Who's your coach? The relationship between coach characteristics and birth attendants' adherence to the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist

The status quo and influencing factors of knowledge, attitude and practice of obstetric staff on the safe childbirth checklist

Practical Guidelines for Safe Childbirth Checklist has not been widely used in medical institutions at all levels in China. This study aims to understand the current status of knowledge, attitude and practice of obstetric medical staff toward the Safe Childbirth Checklist and analyze its influencing factors to provide a reference for establishing the promotion of the checklist. Convenience sampling was used in a cross-sectional survey of 685 obstetric medical staff in Chongqing using a self-designed questionnaire to analyze their knowledge, attitude and practice of the checklist. The scores of knowledge, attitude and practice of obstetric medical staff on the checklist were 29.96 ± 5.44, 62.87 ± 9.11, and 37.74 ± 6.82, respectively. Occupation and hospital level were influencing factors of the knowledge and practice scores, while length of service was the only influencing factor of the knowledge score. Education was the influencing factor of attitude score. The total effects of the knowledge, facilitation and inhibition dimensions on practice were 0.671, 0.263 and -0.135, respectively. Mediating effects presented in the facilitation and inhibition of attitude in safe childbirth. Obstetrics medical staff know the checklist well, however, their attitudes and practices need to be improved. Managers should take targeted measures to strengthen the attitudes and practices of obstetric medical staff toward safe childbirth and promote the use of the checklist, thus providing a powerful safeguard for higher delivery quality and safer delivery.

Who's your coach? The relationship between coach characteristics and birth attendants' adherence to the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist

Background: Research demonstrates that coaching is an effective method for promoting behavior change, yet little is known about which attributes of a coach make them more or less effective. This post hoc, sub-analysis of the BetterBirth trial used observational data to explore whether specific coaches' and team leaders' characteristics were associated with improved adherence to essential birth practices listed on the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist. Methods: A descriptive analysis was conducted on the coach characteristics from the 50 BetterBirth coaches and team leaders. Data on adherence to essential birth practices by birth attendants who received coaching were collected by independent observers. Bivariate linear regression models were constructed, accounting for clustering by site, to examine the association between coach characteristics and attendants' adherence to practices.  Results: All of the coaches were female and the majority were nurses. Team leaders were comprised of both males and females; half had clinical backgrounds. There was no association between coaches' or team leaders' characteristics, namely gender, type of degree, or years of clinical training, and attendants' adherence to essential birth practices. However, a significant inverse relationship was detected between the coach or team leader's age and years of experience and the birth attendants' adherence to the checklist.  Conclusion: Younger, less experienced coaches were more successful in promoting essential birth practices adherence in this population. More data is needed to fully understand the relationship between coaches and birth attendants.