Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block under dexmedetomidine sedation versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective pilot study

Outcomes of Dexmedetomidine with Local Regional Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Adequate sedation to complement regional techniques in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be challenging. Dexmedetomidine has both analgesic and amnesic properties and is reported to be a safe and acceptable alternative to conventional general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA). Outcomes observing dexmedetomidine in conjunction with regional anesthesia in CEA are not well described or known.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the immediate (during hospitalization) and short-term (within 30 days of hospitalization) postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent CEA using GETA versus local regional anesthesia (LRA) alone versus dexmedetomidine with LRA at a single institution to determine whether dexmedetomidine is a safe adjunct and if there are anesthesia advantages over LRA alone.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study from January 2015 to December 2019 at Saint Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor. Patients were stratified into three groups based on anesthesia type: GETA, LRA, and dexmedetomidine (D) + LRA. Primary outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death. Patient demographics were characterized and adjusted using propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy nine patients met inclusion criteria; 182 patients in the GETA group, 66 in the D + LRA, and 131 in LRA. There were no significant differences across anesthesia groups in primary outcomes of stroke, MI, and death during the admission. The GETA group had significantly longer length of stay (LOS) compared to the D + LRA group (LOS = 1.51 days versus 0.85 days; P = 0.011) and the LRA group (LOS = 1.08 days; P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in hospital LOS between the D + LRA group and LRA only groups (P = 0.952). There was no significant difference between stroke (LRA 0.87%, GETA 0.85%, and LRA + Dex 3.52%), MI (LRA 0%, GETA 0.49%, LRA + Dex 0%), or death (LRA 5.24%, GETA 1.16%, LRA + Dex 0%), within 30 days between all three of the anesthesia groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores when comparing the GETA group (mean 1.3, standard deviation [SD] 2.5) to LRA (mean 1.2, SD 2.1) and between LRA and D + LRA (mean 0.9, SD 2.1). Procedure time (time of skin incision to closure) and total room time were comparable among all three anesthesia groups (LRA 2.2 hr, SD 2.2; GETA 2.1 hr, SD 0.5; LRA + Dex 2.1 hr, SD 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dexmedetomidine in addition to LRA is a safe and acceptable alternative to conventional GETA or LRA alone in CEA with shorter length of hospital stay when compared with GETA, improved patient tolerance based on physician observation, and similar rates of immediate and short-term complications and postoperative pain scores.

Relationship between annular calcification of plaques in the carotid sinus and perioperative hemodynamic disorder in carotid angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between annular plaque calcification in the carotid sinus and perioperative hemodynamic disorder (HD) in carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 49 patients undergoing CAS due to narrowing of the carotid sinus were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had preoperative carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) and were divided into HD and non-HD groups based on the occurrence of HD in the perioperative period of CAS. HD was defined as persistent bradycardia (heart rate < 60 beats per min) or persistent hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) in the perioperative period and lasting for at least 1 h. The baseline data, including the degree of carotid artery stenosis, plaque length, plaque thickness, calcified plaque morphologies (i.e., plaque circumferential angle: < 90° defined as dotted calcification; 90°-180° defined as arcuate calcification; > 180° defined as annular calcification), contralateral carotid artery conditions, balloon diameter, and stent types, were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for the occurrence of HD.

RESULTS

Among the 49 patients undergoing CAS, 14 (28.57%) developed perioperative HD, and 35 did not. Annular calcification was more common in the patients in the HD group than in the non-HD group. No significant differences in the probabilities of dotted and arcuate calcifications were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The duration of continuous dopamine consumption in the HD group was 9-71 h. The average hospital stay of the HD group (10.14 ± 4.17 days) was significantly longer than that of the non-HD group (6.57 ± 1.9 days; p < 0.001). Patients in the HD group had significantly more pronounced lumen stenosis (p = 0.033) and longer plaque length (p = 0.034) than those in the non-HD group. After adjusting for age and sex, multivariate regression analysis showed that the presence of annular plaque calcification was an independent predictor of HD (odds ratio: 7.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.46-40.37, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of annular plaque calcification in the carotid sinus was an independent risk factor for perioperative HD in CAS. Preoperative carotid CTA assists with the early identification of high-risk patients who may develop HD.

Anesthetic Management of a Patient Undergoing Cochlear Implantation With Superficial Cervical Plexus Block and Sedation: A Case Report

Avoidance of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation has been shown to reduce respiratory complications in patients with severe lung disease. We describe the case of a 75-year-old patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent cochlear implantation managed with nerve block and sedation. A superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) was performed with 1% mepivacaine before surgery. A small amount of intravenous analgesic and sedative was administered. The patient experienced only slight pain during surgery. A SCPB had a good analgesic effect on the posterior auricle. Cochlear implantation in patients with COPD can be performed using a SCPB and sedation.

Cerebral and Systemic Stress Parameters in Correlation with Jugulo-Arterial CO2 Gap as a Marker of Cerebral Perfusion during Carotid Endarterectomy

Intraoperative stress is common to patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA); thus, impaired oxygen and metabolic balance may appear. In this study, we aimed to identify new markers of intraoperative cerebral ischemia, with predictive value on postoperative complications during CEA, performed in regional anesthesia. A total of 54 patients with significant carotid stenosis were recruited and submitted to CEA. Jugular and arterial blood samples were taken four times during operation, to measure the jugulo-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (P(j-a)CO₂), and cortisol, S100B, L-arginine, and lactate levels. A positive correlation was found between preoperative cortisol levels and all S100B concentrations. In addition, they are positively correlated with P(j-a)CO₂ values. Conversely, postoperative cortisol inversely correlates with P(j-a)CO₂ and postoperative S100B values. A negative correlation was observed between maximum systolic and pulse pressures and P(j-a)CO₂ after carotid clamp and before the release of clamp. Our data suggest that preoperative cortisol, S100B, L-arginine reflect patients' frailty, while these parameters postoperatively are influenced by intraoperative stress and injury. As a novelty, P(j-a)CO₂ might be an emerging indicator of cerebral blood flow during CEA.

Cardiac output and cerebral blood flow during carotid surgery in regional versus general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a preventive procedure aimed at decreasing the subsequent risk of fatal or disabling stroke in patients with significant carotid stenosis. It is well-known that carotid surgery under ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (US-RA) causes a significant increase in blood pressure, heart rate and stress hormone levels owing to increased sympathetic activity. However, little is known about the effects on cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and cerebral blood flow (CBF) under US-RA as compared with general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

Patients scheduled for CEA were randomized prospectively to receive US-RA (n = 37) or GA (n = 41). The primary end point was the change in CI after induction of anesthesia and the change from baseline over time at four different times during the entire procedure in the respective randomized US-RA and GA groups. In addition to systolic blood pressure and heart rate, we also recorded peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, and minimum diastolic velocity as seen from transcranial Doppler ultrasound examination, as well as regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO₂) as seen from near-infrared refracted spectroscopy to evaluate cerebral blood flow.

RESULTS

In the US-RA group, the CI increased after induction of anesthesia (3.7 ± 0.8 L/min/m²) and remained constant until the end of the procedure. In the GA group CI was significantly lower (2.4 ± 0.6 L/min/m²; P < .001). After induction of anesthesia, the rSO₂ remained constant in the GA group on both the ipsilateral (63 ± 9 rSO₂) and the contralateral (65 ± 7 rSO₂) sides; in contrast, it significantly increased in the US-RA group (ipsilateral 72 ± 8 rSO₂; P < .001; contralateral 72 ± 6 rSO₂; P < .001). The transcranial Doppler ultrasound parameters (peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, and minimum diastolic velocity) did not differ between the US-RA and the GA group. The clinical outcome was similarly favorable for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CI was maintained near baseline values throughout the procedure during US-RA, whereas a significant decrease in CI values was observed during CEA under GA. Near-infrared refracted spectroscopy values, reflecting blood flow in small vessels, were higher in US-RA patients than in those with GA. These differences did not influence clinical outcome.

Plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients for carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: Protocol for a systematic review with meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analysis of randomized clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Traditional carotid endarterectomy is considered to be the standard technique for prevention of a new stroke in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Use of plexus anesthesia or general anesthesia in traditional carotid endarterectomy is, to date, not unequivocally proven to be superior to one other. A systematic review is needed for evaluation of benefits and harms to determine which technique, plexus anesthesia or general anesthesia is more effective for traditional carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

The review will be conducted according to this protocol following the recommendations of the 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews' and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Randomized Clinical Trials comparing plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia in traditional carotid endarterectomy will be included. Primary outcomes will be postoperative death and/ or stroke (<30 days) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be non-serious adverse events.We will primarily base our conclusions on meta-analyses of trials with overall low risk of bias. We will use Trial Sequential Analysis to assist the evaluation of imprecision in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. However, if pooled point-estimates of all trials are similar to pooled point-estimates of trials with overall low risk of bias and there is lack of a statistical significant interaction between estimates from trials with overall high risk of bias and trials with overall low risk of bias we will consider the Trial Sequential Analysis adjusted confidence interval precision of the estimate achieved in all trials as the result of our meta-analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The proposed systematic review will collect and analyze secondary data from already performed studies therefore ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be disseminated by publication in a peer-review journal and submitted for presentation at relevant conferences.