Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol

The Effectiveness of Video Decision Aid on Advance Care Planning With Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The purpose of this review was to examine the effect of video decision aids on adult patients' advance care planning-related outcomes. Seven English electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, OpenGray) and 3 Chinese databases (CNKI, WanFang, and VIP) were searched to identify relevant studies. Fourteen randomized controlled trials were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that video decision aids reduced patients' preferences for life-prolonging care (risk ratio [RR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.61; P < .01), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64; P < .01), and intubation tube placement (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.09-2.48; P = .02) and increased patients' willingness to have a goals-of-care conversation (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.32-2.65; P = .0004) and knowledge of advance care planning (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.09; P < .01). However, because of the variability among the studies, the results have limitations. Future research needs to increase the sample size and improve the experimental design to confirm the impact of video decision aids on advance care planning.

Implementing advance care planning in heart failure: a qualitative study of primary healthcare professionals

Background

Advance care planning (ACP) can improve the quality of life of patients suffering from heart failure (HF). However, primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) find ACP difficult to engage with and patient care remains suboptimal.

Aim

To explore the views of primary care HCPs on how to improve their engagement with ACP in HF.

Design and setting

A qualitative interview study with GPs and primary care nurses in England.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 24 primary care HCPs. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Three main themes were constructed from the data: ACP as integral to holistic care in HF; potentially limiting factors to the doctor–patient relationship; and approaches to improve professional performance. Many HCPs saw the benefits of ACP as synonymous with providing holistic care and improving patients’ quality of life. However, some feared that initiating ACP could irrevocably damage their doctor–patient relationship. Their own fear of death and dying, a lack of disease-specific communication skills, and uncertainty about the right timing were significant barriers to ACP. To optimise their engagement with ACP in HF, HCPs recommended better clinician–patient dialogue through question prompts, enhanced shared decision-making approaches, synchronising ACP across medical specialties, and disease-specific training.

Conclusion

GPs and primary care nurses are vital to deliver ACP for patients suffering from HF. HCPs highlighted important areas to improve their practice and the urgent need for investigations into better clinician–patient engagement with ACP.