1
|
Barry L, Tighe SM, Griffin A, Ryan D, O'Connor M, Fitzgerald C, Egan S, Galvin R, Meskell P. A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) exploring the barriers and facilitators to screening in emergency departments using the theoretical domains framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1090. [PMID: 37821877 PMCID: PMC10568862 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10027-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Validated screening tools can be utilised to detect early disease processes and risk factors for disease and adverse outcomes. Consequently, identifying individuals in need of early intervention and targeted assessment can be achieved through the implementation of screening in the ED. Successful implementation can be impacted by a lack of resources and ineffective integration of screening into the clinical workflow. Tailored implementation processes and staff training, which are contextually specific to the ED setting, are facilitators to effective implementation. This review will assist in the identification of barriers and facilitators to screening in the ED using a QES to underpin implementation processes. Healthcare workers engage in screening in the ED routinely. Consequently, this review focused on synthesizing the experience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who are involved in this process. This synthesis is informed by a QES protocol published by the lead author in 2021 (Barry et al., HRB Open Res 3:50, 2021). METHODOLOGY A comprehensive literature search, inclusive of grey literature sources, was undertaken. Initially, an a priori framework of themes was formed to facilitate the interpretation and organisation of search results. A context specific conceptual model was then formulated using "Best fit" framework synthesis which further assisted in the interpretation of data that was extracted from relevant studies. Dual blind screening of search results was undertaken using RAYYAN as a platform. Thirty studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Dual appraisal of full text articles was undertaken using CASP, GRADE CERQual assessed confidence of findings and data extraction was performed by two reviewers collaboratively. FINDINGS This is the first known synthesis of qualitative research on HCW's experiences of screening in the ED. Predominantly, the findings illustrate that staff experience screening in the ED as a complex challenging process. The barriers and facilitators identified can be broadly categorised under preconditions to screen, motivations to screen and knowledge and skills to screen. Competing interests in the ED, environmental stressors such as overcrowding and an organisational culture that resists screening were clear barriers. Adequate resources and tailored education to underpin the screening process were clear facilitators. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42020188712 05/07/20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Barry
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Sylvia Murphy Tighe
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Anne Griffin
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Damien Ryan
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Margaret O'Connor
- Department of Ageing and Therapeutics, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Christine Fitzgerald
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Siobhan Egan
- Clinical Research Support Unit, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rose Galvin
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King O, Ingwersen K, Bufton B, Hitch D, Dupre B, Harding M, Mayhew C, van de Ven S. 'Are we opening a can of worms?': Community-based occupational therapists' experiences working with clients with unexpected mental health issues. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2638-e2647. [PMID: 35953897 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
General community occupational therapists (OTs) work with clients experiencing chronic and complex conditions, some living with one or more comorbid common mental health issues (such as anxiety, depression or distress). This study aimed to describe the perspectives of general community OTs of their engagement with clients experiencing mental health issues; their perceptions of the implementation of routine screening in their practice, and the knowledge, skills and support they need to identify and support their clients' mental health needs. Six focus groups were undertaken with general community OTs (n = 21) from three Australian health services in rural, regional and metropolitan settings, between December 2020 and January 2021. Data were analysed using a team-based framework approach. Three key themes were identified: (1) OTs' experiences working with people with mental health issues; (2) impacts of engaging with clients experiencing mental health issues on OTs; and (3) implementing routine mental health screening in general community OT practice. The latter had two sub-themes: (i) identified considerations and (ii) education and system-level support needs. General community OTs frequently work with clients with mental health issues. These experiences impact their practice in multiple ways. This study highlights opportunities for integrating routine mental health screening into general community OT practice and identifies the system and educational development required to support this enhancement to practice. Supporting general community OTs to routinely screen for mental health issues will enhance collaborative client-centred care. Our findings may also have implications for other community-based health professionals and services, particularly those delivered in clients' homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia King
- University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia
- South West Healthcare, Warrnambool, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Ingwersen
- University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Brooke Bufton
- University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Danielle Hitch
- Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Western Heath, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barry L, Galvin R, Murphy Tighe S, O'Connor M, Ryan D, Meskell P. The barriers and facilitators to implementing screening in emergency departments: a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) protocol exploring the experiences of healthcare workers. HRB Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13073.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Screening in the emergency department (ED) can identify individuals in need of targeted assessment and early intervention in the hospital or community setting. Time pressures, inadequate resources, poor integration of screening tools into clinical workflow and lack of staff training are barriers to successfully implementing screening in the ED. Tailored implementation processes and education programmes were identified as facilitators. The aim of this QES is to synthesise evidence pertaining to the barriers and facilitators to implementing screening in the ED. This review will focus on the experience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who are involved in this process. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be completed in Scopus, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane library. Grey literature sources will be searched and include Open Grey, Google Scholar, Lenus Irish Health Repository, Science.Gov and Embase Grey Literature. Qualitative or mixed methods studies that include qualitative data on the experiences of HCWs will be included. “Best fit” framework synthesis will be utilised to produce a context specific conceptual model to describe and explain how these barriers and facilitators may impact on implementation. An a priori framework of themes, formed from the existing evidence base, will inform the ultimate thematic analysis and assist in the organisation and interpretation of search results, ensuring the QES is built upon current findings. CASP will be utilised to quality appraise articles and GRADE CERQual will assess confidence in the QES findings. The screening, quality appraisal, data extraction and assessment of confidence in findings will be completed by two reviewers independently and in duplicate. Contingencies for conflict management during these processes will be outlined. Conclusions: This synthesis, will offer a new conceptual model for describing healthcare workers’ experience of the barriers and facilitators that impact on the implementation of screening tools in the ED. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020188712 05/07/20
Collapse
|
4
|
Barry L, Galvin R, Murphy Tighe S, O'Connor M, Ryan D, Meskell P. The barriers and facilitators to screening in emergency departments: a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) protocol. HRB Open Res 2020. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13073.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Early detection of adults at risk of adverse outcomes through systematic screening in the emergency department (ED) can serve to identify high risk groups in need of targeted assessment and early intervention in the hospital or community setting. However, issues such as time pressures, inadequate resources, poor integration of tools into clinical workflow and lack of staff training are cited among the barriers to successfully implementing screening tools in the ED. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is to synthesize evidence pertaining to the barriers and facilitators to implementing screening tools in the ED. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be completed in the following databases Scopus, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane library. Grey literature sources will also be searched. Qualitative or mixed methods studies that include qualitative data on the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders on the implementation of screening tools in the ED will be included. “Best fit” framework synthesis will be utilised to produce a context specific conceptual model to describe and explain how these barriers and facilitators may impact on implementation. An a priori framework of themes, formed from the existing evidence base, will inform the ultimate thematic analysis and assist in the organisation and interpretation of search results, ensuring the QES is built upon current findings. CASP will be utilised to quality appraise articles and GRADE CERQual will assess confidence in the QES findings. Conclusions: This synthesis will offer a new conceptual model for describing the perspectives, perceptions and experiences of barriers and facilitators experienced by patients and key stakeholders involved in the implementation of screening tools in the ED. The results of this review will inform practice and aid the development and implementation of change strategies to support the implementation of screening tools in the ED. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020188712 05/07/20
Collapse
|