1
|
Gill RK, Droney J, Owen G, Riley J, Stephenson L. Digital advance care planning with severe mental illness: a retrospective observational cohort analysis of the use of an electronic palliative care coordination system. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:56. [PMID: 38403633 PMCID: PMC10895857 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01381-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with severe mental illness (SMI) face significant health inequalities, including in palliative care. Advance Care Planning (ACP) is widely recommended by palliative care experts and could reduce inequalities. However, implementing ACP with this group is challenging. Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems such as Coordinate my Care (CMC) have been introduced to support documentation and sharing of ACP records with relevant healthcare providers. This study explores the use of CMC amongst those with SMI and aims to describe how those with a primary diagnosis of SMI who have used CMC for ACP, and makes recommendations for future research and policy. METHOD A retrospective observational cohort analysis was completed of CMC records created 01/01/2010-31/09/2021 where the service user had a primary diagnosis of SMI, with no exclusions based on comorbidities. Descriptive statistics were used to report on characteristics including: age, diagnosis, individual prognosis and resuscitation status. Thematic analysis was used to report on the content of patients' statements of preference. RESULTS 1826 records were identified. Of this sample most (60.1%) had capacity to make treatment decisions, 47.8% were aged under 70, 86.7% were given a prognosis of 'years' and most (63.1%) remained for full cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardio-pulmonary arrest. Records with completed statements of preferences (20.3%) contained information about preferences for physical and mental health treatment care as well as information about patient presentation and capacity, although most were brief and lacked expression of patient voice. DISCUSSION Compared to usual CMC users, the cohort of interest are relatively able, younger people using CMC to make long-term plans for active physical and mental health treatment. ADM is a service user-driven process, and so it was expected that authentic patient voice would be expressed within statements of preference, however this was mostly not achieved. CONCLUSIONS This digital tool is being used by people with SMI but to plan for more than palliative care. This cohort and supporting professionals have used CMC to plan for longer term physical and mental healthcare. Future research and policy should focus on development of tailored digital tools for people with SMI to plan for palliative, physical and mental healthcare and support expression of patient voice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rea Kaur Gill
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK.
| | - Joanne Droney
- The Royal Marsden, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Gareth Owen
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK
| | - Julia Riley
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK
- South Central and West Commissioning Support, 18-20 Massett Road, Horley, RH6 7DE, UK
| | - Lucy Stephenson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lasalvia A, Patuzzo S, Braun E, Henderson C. Advance statements in mental healthcare: time to close the evidence to practice gap. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2023; 32:e68. [PMID: 38053411 PMCID: PMC10803188 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796023000835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This article discusses advance statements in mental health care, which allow individuals with mental disorders to express their preferences for treatment during mental health crises. Despite the evidence supporting their effectiveness, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. This article explores variations among advance statements, such as psychiatric advance directives (PADs), joint crisis plans (JCPs) and self-binding directives (SBDs), highlighting their content, development process and legal status. We outline the benefits of advance statements, including empowerment, early intervention, improved therapeutic relationships and reduced compulsory admissions. We then draw attention to the challenges that may contribute to their lack of implementation, including legal complexities, communication issues, cultural factors, potential inequities, healthcare provider knowledge, changing preferences, resource constraints, crisis responses, data privacy, family involvement, and long-term evaluation. In conclusion, advance statements offer significant benefits but require addressing these critical aspects to ensure ethical and effective use. Bridging the evidence-to-practice gap is essential, with a focus on implementation science. Integrating these tools into routine clinical practice can significantly benefit individuals with severe mental disorders and mental health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lasalvia
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Patuzzo
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Esther Braun
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Henderson
- Health Service and Population Research Department P029, David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scholten M, Efkemann SA, Faissner M, Finke M, Gather J, Gergel T, Gieselmann A, van der Ham L, Juckel G, van Melle L, Owen G, Potthoff S, Stephenson LA, Szmukler G, Vellinga A, Vollmann J, Voskes Y, Werning A, Widdershoven G. Opportunities and challenges of self-binding directives: A comparison of empirical research with stakeholders in three European countries. Eur Psychiatry 2023; 66:e48. [PMID: 37293987 PMCID: PMC10305757 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-binding directives (SBDs) are psychiatric advance directives that include a clause in which mental health service users consent in advance to involuntary hospital admission and treatment under specified conditions. Medical ethicists and legal scholars identified various potential benefits of SBDs but have also raised ethical concerns. Until recently, little was known about the views of stakeholders on the opportunities and challenges of SBDs. AIMS This article aims to foster an international exchange on SBDs by comparing recent empirical findings on stakeholders' views on the opportunities and challenges of SBDs from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. METHOD Comparisons between the empirical findings were drawn using a structured expert consensus process. RESULTS Findings converged on many points. Perceived opportunities of SBDs include promotion of autonomy, avoidance of personally defined harms, early intervention, reduction of admission duration, improvement of the therapeutic relationship, involvement of persons of trust, avoidance of involuntary hospital admission, addressing trauma, destigmatization of involuntary treatment, increase of professionals' confidence, and relief for proxy decision-makers. Perceived challenges include lack of awareness and knowledge, lack of support, undue influence, inaccessibility during crisis, lack of cross-agency coordination, problems of interpretation, difficulties in capacity assessment, restricted therapeutic flexibility, scarce resources, disappointment due to noncompliance, and outdated content. Stakeholders tended to focus on practical challenges and did not often raise fundamental ethical concerns. CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders tend to see the implementation of SBDs as ethically desirable, provided that the associated challenges are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthé Scholten
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Simone A. Efkemann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Mirjam Faissner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marleen Finke
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jakov Gather
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Tania Gergel
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Astrid Gieselmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lia van der Ham
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Georg Juckel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Laura van Melle
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gareth Owen
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Potthoff
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Lucy A. Stephenson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - George Szmukler
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jochen Vollmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Yolande Voskes
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Werning
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Guy Widdershoven
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Babatunde A, Ruck Keene A, Simpson A, Gilbert S, Stephenson L, Chua KC, Owen G, Simpson AJ, Smith S, Henderson C. Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:344. [PMID: 37198589 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04825-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK government committed to legislating for Advance Choice Documents/Advance Statements (ACD/AS) following their recommendation by the Independent Review of the MHA (2018). ACDs/AS are yet to be implemented in routine practice despite evidence and high demand; they are associated with improved therapeutic relationships and a reduction (25%, RR 0.75, CI 0.61-0.93) in compulsory psychiatric admission. Barriers to their implementation are well documented, ranging from low knowledge levels to logistical challenges in accessing the content during episodes of acute care. In the UK this is an issue for Black people, who experience detention rates disproportionately (over three times) higher than those of White British people and have poorer care experiences and outcomes. ACDs/AS allow for Black people to have their concerns heard by mental health professionals in a care system where they often feel their views are ignored. AdStAC aims to improve Black service users' experiences in mental health services in South London by co-producing and testing an ACD/AS implementation resource with Black service users, mental health professionals and carers/supporters of Black service users. METHODS/DESIGN The study will take place in South London, England over three phases: 1) formative work through stakeholder workshops; 2) co-production of resources through a consensus development exercise and working groups; and 3) testing of the resources using quality improvement (QI) methods. A lived experience advisory group, staff advisory group and project steering committee will support the study throughout. The implementation resources will comprise: advance choice document/advance statement (ACD/AS) documentation, stakeholder trainings, a manual for mental health professionals to facilitate the processes of creating and revising advance statements, and informatics development. DISCUSSION The implementation resources will help increase the likelihood of the new mental health legislation in England being implemented effectively; through aligning evidence-based medicine, policy and law to effectively provide positive clinical, social and financial outcomes for Black people, the National Health Service (NHS) and wider society. This study will likely benefit a wider group of people with severe mental illness, as when marginalised groups who are least engaged, can be supported with these strategies, then the strategies are likely to work for others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Babatunde
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Alex Ruck Keene
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, 39 Essex Chambers, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Steven Gilbert
- Steve Gilbert Consulting, Blackthorn House, St Pauls Square, Birmingham, BC 1RL, UK
| | - Lucy Stephenson
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF , UK
| | - Kia-Chong Chua
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Gareth Owen
- Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF , UK
| | - Adelabu Jonathan Simpson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | | | - Claire Henderson
- Health Services and Population Research Department, David Goldberg Centre, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|