Tracheoesophageal speech: with and without tracheostoma valve

An external neck brace to support the peristomal fixation of an automatic stoma valve (ASV): 3D stereophotogrammetrical assessment

CONCLUSION

The external neck brace (ENB) is a new concept in the improvement of peristomal fixation of an automatic stoma valve (ASV), which was evaluated with a new imaging method. The addition of the ENB to the Flexiderm (FLD) and Xtrabase (XB) adhesives significantly reduced absolute mean differences between the speech and the non-speech conditions.

OBJECTIVES

After total laryngectomy, peristomal fixation problems of adhesives and stoma valves are still the main reasons for the relatively small number of patients that actually use an ASV on a daily basis. Several concepts could not prevent these fixation problems. To overcome or at least diminish these attachment problems, an ENB has been developed to support peristomal adhesives. The mechanism behind this brace is that it absorbs the high stomal pressures created during tracheoesophageal speech. In this pilot study the mechanism outlined above was objectified using 3D stereophotogrammetrical measurements.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical pilot study in a university hospital setting, involving nine laryngectomized patients. Ten 3D images were taken of all patients using stereophotogrammetry; five pictures during a moment of speech and five during a non-speech condition. Two different peristomal adhesives were used during these two conditions: the Provox Flexiderm (FLD) adhesive and the Provox Xtrabase (XB) adhesive, both with and without the addition of the ENB. Besides these four combinations, a final fifth set-up using all the components (FLD + XB-ring + ENB) was added. Absolute mean differences were compared between two photographs of the area of interest, which is covered by the adhesive for all five different set-ups mentioned above. This was done during speech and non-speech conditions.

RESULTS

Absolute mean differences at the region of the base plate between speech and non-speech conditions were most obvious while using just the FLD adhesive (4.70 mm). The use of the ENB significantly reduced the absolute mean difference to 0.58 mm (p < 0.02). The suggested set-up with a basis of the FLD adhesive combined with the solid ring extracted from the XB adhesive and the ENB showed the smallest absolute mean difference of 0.38 mm between speech and non-speech conditions (p < 0.025).

The effects of a total laryngectomy on speech breathing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Alaryngeal speech rehabilitation following a total laryngectomy is a multifactorial disorder that includes changes in phonation, respiration, and overall general health. Tracheoesophageal speech is the preferred method of rehabilitation. In this approach, pulmonary air support is diverted from the trachea into the esophagus to generate voicing. Tracheoesophageal speakers must overcome radical upper airway changes, increased resistance in the phonatory source, reduced sensory feedback from the respiratory system, and probable respiratory compromise. This review integrates previous laryngectomy research with recent studies investigating kinematics in tracheoesophageal speakers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tracheoesophageal speakers are often very intelligible and communicate effectively, but little has been done to investigate the physiological demands of tracheoesophageal speech on speakers. Two recent studies have specifically investigated speech breathing behaviors in tracheoesophageal speakers. Both investigations reported increased effort and differences in speech breathing compared to laryngeal speakers; however, continued research is needed to understand the effects of a total laryngectomy on speech breathing.

SUMMARY

The physiological changes following a laryngectomy, especially in the ability to produce tracheoesophageal speech, are not well known. Rehabilitation for these individuals requires an understanding of the changes in respiration that might influence speech breathing behaviors.

A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of an automatic occlusion device for tracheoesophageal speech: the Provox FreeHands HME

This study aimed to evaluate a new automatic tracheostoma valve: the Provox FreeHands HME (manufactured by Atos Medical AB, Sweden). Data from four laryngectomee participants using automatic and also manual occlusion were subjected to acoustic and perceptual analysis. The main results were a significant decrease, from the manual to automatic occlusion condition, in maximum phonation time, mean intensity of read speech and percentage pause time. There was an increase in random noise in the speech signal and a significant increase in extraneous noise caused by the device. Perceptual analysis revealed no clear functional impact of these differences. Data from a questionnaire and diary suggested the main advantage of automatic occlusion was the freedom to speak while performing manual tasks. The principal disadvantage appeared to be a decrease in base-plate seal duration. The results suggest that, for some clients, the FreeHands valve is a useful option for use alongside manual occlusion.

Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of a new automatic stoma valve (ASV) it appears possible to rehabilitate patients who have previously been unsuccessful in acquiring hands-free speech. As well as making daily ASV use possible for an additional group of patients, this new device was also appreciated by many patients as an additional rehabilitation tool for specific occasions. Despite statistically significant improvements in aspects of voice and breathing using this novel ASV, improvement of peristomal adhesion is probably the main factor needed to further increase success rates. Nevertheless, our results show that it makes sense to keep trying to achieve hands-free speech, even if previous attempts have failed.

OBJECTIVE

To make a long-term (6 months) assessment of compliance and aspects of voice, breathing and quality of life using a new ASV: the Provox FreeHands heat and moisture exchanger (HME).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical multicentre trial in 79 laryngectomized patients (8 regular ASV users, 58 previously unsuccessful users and 13 new users). Data were collected at baseline and after 1 and 6 months by means of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaires and specific structured questionnaires concerning compliance, skin adhesion, voicing and pulmonary aspects. An objective assessment of voice parameters (maximum phonation time, maximum phonation time while counting, dynamic loudness range and number of pauses in a standard read-aloud text) was made for comparison of different stoma occlusion methods (digital occlusion via an HME and two different ASVs). A subjective assessment of overall voice quality was made.

RESULTS

After 6 months, 19% of patients used the new ASV on a daily basis (mean 5 h/day), while 57% used it on an irregular basis as an additional rehabilitation tool for special occasions. Two-thirds of the study group indicated that they would continue to use the new ASV after the study period. With respect to the objective parameters, statistically significantly better maximum phonation times and dynamic loudness ranges were observed with the new ASV compared to the Blom-Singer ASV. However, the best results for all the objective parameters were obtained with digital occlusion via the Provox HME.

Experience with Barton button and peristomal breathing valve attachments for hands-free tracheoesophageal speech

BACKGROUND

Tracheostoma breathing valves permit hands-free tracheoesophageal (TE) speech production; however, few laryngectomees routinely use them because of problems with attachment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 45 TE speakers to determine the success rate and factors associated with successful breathing valve use based on attachment. All patients attempted to use a tracheostoma breathing valve with either a standard or customized peristomal housing, or a standard or customized Barton button. Device selection was based on inspection of the patient's neck and peristomal contour. Six to eight consecutive hours of attachment defined success.

RESULTS

Overall, 9% of subjects succeeded with any peristomal attachment as compared to 68% with either a standard (57%) or customized (85%) Barton button. Smooth stomal contour, a contiguous stomal lip, and correct button length were important for successful Barton button use.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard or customized Barton buttons offer excellent alternatives to peristomal housing attachments for hands-free TE speech in select patients.

The influence of stoma occlusion on aspects of tracheoesophageal voice

In this study, speech of 21 laryngectomized patients is investigated under 2 different stoma occlusion conditions, i.e. direct digital occlusion of the stoma (by thumb or finger), and digital occlusion (by finger) via a special heat and moisture exchanger with speech valve (Provox Stomafilter). For both conditions, acoustical analyses of voice quality (various pitch, amplitude, tremor and harmonicity measures) were performed on a sustained /a/, the mean maximum phonation time was calculated, and a phonetogram was made. Acoustical analysis was possible in 13 of the 21 voices (for the other voices, the pitch was too low or the voice was too aperiodic), but no statistical significant differences were found for any of the acoustical parameters studied. However, the maximum phonation time was significantly longer, and the dynamic range significantly larger, under the Stomafilter occlusion condition. The maximum phonation time showed a relevant improvement in 57% of the patients, while the dynamic range showed a relevant improvement in 35% of the patients. In total, 75% of the patients experience an improvement in one or both of these speech characteristics when using the Stomafilter occlusion. It can be concluded that optimal stoma occlusion by means of a specialized device has a positive influence on two relevant parameters of prosthetic voice production: maximum phonation time and dynamic loudness range.

Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers

The present study investigated the vocal capacities of adult men who had undergone total laryngectomy. Esophageal (N = 10) and tracheoesophageal (N = 10) speakers were compared for the parameters maximum phonation time (MPT), maximum number of syllables that could be spoken on one air intake (SYLLS), dynamic range (DYN), frequency range (FREQ), and maximum intensity level (MIL). Statistical analyses yielded significant between-group differences for the parameters MPT, SYLLS, and MIL but not for DYN and FREQ. Thus, although the groups did not differ with respect to range of intensity and frequency measures, maximum performance on the durational and intensity measures was always less for the esophageal speakers than for the tracheoesophageal speakers. Pearson's product-moment correlations among these parameters were remarkably different for esophageal and tracheoesophageal subjects, suggesting that phonatory and aerodynamic factors interact differently in the two groups.

Vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Provox voice prosthesis

Vocal rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients can be attained by surgical (tracheoesophageal speech) or conservative methods (oesophageal speech or artificial larynx). We prospectively studied voice restoration in 37 patients who underwent total laryngectomy in the period from February 1991 to February 1993. The patients were given the opportunity to assess both non-shunt oesophageal speech and shunt oesophageal speech using the Provox voice prosthesis. The Provox low resistance, self-retaining voice prosthesis is a biflanged device made of silicon rubber. A primary tracheoesophageal puncture was made in 28 patients, while a secondary puncture was performed in another nine patients. The results were assessed according to criteria established at the 'Third International Congress on Voice Prosthesis' in Groningen (1988). Functional tracheoesophageal speech after primary puncture was achieved in 95% of patients 12 months after puncture, while oesophageal voice was acquired by 55%. Only minor surgical and prosthesis-related complications were encountered during this follow-up period in 29% of the patients. The device lifetime varied from 3 months to at least 2 years (mean 5.4 months).