Comparison of Resident, Advanced Practice Clinician, and Hospitalist Teams in an Academic Medical Center: Association With Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization

Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates by Physician and Patient Sex

BACKGROUND

Little is known as to whether the effects of physician sex on patients' clinical outcomes vary by patient sex.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the association between physician sex and hospital outcomes varied between female and male patients hospitalized with medical conditions.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Medicare claims data.

PATIENTS

20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with medical conditions during 2016 to 2019 and treated by hospitalists.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were patients' 30-day mortality and readmission rates, adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and hospital-level averages of exposures (effectively comparing physicians within the same hospital).

RESULTS

Of 458 108 female and 318 819 male patients, 142 465 (31.1%) and 97 500 (30.6%) were treated by female physicians, respectively. Both female and male patients had a lower patient mortality when treated by female physicians; however, the benefit of receiving care from female physicians was larger for female patients than for male patients (difference-in-differences, -0.16 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, -0.42 to 0.10 pp]). For female patients, the difference between female and male physicians was large and clinically meaningful (adjusted mortality rates, 8.15% vs. 8.38%; average marginal effect [AME], -0.24 pp [CI, -0.41 to -0.07 pp]). For male patients, an important difference between female and male physicians could be ruled out (10.15% vs. 10.23%; AME, -0.08 pp [CI, -0.29 to 0.14 pp]). The pattern was similar for patients' readmission rates.

LIMITATION

The findings may not be generalizable to younger populations.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that patients have lower mortality and readmission rates when treated by female physicians, and the benefit of receiving treatments from female physicians is larger for female patients than for male patients.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Gregory Annenberg Weingarten, GRoW @ Annenberg.

Teams in Transition: Increasing Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Antimicrobial Use and Infectious Diseases Consultation

Background

Advanced practice providers (APPs) have taken on increasing responsibilities as primary team members in acute care hospitals, but the impact of this practice shift on antimicrobial prescribing and infectious diseases (ID) consultation requests is unknown. Here we describe longitudinal trends in antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) and ID consultation by attributed provider type in 3 hospitals.

Methods

We performed a retrospective time series analysis of antimicrobial use and ID consultation from July 2015 to June 2022 at a major university hospital and 2 community hospitals. We evaluated antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation over time and assessed attribution to 3 groups of providers: attending physicians, trainees, and APPs. We used multinomial logistic regression to measure changes in percentage of DOT and ID consultation across the clinician groups over time using physicians as the referent.

Results

Baseline distribution of antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation varied by practice setting, but all subgroups showed increases in the proportion attributable to APPs. Large increases were seen in the rate of ID consultation, increasing by >30% during the study period. At our university hospital, by study end >40% of new ID consults and restricted antimicrobial days were attributed to APPs.

Conclusions

Hospitals had differing baseline patterns of DOT attributed to provider groups, but all experienced increases in DOT attributed to APPs. Similar increases were seen in changes to ID consultation. APPs have increasing involvement in antimicrobial use decisions in the inpatient setting and should be engaged in future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Performance management of generalist care for hospitalised multimorbid patients-a scoping review for value-based care

Objectives

Given the shift towards value-based healthcare and the increasing recognition of generalist care, enacting value-based healthcare for generalist care is critical. This work aims to shed light on how to conduct performance management of generalist care to facilitate value-based care, with a focus on medical care of hospitalised patients.

Design and setting

A scoping review of published literature was conducted. 30 publications which were relevant to performance management of generalist medical inpatient care were included in the review.

Outcome measures

The performance measures used across the studies were analysed and other qualitative findings were also obtained.

Results

We report an overall lack of research on performance management methods for generalist inpatient care. Relevant performance measures found include both outcome and process of care measures and both clinical and reported measures, with clinical outcome measures the most frequently reported. Length of stay, readmission rates and mortality were the most frequently reported. The insights from the papers emphasise the relevance of process of care measures for performance management, the advantages and disadvantages of types of measures and provide suggestions relevant for performance management of generalist inpatient care.

Conclusion

The findings of this scoping review outline a variety of performance measures valuable for generalist inpatient care including clinical outcome measures, reported outcome measures and process of care measures. The findings also suggest directions for implementation of such performance management, including emphasis on physician level performance management and the importance of documentation training. Further research for selecting and operationalising the measures for specific contexts and developing a comprehensive performance management system involving these measures will be important for achieving value-based healthcare for generalist inpatient care.

An Effective Model for Unit-Based Advanced Practice Provider/Physician Collaboration on a Complex Medicine Hospital Unit

Advanced practice provider care effectively improves outcomes and reduces costs. During COVID-19 challenges and staffing shortages, a team developed and piloted a collaborative advanced practice provider/physician hospital medicine model that resulted in improved outcomes, costs, and quality metrics, including increased productivity and revenue, decreased length of stay, and decreased medical emergency team/rapid response calls.

Development of a novel hospitalist advanced practice provider assessment instrument: A pilot study

Advanced practice providers (APPs) graduate from school with variable hospitalist experience. While hospitalist-specific onboarding is recommended for hospitalist APPs, no standard method currently exists to assess their readiness for practice. We created a 17-item instrument called the Cardin Hospitalist Advanced Practice Provider-Readiness Assessment (CHAPP-RA) to assess APPs'; readiness for practice using a milestones-based scale. We piloted CHAPP-RA at a single site where 11 APPs with varied experience were rated by 30 supervising physicians. Supervisors also provided global ratings for overall performance. We investigated the feasibility of CHAPP-RA and collected validity evidence for the interpretation of scores. The mean time to complete one CHAPP-RA was 10.5 min. Supervisors rated novice APPs lower than more experienced APPs, p ≤ .001. CHAPP-RA ratings also correlated strongly with global ratings. CHAPP-RA is feasible to implement and has initial validity evidence.

Patterns of utilization and evaluation of advanced practice providers on academic hospital medicine teams: A national survey

This survey study aimed to provide a contemporary appraisal of advanced practice provider (APP) practice and to summarize perceptions of the benefits and challenges of integrating APPs into adult academic hospital medicine (HM) groups. We surveyed leaders of academic HM groups. We received responses from 43 of 86 groups (50%) surveyed. Thirty-four (79%) reported that they employed APPs. In most groups (85%), APPs were reported to perform daily tasks of patient care, including rounding and documentation. Less than half of the groups reported that APPs had completed HM-specific postgraduate training. The reported benefits of APPs included improved perceived quality of care and greater volume of patients that could be seen. Reported challenges included training requirements and support for new hires. Further investigation is needed to determine which APP team structures deliver the highest quality care. There may be a role for expanding standardized competency-based postgraduate training for APPs planning to practice HM.

The scope of hospital medicine practice at night: a national survey of night shift hospitalists

Introduction: Although in-person hospitalist presence, increasingly staffed by dedicated nocturnists, has become the norm overnight in the hospital, the scope of nocturnist practice and typical workload has not been defined. This study examines the clinical responsibilities and patient safety perceptions of hospitalists who work night shifts in the United States.Methods: In the fall of 2019, a cross-sectional, web-based survey was administered to physician and nurse practitioner/physician assistant (NP/PA) hospitalists who work night shifts. The questionnaire assessed night staffing structure, typical responsibilities, patient volume, perceptions of safety overnight, as well as demographic information. The survey was posted on the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Hospital Medicine Exchange (HMX) Online Discussion Forum. Additionally, the survey was distributed by 'snowball method' by respondents to other night hospitalists. Responses were collected anonymously.Results: Of the 167 respondents, 157 reported working night shifts. There was at least one respondent from 32 different states. In addition to performing admissions to medicine services and covering inpatients, night hospitalists cover ICU patients, participate in RRT/Code teams and procedure teams, perform consults, participate in medical education, and take outpatient calls. Across institutions, there was a large distribution in numbers of patients covered in a night shift; however, patient volume fell into typical ranges: 5-10 admissions for physicians, 0-6 admissions for NP/PAs, and 25-75 patient cross-coverage census. When physicians perform more than five admissions per night, hospitalists were less likely to agree that they could provide safe care (88% vs. 63%, p = 0.0006).Conclusions: This is the first national study to examine the clinical responsibilities of hospitalists working overnight. Overnight responsibilities are heterogeneous across institutions. As hospitals are increasingly employing nocturnists, more research is needed to guide night staffing and optimize patient safety.