy PE, Incardona JD, Evans WA, Smith PK, Oriard TL, Norris ID, Stoner BR, Guest JS, Hawkins BT. Laboratory Demonstration and Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis of an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2020; 54:16147-16155. [PMID: 33269914 PMCID: PMC7745533 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Providing safe and reliable sanitation services to the billions of people currently lacking them will require a multiplicity of approaches. Improving onsite wastewater treatment to standards enabling water reuse would reduce the need to transport waste and fresh water over long distances. Here, we describe a compact, automated system designed to treat the liquid fraction of blackwater for onsite water reuse that combines cross-flow ultrafiltration, activated carbon, and electrochemical oxidation. In laboratory testing, the system consistently produces effluent with 6 ≤ pH ≤ 9, total suspended solids (TSS) < 30 mg L-1, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) < 150 mg L-1. These effluent parameters were achieved across a wide range of values for influent TSS (61-820 mg L-1) and COD (384-1505 mg L-1), demonstrating a robust system for treating wastewater of varying strengths. A preliminary techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted to elucidate primary cost drivers and prioritize research and development pathways toward commercial feasibility. The ultrafiltration system is the primary cost driver, contributing to >50% of both the energy and maintenance costs. Several scenario parameters showed an outsized impact on costs relative to technology parameters. Specific technological improvements for future prototype development are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Trotochaud
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Rebecca M. Andrus
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champagne, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Kayana J. Tyson
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Graham H. Miller
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Claire M. Welling
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | | | | | | | - Paul K. Smith
- Cascade
Designs, Seattle, Washington 98134, United States
| | - Tim L. Oriard
- Cascade
Designs, Seattle, Washington 98134, United States
| | - Ian D. Norris
- Cascade
Designs, Seattle, Washington 98134, United States
| | - Brian R. Stoner
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| | - Jeremy S. Guest
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana−Champagne, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Brian T. Hawkins
- Duke
University, Center for Water, Sanitation,
Hygiene, and Infectious Disease (WaSH-AID), Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
- Department
of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States
| |
Collapse
|